hi fish -
You do have to realize that a lot of us do some pretty open and lively debate here. Sometimes posters even take up viewpoints which may not be their own personal hard-held belief systems.
I would hazard a guess, having been in a couple of flood threads already, that what you would probably find here are: (roughly, and IMHO):
35-40% - skeptical of a literal world wide flood but could accept a legend born of localized events.
35-40% - view such things as myth the same as Zeuss or Apollo and have moved beyond literal views in matters of faith.
Remainder - there are a minority who are true believers and would be looking for the remains of the ark if they could.
Of course, "Your mileage may differ..."
Myself, I kind of go with the localized Black Sea flood legend and view it as religious literature but not science. (too many physical and biological problems here for me to go literal).
Most of respect each other enough to be able to debate it without too much rancor. Notice I said most!
As noted, you sure did make one heck of an entrance with this one! Welcome again,
James