ellderwho

Joined

• started 22 topics
• posted 1,241 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by ellderwho

• 
  27

  Doofus Prince dub. on AI

  by ellderwho in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  shouldnt that purple dubbie be at a meeting somewhere?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  ellderwho

  Shouldnt that Purple dubbie be at a meeting somewhere?
• 
  23

  Taylor Hicks Wins American Idol

  by lovelylil in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i am glad!

  i did not like kate.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  ellderwho

  Good for Taylor......
• 
  40

  Does your personal vehicle reflect your personality?

  by Gregor in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  there is a clever volkswagen tv ad currently running in the u s that depicts various types of people driving cars that reflect their personality, like older males driving sleek sports cars to compensate for their "shortcomings" or a younger man driving an expensive european sedan as he pronounces with a bullhorn "because my father never hugged me!

  or another who says "because i make more money than you!

  have any of you ever gotten your self image tangled up with a vehicle?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  ellderwho

  I dont like driving in cars period. I drive an F150 4x4 crew cab. I do a lot of ATV-ing.
• 
  23

  Has Anybody Heard This Rumor?

  by metatron in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i spoke with a "loyal" person with strong connections to the katrina rebuilding oversight.

  they claimed that.

  the society has spent well over 100 million bucks on rebuilding.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  ellderwho

  I dont know Met. 100 mil. is a figure that just might make headlines. I'd have to say that number is embelished a bit.
• 
  290

  607

  by Zico in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  can anyone provide me with any evidence (links to other sites is fine) that jerusalem could not have possibly fallen to the babylonians in 607?

  thanks again for your answers.

  zico

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  ellderwho

  Do not worry I deal with the clown....."

  That speaks volumes. But cuntinue on....
• 
  290

  607

  by Zico in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  can anyone provide me with any evidence (links to other sites is fine) that jerusalem could not have possibly fallen to the babylonians in 607?

  thanks again for your answers.

  zico

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  ellderwho

  When a writer makes some statements and immediately follows them with a dash and something like "see the following source reference . . .", he obviously intends that the reader understand that the reference is cited to support all of the statements. This is especially true of the statement immediately preceding the source reference. Anyone who does not understand this basic method of dealing with supporting references......

  Well said Alan.

  Further the brackets in the Insight vol2 would lead one to believe thats what Grayson meant, my elder step dad was so convinced he went on line and had to see for himself. He actually bought Graysons book, and we looked at it together while we had our study. Guess what? Nothing was ever mentioned again about 607.

  Just a glance of the referenced quotes in the "Should you believe in the Trinity" one can discern the dishonesty throughout the brochure.
• 
  290

  607

  by Zico in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  can anyone provide me with any evidence (links to other sites is fine) that jerusalem could not have possibly fallen to the babylonians in 607?

  thanks again for your answers.

  zico

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  ellderwho

  in spite of the insertion of modern dates

  Why would the Towers use [ ] maybe the same reason they used them in Collosians. All [other] things. To try and infer something that is not there.

  If Im quoted on these boards would the person quotes me insert [] to further help the reader understand what I really meant?

  You qwack me up Neil, btw ever come up with that list?
• 
  290

  607

  by Zico in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  can anyone provide me with any evidence (links to other sites is fine) that jerusalem could not have possibly fallen to the babylonians in 607?

  thanks again for your answers.

  zico

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  ellderwho

  The date 607 is rock solid and Grayson's reference proves the matter in spite of the insertion of modern dates consistent with biblical
• 
  290

  607

  by Zico in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  can anyone provide me with any evidence (links to other sites is fine) that jerusalem could not have possibly fallen to the babylonians in 607?

  thanks again for your answers.

  zico

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  ellderwho
• 
  290

  607

  by Zico in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  can anyone provide me with any evidence (links to other sites is fine) that jerusalem could not have possibly fallen to the babylonians in 607?

  thanks again for your answers.

  zico

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  ellderwho

  first learning the Truth in 1958 and have been studying chronology since the early seventies.

  All those years and still no workable kings list, does not that simple fact raise any red flags for you? Its quite a stretch 625 to 539. Can you at least refer to, or produce a list from what you have available from the Organization for whom you taut as celebrated?

  Ive yet to see you address this problem.