: Doesn't a whole heap of "bttt"s constitute spamming?
Not if it's used in "moderation!"
bttt.
Farkel
Maybe!
by Farkel 11 Replies latest jw friends
-
Farkel
-
Holey_Cheeses*King_of_the juice.
Once again my ignorance coming to the surface - what the farkel is bttt?
cheeses - not always understanding.
-
Brummie
what the farkel is bttt?
You may want to redirect that question to Undisfellowshipped.
Brummie - back to the top class
-
Holey_Cheeses*King_of_the juice.
Brummie,
Ahhhhh, thank you. Bump that thread in other words.
cheeses.
-
Gopher
back to the top back to the top back to the top back to the top back to the top back to the top back to the top back to the top back to the top back to the top back to the top back to the top back to the top back to the top back to the top back to the top back to the top back to the top back to the top back to the top back to the top back to the top back to the top back to the top back to the top back to the top
in moderation, of course
-
larc
Everything should be used in moderation, including moderation
-
pseudoxristos
bttt
I couldn't resist.
pseudo
-
AlanF
A lot of bttt, in relative moderation of course, can be very fine.
AlanF
-
Holey_Cheeses*King_of_the juice.
Hitler. There, that should now invoke Godwin's Law and bring this to an end.
cheeses - who has learnt something today.
-
manon
It really isn't a case of BTTT it's just gridlock.