3 Parts: Psych Issues When Leaving Restrictive Relig Grps- Print Copy

by Frannie Banannie 24 Replies latest watchtower medical

  • Frannie Banannie
    Frannie Banannie

    Yall might wanna print a copy of this, if it interests you. FB

    Part 1:

    Psychological Issues of Former Members of
    Restrictive
    ReligiousGroups

    Jim Moyers, MA, MFT

    (While this article was originally written for
    psychotherapistsworking with ex-fundamentalists,
    it
    should be helpful for anyone whohas been involved
    with
    a restrictive religious group.

    Restrictive religious groups, characterized by
    rigid
    beliefs,authoritarian structure, rejection of
    mainstream culture, and atendency to isolate
    their
    members from outside influences that mightlead to
    questions about the group's teachings, come in
    many
    formsfrom fringe cults to well established
    churches.

    While the experienceof individuals involved with
    so-called cults that clearly deviatefrom
    established
    religious practice has been extensively
    discussedin
    both popular and professional literature, there
    is
    relativelylittle recognition of the similar
    issues
    presented by thoseaffiliated with more
    restrictive
    forms of mainstream religion suchas can be found
    in
    Christian fundamentalism.

    Shattered Faith

    There are many people who find membership in such
    groups to be apositive experience. This article
    is not
    so much concerned with themas it is with those
    who,
    often after a great deal of inner turmoil,leave
    such
    groups. Many, especially those who had been
    intenselyinvolved with their religion, experience
    what
    has been called the"shattered faith syndrome"
    (Yao,
    1987). Having lost faith in whatwas once a
    primary
    source of meaning and guidance, the
    formerbeliever is
    apt to feel lost and overwhelmed.

    Estrangement from thecommunity of believers - the
    focus of social life for most membersof
    restrictive
    religious groups- compounds the former
    member'sisolation and despair.

    The psychological effect of membership in a
    restrictive religiousgroup often persists long
    after
    the outward severing of ties. Theremay be a
    chronic
    sense of dissatisfaction coupled with difficulty
    infinding new sources of meaning and direction.

    Formermembers are aptto distrust their own
    judgment,
    and may feel despair in theirinability to
    recapture
    the certainty that they once experienced in
    unquestioningly accepting the group's teachings.

    Fundamentalistgroups tend to view pride in
    oneself as
    sinful. This is internalizedas the persistently
    negative self image that is apparent in
    manyex-believers.

    Sexual inhibitions, compulsions, frustration,
    andguilt
    are liable to linger on long after negative
    beliefs
    about sexhave been consciously rejected. Having
    been
    taught to regard everyimpulse as potentially
    evil, the
    former group member may have littletolerance for
    spontaneity and lack the means for
    genuineself-expression.

    Conditioned distrust of the world outside
    thecommunity
    of believers coupled with the experience of
    disillusionmentwith teachings that once seemed
    infallible can present seriousobstacles to
    joining any
    group or making lasting commitments.

    Issues Of the Former Member in Psychotherapy

    Ex-members of restrictive religious groups RARELY
    COME
    INTO THERAPY WITH THEIR RELIGIOUS PAST AS THE
    PRESENTING ISSUE. They are ofcourse subject to
    the
    same pathogenic factors as everyone else: sucha
    background is not an all-inclusive explanation
    for
    every problem aformer member may present. But as
    the
    work of therapy proceeds,unresolved conflicts
    involving past beliefs sometimes becomeapparent.

    Religious conflicts should always be approached
    from a
    carefullyneutral position. The therapist must
    walk a
    fine line between thetraditional psychoanalytic
    bias
    against religion as pathological onone hand and
    naivet
    about the potential of some religious systemsfor
    undermining a healthy sense of self on the other.
    Even
    thoughthe client may claim to have rejected her
    or his
    former beliefs, thetherapist should remain
    neutral.

    Emphasizing negative aspects of aonce strongly
    held
    way of being in the world may trigger defense
    ofsomething with which the client is still
    unconsciously identified.Criticism of past
    beliefs may
    be misconstrued as criticism of theclient for
    having
    believed them.

    There may be shame in having onceaccepted as true
    things that now seem untenable.The former member
    should be encouraged to look at the positive
    aswell as
    negative aspects of having belonged to a
    restrictivereligious group.

    It is often helpful to approach the involvement
    asa
    developmental stage that was important, in ways
    both
    good and bad,in shaping the individual's life. As
    with
    any other developmentalstage, the restrictive
    belief
    system was eventually outgrown. Butunlike most
    other
    life stages, there is rarely a readily
    apparentnext
    stage for the former believer to move on to. This
    is
    especiallytrue with groups that actively
    discourage
    awareness of other systemsof thought and
    lifestyles.

    Group members may know nothing aboutother
    religions,
    the humanities, or modern critical thought.
    Education
    in schools operated by the group, where all ideas
    arefiltered through the shared belief system,
    tends to
    increase socialand cultural isolation. Thus the
    former
    member may be unaware ofalternative approaches to
    spiritual and existential questions.Support for
    spiritual and philosophical explorations, in
    contrast
    tothe limits set by the former belief system,
    will
    help validate theclient's capacity for
    independent
    thought.Without the unequivocal pronouncements
    that
    once guided them, formermembers of restrictive
    groups
    are apt to feel lost and confused.

    Inany transition, there is a naturally occuring
    period
    of time betweenthe collapse of old beliefs and
    their
    replacement by a new set ofguiding principles.
    Kuhn's
    (1970) account of the disorientation thatoccurs
    when a
    scientific viewpoint once thought to be
    definitivefails to fit emergent facts can be
    applied
    to the similar confusionthat comes with shifts in
    religious belief.

    Bridge's (1980) conceptof an "empty" middle phase
    in
    transitions is also helpful innormalizing the
    ex-believer's sense of confusion and inner
    emptinessas
    a natural part of the process of moving beyond
    outmoded viewsabout self and the world.

    The tenets of a restrictive religious group serve
    as
    the primarysource of meaning and self definition
    for
    its members. In departingfrom them, the former
    believer loses what may well have been thecentral
    focus of her or his life.

    As with any loss, there is anassociated grief
    process
    which, however, often goes
    unrecognized.Acknowledging
    losses as well as gains in leaving the group,
    andnormalizing the depression the ex-member may
    feel
    as a naturalresponse to the loss can go a long
    way
    towards helping him or hermove through the
    necessary
    grief process.

    Ex-believers often feel doubly misunderstood and
    isolated. Familyand friends who remain in the
    group
    are likely to have littletolerance for the views
    of
    anyone who has rejected their beliefs.People who
    do
    not share the same background are not likely
    tounderstand the intense and long lasting effects
    of
    having oncebelonged to a restrictive religion.
    Often
    the connection betweencurrent life difficulties
    and
    past religious experience is notapparent even to
    the
    former member.

    Fundamentalist doctrines emphasize human
    imperfection,
    maintainingthat there is no possibility for doing
    good
    without the assistanceof divine grace. Along with
    the
    loss of idealized images about thegroup and its
    leaders, the disillusioned believer also loses
    whatwas
    believed to be the only hope of salvation. Self
    esteem
    basedupon association with the group and its
    "sure
    truths," is seriouslyimpacted when one no longer
    belongs to the group.

    I have foundJung's (1965) concept of the self as
    an
    inner, transcendent sourceof healing and
    wholeness
    that is often projected onto institutionsand
    their
    leaders useful in helping people reclaim aspects
    ofthemselves that they may have given away to the
    group. In addition,Jung's psychological awareness
    of
    spirituality and account of hisown struggle with
    religious beliefs can be very helpful
    forindividuals
    seeking a new way to understand their
    religiousexperience.

    In therapy as well as in other relationships, the
    projectionsformerly carried by the group and its
    leaders are likely to appearin the form of
    idealization or devaluation, with the two
    processessometimes alternating. Ex-believers may
    need
    to test a relationshipto see if they are at risk
    for
    another painful betrayal.

