Not really. I can't see this as a fine witness from Jackson, as he keeps reverting back to the patriarchal nature of this religion and it doesn't sit well with the RC.
Stewart is using scripture too. And, he is doing well
i thought at the end, stewart made brilliant use of scripture (about establishing fornication or other sexually immoral practises) how, in such a clever way stewart used scripture to point out that some one could basically stake out someone's house to see if a person stayed over night be they homosexual or heterosexual............that on the basis of a sort of stakeout, the two witness rule was ambivalent yet it prevailed.
due to sufficient suspicion.. and therefore why did this "suspicion" not prevail with child sexual abuse.
Not really. I can't see this as a fine witness from Jackson, as he keeps reverting back to the patriarchal nature of this religion and it doesn't sit well with the RC.
Stewart is using scripture too. And, he is doing well
i thought at the end, stewart made brilliant use of scripture (about establishing fornication or other sexually immoral practises) how, in such a clever way stewart used scripture to point out that some one could basically stake out someone's house to see if a person stayed over night be they homosexual or heterosexual............that on the basis of a sort of stakeout, the two witness rule was ambivalent yet it prevailed.
due to sufficient suspicion.. and therefore why did this "suspicion" not prevail with child sexual abuse.
i have sent all the links you people put up and the scriptures.
everyone of them is now ...there.. i hope angus has the chance to use them..
I have sent all the links you people put up and the scriptures. Everyone of them is now ...there.
I hope Angus has the chance to use them.
.
https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/636f01a5-50db-4b59-a35e-a24ae07fb0ad/case-study-29,-july-2015,-sydney.
Just sent that on straight off to the woman dealing with me....She says the points that are given to them are used......
Thanks Crow
.
https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/636f01a5-50db-4b59-a35e-a24ae07fb0ad/case-study-29,-july-2015,-sydney.
Well if there are a pile of people with Jackson right now.... Iv'e got all of you in my house......
So there...Geoffrey
.
https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/636f01a5-50db-4b59-a35e-a24ae07fb0ad/case-study-29,-july-2015,-sydney.
.
https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/636f01a5-50db-4b59-a35e-a24ae07fb0ad/case-study-29,-july-2015,-sydney.
I was worried at first, for I thought they were going to let him witness to them. Then I remembered how slowly they started the first time.
As Angus said......." Yes, well. We'll just go point by point for now..."
It put Mr Jackson back where he needed to be as he was so utterly smug at first.
.
https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/636f01a5-50db-4b59-a35e-a24ae07fb0ad/case-study-29,-july-2015,-sydney.
Go straight to the" Royal Commission for child sexual abuse case 29 type in live feed."
Just use those words and google or whatever will take you to the site.....make sure you see .gov.au.....
They have convened for lunch right now. Stewart set Jackson up so well just now. McClellan became impatient with Jackson for dodging the question.
i thought at the end, stewart made brilliant use of scripture (about establishing fornication or other sexually immoral practises) how, in such a clever way stewart used scripture to point out that some one could basically stake out someone's house to see if a person stayed over night be they homosexual or heterosexual............that on the basis of a sort of stakeout, the two witness rule was ambivalent yet it prevailed.
due to sufficient suspicion.. and therefore why did this "suspicion" not prevail with child sexual abuse.
I thought at the end, Stewart made brilliant use of scripture (about establishing fornication or other sexually immoral practises) How, in such a clever way Stewart used scripture to point out that some one could basically stake out someone's house to see if a person stayed over night be they homosexual or heterosexual............that on the basis of a sort of stakeout, the two witness rule was ambivalent yet it prevailed. Due to sufficient suspicion.
And therefore why did this "suspicion" not prevail with child sexual abuse