The 1950s NWT (1984)

TD

Anonymous
Dr. BeDuhn disagrees strongly with the insertion of the name "Jehovah" in the NT, pointing out that no translation that bills itself as literal has any business making that kind of assumption.
He's sympathetic to the NWT because he's weary of the Trinitarian bias in Bible scholarship, as a lot of us are.
HowTheBibleWasCreated

I will give the WT a bone here and admit the 1984 referance edition is excellent for the referances that show varients between the LXX Vg MS etc. I often use those referances.