    Therapeuticprocess often revolves around
    reclamation
    of the personal authorityonce given over to the
    group,
    and now perhaps projected ontosignificant others
    as
    well as the therapist.The former believer may be
    very
    adept at unconsciously meeting theperceived
    expectations of others. Denial, repression,
    splitting,
    anda false sense of self are often well developed
    defense mechanisms.

    The black and white thinking expressed in such
    conflicting pairs ofopposites as God vs. devil,
    church
    vs. world, sin vs. righteousness,leads to
    repression
    of anything that might possibly be construed
    asunacceptable. Constant self monitoring and
    rigid
    self control, alongwith confession of every sin
    in
    prayer, may have been regarded asthe only means
    for
    avoiding divine condemnation.

    In the literalismcharacteristic of
    fundamentalism, an
    "evil" thought or feeling isconsidered just as
    sinful
    as an evil act.

    Impulses and feelings maybe believed to be
    demonic in
    origin. The former group member islikely to need
    frequent reminders that there is nothing
    inherentlyevil about negative feelings, and the
    fact
    of their existence doesnot mean that they will be
    acted out.Strongly held beliefs greatly
    complicate
    family dynamics when notall family members share
    those
    beliefs. Unlike former members of"cults" whose
    families likely opposed their group
    membership,individuals who leave fundamentalism
    often
    leave family membersbehind.

    People who have left religious groups to which
    theirfamilies still belong will need support in
    coping
    with the anger,pain, and grief of being
    misunderstood
    and judged. They will alsoneed assistance in
    maintaining a personal philosophy that
    clasheswith the
    deeply held beliefs of family members.

    Family interactionscan become dominated by the
    well
    meant attempts of the "faithful" topersuade their
    "lost loved one" to return to "the
    Truth."Conversely,
    the former believer's desire to win family and
    friendsover to his or her condemnation of the
    group is
    often as strong asthe desire of those who still
    belong
    to bring her or him back intothe fold.

    Dysfunctional family patterns are sometimes
    hidden
    behind theidealized image of the religiously
    affiliated family, an image thatis apt to fail
    when
    faith in the church is lost. The discovery
    ofpathology
    in one's family presents yet another challenge
    topreviously held beliefs.

    Adolescents from families belonging torestrictive
    religious groups often rebel through gross
    violations
    ofthe strict moral codes that have been
    prescribed for
    them.

    Sexualacting out, running away, and substance
    abuse
    may represent attemptsto establish autonomy in
    the
    face of overbearing parental andreligious
    authority.

    Divorce and bitter child custody disputes,based
    in
    black and white conflicts over transcendent
    values,
    oftenoccur when one spouse leaves a restrictive
    religious group while theother remains.

    While not all groups go so far as to prohibit
    contactwith those who leave, a former member is
    unlikely to be wellregarded by the faithful.

    Conclusion

    Psychological issues of formermembers of
    restrictive
    religious are unique in the degree to whichthey
    involve past religious belief and experience. It
    is
    importantto remember that what may seem to be
    eccentric ideas and practicesare likely to have
    been
    very important in shaping the formerbeliever's
    life.

    In addition to the usual goals of
    psychotherapy,former members may need assistance
    in
    exploring lingering religiousconflicts, as well
    as
    support in seeking sources of meaning andguidance
    more
    congruent with current beliefs and lifestyle.

    References

    Bridges, W. (1980). Transitions. Reading, Mass.

    Jung, C.G. (1965).Memories, Dreams, Reflections.
    New
    York: Random House.

    Kuhn, T.S.(1970).The Structure of Scientific
    Revolutions. Chicago: University ofChicago Press.

