how in the world are they putting stuff on Wikipedia that isn't well sourced since we know that the policy manuals are confidential. I know anybody can write anything, but at the minimum, their statement that elders do report even in the case of one witness should be struck for lack of credible source. In fact, the actual source that can be linked without DMCA says otherwise.
I love how they put WT articles and Year Books as sources. The Watchtower and Awake doesn't even put accurate references in them!
The wiki pages seems to be one giant WT article. I'm surprised we don't study it for the midweek meeting. I can see all the heads bobbing now as they read the persecution portion.