Salut!
comment vas tu ajourd'hui? (sp?)
... Enough to get the point !!! ... you are very modest !!!
Myx: Lol! sorry, wrote that over like a 2 hour period, should really proof read! mais, merci.
Ok now here is the deal for them : Those who wants a lot of monney :
(win more on the numbers of sells than the price)
More people in good shape / more economy = more trades = more numbers of sells ! (THEY STILL CAN WIN IF THEY HELP !!!)
Myx: much more succint way than I put it, but yeah, that's my thoughts!
I mean : Acting like US and ALIKE are doing is like eating the egg instead of letting the egg being mature and multiply whith all his ressources ... mores eggs !!! for everyone - even for them
Myx: oh....they're more than that. they're nest robbers. they want all the eggss
IF we don't wan't to be lead by either china or usa and alike and gives the whole world a chance we have to try SOMETHING ! and really get what we deserve
Myx: exactly, what we have now isn't really healthy for many nations. maybe a more fair trade would fail economies miserably, but its worth the risk with hundreds of millions of people in poverty for a variety of reasons, but unfair trade is something the US and the EU can effect if they are willing.
LOL, He's more than just a pretty Bush
by SixofNine 13 Replies latest jw friends
-
Myxomatosis
-
frenchbabyface
Myx: exactly, what we have now isn't really healthy for many nations. maybe a more fair trade would fail economies miserably, but its worth the risk with hundreds of millions of people in poverty for a variety of reasons, but unfair trade is something the US and the EU can effect if they are willing.
You know what Myx :
Maybe a more fair trade would fail economies miserablyYes it is a risk ... but It is only a question of management and WHY / WHAT / WHERE / WHEN / HOW /OK this is an IDEA OUT OF OTHERS :
As we know that economy is not limitated - we can take A LOAN ON A WORLDWILD SCALE = A MUTUAL SPECULATION (*) = 0$ to reimburse LOL this way it's only an agreement*) that could be reimburse (FAKE) further to further (FAKE cause related to the evolution of the situation) ... THIS WAY NOBODY is SUFFERING
(*) in fact it is only asking the right to speculate the way they do !!! (without risk - on our back) cause when they put the price before we buy the product (a loan - even if they don't sell it - in case of bankruptie - the citizen pay the bill ... so) ... it is just THE SAME ... but here we WIN BOTH SIDES ! -
frenchbabyface
WIN BOTH SIDES !
only the rich onces would have to be patiente to get more monney (but they've got monney enough, that should'n't be a problem for them) LOLWe also have lots of true economicals solutions to add optimised the process ...
-
frenchbabyface
I can't sleep ... for more comprehension :money is not limited on the amount of any stock (assets / property or whatever / stock option ...)
but the actual financial market rules makes it that way.
Econony is only limited to human capacities ressources. So printing monney doesn't mean inflation if it is related to a real production ... (or the stock have to have more values - that is how they stole us - in puting it that way those who's got the stocks got the money over value - not the one who producted it = morbid speculation )it is not even ideological here ...