by Simon 128 Replies latest social current
The bushwacky method of stopping/getting bin ladin hasn't worked either. Btw, bush totally ignored al queda until 9-11
Well, apparently Clinton igorned him too. Thankfully, bin Laden hasn't been able to get to the US since 9-11. Unfortunately, he has been able to terrorize other nations.
SixofNine:
Have another drink. That will help my case even more.
Bush just didn't think of the consequenses on the other side of the coin. Frankly, I'm at a loss as to what he should have done after Sept. 11. Maybe just nothing.
You sound like a democrat/liberal. Glad you're not president.
You know that I'm Canadian, BS. Why would I want to be president of a country that I don't even belong to, LOL!
Get that chip out of your shoulder and stop bothering me please.
Bush wasn't my first choice when he ...won his election but with everything everyone wants to find wrong with him it amazes me that ANYONE (in their right mind) could compare him to Saddam HUssan and be serious or even kidding. What colossal crap.
Why is it then IF there is any resemblance between the two, that the entire world isn't being dragged out of their homes and grass huts and brutally tortured and killed? Simon why are you so safe right now? Maybe you should start praying if you think Bush is the same as Saddam?
I'd feel safer if religious fundamentalists from both sides stopped dicking with the planet.
If you are trying to imply that the world is a safer place since Dub for brains took over then I think you are dead wrong and think that the facts prove it.
If you are trying to imply that the world is a safer place
no
I am saying that just because you do not like him or just because he has done some dumb things, in no way shape or form does that make him a monster dictator as you imply or as you have said. That is extreme and unfair on your part. That is what I am saying.
I will add that it is because of your remarks and those extreme remarks of others of others I find myself doing something I never thought I would do, defend Bush.
Have another drink. That will help my case even more.
lol. It won't change the record on Clinton.
This is what's so funny about these so-called "conservative" partisans. They believe that Bush has been "tough on terror" and Clinton was "weak on terror". Since if anything the opposite is true, at some point it goes beyond simple ignorance, as they really seem to be interested in this stuff. At some point, you have to just think they really are idiots.
Lots of namecalling, but absoluting NO factual support of how Clinton was allegedly so tough on terror. Do give us the factual data that causes you to believe Clinton was tough on terrorism. He played politics; other nations would be "upset" if he got too rough. He fired missles at an aspirin factory; he treated terrorism as a "legal" matter. He lost several opportunities to take Bin Laden. If THAT'S your interpretation of "tough", then I have to wonder who really is the idiot.
plmkrzy ,no you and all of the western world should change their middle east politics and apologize to the arabs for decades of shitting on them. with different foreign politics of the US 911 would never have happened.
Ya, that's it. For thousands of years arabs have been shitting on each other and now all of a sudden it's the fault of a 230 year old country
since Dub for brains took over
Simon, you and I obviously don't agree on this issue, but, good one, lol.
