Top Five Forbidden Watchtower Subjects

by metatron 44 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • metatron
    metatron

    If you are an 'old timer' and wonder why the Watchtower and Awake
    magazines are so bland and lacking in content, it may come as no surprize
    to you that it's often because a number of topics are 'off limits'.
    That is, certain subjects are so troublesome to the Watchtower leadership
    that they avoid detailed discussion of them. Here's some examples:

    1) Condemnation of homosexuals

    In the past, the Watchtower and Awake openly discussed this subject
    in detail, along with the usual 'will be destroyed at Armageddon'
    conclusion. However, social and political pressures now limit what they
    feel willing to say ESPECIALLY in assembly or convention talks. They are
    well aware that many assemblies are held in cities where local members
    of the gay community may monitor the assembly program to find examples
    of 'hate speech'. From here on, you might not see or hear anything more
    specific than a reference to 1 Cor. ("adulterers, fornicators,...).

    2) Any Date-Setting for Armageddon

    Since the 1975 debacle in particular, the Governing Body has been careful
    about saying anything that sets a date for Armageddon. Of course, it's always
    "soon" (meaningless as that is). When a remark about the preaching work being
    concluded in the 20th century appeared (1989), the sentence was later changed
    in the bound volume printing to avoid any date setting.

    3) Most Chronology

    Most chronology has disappeared from the publications, particularily
    that which concerns the Gentile Times and 6000 years from Adam's creation.
    At this point, it's difficult to tell EXACTLY WHAT THEY BELIEVE about these
    subjects at present! The Knowledge book 'downsized' the whole Gentile Times
    doctrine down to a single paragraph, as if unimportant. Most probably, the
    subject is too complicated for them to bother with - and too associated with
    failed expectations for them to comment in any detail.

    4) Voting and Neutrality

    This is a touchy area since ('nudge-nudge, wink-wink') they must actively
    discourage voting - and FORBID SERVICE IN ANY ARMED FORCES ANYWHERE, without
    being too specific in writing. The "Questions From Readers" on voting left
    the matter up in the air - will they disfellowship people for voting or not?
    This ambiguous reply was triggered by legal/political problems in Europe
    where France and others are putting pressure on the Society forbidding any
    participation in voting/politics by Witnesses. It brings up a 'and why should we
    give you a tax exemption, again?' kind of question.
    The Society expels members who join the Army, Air Force, etc. by inventing the
    fiction of reading their name to the congregation as someone who has "disassociated
    himself". Since this is also the current procedure for expelling someone who
    has taken a blood transfusion, they risk exposing the subterfuge to more
    authorities.

    5) The Devil, the World, and the U.N.

    So, the DEVIL CONTROLS THE WORLD, right? He directs the governments and
    has invented the UN to deceive the world into destruction. isn't that correct?
    You are VERY UNLIKELY to hear or read anything this plain and blunt in any
    publication. They hate being embarrassed in court by quotes that Satan runs
    the governments. The same thing applies to fighting persecution by appeals to
    UN.

    Feel free to add your own 'forbidden' topics. They are much more careful about
    attacking the Catholic Church and holidays as well - in a world that tries to
    avoid intolerance, they don't want to look bad.

    The big question now is - will BLOOD join this list above? Having removed
    it from the new "Search for the True God" book, will it disappear from view?

    A final reason for these changes is that the 25 - 30 men who run the Watchtower
    are probably having doubts themselves about a lot of things, especially as their
    contributions dry up, more scandals are exposed and more doctrine is rendered
    defenseless.

    metatron

  • Dia
    Dia

    Thanks met,

    I would say 'charity' is a forbidden topic. Helping your fellow man.

    Kindness.

    Loving and effective child-rearing.

    Empathy.

    Showing respect.

    Humility.

    Feelings.

    Edited by - Dia on 4 November 2002 13:37:5

  • cruzanheart
    cruzanheart

    I got a chuckle when I looked through the 1958 Awake! volume and saw that in-vitro fertilization, when another man's sperm is used to fertilize the woman's egg, is ADULTERY, punishable by disfellowshipping. Haven't heard anything about THAT lately.

    Nina

  • larc
    larc

    The interpretation of the King of theNorth and the King of the South is a dead issue. That interpretaion has changed several times over their history.

  • Farkel
    Farkel

    "This Generation" will become even more bland and unreferenced as to be totally meaningless.

    1914 will slowly fade away especially in a decade or so when dubs realize that the all-powerful reigning Jesus Christ didn't do squat in his first hundred years of earthly reign.

    What householder will swallow the line that the "last days" and "time of trouble" began in 1914 when a dub tells them that story in say, 2016?

    You don't hear much anymore these days about all the governments turning on religion and then turning on JWs, confiscating their properties and forcing them to go into hiding, do you?

    Neither do you hear anything about "There are no Jehovah's Witnesses in any prisons." That used to be true, because if someone was a dub and had to go to prison, he was DFd. Therefore he was no longer a Jehovah's Witness. Since we know there are JW pedophiles in prison who are technically still in good standing as JWs, the society ain't gonna be making the "no dubs in prisons" anymore.

    Farkel

  • RunningMan
    RunningMan

    The full sealing of the annointed in 1935 is no longer mentioned. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if the whole annointed farce is eventually backed away from.

  • NewYork44M
    NewYork44M

    You don't hear about man being created 6,027 years ago. For years we heard all the technical aspects of the calculation of 6,000 years of human existance. No more.

    You don't hear that Babylon the Great was destroyed in 1919.

  • blondie
    blondie

    What about the messenger of the covenant coming to inspect the temple in 1918. Rutherford must have had that on his books, 2 times on every page.

    Blondie (Who finds JFR tiresome to read)

    (Actually NY they teach that BTG "fell" in 1919. Destruction lies ahead with the beginning of the great tribulation) But they aren't mentioning that either.

    Edited by - Blondie on 4 November 2002 15:28:50

  • metatron
    metatron

    Given that one of the deleted chapters in the new book (relative to the United in Worship
    book) was on how to know if you are one of the annointed, I'd say that the doctrine
    is being de-emphasized. Maybe they want to change partaking at the Memorial so that the
    whole ceremony isn't such a farce - as well as back away from the idea of 'anointed'
    leadership.

    They love the phrase 'faithful and discreet slave' but seem to have dropped much of its
    linkage to the 144,000.

    metatron

  • NewYork44M
    NewYork44M

    Blondi, thanks for getting my "truthspeak" in line. However, have you ever had anyone explain the difference between falling and being destroyed?

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit