How Watchtower Leaders Work At Deceiving Themselves (wt 6/05)

by metatron 4 Replies latest jw friends

  • metatron
    metatron

    The latest Watchtower (June 1, 2005) contains a particularily glaring example of the

    organization working to deceive itself. You can find it on page 17, in the study article.

    Concerning the matter of field service reports, it says "As long as we perform our ministry

    with the right motive, is it really necessary to keep account of what we do or how much?

    These are reasonable questions, since we do not want to put numbers ahead of acts of faith

    or let having a good report become a major concern regarding our Christian activity."

    "a major concern"? You mean like putting in enough time to get the Circuit Overseer

    off your back, Brother Elder?

    The article then refers to Acts, in which it was reported that "Soon the number of disciples

    grew to 3,000 and then 5,000..." .

    Take note of how deceptively these scriptures are cited. Actually the correct quote is:

    "about 3,000" and "about 5,000". Of course if you quote it correctly - and take note of

    how the early church rounded off to three decimal places , the whole argument

    to "endeavor to keep accurate records of what is accomplished" gets blown up.

    The article tells us "how gratifying to know that our personal report is included in "

    their worldwide report. It continues "Remember, without your report, the overall

    report would be incomplete." (! ! ? ?)

    Is there any lack of testimony on the internet, in particular, that the hours reported

    are hugely bogus? That countless publishers and even elders are padding their reported

    time? That Witness kids are being taught to do the "pioneer stroll"?

    Personally, I find great gratification when I read the Society's worldwide report in

    knowing that I helped make it bogus! You can too, just by faking your field service report!

    Do Watchtower leaders not know this? I think they are content to wallow in their own

    misquotations, non-sequitors and nonsense.

    metatron

  • Sunspot
    Sunspot
    These are reasonable questions, since we do not want to put numbers ahead of acts of faith

    or let having a good report become a major concern regarding our Christian activity."

    It would seem that inquiring minds want to know why they have to turn in those dratted time slips. Anyway---sometimes this is the only time that some JWs get "noticed" when they get a phone call to get their "hours" by the Service Overseer!

    The JWs aren't the ones who put the focus on how many hours that are recorded-----it's the WTS itself making this a big deal!

    Annie

  • jaffacake
    jaffacake

    Yeah, Acts simply gives the very approximate number of people who had been converted to Christianity. No record kept of their names. No record of hours spent preaching, no requirement to attend regular meetings. Those converted were done so quickly and spontaneously and baptised without having to learn doctrines or answer questions. They were baptised as Jesus commanded, in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.

  • Mary
    Mary
    These are reasonable questions, since we do not want to put numbers ahead of acts of faith or let having a good report become a major concern regarding our Christian activity."

    Oh vomit, vomit, vomit.......this is the very foundation of this religion: reporting numbers. Who the hell do they think they're kidding?! There's not one scripture anywhere in the bible that even HINTS that a person has to turn in a field service report each month; or for that matter, there's no scripture indicating that Jesus ever preached door-to-door yet Witnesses are taught that if they don't do both, they'll die at Armageddon..........which is right around the corner...

  • OldSoul
    OldSoul

    Er, um .. so .. you have proof that on two occasions there was a rough estimate of how many were "added". How many scrolls were placed? How many regular weekly bible studies were conducted in the families of those "added"? How many return visits were recorded in the Bible?

    Speaking of which, the Ethiopian eunich was a proselyte, but Cornelius was not. And after only one Bible study he was qualified for baptism? Peter didn't ask a single question before announcing that not only Cornelius, but his whole household were ready for baptism. On the basis of what? He feared God. He didn't agree to serve the brothers in Jerusalem as a prerequisite for baptism.

    How many were in that household? We don't know. Why? There was no record.

    I think I am rapidly tiring of the struggle.

    Respectfully,
    OldSoul

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit