Better in terms of who would the WT think represents them best.
I say Kerry because he will say whatever is needed no matter what facts history shows. (this is true of most all politicians by the way) For instance when he was in the service he talked bad about it. Now he acts as if he's proud of his military record. He says Bush lied there were no WMD's in Iraq, but he backed Clinton when he said Iraq had WMD's
Similarly the Society will say whatever it thinks is in their best interest at the time, they say the UN represents one of the beasts in the book of Daniel but at the same time they print articles showing the good the UN has done around the word. While secretly being a member.
I don't mean for this to be a Bush vs. Kerry thread but rather, who do you think fits the profile of a company man that the WT so desperately seeks.
William