    Yao, R. (1987).Addiction and the Fundamentalist
    Experience. New York:Fundamentalists
    Anonymous.Earlier
    versions of this article appeared in
    Psychotherapy,
    TheCalifornia Therapist, and Cultic Studies
    Journal.(c)

    1999 James C. Moyers

    Part 2:

    Signs of Unresolved Trauma


    A Pattern of out-of-control and self-injurious
    behavior

    Self-destructive addictions

    Intrusive thoughts, images, feelings and
    nightmares

    Flashbacks

    Extensive comorbidity/multiple diagnosis

    Inability to tolerate feelings or conflicts

    Intense self-blame and feeling unworthy

    Staying stuck in the victim or perpetrator roles

    Disorganized attachment patterns

    Black and white thinking and other cognitive
    distortions

    Pathological dissociation

    Suicidal ideation


    Signs of Unresolved Grief


    Prolonged and excessive guilt

    Sudden outbursts of anger/excessive anger

    Recurring or long lasting depression

    Caretaking behavior

    Self-mutilation

    Emotional numbness or constriction


    Grief Triggers


    Anniversaries

    Holidays

    Age-related

    Seasonal

    Music

    Rituals


    The Process of Healing from Trauma & Loss

    Acknowledging the loss

    Telling the story and sharing the pain

    Accepting support

    Connecting current behavior with the original
    wound

    Separating the past from the present

    Creating a new story; integrating the trauma into
    the
    context of one's life with new understanding

    Part 3:

    Common Psychological Problems of Mind
    Manipulation:

    The following problems and emotions are common
    with
    survivors. These are all normal emotions and will
    pass
    as you recover.

    Keeping a journal and sorting one's overwhelming
    feelings is most healing and helps work through
    feelings of betrayal and abuse.

    Finding someone to listen non-judgmentally and
    empathetically to your abusive experience is also
    a
    vital part.

    Feeling of Spiritual Rape of the Soul

    Enormous Feelings of Betrayal**

    Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder - [trauma
    becomescrystallized a few days after a traumatic
    event, such as exiting acult] (several of a
    cluster of
    symptoms can develop, includingspontaneous
    crying,
    suicidal thoughts, emotional numbing,
    phobias,social
    withdrawal, flashbacks, amnesia, anxiety,
    depression,
    shame,guilt, self-loathing, fear of going
    insane.)

    Identity Confusion/disorientation (the pre-cult
    personality--or realself--struggles with the
    in-cult
    personality that was imposed by thecult) (there
    can be
    difficulty integrating the cultic world with
    theoutside world)

    Dissociation (not being in touch with reality or
    those
    around them;inability to communicate)

    Floating (getting triggered into cult mode,
    flashbacks
    into the cultmind-set; thoughts of returning to
    the
    cult)

    Panic and Anxiety Attacks

    Obsessive Thoughts

    Depression

    Psychosomatic Symptoms (head/backaches, asthma,
    skin
    rash, lethargy)

    Problems or Inability in Making Decisions
    (because of
    thedependency fostered by the cult)

    Inability to Concentrate (with short-term memory
    loss)

    Fear ("What if I am wrong?" "What if harmful
    events
    actually dohappen?" "I can't ever be happy
    outside the
    group." Includesphobias & fear going crazy
    because of
    "floating")

    Grief & Sense of Loss (grieving loss of
    innocence,
    idealism,spirituality, self-esteem, pride; sense
    of
    purpose, meaning andbelonging in life; support
    system;
    friends and family lost in cult;loss of time,
    goals
    and youth.

    Guilt/Shame (for getting involved, for the people
    they
    recruited,things done while in the group; for
    leaving)

    Lack of Trust (of group situations; deep
    suspicions
    about othersmotives and attitudes)

    Intense Loneliness (strong & unique bonds were
    forged
    in the cult)

    Sense of Purposelessness & Disconnection (missing
    the
    peakexperiences of the group)

    Sense of Isolation/Alienation ("No one
    understands
    what I amgoing through.")

    Overly Critical of Oneself and Others (due to
    incorporating theharsh attitudes of the cult
    leader)

    Seeing Everything in Black and White (cults do
    not
    teach to lookfor the gray areas)

    Problems Having Boundaries (boundaries were
    violated
    time andagain in the cult until one lost sense of
    which boundaries wereappropriate)

    Lack of Self-Esteem & Feelings of Worthlessness
    (cult
    leaderscontinually blame members)

    Sleep Disorders (including nightmares and
    insomnia)

    Eating Disorders

    Sexuality Problems

    Fear of Intimacy and Commitment

    Harassment and Threats

    Anger or Rage (toward the group & leader; towards
    oneself;suppression of anger in the cult actually
    contributed to depressionand sense of
    helplessness)

    Problems with Career or Employment (because of
    years
    in thecult; lost job opportunities, etc.)

    Family Issues

    Spiritual (or philosophical) issues

    Impatience with the Recovery Process**

    Complex Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: Judith
    Herman
    (author ofTrauma and Recovery), along with others
    likes to use the this term forpeople who have
    suffered
    prolonged, repeated trauma. This disorder canbe
    the
    result of months or years of subjection to
    totalitarian control.

    Compiled by Dee and Mike
    Exit & Support Network

  • nicolaou
    nicolaou

    It's an interesting essay Fran' and worth reading so I hope you don't mind me reposting it in a bit more readable form. Thanks for bringing this to our attention.

    Nic'

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Part 1:

    Psychological Issues of Former Members of Restrictive Religious Groups

    Jim Moyers, MA, MFT

    (While this article was originally written for psychotherapists working with ex-fundamentalists, it should be helpful for anyone who has been involved with a restrictive religious group.)

    Restrictive religious groups, characterized by rigid beliefs, authoritarian structure, rejection of mainstream culture, and a tendency to isolate their members from outside influences that might lead to questions about the group's teachings, come in many forms from fringe cults to well established churches.

    While the experience of individuals involved with so-called cults that clearly deviate from established religious practice has been extensively discussed in both popular and professional literature, there is relatively little recognition of the similar issues presented by those affiliated with more restrictive forms of mainstream religion such as can be found in Christian fundamentalism.

    Shattered Faith

    There are many people who find membership in such groups to be a positive experience. This article is not so much concerned with them as it is with those who, often after a great deal of inner turmoil, leave such groups. Many, especially those who had been intensely involved with their religion, experience what has been called the "shattered faith syndrome" (Yao, 1987). Having lost faith in what was once a primary source of meaning and guidance, the former believer is apt to feel lost and overwhelmed.

    Estrangement from the community of believers - the focus of social life for most members of restrictive religious groups- compounds the former member’s isolation and despair. The psychological effect of membership in a restrictive religious group often persists long after the outward severing of ties. There may be a chronic sense of dissatisfaction coupled with difficulty in finding new sources of meaning and direction.

    Former members are apt to distrust their own judgment, and may feel despair in their inability to recapture the certainty that they once experienced in unquestioningly accepting the group's teachings. Fundamentalist groups tend to view pride in oneself as sinful. This is internalised as the persistently negative self-image that is apparent in many ex-believers.

    Sexual inhibitions, compulsions, frustration, and guilt are liable to linger on long after negative beliefs about sex have been consciously rejected. Having been taught to regard every impulse as potentially evil, the former group member may have little tolerance for spontaneity and lack the means for genuine self-expression.

    Conditioned distrust of the world outside the community of believers coupled with the experience of disillusionment with teachings that once seemed infallible can present serious obstacles to joining any group or making lasting commitments.

    Issues Of the Former Member in Psychotherapy

    Ex-members of restrictive religious groups RARELY COME INTO THERAPY WITH THEIR RELIGIOUS PAST AS THE PRESENTING ISSUE. They are of course subject to the same pathogenic factors as everyone else: such a background is not an all-inclusive explanation for every problem a former member may present. But as the work of therapy proceeds, unresolved conflicts involving past beliefs sometimes become apparent.

    Religious conflicts should always be approached from a carefully neutral position. The therapist must walk a fine line between the traditional psychoanalytic bias against religion as pathological on one hand and naiveté about the potential of some religious systems for undermining a healthy sense of self on the other. Even though the client may claim to have rejected her or his former beliefs, the therapist should remain neutral.

    Emphasizing negative aspects of a once strongly held way of being in the world might trigger defence of something with which the client is still unconsciously identified. Criticism of past beliefs may be misconstrued as criticism of the client for having believed them.

    There may be shame in having once accepted as true things that now seem untenable. The former member should be encouraged to look at the positive as well as negative aspects of having belonged to a restrictive religious group. It is often helpful to approach the involvement as a developmental stage that was important, in ways both good and bad, in shaping the individual's life. As with any other developmental stage, the restrictive belief system was eventually outgrown. But unlike most other life stages, there is rarely a readily apparent next stage for the former believer to move on to. This is especially true with groups that actively discourage awareness of other systems of thought and lifestyles.

    Group members may know nothing about other religions, the humanities, or modern critical thought. Education in schools operated by the group, where all ideas are filtered through the shared belief system, tends to increase social and cultural isolation. Thus the former member may be unaware of alternative approaches to spiritual and existential questions. Support for spiritual and philosophical explorations, in contrast to the limits set by the former belief system, will help validate the client's capacity for independent thought. Without the unequivocal pronouncements that once guided them, former members of restrictive groups are apt to feel lost and confused.

    In any transition, there is a naturally occurring period of time between the collapses of old beliefs and their replacement by a new set of guiding principles. Kuhn's (1970) account of the disorientation that occurs when a scientific viewpoint once thought to be definitive fails to fit emergent facts can be applied to the similar confusion that comes with shifts in religious belief.

    Bridge's (1980) concept of an "empty" middle phase in transitions is also helpful in normalizing the ex-believer's sense of confusion and inner emptiness as a natural part of the process of moving beyond outmoded views about self and the world.

    The tenets of a restrictive religious group serve as the primary source of meaning and self-definition for its members. In departing from them, the former believer loses what may well have been the central focus of her or his life. As with any loss, there is an associated grief process, which, however, often goes unrecognised. Acknowledging losses as well as gains in leaving the group, and normalizing the depression the ex-member may feel as a natural response to the loss can go a long way towards helping him or her move through the necessary grief process.

    Ex-believers often feel doubly misunderstood and isolated. Family and friends who remain in the group are likely to have little tolerance for the views of anyone who has rejected their beliefs. People who do not share the same background are not likely to understand the intense and long lasting effects of having once belonged to a restrictive religion. Often the connection between current life difficulties and past religious experience is not apparent even to the former member.

    Fundamentalist doctrines emphasize human imperfection; maintaining that there is no possibility for doing good without the assistance of divine grace. Along with the loss of idealized images about the group and its leaders, the disillusioned believer also loses what was believed to be the only hope of salvation. Self esteem based upon association with the group and its "sure truths," is seriously impacted when one no longer belongs to the group.

    I have found Jung's (1965) concept of the self as an inner, transcendent source of healing and wholeness that is often projected onto institutions and their leaders useful in helping people reclaim aspects of themselves that they may have given away to the group. In addition, Jung’s psychological awareness of spirituality and account of his own struggle with religious beliefs can be very helpful for individuals seeking a new way to understand their religious experience.

    In therapy as well as in other relationships, the projections formerly carried by the group and its leaders are likely to appear in the form of idealization or devaluation, with the two processes sometimes alternating. Ex-believers may need to test a relationship to see if they are at risk for another painful betrayal.

    Therapeutic process often revolves around reclamation of the personal authority once given over to the group, and now perhaps projected onto significant others as well as the therapist. The former believer may be very adept at unconsciously meeting the perceived expectations of others. Denial, repression, splitting, and a false sense of self are often well-developed defence mechanisms.

    The black and white thinking expressed in such conflicting pairs of opposites as God vs. devil, church vs. world, sin vs. righteousness, leads to repression of anything that might possibly be construed as unacceptable. Constant self-monitoring and rigid self-control, along with confession of every sin in prayer, may have been regarded as the only means for avoiding divine condemnation.

    In the literalism characteristic of fundamentalism, an "evil" thought or feeling is considered just as sinful as an evil act. Impulses and feelings maybe believed to be demonic in origin. The former group member is likely to need frequent reminders that there is nothing inherently evil about negative feelings, and the fact of their existence does not mean that they will be acted out. Strongly held beliefs greatly complicate family dynamics when not all family members share those beliefs. Unlike former members of “cults" whose families likely opposed their group membership, individuals who leave fundamentalism often leave family members behind.

    People who have left religious groups to which their families still belong will need support in coping with the anger, pain, and grief of being misunderstood and judged. They will also need assistance in maintaining a personal philosophy that clashes with the deeply held beliefs of family members. Family interactions can become dominated by the well meant attempts of the "faithful" to persuade their "lost loved one" to return to "the Truth.” Conversely, the former believer's desire to win family and friends over to his or her condemnation of the group is often as strong as the desire of those who still belong to bring her or him back into the fold.

    Dysfunctional family patterns are sometimes hidden behind the idealized image of the religiously affiliated family, an image that is apt to fail when faith in the church is lost. The discovery of pathology in one's family presents yet another challenge to previously held beliefs.

    Adolescents from families belonging to restrictive religious groups often rebel through gross violations of the strict moral codes that have been prescribed for them. Sexual acting out, running away, and substance abuse may represent attempts to establish autonomy in the face of overbearing parental and religious authority.

    Divorce and bitter child custody disputes, based in black and white conflicts over transcendent values, often occur when one spouse leaves a restrictive religious group while the other remains. While not all groups go so far as to prohibit contact with those who leave, a former member is unlikely to be well regarded by the faithful.

    Conclusion

    Psychological issues of former members of restrictive religious are unique in the degree to which they involve past religious belief and experience. It is important to remember that what may seem to be eccentric ideas and practices are likely to have been very important in shaping the former believer’s life.

    In addition to the usual goals of psychotherapy, former members may need assistance in exploring lingering religious conflicts, as well as support in seeking sources of meaning and guidance more congruent with current beliefs and lifestyle.

    References

    Bridges, W. (1980). Transitions. Reading, Mass.

    Jung, C.G. (1965). Memories, Dreams, Reflections. New York: Random House.

    Kuhn, T.S.(1970).The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University ofChicago Press.

    Yao, R. (1987). Addiction and the Fundamentalist Experience. New York:Fundamentalists Anonymous.Earlier versions of this article appeared in Psychotherapy, TheCalifornia Therapist, and Cultic Studies Journal.(c)

    1999 James C. Moyers Part 2: Signs of Unresolved Trauma

    A Pattern of out-of-control and self-injurious behavior

    Self-destructive addictions

    Intrusive thoughts, images, feelings and nightmares

    Flashbacks

    Extensive comorbidity/multiple diagnosis

    Inability to tolerate feelings or conflicts

    Intense self-blame and feeling unworthy

    Staying stuck in the victim or perpetrator roles

    Disorganized attachment patterns

    Black and white thinking and other cognitive distortions

    Pathological dissociation

    Suicidal ideation

    Signs of Unresolved Grief

    Prolonged and excessive guilt

    Sudden outbursts of anger/excessive anger

    Recurring or long lasting depression

    Caretaking behavior

    Self-mutilation

    Emotional numbness or constriction

    Grief Triggers

    Anniversaries

    Holidays

    Age-related

    Seasonal

    Music

    Rituals

    The Process of Healing from Trauma & Loss

    Acknowledging the loss

    Telling the story and sharing the pain

    Accepting support

    Connecting current behavior with the original wound

    Separating the past from the present

    Creating a new story; integrating the trauma into the context of one's life with new understanding

    Part 3:

    Common Psychological Problems of Mind Manipulation:

    The following problems and emotions are common with survivors. These are all normal emotions and will pass as you recover.

    Keeping a journal and sorting one's overwhelming feelings is most healing and helps work through feelings of betrayal and abuse. Finding someone to listen non-judgmentally and empathetically to your abusive experience is also a vital part.

    Feeling of Spiritual Rape of the Soul

    Enormous Feelings of Betrayal**

    Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder - [trauma becomescrystallized a few days after a traumatic event, such as exiting acult] (several of a cluster of symptoms can develop, includingspontaneous crying, suicidal thoughts, emotional numbing, phobias,social withdrawal, flashbacks, amnesia, anxiety, depression, shame,guilt, self-loathing, fear of going insane.)

