Non-Bible-believer questions on the flood...

by undercover 15 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • Raphael

    The vast majority of animals are not clean, and were represented by only two specimens each. The term ?clean animal? was not defined until the Mosaic Law. But since Moses was also the compiler of Genesis, if we follow the principle that ?Scripture interprets Scripture?, the Mosaic Law definitions can be applied to the Noahic situation. There are actually very few ?clean? land animals listed in Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 14

  • Raphael

    .confused the hell out of me too...

    BTW...pandas are dirty little buggers

  • mkr32208

    Stop questioning!!! You f*cking apostates just believe what we say why is that so God D*mn hard you just do it and stop this making waves...

    Sorry just wanted to see what it would be like to be on the GB for a second!

  • moshe

    I believe that recently scientists drilled an ice core in Greenland to bedrock- 2 miles down through the ice cap.Ice can be dated with ring markings just like a tree. The dates were over 100,000 yrs old. Doesn't water melt ice ? Obviously no flood in greenland for at least 100,000 yrs. Shalom, moshe

  • MungoBaobab

    Haven't you heard? Haven't you heard they found a frozen mammoth with food still in its mouth in Siberia? So there. Proof of the Flood.

    >>scratches head<<


  • avishai

    Naughty Moshe!!! I'm telling your Rabbi!!

Share this