U.S. Exaggerates Relative Size of Iraq Alliance

by Trauma_Hound 10 Replies latest social current

  • Trauma_Hound
    Trauma_Hound

    U.S. Exaggerates Relative Size of Iraq Alliance

    Reuters
    Thursday, March 20, 2003; 4:10 PM

    By Jonathan Wright

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. leaders say they are proud of the alliance they have assembled against Iraq, even in comparison with the broad alliance the United States assembled for the war to drive Iraqi forces out of Kuwait in 1991.

    Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld told a news conference on Thursday: "The coalition in this activity is larger than the coalition that existed during the Gulf War in 1991."

    But the facts put out by the administration itself suggest otherwise.

    In 1991 at least 33 countries sent forces to the campaign against Iraq and 16 of those provided combat ground forces, including a large number of Arab countries.

    In 2003 the only fighting forces are from the United States, Britain and Australia. Ten other countries are known to have offered small numbers of noncombat forces, mostly either medical teams and specialists in decontamination, making a comparable alliance of about 13 countries.

    U.S. officials have named 33 countries which support the U.S. invasion of Iraq but this includes countries which are providing overflight and basing rights and which are giving only diplomatic or political support for the invasion.

    President Bush said on Wednesday that 35 countries have chosen to "share the honor" of supporting the campaign but U.S. officials could not name more than the 33.

    They say some 15 other countries are cooperating with the U.S. war effort behind the scene, mostly by giving access to bases and airspace, but they do not want to be named.

    In 1991 the United States and its allies did not count countries which provided overflight rights or political support because the campaign had the overwhelming support of the U.N. Security Council, which had voted 12-2 for the use of force.

    LIMITED ARAB INVOLVEMENT

    A small group of Arab countries -- including Jordan, Yemen, Sudan, Tunisia and Algeria -- opposed the campaign to drive Iraqis forces out of Kuwait but in the rest of the world there was overwhelming support for the military effort.

    This time the United States failed to obtain U.N. Security Council authorization for the use of force. It gave up its efforts when it became clear that it could not win.

    One of the biggest difference is that none of the declared members of the 2003 alliance are Arab countries, although some may be on the list of governments who prefer to act in secret, and several, including Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Qatar, are allowing their facilities to be used.

    In 1991 all six members of the Gulf Cooperation Council, as well as Egypt, Syria and Morocco, took part in the fighting.

    Other significant absentees in 2003 are the French, who contributed 16,000 troops in 1991 but led the diplomatic drive this year to prevent a U.S. invasion of Iraq, the Canadians, who sent three warships last time, and the Pakistanis.

    The United States has won some new allies among the countries of eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union.

    Some of these are countries Rumsfeld referred to as "new Europe" in contrast to the European anti-war group led by France and Germany.

    These new allies are Albania, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Georgia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Uzbekistan -- almost one half of the total alliance membership.

    "It's no accident that many members of this coalition recently escaped from tyranny and oppression and they understand what is at stake in bringing freedom and liberation to the Iraqi people," White House spokesman Ari Fleischer told a briefing on Thursday.

    The largest contribution from any one of these countries is the 200 noncombat troops sent by Poland.

    Fleischer said the governments supporting the United States represented some 1.18 billion people. That would be about one sixth of the total world population.

    He said the countries have a combined GDP of approximately $21.7 trillion. That is more than half of the world total of about $40 trillion, because the alliance contains the two biggest economies in the world -- the United States and Japan, as well as Group of Eight members Britain and Italy.

  • ThiChi
    ThiChi

    Most of the nations named by Powell would not have a combat role, but have allowed the United States to base troops on their soil and to let U.S. planes overfly their territory. Others have offered expertise in dealing with possible chemical weapons attacks.

    "We now have a coalition of the willing that includes some 30 nations who publicly said they could be included in such a listing," Powell said, "and there are 15 other nations, for one reason or another, who do not wish to be publicly named but will be supporting the coalition."

    I do not see any exaggerations..... The big lie is the red diaper doper baby’s claim that the US is going it alone!

    Boucher did not specify which countries would send troops to fight. But Britain is known to have contributed about 45,000 troops, Australia has offered 2,000 and Poland, 200. Albania has offered 70 soldiers for noncombat roles and Romania contributed 278 non-combat experts in demining, in chemical and biological decontamination and military police.

    Three Arab countries are used for air bases and other support.......

  • Trauma_Hound
    Trauma_Hound
    The big lie is the red diaper doper baby’s claim that the US is going it alone!

    Really, where did I say that, prove it ********

  • DakotaRed
    DakotaRed

    Upwards of 40 nations supporting is still upwards of 40 nations, regardless of whether they send troops or not. Bush did not ask for troops, but for support. One is japan, whose constitution disallows any military involvement in foreign nations affairs, but they have agreed, voluntarily, to send troops to help with the refugees.

    Spin it anyway you like, it has started and it will be finished and the Iraqis will be liberated. How will you spin it when the Iraqi people celebrate their liberation?

    Maybe you think the San Francisco police were exaggerating the in excess of 1,000 protestors arrested today? I have yet to see any from the pro-America rallies arrested.

  • DJ
    DJ

    Trauma Hound,

    I'd really appreciate it if you would try to pay better attention to the name calling that you engage in on this board. It's fine to disagree with others but try doing it in a respectful manner.

  • Trauma_Hound
    Trauma_Hound

    That's funny, 90 country's supported the action in the first gulf war. So still the claim is BS.

  • DJ
    DJ

    Upon further thought, TRAUMAHOUND.......why don'tcha just move to Iraq/

  • Trauma_Hound
    Trauma_Hound
    Upon further thought, TRAUMAHOUND.......why don'tcha just move to Iraq/

    Upon further thought, why don't you move to China, Facist.

  • DJ
    DJ

    lol........you've got to be the most annoying childish poster on this board. Did you stick out your tongue when you said that? btw, you gay?

  • jelly
    jelly

    Careful DJ Simon will come along and delete your post.

    Terry

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit