by cofty 25 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
Cofty on another (summary) thread you wrote:
The biogeography of oceanic islands presents an impossible dilemma for creationism.
So what is the “impossible dilemma”?
Does the “dilemma” assume that creationists don’t believe in or can’t use migration as a possible explanation?
How would migration explain the data?
Migration (from nearby mainland) is part of your scenarios.
What is the “impossible dilemma” for creationists?
As I thought, you didn't understand the topic. Read it again.
How did Hawaii end up with 60 endemic species of honeycreepers?
Cofty you claim that it is an “impossible dilemma” for creationists?
What is the impossible dilemma?
I have asked this several times now.
Just telling people that they don’t “understand” and that they need to re-read the topic isn’t much of a support for your claim of “impossible dilemma.”
How did Hawaii end up with 60 endemic species of honeycreepers?
How is Hawaii having “60 endemic species of honeycreepers” an “impossible dilemma for creationism”?
What is the “impossible dilemma” that you claim?
Just answer the question and the dilemma will be self-evident.
How did Hawaii end up with 60 endemic species of honeycreepers?
Cofty claims that “Evolution is a fact” and then proceeds to give threads like this as supposed proofs. He further claims that the situation that he describes on this thread is an “impossible dilemma for creationism” -yet won’t spell out the dilemma when challenged.
Burden of proof is on him to explain his “impossible dilemma for creationism” that he claims.
This is like playing chess with a pigeon.
Answer the question.
How did Hawaii end up with 60 endemic species of honeycreepers? It is impossible to explain without evolution/speciation.
