by Lee Elder 24 Replies latest watchtower medical
A new article by S. Sparrow, published today at AJWRB, investigates Dr. Joachim Boldt, one of the Watchtower's “bloodless medicine” experts. A notorious “medical pretender” who has exposed JW's to additional needless risk. Watchtower continues to cite this source, and fails to expose him as a fraud. In the process, they leave more than eight million people exposed to bad medical advice.
http://ajwrb.org/the-watchtowers-medical-expert
Yet another example of the WTS's use of psuedoscience.
Yet another case of unless it's corroborated from another source, disregard anything you hear (or read) from that lot!
Lives will continue to be at risk for as long as WT parades spiritual twoddle as medical advice.
Black Box Warning for WT: This phoney baloney medical advice is brought to you by a corrupt religious organization.
If they are basing their recommendations on information from an incompetent source, maybe they are legally liable for the damage that results? Can you say class-action lawsuit?
We need Orphan Crow to weigh in on this. As I recall, she is very familiar with this.
Orphan Crow wrote the article. She's taking a little break from the internet.
Not only does the expert say we don't need blood but he prescribes a procedure which makes them bleed out more. His theories are bullshit but with a twist , the twist is your life leaving your body from a lack of oxygen after following this so called expert. Well done again wt your medical advice would not be fit for a veterinary clinic.
As always, everything this pseudo-expert writes completely ignores the need for blood in trauma medicine.
Little wonder, the organization that cites him the most - JW organization - has nothing to say about the futility of bloodless medicine in Emergency Departments.
Just google the man's name and you will get an 'ear-full' of whats up with him. He's become more or less notorious.
I don't have WT Library on this device but it would be interesting to see how many times hits his name would get on a search
94 Retractions and counting for this 'medical expert'. Now two more 'research papers' are being questioned - in these instances it is for manipulating data.
http://retractionwatch.com/2017/03/01/94-retractions-whats-two/#more-48399
