so the matter of Neo-Babylonian chronology is not overly important to us.
Oh man thats a good one. Well there ya go. It cannot be overly important. And you know why.
ellderwho
JoinedPosts by ellderwho
-
84
WTBS article prove 587/586 BC fall of Babylon
by crazies inlabashi-marduk: (9 months) succeeded by nabonidus
(insight volume 1 p.453 chronology; watchtower 1965 january 1 p.29)
evil-merodach: 560 bce562 bce (2 years)
-
-
ellderwho
-
84
WTBS article prove 587/586 BC fall of Babylon
by crazies inlabashi-marduk: (9 months) succeeded by nabonidus
(insight volume 1 p.453 chronology; watchtower 1965 january 1 p.29)
evil-merodach: 560 bce562 bce (2 years)
-
-
ellderwho
Scholar,
Once again you have displayed your inabilty to solidify your position. The WT has you over a barrel that is not there. Its now in your mind. You continue to wave the 607 flag. While baring the 607 cross for the Tower. They have left you with nothing to argue with. I dont know if that has hit home for you yet.
Look at the way you defend your position. Ive been searching some ninehundred posts' you have made.( looking for that elusive list) And what Im seeing, even in your first post, till present is how your continually sidestepping the real issue. Your consistently asked to either show proof of secular evidence of 607 or show a kings list. But you never do.
You just never put up any shred of anything. Do you agree if there was something for 607 kings list, someone, somewhere other than Witnesses, would come foward in some journal and say "ya know the WT has something here" ??? Doesnt it strike you as strange that nothing like that has never happened. Not to say it couldnt.
Even the British Museum of Antiquities says nothing exist for 607. Its my understanding they have the goods.
Bottom line in all this nonsense is you really have nothing. Until that changes your arguement remains from quite silence.
Then again you could point to one of your previous posts that show that comprehensive kings list.
-
84
WTBS article prove 587/586 BC fall of Babylon
by crazies inlabashi-marduk: (9 months) succeeded by nabonidus
(insight volume 1 p.453 chronology; watchtower 1965 january 1 p.29)
evil-merodach: 560 bce562 bce (2 years)
-
-
ellderwho
EW If I don't have to produce a kings list, I could say it fell invisibly in 1914.
Ha, yeah I think he posted his list invisiblyD (scholar) Dog
-
84
WTBS article prove 587/586 BC fall of Babylon
by crazies inlabashi-marduk: (9 months) succeeded by nabonidus
(insight volume 1 p.453 chronology; watchtower 1965 january 1 p.29)
evil-merodach: 560 bce562 bce (2 years)
-
-
ellderwho
I have already posted a regnal list for the Neo-Babylonian monarchy and this has already been posted here based on WT publications namely the Insight volumes.
Scholar you,ve already cut to the chase. You said that you had posted a list, and I just want to look at it.
The posts by crazies and jw facts provide the information you require so you can make up your list or summary from these two postings.
No they dont, I said I want your list, and you said its posted already. I just have to find it because you said I have'nt followed you close enough, and that I could possibly going down a path of self-delusion.
Right here:
Still looking.It appears that you have not followed my five year long defence of our chronology as you claim so perhaps you are walking in the path of self-delusion.
scholar JW
-
84
WTBS article prove 587/586 BC fall of Babylon
by crazies inlabashi-marduk: (9 months) succeeded by nabonidus
(insight volume 1 p.453 chronology; watchtower 1965 january 1 p.29)
evil-merodach: 560 bce562 bce (2 years)
-
-
ellderwho
It appears that you have not followed my five year long defence of our chronology as you claim so perhaps you are walking in the path of self-delusion.
Well I stand corrected, I will do my homework and research your posts' to find said list and post it here as soon as I find it.
BTW I havent seen a list in my three years here. In all the battles Ive followed on this topic with you and others Ive never seen you post a "list" in your defense.
However that does not mean you havent, also if its so simple why not post a quick list a be done with me?
-
84
WTBS article prove 587/586 BC fall of Babylon
by crazies inlabashi-marduk: (9 months) succeeded by nabonidus
(insight volume 1 p.453 chronology; watchtower 1965 january 1 p.29)
evil-merodach: 560 bce562 bce (2 years)
-
-
ellderwho
it is simple and easy to explain but this cannot be said for the chronologies of Christendom where there is much disputation over the year for the Fall of Jerusalem in either 586 or 587.
I keep requesting that you do the above. Why wont you? You've been on the board, some five years, and all this time no comprehensive kings list and years ruled, whatsoever? Why not? Show your work thats all I ask. C'mon, is that so hard to do
Then your scholars can really have something to celebrate.
-
84
WTBS article prove 587/586 BC fall of Babylon
by crazies inlabashi-marduk: (9 months) succeeded by nabonidus
(insight volume 1 p.453 chronology; watchtower 1965 january 1 p.29)
evil-merodach: 560 bce562 bce (2 years)
-
-
ellderwho
The halarity continues,
because our system works, Jerusalem fell in 607 BCE.
Then shut me and all of christendom up in one stroke of the keys.
Show us the kings and years rule that add up from 607-------539.
mock the secular chronololgy
He-he-he Your arguement is still from silence. Do you understand that?
-
3
living with my elder stepdad over xmas
by ellderwho insuperbeckas post promted me to post this subject.
my parents are retiring to florida(gods waiting room) moms already down there, he's living with us here in newjersey till he offically retires.
lights, yard, tree, the whole nine.
-
-
ellderwho
Freewilly,
Dude you crack me up, thats halarious.
-
3
living with my elder stepdad over xmas
by ellderwho insuperbeckas post promted me to post this subject.
my parents are retiring to florida(gods waiting room) moms already down there, he's living with us here in newjersey till he offically retires.
lights, yard, tree, the whole nine.
-
-
ellderwho
Superbeckas post promted me to post this subject. My parents are retiring to Florida(Gods waiting room) moms already down there, he's living with us here in NewJersey till he offically retires.
We are very christmas-eey. Lights, yard, tree, the whole nine. He just ignores it, I guess. My 18 and 19 yo are in the know about poppop. But my 7 yo is running around waiting on santa.
Our tree is in the family room where he has to walk by it several times a day. I could just imagine the thought- "look at that satanic tree with the devil living in it"
Anyway he hasnt said a thing about it. I doubt he's mentioned it at the hall. He is a bit of a heavy at the hall as well, being a college educated elder and all. Giving talks all over the area.
Thoughts, comments?
EW.
-
84
WTBS article prove 587/586 BC fall of Babylon
by crazies inlabashi-marduk: (9 months) succeeded by nabonidus
(insight volume 1 p.453 chronology; watchtower 1965 january 1 p.29)
evil-merodach: 560 bce562 bce (2 years)
-
-
ellderwho
This post has already posted the presentation of the regnal data for the Neo-Babylonian period as referred in the Insight to the Scriptures so there is no need for me to comment on this.
Yeah, so string you years together and make it work. Make your celebrated scholars work shine. I challenge you to make it work.
Oh yeah, you cant. Sorry dude your arguement is still from silience. Im certain your reasonings work somewhere like at the Hall sunday mornings.
He-he not here.
So there!
Ahhhhh----yeeee-aaaaaahhhhhh