the last four years:.
with all the changes in the 'generation', 'sealing', doctines, etc.
- there have been unexpected [i imagine] jumps in this number.
http://www.jwfacts.com/watchtower/memorial-partakers.php is a great article on this from jwfacts.
The general slope of the curve changes in the 2004/2005 area, if one includes 2000 - 2011 and do a straightline approximation, the prediction would be 11295, a slight decrease from last year, but in general an increase over the past 12 years.
the last four years:.
with all the changes in the 'generation', 'sealing', doctines, etc.
- there have been unexpected [i imagine] jumps in this number.
If one uses a straightline forecast using the partakers starting in 2005 to the present the 2012 attendance will be ..........12399.
the last four years:.
with all the changes in the 'generation', 'sealing', doctines, etc.
- there have been unexpected [i imagine] jumps in this number.
I guess if you can't explain it or can't change it, stop reporting it.....and hope that the folks will not really think it is a significant change.
Since it is a congregational letter, the 'rank and file' will not notice a change, so this will not have any impact at all on the members who don't think for themselves, will only raise a few eyebrows of the inquisitive ones, especially if they look at what the numbers have been doing......
not having any luck searching for this, i know there is a qfr that provides very specific guidance that a ubm if the 'head of household' is responsible for choosing the faith of the children.
i recall there being a recent wt article with similar information which i have also not been able to find, any help would be appreciated..... .
thanks!.
Thanks so much, that is what I was looking for, watchtower cd does not work on my apple computer, does anyone know if a mac version is available?
have anyone of you read, the absolutly jaw dropping paragraph in this article about a women who was hit by her husband?
its in page 25 of the 2/15/12 wt study edition (i read the dumbed down version).. .
if there was any question, that the watchtowers stance is for wives to simply take it when their husbands abuse them, this makes it crystal clear.. who the hell is scanning these things before they go to print?
yea it is a while but this is a thread we should keep open until the study comes upIt needs to be kept open, I had sent out quite a few letters on this, may try to follow up now that the 'learning' will be taking place soon. This still amazes and concerns me beyond belief.
have anyone of you read, the absolutly jaw dropping paragraph in this article about a women who was hit by her husband?
its in page 25 of the 2/15/12 wt study edition (i read the dumbed down version).. .
if there was any question, that the watchtowers stance is for wives to simply take it when their husbands abuse them, this makes it crystal clear.. who the hell is scanning these things before they go to print?
Guess its still awhile, 23 April.
have anyone of you read, the absolutly jaw dropping paragraph in this article about a women who was hit by her husband?
its in page 25 of the 2/15/12 wt study edition (i read the dumbed down version).. .
if there was any question, that the watchtowers stance is for wives to simply take it when their husbands abuse them, this makes it crystal clear.. who the hell is scanning these things before they go to print?
The WT study on this article is approaching, so important to bring BTTT
program 2011 - 2012. theme: 'let god's will take place' - matt.
6:10. morning session.
9:40 music.
Is this a one day assembly?
not having any luck searching for this, i know there is a qfr that provides very specific guidance that a ubm if the 'head of household' is responsible for choosing the faith of the children.
i recall there being a recent wt article with similar information which i have also not been able to find, any help would be appreciated..... .
thanks!.
Not having any luck searching for this, I know there is a QFR that provides very specific guidance that a UBM if the 'head of household' is responsible for choosing the faith of the children. I recall there being a recent WT article with similar information which I have also not been able to find, any help would be appreciated....
Thanks!
have anyone of you read, the absolutly jaw dropping paragraph in this article about a women who was hit by her husband?
its in page 25 of the 2/15/12 wt study edition (i read the dumbed down version).. .
if there was any question, that the watchtowers stance is for wives to simply take it when their husbands abuse them, this makes it crystal clear.. who the hell is scanning these things before they go to print?
Moving BTTT for newcomers to see....
