"... the Dead Sea scolls and the Nag Hammadi discoveries have changed a lot of ideas about early Christianity. They were all dicovered only in the 1940's and 1950's. I would prefer to read a book that takes them into account."...( transhuman )
And the Ugaritic texts!....( Mat )
All well and good, howerver Galdden's book is not about early Chistianity, it is a about the Bible itself. From Chapter 11 "...we now come to adeeply interesting question,-----the question of the cannon" ( Pg 221 )
Interesting indeed. Did you know for example that the books of 1st and 2nd Esdras, Tobit, Judith, Wisdom of Solomon, Sirach, Baruch, Susanna, Bel and the Dragon and the three books of Maccabees were included in the origanal King James, as well as the other five English translations that proceeded the King James? Why are they no longer a part of moderen translations. They were included in the Greek Septuagint.
It intrigues me that some of you are biased aginst a book written in 1891. Men of that day and time were as much of a scholar as men of today. Gladden's book is about the Bible, as a whole, not early Chistianity. As Juan Viejo and Terry pointed out there are an abundance of books and internet sites that address that subject. Are the above mentioned texts important, of course, in context of early Chistianity.
I will tell you Gladden goes into great detail about the New Testament in context of Who Wrote The Bible.
"...much the greater number of quotations from the Old Testement found in the Gospels and the Epistels are taken from the Septuagint." ( Pg 225 ) He gives examples to support that statement. They are not pulled out of a hat.