    Identity Confusion/disorientation (the pre-cult personality--or realself--struggles with the in-cult personality that was imposed by thecult) (there can be difficulty integrating the cultic world with theoutside world)

    Dissociation (not being in touch with reality or those around them;inability to communicate)

    Floating (getting triggered into cult mode, flashbacks into the cultmind-set; thoughts of returning to the cult)

    Panic and Anxiety Attacks

    Obsessive Thoughts

    Depression

    Psychosomatic Symptoms (head/backaches, asthma, skin rash, lethargy)

    Problems or Inability in Making Decisions (because of thedependency fostered by the cult)

    Inability to Concentrate (with short-term memory loss)

    Fear ("What if I am wrong?" "What if harmful events actually dohappen?" "I can't ever be happy outside the group." Includesphobias & fear going crazy because of

    "floating")

    Grief & Sense of Loss (grieving loss of innocence, idealism,spirituality, self-esteem, pride; sense of purpose, meaning andbelonging in life; support system; friends and family lost in cult;loss of time, goals and youth.)

    Guilt/Shame (for getting involved, for the people they recruited,things done while in the group; for leaving)

    Lack of Trust (of group situations; deep suspicions about othersmotives and attitudes)

    Intense Loneliness (strong & unique bonds were forged in the cult)

    Sense of Purposelessness & Disconnection (missing the peakexperiences of the group)

    Sense of Isolation/Alienation ("No one understands what I amgoing through.")

    Overly Critical of Oneself and Others (due to incorporating theharsh attitudes of the cult leader)

    Seeing Everything in Black and White (cults do not teach to lookfor the gray areas)

    Problems Having Boundaries (boundaries were violated time andagain in the cult until one lost sense of which boundaries wereappropriate)

    Lack of Self-Esteem & Feelings of Worthlessness (cult leaderscontinually blame members)

    Sleep Disorders (including nightmares and insomnia)

    Eating Disorders

    Sexuality Problems

    Fear of Intimacy and Commitment

    Harassment and Threats

    Anger or Rage (toward the group & leader; towards oneself;suppression of anger in the cult actually contributed to depressionand sense of helplessness)

    Problems with Career or Employment (because of years in thecult; lost job opportunities, etc.)

    Family Issues

    Spiritual (or philosophical) issues

    Impatience with the Recovery Process**

    Complex Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: Judith Herman (author ofTrauma and Recovery), along with others likes to use the this term forpeople who have suffered prolonged, repeated trauma. This disorder canbe the result of months or years of subjection to totalitarian control.

    Compiled by Dee and Mike

    Exit & Support Network

  • Frannie Banannie
    Frannie Banannie

    Not at all, Nic....Glad you could help with this post....it IS rather long, but so necessary...cleared up a lot of issues for me.....and thanks to you, now others might not find it so tedious to wade thru....and helpful to boot!

    Frannie Banannie

  • DanTheMan
    DanTheMan

    Good info, thanks for sharing.

  • Odrade
    Odrade

    Thanks both of you Frannie and Nic. great material that I will be able to use.

    Odrade.

  • Frannie Banannie
    Frannie Banannie

    Thanks, Odrade & Dan....but I really hafta give the credit to Jan Groenveld....she's passed on now, but she was a remarkable xdub and supplied xdub online support groups and websites with this info and a veritable wealth of other pertinent info to help our healing processes, plus she had an unprecedented sense of humor....I'm gonna miss her very much...

    Frannie B

  • DJ
    DJ

    bttt

  • Frannie Banannie
    Frannie Banannie

    (smiles) Thanks, DJ...it really does need to be bttt'd occasionally, dudnit?

    Frannie B

  • waiting
    waiting
    Strongly held beliefs greatly complicate family dynamics when not all family members share those beliefs. Unlike former members of "cults" whose families likely opposed their group membership, individuals who leave fundamentalism often leave family members behind.

    Interesting point. Never thought about it. Most Moonies went against their family to join the Moonies. And their families were glad when they left the Moonies.

    A person who leaves a fundamentalist religion many times leaves family behind - and walks away totally alone.

    Thanks, FB

  • Frannie Banannie
    Frannie Banannie

    bttt (just in case someone needs this info, too)

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit