THE silentlambs ARCHIVE - Every News Article Ever

by UnDisfellowshipped 21 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse

  • UnDisfellowshipped
    UnDisfellowshipped
    North Jersey News - April 20th 2002:

    Around the region

    Saturday, April 20, 2002

    A West Milford man pleaded guilty to child endangerment offenses Friday for sexual encounters he had with two teenage girls he met through his membership at the Jehovah's Witnesses temple in town.

    Tom Blankenship, 23, had been befriended by an elder at the church and was often invited over for meals and visits, said Joseph Del Russo, Passaic County chief assistant prosecutor.

    From the fall of 1998 through April 2000, Blankenship had sexual relations with one of the elder's relatives, a 17-year-old girl. He had similar sexual contact with another relative, a 14-year-old girl, from June 2001 through Feb. 21, Del Russo said.

    Although there was no physical force used in the incidents, Blankenship was charged with multiple sexual assault charges because of the victims' ages. The incidents sometimes took place when Blankenship was over for visits, other times when he sneaked into the house late at night, Del Russo said.

    The church elder contacted police Feb. 27 and Blankenship was arrested March 3 and charged with sexual assault, criminal sexual contact, and child endangerment offenses.

    He pleaded guilty to two of the child endangerment offenses and will face a probationary sentence with up to 364 days in the county jail. Had he been convicted at trial, Blankenship faced up to 10 years behind bars.

    - Jennifer V. Hughes
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    New Zealand Television News Story - April 8th 2002:

    POSSIBLE MOTIVE FOR DISAPPEARANCE

    UPDATED: 05:50PM MONDAY 8 APRIL

    Police have finally uncovered a possible motive for the disappearance of a teenage Jehovah's Witness on a camping trip four months ago.

    Other church members who were with Elon Oved, have admitted they were dressing up in women's underwear and taking photos of each other urinating.

    Oved's father says his shy son would have left the group out of embarassment and then lost his way.

    Four months after his son disappeared in the mountains, Rami Oved says he's disgusted to find out exactly what happened on the tramping trip just before he went missing.

    This photograph shows one of the group - a 15-year-old boy - wearing a bra. The group's leaders have also admitted taking photos of people urinating.

    Elon's father, Rami Oved says: "Elon was very sensitive when it comes to that so I'm sure he was very fearful of being photographed or followed and therefore he was pushed further into the bush."

    14-year-old Elon Oved was on a camping trip with fellow Jehovah's Witness church members in the Lewis Pass area last December... he disappeared after changing clothes behind a hut...his body was found two months later.

    Police say while the conduct was not criminal, they are annoyed that they weren't told about the pranks.

    The Jehovah's Witness church emphasised it was a privately organised trip... but said the photograph.."reflects behaviour that is totally unacceptable to the moral standards espoused by the Jehovah's Witness community. If photographs were taken of people urinating during the trip, such conduct is similarly inappropriate, even if the actions were meant as a practical joke."

    Police have already re-interviewed the camping party... details of their behaviour will be heard at a coroner's inquest into Elon's death.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Oregonian Newspaper - March 29th 2002:

    Letter to Editor of The Oregonian Newspaper.

    Witnesses hide molestation The Catholic church has hidden sexual abuse by moving guilty priests to new communities. Even more abominable, Jehovah's Witnesses hide the molestation of their youths by threatening the victims with expulsion if they try to warn and protect other members or even to report the perpetrators to police.

    03/29/02

    Last August, I was one of a group of advocates from across the nation to travel to Ritzville, Wash., to support one such victim when she brought charges against her Jehovah's Witness molester/rapist, Manuel Belize, at his retrial.

    For at least three decades, Jehovah's Witness rape victims were accused of "consenting to fornication" for being unable to scream when criminally assaulted. An untold number were disfellowshipped and shunned. Some committed suicide.

    How do the victims of these violent crimes become a danger to the fellowship, thus needing to be expelled and shunned? Is it not, rather, the other way around?
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Sacramento Bee Newspaper - March 16th 2002:

    Former El Dorado family dead in murder-suicide

    Robert Bryant killed his children and wife, then himself, officials say

    By Walt Wiley and Peter Hecht -- Bee Staff Writers

    Published 2:15 a.m. PST Saturday, March 16, 2002

    A family of six that moved from Shingle Springs to McMinnville, Ore., in May was found dead in a murder-suicide, authorities in Oregon said Friday.

    Robert Bryant killed his wife and four children before turning the gun on himself, said Yamhill County District Attorney Bradley C. Berry.

    All apparently had been killed by shotgun blasts.

    "Mr. Robert Bryant killed his wife and children and then took his own life," Berry said. A motive is not yet known.

    The children last attended school Feb. 22. Based on a receipt with a time stamp found in the home, the shootings are believed to have occurred the night of Feb. 23, he said.

    The body of Bryant, 37, a landscaper who owned Bryant's Landscape Maintenance in El Dorado County from 1981 until the business failed 19 years later, was found in the living room with a shotgun still in his right hand.

    Also dead were his 37-year-old wife, Janet Ellen Bryant, and their children: Clayton, 15, Ethan, 12, Ashley, 10, and Alyssa, 8.

    Their bodies were discovered Thursday after several reports by neighbors that no one had been seen around the house for two weeks. Investigators believe they had been dead for three weeks.

    The Bryants left California after Robert Bryant's business failed and a bitter split with family members and the Jehovah's Witnesses Shingle Springs congregation.

    The Bryant family lived for four years in a well-kept, ranch-style home on an acre of manzanita and small oaks near Shingle Springs. They had purchased the home for $159,000 in 1997 and sold it for $245,000 in May.

    The family moved to Mc-Minnville, 40 miles southwest of Portland, and lived in a travel trailer from midsummer until Christmas at the Olde Stone Village trailer park.

    The Bryants finished paying in December for the 2.2 acres they bought for $96,000 from Dennis Goecks, a former Yamhill County commissioner and neighbor. They planned to build a permanent residence next to the double-wide modular home in which they'd most recently been living, Goecks said.

    "The family used to remind us of what we were like when we first got here," Goecks said. "They were excited to have found a beautiful place to live. They were excited about making it look really great."

    In Shingle Springs, Mark Messier Sr., an elder at the Shingle Springs Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses, said Bryant was expelled from the congregation about three years ago after he announced that he no longer accepted its religious teachings.

    Messier said Bryant also became estranged from several branches of his family, including his parents, three brothers and a sister in the Shingle Springs and Cameron Park area.

    He said other family members were Jehovah's Witnesses and the split appeared to involve differences over religious beliefs.

    "He had isolated his children from the rest of the family," Messier said. "They wanted access to visit with the children, like grandparents would and like uncles would. But he (Bryant) was refusing to allow them visitation."

    Messier said grieving members of Bryant's extended family were headed to Oregon on Friday.

    The bodies were discovered by Yamhill County Sheriff's Detective Jack Crabtree about 9 p.m. Thursday during an unrelated call in the rural neighborhood.

    Crabtree used a ladder to peer through a window after neighbors expressed concern for the family that had not been seen for weeks. He said that when he saw Robert Bryant's body on the floor, he knew he would find more bodies inside.

    Ashley and Alyssa were in one room, in twin beds formed like an L. Older brothers Ethan and Clayton were in bunk beds in another room. Their mother was on the floor nearby. There was a lone spent shell for each victim.

    At area schools Friday, teachers and students wept, hugged one another and talked about the kids they hadn't had time to get to know very well.

    Chris Webb, an 18-year-old senior at McMinnville High School, knew Clayton Bryant as a nice person who never gave anyone any problems.

    "He would always be telling me about how he had redone some guy's whole lawn that weekend and that he had been paid," Webb said.

    Michel Jo Scott owns a catboarding business in Newberg. She became worried about the family after Bryant failed to show up to complete irrigation work he had contracted to do.

    She, like many others Friday, was left searching for answers.

    "He just seemed to be such a nice fellow," Scott said. "He had the sweetest smile."

    "When they sold their house and were packing up to move, he said he was having a tough time with his business here and he had a better opportunity in Oregon," said Bob Riley, a neighbor who lived a few houses down the gravel Pleasant View Lane where the Bryants lived near Shingle Springs.

    Riley, whose family moved into the neighborhood in March 2000, said his family tried to befriend the Bryants because they had children of similar ages.

    He said the Bryant parents kept a close watch on their children and seemed reluctant to have them socialize with the neighbors.

    "We tried to create some opportunities for the kids to play together, and we invited them to our church," Riley said. "But (Robert Bryant) said they were Jehovah's Witnesses and they celebrated the Sabbath on Saturday instead of Sunday. We tried maybe a half-dozen times to get the kids together but came to the conclusion that they were a family that wanted to keep their kids close and they didn't want to expose them to outside influences of any kind."

    He said Bryant would take the children on fishing and camping trips.

    "The children were well-liked and respected by everybody who knew them," Messier said. "The children have always been very outgoing and energetic and sociable. But he limited their socialization. That was his choice."
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ThisIsNorthScotland.co.uk News - March 4th 2002:

    MISSING PAEDOPHILE IN PRISON FOR THREE YEARS

    http://www.thisisnorthscotland.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=62692&command=displayContent&sourceNode=62244&contentPK=1190243

    IAIN MACIVER

    09:00 - 04 March 2002



    THE mystery over why a convicted paedophile from Alloa suddenly vanished from a remote village where he had settled controversially has been solved.

    Jehovah's Witness Thomas Maxwell is in jail after being found guilty of a further string of sexual attacks and cruelty to girls - some as young as seven.

    Some of the latest offences he was jailed for date back more than 30 years.

    Maxwell, 61, moved to Leverburgh in the south of Harris just before his conviction in June, 2000, for sex offences against a 12-year-old girl.

    In June, 2000, Maxwell was living in Woodlea Park , Sauchie, near Alloa, when he was found guilty at Alloa Sheriff Court on two counts of behaving with shameless indecency.

    Islanders reacted angrily when he was sentenced to three years probation and 240 hours community service at Alloa Sheriff Court .

    Sheriff William Reid said his decision not to impose a prison sentence was influenced by Maxwell's voluntary exile "to a remote part of the Western Isles".

    In recent weeks, villagers in Leverburgh had been baffled over why Maxwell had not been seen since the end of January.

    One said: "It was obvious Maxwell was no longer around. He was always wandering about the village and the beaches although most people would generally steer clear of him.

    "But he had won over a few gullible people. Some would say they found him nice and pleasant and they kept saying that they could not fault his be haviour.

    "These few people said he should not be judged even although they knew full well he had been convicted of serious child sex offences. That attitude is very worrying. It may have made Maxwell seem welcome."

    Now papers released from Edinburgh Sheriff Court show that Maxwell, of 2 Burnside Cottages, Obbe Road , in Leverburgh, was put on trial on January 24 and was convicted on January 28.

    He is now serving a three-year jail sentence after being found guilty on a charge that at various times between August, 1970, and November, 1974, at an Edinburgh address he fondled a girl who was just eight when the abuse began.

    The lewd, indecent and libidinous conduct continued until she was 13, according to the charge.

    Maxwell was also found guilty of attempting sex with the same girl on an occasion between October, 1972, and June, 1975, at either the same address or an address in Linlithgow.

    Finally, Maxwell was found guilty of cruelty between March, 1971, and March, 1973, to another girl who was just seven or eight at the time.

    The court heard that she suffered injuries when Maxwell poured boiling water between her legs as she sat in a basin and when he also held a bottle of steam against her skin.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Garden City Telegram Online Edition - March 2nd 2002:

    Man acquitted of molestation charges

    BY JACLYN O'MALLEY

    Date Posted on Saturday, March 2, 2002 10:05:50 AM

    A 71-year-old Garden City man was acquitted Friday afternoon on charges he repeatedly sexually molested his young granddaughter and two great-granddaughters.

    Arthur Cruz exchanged hearty handshakes and bear hugs with numerous family members who have been supporting him in the courtroom throughout the trial. When the not-guilty verdict on five counts of aggravated indecent liberties with a child was read, his supporters gasped with delight and shed tears of joy.

    Meanwhile, Cruz's 15-year-old granddaughter sat with a relative and sobbed. The girl's companion cried and said she, too, had been victimized by Cruz and can't believe he was freed.

    Cruz's twin 9-year-old great-granddaughters also had testified he sexually assaulted them numerous times when they were younger. They were not present for the verdict. Their mother was, and she celebrated the acquittal in the hallway with Cruz and his clan.

    The 15-year-old came forward last summer. She said Cruz sexually molested her when she was a 10-year-old spending summer vacation at his home. The incidents surfaced when she reported another family member sexually abused her.

    Around the same time, the twins confided in a fireman that they were being abused by Cruz.

    Cruz's defense depended on the jurors finding the girls' testimony not credible enough to convict him. He countered their claims by saying the twins made it up because they were mad he took their pet dog, and saying that the 15-year-old wanted to use it to back up claims against another family member.

    All three girls testified to similar events. They said Cruz assaulted them when no one else was around - usually when a family member was caring for Cruz's sick wife in another room. He tried to kiss them, would shove his hands down their pants and fondle their genitals, they testified.

    They all claimed Cruz told them if they said anything about the fondling, no one would believe them.

    In an interview after his arrest, Cruz told a detective he didn't know any of his grandchildren and was stunned anyone would put a Jehovah's Witness in jail.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This was a Letter sent to the Editor of an Arizona Newspaper around February 25th 2002:

    To the Editor:

    Survivors of sexual abuse need support and validation to heal. The cover-up in the Catholic Church of abuse of children by priests has no doubt further scarred the innocent victims.
    Another religious group is soon to have their cover blown, the fallout from which will be the same as that experienced within the Catholic Churchshame, disbelief, denial, and disgust. The public has an absolute and undisputed right to know that a pedophile may be knocking at their door under the guise of religion.
    Jehovahs Witnesses long standing policy, implemented by the governing body of the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, of requiring two witnesses to a sin, combined with keeping essentially all problems within the congregation to protect their public image, has provided a haven for molesters of all types. Victims can even be disfellowshipped if they warn others in the congregation when the preposterous requirement of two witnesses has not been met.
    Dateline will be offering an expose` of this scandal, possibly in March. A civil sexual abuse lawsuit was filed in Washington against the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society by Erica Rodriguez, whose victimizer is now in prison. The suit cites official Watchtower policy as contributing to the harm Erica endured. Other suits are pending. The Rodriguez story will be the main focus of the Dateline probe.
    Public relations appointees of the Society continue to confound questioners of policy with double-talk while offering no apology or words of comfort to the victims.
    Just as those who have been molested in the Catholic Church have formed support groups among themselves, victims and supporters among Jehovahs Witnesses have formed a national alliance and can be reached at www.silentlambs.org.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Tribune-Courier Newspaper - February 13th 2002:

    Former Jehovah's elder starts abuse Web site

    By Bobbie Foust
    Tribune-Courier Editor

    William Bowen of Calvert City is continuing a campaign he started last year over policies within Congregation of the Jehovah's Witness church regarding alleged
    sexual abuse of children.

    Bowen, a former church elder, resigned last year. Now he has started a support group called silentlambs Inc., a network for abuse victims. Its Web site, www.silentlambs.org , allows victims to share their stories.

    James Bonnell, leader of the local Jehovah's Witness congregation in Draffenville, wouldn't comment on the issue. "This issue was brought up over a year ago, and Mr. Bowen has tried to keep it in the public eye," he said.

    Bowen also has traveled to Washington State to support a victim, who he says was harassed, during two criminal trials of her abuser.

    On Jan. 22, the woman, Erica Rodriguez, filed a federal lawsuit in the Eastern District of
    Washington, against Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Othello Spanish Congregation of Jehovahs Witnesses and Manuel Belizthe man convicted of abusing her as a child.

    Bowen calls the lawsuit just the tip of the iceberg. He claims the church discourages victims from reporting abuse to authorities telling them instead to report it to church leaders.

    Our denomination is now where the Catholic Church was 20 years agoright on the edge of a crisis," Bowen said.

    Bowen recommends three things to stop abuse:

    # Victims should go to the police first.

    # The church should not put a known molester in a position of responsibility.

    # Stop child molesters from going door to door.

    After resigning last year as presiding overseer of the local congregation, Bowen made accusations to "push the denomination's leaders to respond more sympathetically" to abuse victims, a release said. He claims that "on a shoestring budget" in only few months he has contacted more than 1,000 victims.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Chicago Sun-Times - February 11th 2002:

    Jehovah's Witness suit

    A woman who said her family was shunned after reporting sexual abuse by a Jehovah's Witness leader claimed in a federal lawsuit this week that the denomination protects pedophiles.

    The suit by Erica Rodriguez, 23, now of Sacramento, Calif., contends the religion's policy has given pedophiles ''sanctuary, protection, sympathy and support'' while blaming and shaming victims.

    Rodriguez seeks undisclosed damages from the international Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, based in Brooklyn, N.Y., and Manuel Beliz, a former Jehovah's Witnesses leader in Othello, Wash., who was sentenced to 11 years in prison last year for molesting Rodriguez.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Paducah Sun (Kentucky) Newspaper - February 8th 2002:

    No silence of the Lambs

    Web site for pedophile victims provides support, opportunity to share stories

    By C.D. Bradley [email protected].8650

    BENTON, Ky.--Bill Bowen, the former Jehovah's Witness elder who made news when he resigned last year and criticized the church for its position on pedophiles in the congregation, has started a support group for victims.

    "Our purpose is to give a voice to those who have been silenced by the organization," Bowen said of his group, Silent Lambs. "We want to let them know they do have a place they can go to. We don't perform any miracles. We just give them resources and information, sources of counseling and help."

    The nonprofit group's work centers around its Web site at www.silentlambs.org. The site, which Bowen said is visited by about 200 Internet surfers a day, provides a variety of information and resources.

    It includes a place for victims to share their stories, often told in brutal detail. Bowen said the site now has about 400 stories split between a victims page and guestbook.

    The page also keeps tabs on alleged Witness molesters in the news, provides tips on how to "pinpoint a pedophile," picks up church writings on the issue, and offers resources for victims who are looking for help.

    "Only one out of five post their stories," Bowen said of the site's visitors. "Four remain silent. I tell the ones who do that they're really the heroes of the Web site. They are the ones that show that I'm not just some crazy guy in Kentucky who's made up a story.

    "That's why I put up the elders' letters (outlining church policy). That way, they're not about taking my word for it. They can read it themselves."

    Bowen said the church requires members to report anything, including molestation, to the congregation's elders, who then advise them what action to take. Church doctrine requires two witnesses for any type of disciplinary action, and there are generally not two witnesses to pedophilia. Church representatives have said they always follow the law, but Bowen said that does not go far enough. Only 16 states, including Kentucky, require clergy to report accusations of sexual abuse to authorities, and Bowen said elders in the other states generally choose not to report it.

    Bowen has also posted audio from testimony by Erica Rodriguez, who said she was raped and molested by a church elder when she lived in Washington state from the age of four until her family moved when she was 11. Now 23 and living in Sacramento, Calif., she has sued the Brooklyn, N.Y.-based church headquarters the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society claiming church policy protects pedophiles.

    Bowen said when Manuel Beliz, the former elder convicted last year of raping Rodriguez was sentenced a second time, 29 members of the church sent letters supporting him. He said Rodriguez and her family were shunned after she took the matter to legal authorities.

    "Three simple things would make it a better organization," Bowen said. "One, if a child is molested, they should be required to go to the police first, not the elders. Two, if a child molester comes into the congregation, don't put him in a position of responsibility. Three, stop child molesters from going door to door."

    The denomination is known for proselytizing by knocking on doors.

    Bowen said he's not out to destroy the church, and is not making any profit from the support group, which he helps fund and run with the help of volunteers nationwide.

    "It's a meaningful effort, and I'm glad for what it has been able to accomplish," he said. "If anything has been accomplished, it's a growing awareness among people at the Watchtower that they'd better do this right. They've been made aware they need to be careful, and if they mess up, we're going to find out about it and let everybody know."

    The organization can also be reached at 1-877-WTABUSE.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    U.S. Newswire - January 28th 2002:

    More Sexual Abuse Suits Against Jehovah's Witnesses Will Follow, Predicts Ex-Church Elder & Legal Expert

    Story Filed: Monday, January 28, 2002 6:52 PM EST

    SPOKANE, Wash., Jan 28, 2002 (U.S. Newswire via COMTEX) -- A federal civil sexual abuse lawsuit filed last week in Spokane, Washington against the Brooklyn-based Jehovah's Witness organization is "just the tip of the iceberg," according to the leader of a new nationwide support group for church members who have been abused by Jehovah Witness members and leaders. A plaintiff's attorney who has represented more than 400 people who were molested by clergy agrees.

    Dozens more victims of other abusive church leaders may file similar suits, they predict.

    Last Tuesday, a 23-year-old Sacramento woman, Erica Rodriguez, sued the Jehovah's Witness minister who repeatedly abused her and the New York-based denomination which "routinely" gives pedophiles "sanctuary, protection, sympathy and support," the suit claims. Manuel Beliz of the Othello Washington Spanish Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses was convicted of raping and molesting Rodriguez during her childhood and sentenced to 11 years in prison.

    The case is significant because it is one of a relatively small number filed against the Jehovah's Witnesses' national headquarters.

    One of Rodriguez' attorney's in the case, Jeffrey Anderson of St. Paul Minnesota, has filed more sexual abuse suits against religious bodies than any other legal expert. "In my experience over the last 20 years, a handful of brave victims step forward in any denomination. Then, others who are hurting become inspired to seek healing too," he said.

    "Our denomination is now where the Catholic Church was 20 years ago -- right on the edge of a crisis," said William H. Bowen of Calvert City, Kentucky. A former church elder in his local congregation and a Jehovah's Witness for 43 years, Bowen now heads "silentlambs," a new national self-help group for men and women molested by Jehovah's Witness members. ( www.silentlambs.org, 1-877-WTABUSE) He resigned as Presiding Overseer last year to support victims and push the denomination's leaders to respond more sympathetically to abuse victims and turn over alleged molesters to the criminal justice system.

    "In just a few months, with a shoestring budget and a volunteer staff, our group has been contacted by nearly 1,000 Witnesses and former Witnesses who have been raped or molested by church members," Bowen claimed. The alleged victims range in age from 2 to 15 from Maine to California and several foreign countries.

    Repressive and insular church policies, a rigid hierarchy and a strong emphasis on obeying church authorities combine to "trap victims in a cult of silence," Bowen believes. Members of other faith groups who are abused are more apt to speak up and consult attorneys or turn to police, he feels.

    "Both formally and informally, Witnesses are taught to take all matters, especially controversial matters, to church leaders, and to avoid bringing shame on the church," said Barbara Anderson, another leader in "silentlambs." Anderson served for 10 years at "Bethel," the Brooklyn New York headquarters of the denomination. Like Bowen, she became disillusioned after being assigned as a researcher on how church leaders handled abuse accusations.

    But that "cult of silence" is slowly changing, she believes. "More and more Witnesses realize that exposing sexual crimes is God's will. They recognize that getting rid of molesters is healthy for the church." Witnesses are "encouraged, even inspired" by the example of victims in Catholic and Protestant denominations who have sued their perpetrators with increasing success in recent years, she said.

    "We find that the more conservative and controlling a church group is, the harder it is for someone who has been victimized to come forward," said attorney Timothy Kosnoff of Bellevue Washington. Kosnoff also represents Rodriguez and has handled sexual abuse claims against other religious organizations.

    "That's why having a support group is so helpful, and that's why getting the police or a therapist or any outside professional involved is critical," he said.

    While the Jehovah's Witnesses headquarters maintains extensive internal files on accused molesters within the church, they refuse to make public this information. In many cases, they do not report the crime to police, Bowen said. As a result, no solid figures exist on the number of Jehovah's Witnesses who have been accused of sexual molestation.

    "Whatever that number is, you can be sure it's going to start growing quickly and dramatically," said Bowen. "Victims are starting to discover that the church can no longer bully them into silence."

    The denomination has one million members in the United States and six million across the world.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Sacramento Bee (SacBee.com) News - January 26th 2002:

    Woman sues Jehovah's Witnesses in sex abuse

    By Jennifer Garza -- Bee Staff Writer - (Published January 26, 2002)

    Claiming church policy protects child molesters, a Sacramento woman is suing the national headquarters of Jehovah's Witnesses and a church elder convicted of raping her.

    Erica Rodriguez, 23, says in a civil lawsuit filed earlier this week that church elders threatened her with expulsion if she told police that as a child she had been molested by a longtime congregant while living in the state of Washington.

    Rodriguez and her mother were shunned by church members for reporting the abuse while the accused was given "sanctuary, protection, sympathy and support," according to the lawsuit.

    Rodriguez is seeking undisclosed damages from Manuel Beliz; the Othello Spanish Jehovah's Witnesses Congregation in Othello, Wash.; and Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, the church's national governing body. The suit was filed in U.S. District Court in Spokane, Wash.

    Church officials would not comment on Rodriguez's lawsuit, but did say they report crimes to the proper authorities.

    "We have no objection to a crime being handled," said J.R. Brown, director of the Office of Public Information for the national organization. "In no way do we conflict with how police or other authorities handle these cases."

    Beliz, 48, is a former church elder in Othello, about 100 miles southwest of Spokane. Last August, he was convicted of raping and molesting Rodriguez from the time she was 4 until she was 11, when her family moved from Washington to Sacramento, where Rodriguez still lives.

    Beliz is serving an 11-year sentence in Washington State Penitentiary in Walla Walla.

    Rodriguez said Friday that the molestation began when she visited the home of her best friend, Beliz's daughter. She said Beliz told her that if she reported the abuse he would make sure her family would face expulsion, or "disfellowship," from the Jehovah's Witnesses.

    After Rodriguez's family moved to Sacramento, Rodriguez said she told church elders here about Beliz. They told her to let the church handle it, she said.

    "We were loyal and devoted," Rodriguez said. "We trusted the church and thought they would do the right thing."

    Instead, she said, the church elders did nothing.

    Eventually, Rodriguez went to Sacramento police. They contacted police in Othello, and Beliz was later arrested.

    "Church policy requires that there be two witnesses, and as you know that doesn't happen in molestation cases," Rodriguez said.

    Her attorney, Jeff Anderson of St. Paul, Minn., said the church policy makes it easier for predators to escape detection.

    "Jehovah's Witnesses have been employing practices that don't protect children," said Anderson, who has filed more than 400 sexual-abuse cases against clergy across the country.

    "They aren't entitled to operate above or below the law when it comes to a child's safety," he said.

    But church officials strongly denied Anderson's allegation.

    "The two-witnesses requirement applies to how we handle transgressions or sins as a church," Brown said. "It has nothing to do with how we handle a crime.

    "We are a church made up of families ... We would not allow predators to get away with this," Brown said.

    Rodriguez said the church failed her. Although she was never stripped of her church membership, she no longer belongs to a congregation.

    "I don't believe in organized religion anymore," she said, "not after this."
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Guardian U.K. Newspaper - January 26th 2002:

    Witness on the watchtower

    Stephen Bates

    Saturday January 26, 2002

    The Guardian

    The letter from JR Brown, director of the office of public information for Jehovah's Witnesses in New York, spoke fondly of the Guardian, pointing out that "our journals, Awake! and the Watchtower quote from it extensively." Sadly, his opinion had changed as a result of a four-paragraph article I had written last November.

    The story was a particularly terrible one. Larry and Constance Slack, a devoutly religious couple from Chicago's south side, had been accused of beating their 12 year-old daughter Laree to death with a length of electric cable, 5ft long and almost an inch thick, after she could not find her mother's coat quickly enough for them go out on time one Saturday evening.

    They had beaten her in accordance with Deuteronomy 25, verses 1-3, prescribing 40 lashes' chastisement, minus one, as authorised by Jewish tradition, but then zealously reproducing St Paul's punishment (Corinthians 2:11) by multiplying it three times. The child, whose mother Constance administered some of the lashes, died after being beaten 160 times. Mrs Slack is a nurse.

    The couple's five other children - one of whom, an eight year-old boy, was also beaten for being unable to find the coat - were ordered to help hold Laree down. She was gagged with a towel to prevent her screams being heard.

    But what disturbed JR Brown about the Guardian's report was not the shocking story itself but the fact that the Slacks were described as Jehovah's Witnesses. He helpfully appended a statement from Leon, Larry Slack's brother, insisting that the couple were not devout witnesses. Although baptised as JWs, "for the last 10 years they have not shared in our worship services, although there were a few relatively short time periods that they would sporadically show up at meetings.

    "To physically harm, abuse or kill others is diametrically opposed to the Bible principles we believe in and strive to practice... among the qualities we study about in the Bible... are.... love, joy, peace, long suffering, kindness, goodness, faith, mildness and self-control."

    The Jehovah's Witnesses have reason to be nervous about this case. A series of court actions concerning child abuse are pending across the US, and the sect's guidelines are coming under scrutiny because they appear to hinder any investigation of allegations made by children. They recommend, for instance, that complaints be investigated only if abuse is observed by two independent witnesses, and that any documentation arising from an inquiry should be burned rather than shown to outsiders.

    The Watchtower does not prescribe 117 lashes for children, but it certainly endorses Proverbs 23:14: "Do not withold discipline from a child; if you punish him with the rod, he will not die." Line four of song 164 in the Witnesses' hymn book, Children: Precious Gifts From God", chirrups: "He says 'Use the rod, yet with tenderness and loving care'."

    The organisation has been in almost daily expectation of Armageddon since 1914, and keeps members in line by predicting a grim fate for non-believers - known privately as birdseed - since, in fulfilment of Ezekiel 39:18, their bones will be picked clean by crows. In particular, since September 11, they hope no one notices that their standard depiction of the onset of Armageddon is a jet plane crashing into a New York skyscraper.

    The Watchtower holds that "theocratic war strategy" can justly be used to deceive outsiders: "In times of spiritual warfare, it is proper to mis-direct the enemy by hiding the truth. It is done unselfishly; it does no harm."

    Presumably, this is JR Brown's precept in his letter. A trawl of Awake! and The Watchtower reveals few references to "the Manchester Guardian" in the last 20 years - certainly none current quoting from it extensively - and those there are appear to be distortions, or outright reversals, of what our articles said. As with the Bible, the interpretation is wrenched out of context.

    But there's a deeper, nagging, thought here. Why is the Watchtower so keen to abandon the Slacks to their fate? Surely a Christian religion should not deny its followers, however repugnantly they have behaved? Did not the example of St Peter on Good Friday lay down a few guidelines here? It can't be, can it, that JR Brown believes that ordinary folk - birdseed, Guardian readers - might think that JWs' reading of the Bible allows such a misunderstanding?

    We await his next response with interest.

    Stephen Bates is the Guardian's religious affairs correspondent
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Crosswalk.com News Channel - January 25th 2002:

    Jehovah's Witness Church Accused of Hiding Sexual Abusers

    By Matt Pyeatt
    CNS Staff Writer

    January 25, 2002

    www.CNSNews.com -

    The woman who was sexually abused by a leading elder in a Jehovah's Witness church in Washington State claims the church regularly hides illegal actions of its members and officials to protect its "image."

    The elder, Manuel Beliz, was convicted of raping and molesting 23-year-old Erica Rodriguez and sentenced last August to 11 years in prison. Beliz now awaits the result of a civil suit filed by Rodriguez against him, the Othello Washington Spanish Jehovah's Witness congregation and the church's official national governing body, the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York.

    Rodriguez said Beliz "abused her approximately once a week" from the time she was four until she was 11, when she and her family moved to California. "The criminal case was to protect other kids from a dangerous molester," Rodriguez said. "This case [civil suit] is to protect many more kids from a dangerous denomination."

    Rodriguez believes that "perhaps thousands" of youngsters are victims to the Jehovah's Witness denomination because of what she alleges is the church's policy to allow known molesters to avoid detection and criminal prosecution.

    Attorney Timothy Kosnoff stated that Rodriguez was pressured to remain silent about the issue and that church officials Carlos Chicas and Milton Malendez threatened her with "disfellowship" or ex-communication from the church if she spoke out.

    "This pattern of forbidding abuse victims to contact police or outsiders is standard operating procedure all Jehovah's Witnesses must follow, by direction of the national organization in New York," Kosnoff said. "By failing to contact civil authorities, the Jehovah's Witness elders violated Washington's mandatory child abuse law."

    Beliz is currently serving time in a Washington state prison in Walla Walla. Two separate juries found Beliz guilty of the crimes. The first conviction was overturned because the deputy prosecutor admitted to tampering with the jury by attempting to exclude younger women during jury selection. An appellate court ordered a mistrial and Beliz was convicted a second time.

    Jehovah's Witness church officials in New York deny that the church hides criminal activity. "We have no such policy. Our policy allows for anyone who wishes to report the matter to the authorities to do so," J.R. Brown, national spokesman for the Jehovah's Witness organization, said. "We strictly comply. We are not in any way resistive to the proper authorities being notified."

    Brown said that while he could not comment on the specifics of the case, the church typically follows general policy guidelines in such matters.

    "We follow a general policy that we do not support legally any Jehovah's Witness charged with a crime. We do not use our donated resources to defend any Jehovah's Witness accused of a crime," Brown said.

    Barrett said Rodriguez brought the civil suit to "bring attention to the fact that the Jehovah's Witness church has very regressive policies and she wants to see some changes."

    "The Jehovah Witness church and the Watchtower Society must protect kids and not molesters. A lot of pain and suffering could be prevented if they would forget about the church's image, take sexual abuse seriously and start reaching out to the victims," Rodriguez said.

    But Brown said the core issue is not the church's image.

    "If someone were to feel that our concern for our resources were greater than that for innocent victims, that simply is not true," Brown said. "We are concerned, just as any other organization, about our public image. We are concerned about our resources because we are recipients of donated funds for non-profit charitable work. But we are primarily ministers who are concerned to act as shepherds in a protective and spiritual sense over the members of the congregation," he said.

    "If anyone has been abused by anyone else in the congregation or whether that person is an appointed elder or not, we view this as a horrific crime to inflict on a child or anyone else," Brown said.
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Tri-City Herald (Washington) News - January 23rd 2002:

    Jehovah's Witnesses congregation in Othello sued in sex abuse case

    This story was published 1/23/2002

    By Shirley Wentworth
    Herald Basin bureau

    OTHELLO -- A lawsuit was filed Tuesday against the Othello Spanish Jehovah's Witnesses congregation and its New York governing body, alleging they covered up the sexual abuse of a child.

    The suit filed in U.S. District Court in Spokane by Erica Rodriguez, 23, now of Sacramento, Calif., also seeks unspecified damages from Manuel Beliz, the man who abused her, and the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society.

    Rodriguez, who testified in Adams County Superior Court that she was raped weekly between the ages of 4 and 11 by Beliz, won two criminal court trials. Beliz, 49, first was convicted in 1998, but that conviction was overturned. He was convicted a second time last year, and his 11-year sentence was reinstated.

    Although the Herald usually does not report the names of people who report sexual assaults, Rodriguez has gone public in her quest to save other children from pedophilia.

    Rodriguez said after she moved to California at age 12, an elder in the church she attended there also began abusing her, which went on for four years. She said when she reported the abuse to church elders, the man was removed as an elder but not disfellowshipped from the church.

    When she told the elder that she planned to go to the police, she was told she'd be disfellowshipped. She did contact Sacramento police, who contacted Othello police, who arrested Beliz. Rodriguez also has filed criminal charges against the Sacramento elder, but that case has not yet gone to court.

    Although Beliz was disfellowshipped from the church, he was reinstated as an elder shortly before the trial. Rodriguez said she called the Watchtower legal department to ask why. "This guy said, 'It's none of your business, don't call again,' " she said.

    Jeff Anderson of St. Paul, Minn., the lead attorney in Rodriguez's suit, said he has sued just about every church denomination for covering up child sex abuse over the last 20 years.

    This is the second such suit he has filed against the Jehovah's Witnesses, with the other in New Hampshire.

    "The vast majority have been Catholic; I stumbled over that phenomenon in the early 80s," Anderson said. He filed the first pedophile case against the Catholic Church in 1982.

    Anderson said pedophilia is most likely to occur in "hierarchical, insular, religious organizations that are paternalistic and sexist and repress healthy sexuality."

    "They are secret ... they are run by one male or a small group of men," he said.

    Under Jehovah's Witness church policy, congregation members report transgressions of other members to a judicial committee made up of three or more church elders -- none of whom are women.

    The committee decides what disciplinary action to mete out, often using disfellowshipping as punishment. Disfellowshipping means the congregation -- including family members and friends -- shuns the culprit, who becomes invisible to them.

    When allegations of misbehavior are taken before the elders, at least two witnesses are required if the accused denies the charge -- which is particularly difficult to provide in accusations of sexual abuse.

    Rodriguez's lawsuit alleges the elders tell the victim not to talk to other congregation members or to report the abuse to law enforcement authorities under pain of sanction or disfellowshipping.

    However, Watchtower spokesman J.R. Brown, who had not yet seen the lawsuit and couldn't comment specifically, said the church does not interfere with the reporting of a crime.

    He said church elders are supposed to contact headquarters if they have questions about a case.

    "When we are contacted, we tell elders if they are in a state where (reporting pedophilia) is required," he said. "We want to make sure we are legally compliant."

    Brown said he is aware that numerous cases have been posted on Internet sites such as www.silentlambs.org or www.freeminds.org detailing pedophilia within the Jehovah's Witnesses church.

    But he maintains most of the stories were posted by people who underwent abuse back in the 1980s, when all of society was grappling with the issue.

    "Regrettably, many children probably were molested," he said.

    He said the church has made strong policy changes since then, including taking suspected or convicted pedophiles out of any position in the church, not allowing them to be alone with children and various other restrictions.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Newsday.com - January 23rd 2002:

    Lawsuit claims Jehovah's Witness church protects pedophiles

    By JOHN K. WILEY
    Associated Press Writer

    January 23, 2002, 1:05 AM EST

    SPOKANE, Wash. -- A former Othello woman whose family was shunned after she reported sexual abuse by a Jehovah's Witness leader claims in a civil lawsuit that the denomination protects pedophiles.

    The negligence lawsuit, filed Tuesday in U.S. District Court here on behalf of Erica Rodriguez, 23, contends the Brooklyn, N.Y.-based denomination has a policy that gives pedophiles "sanctuary, protection, sympathy and support," while blaming and shaming the victims.

    She is seeking undisclosed damages from Manuel Beliz, the Othello Spanish Jehovah's Witness congregation and Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, the church's national governing body.

    Beliz, a former church elder in Othello, was convicted last August of raping and molesting Rodriguez from the time she was 4 until her family moved to California when she was 11. Beliz is serving an 11-year sentence at the Washington State Penitentiary.

    Rodriguez currently lives in Sacramento, Calif.

    Othello is located about 100 miles southwest of here.

    Rodriguez's lawsuit contends the church knew Beliz was a pedophile, yet made him a ministerial servant and elder, failing to prevent further abuse of children.

    Rodriguez contends her family was shunned and threatened with excommunication after her mother reported the abuse to church elders in Sacramento, Calif., and Othello. Rodriguez eventually contacted Sacramento police, who contacted Othello police, leading to Beliz's prosecution.

    "What's important to her is that they knew he was a pedophile and they didn't report him, as required under Washington's child abuse reporting statute," Timothy Kosnoff, a Bellevue lawyer representing Rodriguez, said in a telephone interview Tuesday.

    "What gives this case broader significance is the practice within the Jehovah Witness church that, unless there are two witnesses to misconduct, it didn't happen," he said. "That's absurd, particularly in the context of child abuse, which is committed in secrecy."

    Church spokesman J.R. Brown said he could not comment on Rodriguez's lawsuit because lawyers had not received paperwork.

    But he said there is no policy preventing notification of civil authorities of a crime.

    "What we handle is the transgression, or the sin, of child molestation. We distinguish that from the criminal aspect," Brown said. "Our view is, the church handles the sin, the secular authority * Caesar, if you will * handles the criminal activity."

    The church * which has about 6 million members worldwide, including 1 million in the United States * requires two witnesses because the Bible requires it for establishing a sin, he said.

    "Where the state requires that this be reported, we comply fully," he said. "We have designed a policy to protect the victim of child molestation; to protect innocent children and to not allow pedophiles to circulate among us."

    Beliz, 48, was first convicted of two counts of first-degree child rape and two counts of first-degree child molestation in 1998 in the case of Rodriguez.

    The Washington state Court of Appeals granted Beliz a new trial because a deputy prosecutor sought to exclude women from the jury panel.

    Beliz was convicted of the same counts by an Adams County jury last August.

    Rodriguez is also represented by Jeffrey Anderson of St. Paul, Minn., who has filed more than 400 sexual abuse lawsuits against clergy across the nation.

    Rodriguez is supported by William Bowen, who resigned as an elder of a Kentucky Jehovah's Witness church last year over the denomination's handling of child sex abuse claims.

    Copyright 2002, The Associated Press
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Morons.org - January 23rd 2002:

    Update on Jehovah's Witnesses Lawsuit

    Posted by samrolken on Jan. 23, 2002

    The Watchtower organization's authority structure is a safehaven for child molesters, and they need to be pressured to change their policies that harm children!

    This article is an update on a previous article found here.

    A civil suit was filed in Washington district courts this week aiming to change the policies of the Watchtower Society and Jehovah's Witnesses which protect child molesters. Erica Rodriguez was raped and abused on an almost weekly basis from age four to age eleven by an appointed congregation elder. She was threatened with disciplinary action from the congregation if she told anyone about the abuse.

    I spoke briefly with the plaintiff in the case, Erica Rodriguez on Wednesday evening. She said that she wasn't aware of how much of a persistant problem sexual molestation within the congregation was because Witnesses aren't allowed to take in information from sources like the Internet. Erica said that she felt shocked and betrayed because the Watchtower headquarters, congregation elders, and dozens of congregation members showed up to support the convicted rapist. Erica went on to say that the elders felt that the disciplinary system set up within the church was enough to deal with the problem, and that it wasn't even necessary for the proper authorities to know about it, and deal with it.

    Erica also spoke of the way the congregation authorities tried to protect Beliz, the rapist. They threatened not only her, but also her family, friends, and anyone who supported them with punishment if the police were informed. She was told to keep quiet, as was everyone who knew about it. Meanwhile, Manuel Beliz was allowed to continue in his role as a leader within the congregation.

    Erica was quite expressive of the emotional toll taken by all this. She said that she felt guilty and horrible, not only because of the abuse, but because of the betrayal of trust brought on with the way the congregation authorities protected Beliz and supressed the truth. She also lamented over the toll that it has taken on her family members, especially her mother. She felt that if she didn't tell others though, the would be partially at fault if Beliz were to molest other girls( Ezekiel 3:20). She was also shocked that dozens of Witnesses, instead of helping her, showed up at the trial in support of Beliz, and wrote letters claiming they trusted him enough that they would even let Beliz care for their kids.

    Beliz has already been convicted of his crimes, and is currently in prison. This lawsuit is directed not only at him, but also at the central authority of Jehovah's Witnesses. Erica said that the criminal trial was her way to try to stop Beilz from further harming children, and this civil suit is her way of trying to change the policies of the Watchtower organization. I am sure we all hope she succeeds.

    I was also able to speak to William Bowen, the founder of silentlambs.org, the first nonprofit organization founded to bring attention to the problem of child molestation within Jehovah's Witnesses, and to bring support to the victims of this problem. Bowen is in a position to know a great deal about this problem.

    I have lived as a Jehovah's Witness for over 43 years and served in an appointed capacity for over 20+ years. I pioneered [served full-time in the door-to-door service], served at bethel[the headquarters of the Watchtower Society], served as a ministerial servant, elder, taught elder schools, served on well over 100 judicial committees, worked in many administrative and managerial positions, given talks at circuit and district conventions.

    He gave a little more details on the problem as a whole, and Erica's case in particular. Something he said that struck me as disturbing and hypocritical. He said that before the criminal trial, Beliz stood on the steps of the courthouse and read from the Bible about the trials of Jesus. He must have imagined that he was going through these trials for similar reasons Jesus went through his supposed trials, and equated himself to Jesus, elevating himself to the status of a persecuted hero. About 60 of his fellow witnesses were there, smiling up at him and supporting him. He also said the same thing Erica did about the elders testifying that the disciplinary actions of the congregation were enough, and that punishment by the criminal system wasn't necessary.

    I hope that as more details come out about this, the Watchtower Society will change their rules regarding child molesters so that the system is no longer one that protects child molesters. Keep an eye out for the Dateline NBC airing about this situation, and if anyone would like to do anything, they can send letters to the Watchtower Society asking them to change their policy. I haven't detailed the specifics of this dangerous policy because Mr. Bowen has it outlined well on his site.

    Further information is available at silentlambs.org. There you can find all sorts of information from an authoritive source. They have court transcripts, audio segments, and many different features. Silentlambs.org, its founders, and its purpose have the full endorsement and support of morons.org.

    --Sam Kennedy
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    January 23rd 2002:

    Jehovah Witness Coddle Pedophiles

    OTHELLO -- A lawsuit was filed Tuesday against the Othello Spanish Jehovah's Witnesses congregation and its New York governing body, alleging they covered up the sexual abuse of a child.

    January 23, 2002 - Shirley Wentworth (Herald Basin bureau)

    The suit filed in U.S. District Court in Spokane by Erica Rodriguez, 23, now of Sacramento, Calif., also seeks unspecified damages from Manuel Beliz, the man who abused her, and the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society.

    Rodriguez, who testified in Adams County Superior Court that she was raped weekly between the ages of 4 and 11 by Beliz, won two criminal court trials. Beliz, 49, first was convicted in 1998, but that conviction was overturned. He was convicted a second time last year, and his 11-year sentence was reinstated.

    Although the Herald usually does not report the names of people who report sexual assaults, Rodriguez has gone public in her quest to save other children from pedophilia.

    Rodriguez said after she moved to California at age 12, an elder in the church she attended there also began abusing her, which went on for four years. She said when she reported the abuse to church elders, the man was removed as an elder but not disfellowshipped from the church.

    When she told the elder that she planned to go to the police, she was told she'd be disfellowshipped. She did contact Sacramento police, who contacted Othello police, who arrested Beliz. Rodriguez also has filed criminal charges against the Sacramento elder, but that case has not yet gone to court.

    Although Beliz was disfellowshipped from the church, he was reinstated as an elder shortly before the trial. Rodriguez said she called the Watchtower legal department to ask why. "This guy said, 'It's none of your business, don't call again,' " she said.

    Jeff Anderson of St. Paul, Minn., the lead attorney in Rodriguez's suit, said he has sued just about every church denomination for covering up child sex abuse over the last 20 years.

    This is the second such suit he has filed against the Jehovah's Witnesses, with the other in New Hampshire.

    "The vast majority have been Catholic; I stumbled over that phenomenon in the early 80s," Anderson said. He filed the first pedophile case against the Catholic Church in 1982.

    Anderson said pedophilia is most likely to occur in "hierarchical, insular, religious organizations that are paternalistic and sexist and repress healthy sexuality."

    "They are secret ... they are run by one male or a small group of men," he said.

    Under Jehovah's Witness church policy, congregation members report transgressions of other members to a judicial committee made up of three or more church elders -- none of whom are women.

    The committee decides what disciplinary action to mete out, often using disfellowshipping as punishment. Disfellowshipping means the congregation -- including family members and friends -- shuns the culprit, who becomes invisible to them.

    When allegations of misbehavior are taken before the elders, at least two witnesses are required if the accused denies the charge -- which is particularly difficult to provide in accusations of sexual abuse.

    Rodriguez's lawsuit alleges the elders tell the victim not to talk to other congregation members or to report the abuse to law enforcement authorities under pain of sanction or disfellowshipping.

    However, Watchtower spokesman J.R. Brown, who had not yet seen the lawsuit and couldn't comment specifically, said the church does not interfere with the reporting of a crime.

    He said church elders are supposed to contact headquarters if they have questions about a case.

    "When we are contacted, we tell elders if they are in a state where (reporting pedophilia) is required," he said. "We want to make sure we are legally compliant."

    Brown said he is aware that numerous cases have been posted on Internet sites such as www.silentlambs.org or www.freeminds.org detailing pedophilia within the Jehovah's Witnesses church.

    But he maintains most of the stories were posted by people who underwent abuse back in the 1980s, when all of society was grappling with the issue.

    "Regrettably, many children probably were molested," he said.

    He said the church has made strong policy changes since then, including taking suspected or convicted pedophiles out of any position in the church, not allowing them to be alone with children and various other restrictions.
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Morons.org - January 22nd 2002:

    Signs of Intelligence: Jehovah's Witnesses Sued For Harboring Sexual Abusers

    Posted by Pleased samrolken on Jan. 22, 2002

    Victim raped from age four to eleven on an almost weekly basis, and threatened by the congregation elders to ensure her silence...

    A while back on morons.org, I wrote a few rants about how Jehovah's Witnesses are dangerous, and one area in which this is true is in the case of sexual molestation. The way the organization is set up, child molesters are protected. This lawsuit is an attempt to bring attention to this problem in order to change the harmful nature of the organization of Jehovah's Witnesses.
    I contacted the lawyer handling the case, Timothy Kosnoff. He send me a copy of the lawsuit that was filed. The lawsuit charges that the offender in this case, the (now convicted in a criminal trial) rapist Manuel Beliz was protected as a sexual molester. Beliz was promoted to the position of ministerial servant, then elder, the highest level of authority within the congregation. When the victem, Erica Rodriguez complained about the problem she was threatened with the shunning punishment of Jehovah's Witnesses to ensure her silence. The lawsuit also charges that the congregation failed to inform the proper authorities, such as law enforcement and child protection agencies.

    I also was able to speak to Laura Barrett, of the Southern Midwest SNAP Regional Office (Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests), who is also involved with the case. She said that this sort of problem is quite common within the Jehovah's Witnesses organization. Erica Rodriguez and her mother were shunned for reporting the abuse, says Barrett. Barret went on to explain how the Jehovah's Witnesses organization is closed and tightly controlled, which is no good for victims of sexual abuse.

    This is a situation that is recieving national attention. It's estimated that thousands of children are put at risk because of this situation, and it's time that this problem gains wide-spread attention. Soon a segment about this problem with Jehovah's Witnesses will air on Dateline NBC. There is more information at Silent Lambs.

    I am optimistic to be able to speak to the victim herself, Erica Rodriguez. If anyone has any questions they would like her to be asked when (and if) I am able to speak to her, post them below as comments, and I will report her answers in a follow-up story. I was told by her lawyers that she is available for interviews, but I have had some trouble getting ahold of her.

    As expected, the Jehovah's Witnesses office of public information had nothing to say when I contacted them.

    --Sam Kennedy
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    U.S. Newswire - January 22nd 2002:

    Sexual Abuse Suit Filed Against Jehovah's Witness Leaders; Denomination's NY Headquarters Called 'Negligent'

    Tue Jan 22,12:48 PM ET

    To: National and State desk

    Contact: Laura Barrett, 314-645-5915 or 314-443-5915 (cell) Jeff Anderson (attorney), 651-227-9990 or 612-817-8665 Timothy Kosnoff (attorney), 425-637-3070, or David Clohessy, 314-869-7436, ext. 2426, 314-903-3498 pager

    RITZVILLE, Wash. Jan. 22 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Child molesters in the Brooklyn-based Jehovah's Witness church are "routinely given sanctuary, protection, sympathy and support" from church officials according to a new civil sexual abuse lawsuit filed today in Washington state. The leadership of the 1 million member denomination was charged with negligence in the suit.

    A Sacramento woman is seeking damages from a Jehovah's Witness leader who repeatedly raped her during childhood and from the New York-based denomination.

    Erica Rodriguez, 23 years old, is suing Manuel Beliz, the Othello Washington Spanish Jehovah's Witness congregation, and the church's official national governing body. Last August, Beliz was convicted of raping and molesting Rodriguez and was sentenced to 11 years in prison. Rodriguez says that Beliz abused her approximately once a week from the time she was four until she was 11, when her family moved to California.

    The case is significant because it is one of a relatively small number filed against the Jehovah's Witnesses' national headquarters.

    "The criminal case was to protect other kids from a dangerous molester," said Rodriguez. "This case is to protect many more kids from a dangerous denomination." She contends that "perhaps thousands" of youngsters are victimized because official Jehovah Witness policies enable known molesters to avoid detection and criminal prosecution.

    During the three-day criminal trial last year, Rodriguez testified that she reported the abuse to two Jehovah's Witness elders in Sacramento, Carlos Chicas and Milton Malendez. The men pressured Rodriguez to keep quiet, threatened to "disfellowship" or excommunicate her, and promised "we will take care of it," the lawsuit indicates. Chicas contacted Othello elder John White but no action was taken.

    After hearing Rodriguez' allegations, the Othello congregation protected Beliz as an elder within the church and shunned her family, Rodriguez said.

    Eventually, Rodriguez contacted the Sacramento police and Beliz was questioned and later prosecuted.

    "This pattern of forbidding abuse victims to contact police or 'outsiders' is standard operating procedure all Jehovah's Witnesses must follow, by direction of the national organization in New York," said Rodriguez' attorney, Timothy Kosnoff of Bellevue, Washington.

    By failing to contact civil authorities, the Jehovah's Witness elders violated Washington's mandatory child abuse reporting law, Kosnoff said.

    Rodriguez is also represented by Jeffrey Anderson of St. Paul, Minnesota, who has filed more than 400 cases of sexual abuse cases against clergy across the nation. Last summer, Anderson filed a civil suit against Jehovah's Witness leaders in New Hampshire for failing to report two women's abuse allegations to civil authorities.

    "The Jehovah Witness church and the Watchtower Society must protect kids and not molesters," said Rodriguez. "A lot of pain and suffering could be prevented if they would forget about the church's image, take sexual abuse seriously and start reaching out to the victims."

    Rodriguez believes Beliz molested other girls too and hopes her suit "will encourage them to seek justice and begin healing as I have."

    Two juries found Beliz guilty of victimizing Rodriguez. His first conviction was overturned when the deputy prosecutor admitted trying to exclude younger women during jury selection. An appellate court then ordered a re-trial.

    At both trials, dozens of Othello Jehovah's Witnesses and Beliz' family members spoke or wrote to the judge urging a lenient sentence. At the second trial, fifteen current and former Jehovah's Witnesses from across the country came to support Rodriguez and express their disapproval of the church's hierarchy.

    Rodriguez' backers were led by church elder William Bowen of Calvert City, Kentucky, who quit his job last year to lobby for improvements in Witness policies towards abuse victims. Bowen heads "Silent Lambs," the only national support group for men and women abused by Jehovah's Witness officials ( http://www.silentlambs.org, 1-800-WTABUSE).

    "It took a lot of courage for Erica to overcome her trauma and speak out," said Bowen. "She should be praised for helping to save other children. Instead, her church has vilified her. Witnesses have treated other victims in the same way, and this 'shooting the messenger' has to stop."

    Today's civil suit, filed in federal court in Washington's Eastern District, seeks unspecified monetary damages.

    Beliz is now incarcerated at the Washington penal institution in Walla Walla.

    There are approximately one million Jehovah's Witnesses in the United States and six million across the world.

    http://www.usnewswire.com/

    -0-

    /© 2002 U.S. Newswire 202-347-2770/
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Daily Record (U.K.) News - January 15th 2002:

    DAD'S JEHOVAH WITNESSES DID NOTHING TO STOP MY SEX ABUSE NIGHTMARE

    Victim's agony claims

    A TEENAGE GIRL has told how Jehovah's Witness elders failed to help her nail her pervert father.

    Tuesday, January 15, 2002 - Daily Record

    Alison Cousins turned to the elders of her family's church after devout dad Ian abused her for three years.

    The elders knew Cousins had preyed on another girl. He confessed to them two years earlier but police were not informed.

    Alison said she was given no help or encouragement to get justice.

    She recalled yesterday: "I was scared and confused. I needed courage to go to the police and I spoke to the elders hoping they would back me up.

    "Instead, they brushed it under the carpet.

    "I got no encouragement to go to the police, even though my dad had already told them what he did to the first girl.

    "I will never have any faith at all in Jehovah's Witnesses."

    Alison's abuse began when she was only 13 and continued until she was 16.

    She went to the elders of the Kingdom Hall in Stevenston, Ayrshire, in November 1999.

    Alison, now 18, later found her own strength to report her father. And Cousins, 43, was jailed for five years on Friday for indecent acts involving Alison and two other girls.

    One elder admitted yesterday that Cousins told them about his perversion in 1997.

    Colin McCreadie said: "We were informed by Ian Cousins what he had done with the first one. But he assured me that he did not do anything after that.

    "We did discuss Alison's claims. But we decided we would stand back, we were not sure.

    "You don't know a person's heart, you don't know what's in there. What is the truth?

    "I believe Alison was informed by the elders that she should go to the police. I can't recollect who it was."

    One former member of the congregation, Paul Wynn, said elders had tried to "whitewash" the issue.

    And he told how he quit in disgust at being asked to forgive Ian Cousins.

    Mr Wynn, 38, said: "Ian Cousins told elders in 1997 that he had abused the first girl. But no one did anything about it, and because of this the abuse of Alison continued.

    "I was told that I was not welcome at the Kingdom Hall unless I could embrace Ian Cousins as my brother.

    "I could not even look at him, never mind embrace him, after the disgusting things he did.

    "Elders Alex Stewart and Colin McCreadie were told of the two eldest victims but did nothing.

    "All that happened was that Cousins was demoted from his rank as a Ministerial Servant, which is in effect a trainee elder."

    Alison has waived her legal right to anonymity in the hope of saving other girls from abuse.

    Asked about her case, elder Alex Stewart said: "I do not know the outcome of the court case so I cannot comment."

    Since the police were told about Ian Cousins in February 2000, a senior Jehovah's Witness has arrived in Stevenston as Presiding Minister.

    It's claimed Jonathan Briggs is a "troubleshooter"sent to bring stability back to the congregation.

    Mr Briggs told the Record: "It is unfair to ask questions of the individual elders. This is something which needs a response from the church as a whole."

    At the Jehovah's Witness Watchtower UK headquarters, spokesman Paul Gillies said: "We have strict procedures and guidelines that matters like this should go straight to the secular authorities.

    "It is the role of the police to investigate. Our policies put the needs of victims first.

    "There is already a new Presiding Minister at Stevenston. And if, as a result of this case, it becomes apparent that elders are in need of further direction, that will happen.

    "The victims are in need of love and understanding and that is what we want to offer them."

    Police said the Kingdom Hall in Stevenston is not the subject of any investigation.
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  • UnDisfellowshipped
    UnDisfellowshipped
    Christianity Today - December 3, 2001, Vol. 45, No. 15, Page 23:

    Witnesses Accused of Failing to Report Abuse

    Two sisters are suing Watchtower Bible and Tract Society over policy to keep suspicions of sexual crime within the church.

    By Corrie Cutrer | posted 11/20/01

    Two sisters are suing the national organization of the Jehovah's Witnesses over a policy they claim shields child molesters. The suit, filed in New Hampshire, also sparks concerns that other religious groups might face similar legal action.

    The women have charged three entitiestheir stepfather, their former Jehovah's Witness congregation in Wilton, New Hampshire, and the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society (wbts), the group's international headquarters in Brooklyn, New Yorkwith failing to report sexual-abuse incidents to proper authorities. New Hampshire requires that all cases of suspected child abuse be reported to law enforcement.

    In a settled criminal case, Heather Berry, now 19, and her stepsister Holly Berry, now 22, accused their father, Paul Berry, of continual sexual and physical abuse during their childhood. The suit says that when the girls' mother, Sarah Poisson, reported the situation to three elders, they told her to "pray more about the situation" and "be a better wife."

    Paul Berry was convicted last year of 17 counts of aggravated sexual assault against Holly, between the years she was 4 and 10. Berry received a sentence of 56 to 112 years in prison. Charges related to any abuse against Heather from age 3 to age 6 were dropped.

    In the pending civil suit, filed in August, the Berry sisters now seek unspecified financial compensation and changes in wbts operating procedures. The suit, says Poisson, concerns a Jehovah's Witness policy that instructs members to keep suspicions of abuse within the church. In recent years, several former Witnesses have brought criminal suits against elders or members for failing to act on abuse charges.

    "This case is about the shared responsibility of the Watchtower organization," says Jeff Anderson, the attorney representing the Berry sisters. "They gave refuge to [Berry] and molesters like him. They are not free to disregard the law."

    Anderson has served as legal counsel in 500 suits against religious organizations or clergy in cases of child molestation. In September, he was part of a four-person team of attorneys who won a $3 million out-of-court settlement from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in a similar case in Oregon.

    Some observers, though lauding the intent to catch child molesters, believe that success for the Berry sisters could bring trouble to other religious congregations. "There will be copycat cases all over the country," says Richard Hammer, editor of Church Law and Tax Report. Hammer also says a favorable ruling would impair the confidential nature of pastoral counseling sessions. Although nearly 40 states require clergy and other professionals to report suspicions of physical or sexual abuse to local authorities, 33 states excuse church leaders from reporting abuse when they receive information in privileged conversations.

    "It sets up a classic conflict," says Colorado Springs attorney Martin Nussbaum. "These laws create a crisis of conscience where the pastor has to decide, 'Who am I going to obey, Caesar or God?'

    "The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment says there are some things a government can't touch inside a churchlike the church-minister relationship," says Nussbaum. "We can't have our courts telling us how to counsel other individuals. The majority rule in these cases is that church autonomy is respected."

    Plaintiff Heather Berry of Charlestown, New Hampshire, says she hopes the silence will end.

    Copyright 2001 Christianity Today.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The St. Thomas Times-Eric Bunnell's People - November 23rd 2001:

    Updated: Friday, November 23, 2001

    People appears Monday and Friday in this space. The Peopleline is 631-2790.

    Surviving The Game with courage

    We never talked about sex. We never could swear. It was a totally moral, Christian home. Except, Donald DHaene adds. Except for one thing. It was called The Game. While most childhood pastimes are fun, frequently rambunctious, and
    often just plain out of control, this game was different. It was horrific. It was hidden. It was the quiet, continuing childhood sexual abuse of four Elgin children for many years by their father.

    It was our little secret. The Game ended when Donald, 15, and his brother, 18, took their mother, their sister and younger brother, and some belongings packed
    in green garbage bags, and fled their house. And Donald, who grew up in Elgin a victim but who now lives in London as a survivor, has written a book. It is Father's Touch: A Survivor's Memoir of Sexual Abuse and Faith, and it is to be published next winter by a division of American Book Publishing.

    It is, Donald hopes, a cautionary tale. Chapter One has been posted to a Web site. Just as all journeys begin with a first step, Chapter One of Father's Touch is a trip back by Donald to East Elgin, his first since his escape.

    It is not a trip back home, he is quick to point out. Because none of the houses in which he lived until age 16, none of the 14 houses' was a home. And the trip is not an easy experience, even in the car in the company of his partner, Maurice.

    As they leave one of the houses, Donald remembers his pets. And his father asking if he wants a new rabbit. And a young boy wondering if another is worth the price he has to pay. As we travel down the country road, the house on the hill recedes in my memory and with it, I pray, any trace of my father, he
    writes.

    I glance in the sideview mirror. Reading the small print leaves me cold: "Objects are closer than they appear."

    Unsettling. And cinematic. Indeed, Donald is working with a screenwriter on a treatment. Objects are closer . . . in fact, the past is as close to Donald
    today as it ever has been, 20 years after his father was charged, entered a plea bargain and received a provincial jail term. He got caught. Donald and his siblings got therapy. Their abuse came to official attention when Donald was interviewed by OPP as a potential witness in a long-ago East Elgin murder; his
    family being Jehovah's Witness, then, as was the victim. (Donald is a non-believer today.)

    The detective, Donald recalls, was not surprised when the young man before him revealed The Game. In fact, the officer said the abuse had become known in the community.

    That's a big part of the story. Probably by the time I had the conversation with the detective, 30 or 40 people knew. But who would have suspected that, in those days, of the DHaenes?

    Look at their pictures on the Web site. Such a normal family, even if they don't smile . . . even if father has young Donald firmly in his grasp. That's just the point. Counseling has enabled Donald to reassemble the two Donalds of his life into one person; the boy who was abused but who lived only in a forgotten darkness, and the man who survived.

    And he says, I'm not bitter. I think people need to know that if you're looking for justice, that isn't necessarily going to happen. It certainly didn't happen
    in our case. But if not justice, what then? Take control of your destiny. Today, Donald DHaene is 40, a writer, a columnist with Scene, London's alternative biweekly, and happy with his Maurice, who is executive director of a social service agency which operates group homes for disabled residents.

    Unlike some of his contemporaries, Donald can say, I'm having the best time of my life at 40. And he does. "I love how my life is. I'm happy with my friends, and my family, and my career." Indeed, he is more than a survivor. He is a man in control of his destiny.

    The Web site for Father's Touch is (www.fatherstouch.com). People appears Monday and Friday in this space. The Peopleline is 631-2790.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Guardian U.K. Newspaper - October 26th 2001:

    Archbishop pays for Catholic church's complacency

    The removal of Archbishop Ward following a string of paedophilia scandals is just a small part of the church's efforts to improve its unsavoury reputation, writes Stephen Bates

    Stephen Bates, religious affairs correspondent

    Friday October 26, 2001

    When the Vatican acts it can do so quite ruthlessly. Today, John Aloysius Ward, the recalcitrant Roman Catholic archbishop of Cardiff, was summarily removed from his post by the Pope himself in the wake of a series of scandals in his diocese involving paedophile priests.
    Archbishop Ward, who is 72 and so theoretically had nearly another three years to go before reaching retirement age, did not want to go and had incautiously given interviews to local newspapers and the more reactionary Catholic press stating his intention to stay.

    He went to Rome last week for a half-hour long one-to-one with the Pope to press his case. His answer has come swiftly and humiliatingly in the citing of Canon Law 401.2, which gives the pontiff power to remove a diocesan bishop who, "because of illness or some other grave reason has become unsuited for the fulfilment of his office". Only the Pope could order him to retire.

    Since Archbishop Ward claimed in his ill-fated interviews to be in the peak of health some other reason for his departure must be deduced. In truth he had to go and perhaps only an aged and long-serving bishop would ever have thought he could have stayed. For Archbishop Ward had harboured not one but two paedophile priests, both of whom are now serving jail sentences for offences against children.

    The first, Father John Lloyd, was the archbishop's press officer, the second, Father Joe Jordan, was ordained by the archbishop in 1998 in the teeth of warnings from a fellow bishop that he was unsuitable. Jordan, who had earlier been banned from teaching even stayed for a while at the archbishop's house but Ward earlier this month was still claiming that he had no idea of his proclivities.

    Jordan, who coached football as a pretext to meet young boys, was jailed for assaulting two nine-year-old boys. In the current climate of the church there was no excuse for Ward's behaviour. He acted in defiance - or ignorance - of guidelines adopted in 1994 intended to prevent such disasters occurring.

    Archbishop Ward has not been helped by his arrogant and obstinate manner that has turned many priests and congregations in his diocese against him - including all the canons he himself appointed to assist at his cathedral - and which led him wilfully to refuse to see the writing on the wall when the Papal Nuncio to Britain - the Pope's ambassador - wrote to him earlier this year suggesting he might retire quietly.

    Since 1994 and continuing problems, of which the Jordan case was one, the church has brought Lord Nolan and an independent committee in to recommend even tougher rules for clergy and church workers in an effort to reduce the risk still further

    The Catholic church has been saddled with the public humiliation of a series of high-profile cases of sex abuse by priests and is desperately trying to overcome the scandal. In fact, Catholic priests - and other clergy - are statistically much less likely to be sex offenders than other groups but every case produces shame and damaging headlines.

    About 28 priests have been convicted since 1995 and new cases crop up every few months - only this week a priest in Reading was arrested for possession of pornographic images on his computer.

    Other churches have their problems too and have been much more hesitant in dealing with them. The Jehovah's Witnesses, who face a string of court cases in the US, decline to investigate allegations unless there are two independent witnesses and advise parish elders to burn any complaints set down in writing.

    But, in a climate where the church knows it has to be seen to be above suspicion some of Lord Nolan's remedies are drastic, including police checks on every candidate for the priesthood, child protection officials in every parish, annual diocesan reports and even glass-fronted confessionals so that a priest hearing confession from a child is in view at all times.

    Some in the church think this is going too far but Archbishop Ward has paid the penalty for the decades of complacency that preceded such moves. Whether the new guidelines will remove the church's unsavoury reputation however only time will tell.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Kristeligt Dagblad (Danish) Newspaper - October 18th 2001:

    Accusations about sexual molestation in Jehovah's Witness family

    Accusations about sexual molestation can lead to disfellowshipping

    A tragic family conflict is at the moment being carefully observed by Jehovah's Witnesses and former members of the sect. It revolves around a fathers alleged sexual molesting his daughters and murder. The former Witnesses are wondering if the Watchtower Society will take the accusations serious. According to former Witnesses and other critics Jehovah's Witnesses routinely covers up crimes of this nature.

    By Anne Korsholm

    Something indicates that the local Elders will be forced to do something this time, says Ppol Dal, which himself has been an Elder in Jehovah's Witnesses but has now left the sect.

    Head of Information from Jehovah's Witnesses in Denmark, Erik Joergensen do not understand the criticism. According to him the Witnesses has always taken accusations of child molestation very serious.

    The alleged perpetrator is a 78-year-old man from Vesterhimmerland, which has been accused of sexually molesting his daughters. One of the daughters claims that she gave birth to a child as a result of the abuse, and that the 78-year-old man killed the baby.

    Both the father and the daughters are Jehovah's Witnesses.

    Loekstoer Police has dismissed the case because of lack of evidence. Among other things it has been impossible to ascertain if there has been born a baby, which was allegedly killed. According to the support group for ex-Witnesses, Christian Freedom, also a grandchild of the 78 year old man has reported him to the police for molesting her. The Police will neither to confirm nor deny this.

    Convicted for silence

    Jehovah's Witnesses in both USA and Europe have been criticized in later years in connection with sexual abuse, because the Witnesses apparently has held such accusations within the closed doors of the Kingdom Hall and not reported them to the police and worldly authorities.

    In 1998, 3 Elders (Jehovah's Witnesses priests) in France convicted to imprisonment because they did not report a Witness, which had molested his daughter to the Police. The Witness had showed repentance and gotten Jehovahs and the Elders forgiveness. He did not receive forgiveness from the French authorities but 12 years in prison.

    In the USA there has been a number of reports about pedophile Jehovah's Witnesses, which has been protected by their leadership, apparently so that the cases of sexual abuse wouldnt hurt the sects reputation. According to Christian Freedoms latest periodical there is now so many victims that a former Elder in Jehovah's Witnesses in the USA has founded an organization for their benefit, Silent Lambs.

    Witnesses are taught to go to the Elders in the congregation with their problems and not to worldly authorities. It is therefore very important that the local Elders take such accusations serious. Often an internal investigation about child molestation have ended because there was no eyewitnesses, and Jehovah's Witnesses demands 2 or 3 witnesses, for a person to be convicted.

    Internal punishment

    Erik Joergensen says that eyewitnesses isnt the only criteria fro Jehovah's Witnesses to take a case serious.

    We will normally hear both parties in a case, we will talk to people who are close to those involved when the alleged abuse happened. If the circumstances strongly indicate that there has been abuse or the accused confess to it, it will be counted as a fact. He says.

    Apparently Jehovah's Witnesses internal investigation has been set in motion in this case. According to B.T. an internal court consisting of local Elders, which is to decide if the 78 year old man is going to be disfellowshipped.

    Erik Joergensen havent heard about this, but he can confirm that if the 78 year old is found guilty by the Police, he will most likely be disfellowhipped possibly together with his wife, if she knew about the abuse.

    Jehovah's Witnesses is first and foremost a religious society not a court of law. We look at it as our first priority to help this family, so it can live together, he emphasizes.

    In the last row

    Disfellowshipping doesnt mean that the Witness have to leave the sect and about half of all disfellowhipped remains Jehovah's Witnesses, says Erik Joergensen.

    A disfellowhipped lose all positions and the congregation as a social network. The Disfellowhipped can attend the meetings in the Kingdom Hall without the right to comment and without socializing.

    After some time the disfellowhipped can apply for becoming a part of the congregation again, and the elders are sovereign in their decision if and when he is to be allowed into the warmth again.

    Poul Dal, was himself an Elder and participated in disfellowshipping Witnesses which had violated the rules. He can remember that he was participating in disfellowshipping a man, which had divorced and then remarried.

    This cost him 3 years on the last row in the Kingdom Hall. But you can also be disfellowhipped for buying a flagpole and hoist the flag or if you receive a blood transfusion. I was disfellowhipped in 1995, because I didnt believe that Jehovah's Witnesses was the only channel used by God, says Poul Dal.

    The Witnesses can often avoid being disfellowhipped if they quickly show repentance, but according to Erik Joergensen this will not be the case if they have committed sexual abuse and murder.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Transcript of the Radio Interview with Bill Bowen on Meria Hellar's Radio Show - September 30th 2001:

    Meria: "Youll Be Blessed"; Elton John.

    Well we all have children, and certainly what we want for them is the best; we want them to be blessed and have a wonderful happy little life. Sometimes ugly things happen to children and thats something that were going to be discussing today. I have with me today on the show William H. Bowen, who is still an elder in good standing with the Jehovahs Witnesses. He also is the host of Silentlambs.org which is a website for victims of pedophilia especially those that have experienced that within the religion or cult of the Jehovahs Witnesses.

    Before I go any further I would like to say good morning to Bill. "Good Morning, Bill"

    Bill: Good Morning.

    Meria: How are you this morning?

    Bill: Doing fine.

    Meria: Good. Bill would you like to tell my audience a little bit about yourself?

    Bill: Yes. Im a second-generation Jehovahs Witness. My father served as presiding Overseer since I can basically remember. He was used where the need was great as I was growing up; thats the terminology used among Jehovahs Witnesses to help congregations that were troubled or had various needs.

    Meria: And Silentlambs; do you want to tell me a little bit about: What are Silent Lambs?

    Bill: I coined the statement Silent Lambs December of last year when I began deal with a problem of child molestation in my congregation and I began to think of a picture in my mind of a flock of little lambs that were too afraid to speak because of what the shepherds would do to them

    Meria: Right

    Bill: and thus came the statement "Silent Lambs" because I feel that in the organization of Jehovahs Witnesses there will be thousands of lambs, people who have been victimized by child molestation, too afraid to speak because of what the organization will do to them if they try to speak out about their abuse.

    Meria: Well hopefully today well provide a space for you to be the voice for all those people who cant speak for themselves. Bill, Im just going to need to ask you to speak a little louder, Im just watching my monitor and I want to make sure that youre coming through a little louder than you are if you dont mind.

    Bill: Okay, is that a little better?

    Meria: Yes, that is. Okay, so tell me; youve been a Witness obviously most of your life and an elder in the congregation. What does that mean?

    Bill: An elder is a position in the congregation the person that takes the leadership and the teaching and as well as the example as far as how a person should be as a Jehovahs Witness. You also administrate and manage the church records as well as the congregation. You help people when theyre in need, you visit the sick, you do the funerals; its just much like a pastor in a typical church; all those roles and functions.

    Meria: I see. And youre still currently an elder with the religion?

    Bill: Its kind of a technicality. In December of last year, I resigned in protest because of the policies of the Watchtower organization and how they cover up pedophilia. The organization has a protocol though, that states that you cannot stop serving as an elder until the announcement is made in the congregation. Today as we sit here and talk nine months after the fact the organization has refused to make that announcement, to acknowledge my resignation and if they refuse to acknowledge it then technically Im still an elder.

    Meria: I suppose so. So when did the fact of the pedophilia going on around you come to be known to you Bill?

    Bill: The best way I could describe it; I was as nave as any one else perhaps that is a Jehovahs Witness, with regard to there even being a problem in the organization. But it was not until I faced a pedophile in my own congregation that I feel has molested multiple children based on the evidence that Ive come to discover. When I discovered that and began to investigate then I discovered that theres an inherent problem in the organization, that the Jehovahs Witnesses has six internal letters to address child molestation in the last ten years. And I laid those six letters out on a desk and began to review what they said. And when I began to study them I began to understand a dire consequence of what they did not saywhich was basically do not go to the police. They said you have to have two eyewitnesses before an act of pedophilia can be established.

    Meria: Well, youre never going to have eyewitnesses to pedophilia. Thats not exactly something that could happen.

    Bill: Thats about a one in a million chance. Child molesters generally do not do this in public where people can watch. What I began to discover, and became clear to me; it would be nearly impossible to convict these people or even prosecute them --unless theyve admitted to it --by the church judicial system. And thats what I should point out, that Jehovahs Witnesses believe that if your child is molested that you should go to your elders first and ask them what to do. Now typical mainstream Christianity says if your child is molested you go to the police. So among Jehovahs Witnesses, theyre required to go to their elders and then the elders have a tribunal a judicial court or an investigation that they conduct and they use the litmus test of two witnesses to establish if this matter is based or not. And according to the November 1995 Watchtower which clearly states if therere not two witnesses to the fact then the person, the pedophile will be considered an innocent man. So they turn to the child and they say, "Do you have two witnesses? " The child says "No". They then turn to the child molester and say "Did you do it?" and of course 99% of the time the child molester will say "No." Right? Then they turn back to the child and they say "Well you dont have two witnesses; hes an innocent man". So you have to go to church with him, if hes an elder, he remains an elder, he stays up upon the stage, he has all his privileges and you have to be quiet because if you say anything against him you are guilty of slander which could be a disfellowshipping offense which means you could be shunned from the congregation."

    Meria: Kicked out, in other words youd get kicked out. So these children meanwhile end up becoming a double victim.

    Bill: Thats right. You become a Silent Lamb. You become someone no one in the church will acknowledge or even speak to, not even your own parents and if you try to go to the police you get zero cooperation from anyone in the church to help you.

    Meria: Now certainly if the child goes to their parents I should think that the parent would know enough to go to the police.

    Bill: Not if youre a Jehovahs Witness, sad to say.

    Meria: Well why not; are they that indoctrinated that they would just go by what their church tells them to do?

    Bill: If youd attended the District Convention of Jehovahs Witnesses this year they had their special meeting, they presented a drama and the drama was the story of Korah. Korah was a person in the time of Moses who rebelled against what Moses said. And this drama what it presented was, that anyone who speaks against the elders, which was presented as being like Moses, becomes like Korah. If you have a problem, you go to the elders; whatever they tell you to do you must obey because they are considered gifts in men from God. You disobey the elders then you speak against God and in the drama they very graphically showed how Korah was swallowed up by the earth and struck dead by God for not obeying Moses Aka the elders in the congregation. As a Christian Jehovahs Witness, if you are having a problem, the publications are copious with directions; you always go to the elders anytime you have a problem; if you have a family problem you go to the elders; a moral problem you go to the elders; any kind of problem, any infraction against any rule of the Bible you go to the elders for help.

    Meria: Yeah but the bottom line is help and theyre not giving anybody any help. At least not to the victims.

    Bill: The bottom lineI keep saying the bottom linethe point is the elders are not trained in matters of child molestation. Ive attended the elders schools since the mid-eighties and I remember very clearly in the early nineties in the elders school they said basically you read them a scripture and you say a prayer and that should be sufficient. The Scriptures have a great weight in helping people to recover from emotional and mental disorders. So you read them scriptures and that helps them recover from whatever their problem is. If that doesnt solve it, then they should "wait upon Jehovah"; which is a terminology that basically says that you wait on God to solve the problem until he brings about a better time for mankind.

    Meria: Right, and in the meantime whats supposed to happen to these children; they continue to get molested?

    Bill: In many cases, have continued to be molested, as I can prove from my website. They many times become suicidal, they become extremely self destructive, and of course Jehovahs Witnesses have a way to deal with self-destructive suicidal peoplethey disfellowship them.

    Meria: They just kick them out.

    Bill: They commit a moral infraction, as happens with molestation victims, they often become promiscuous or they get involved in drugs. Well Jehovahs Witnesses tribunals or judicial committees take quick action to disfellowship them and then they do not have to deal with the problem.

    Meria: Wow, theyre kind of like the Taliban. Well really, lets think about it; you know women have very little rights in that religion; and Ive had some people on who are gay people that were kicked out of the religion for being gay; now you have child molesters who are getting away with whatever; so children have no rights in that religion. I mean, theyre as oppressive as any third world countrys twisted government could be.

    Bill: Well Ive heard the statement coined. I was in a court case last Monday and their individuals stood up and said they were much like the terrorists against children.

    Meria: Well yeah; to me theres no crime greater than what I call soul robbing of a child, and thats what pedophilias do to children, they actually go in and steal their souls, thats the way it feels to me.

    Bill: Ive come to the conclusion based on the hundreds of victims that Ive talked to that when a child is molested it destroys their life. Their lives are forever changed and they will never have the innocence that they have lost.

    I want to share with youand we havent discussed this I put up on my website a victims page. And the reason I did that is because when I resigned and went public with this material the Watchtower organization assassinated my reputation and character from every way they could. They went and had a special local talk given in my local congregation; where they assigned a substitute circuit overseer to get up, and he started his talk off with these words, paraphrased you might say: "The person who went to the media has spoken against God." And from that point he went on to call me every Christian curse word in the dictionary in my opinion about it. He said, "lying apostates would not succeed", they forbid anyone in the church to speak to me about it. They later went on to tape a four-hour video, with my parents, the Watchtower organization. And they distributed this video to all news and television media in my local area. And the only part of that video that they used in the interview with my parents is where my father said, "My son is just not telling the truth." Thus implying that I was a liar. They werent calling me a liar; they were calling the Silent Lambs liars, the victims, saying they did not exist. They even went on the newspapers, publicly, the officials Mario Moreno and J R Brown basically said "there was no problem, their policy addresses child molestation" and one comment Mario Moreno said "We will never change our policy". He said that in the Louisville Courier.

    I created Silentlambs website in March of this year to give the victims a voice, to let them speak out. If theyre going to call the Society, the Watchtower Society is going to call these victims liars and say they do not exist. Let them tell their stories. Now the Victims page has close to two hundred stories of victims who have posted what happened to them. This really happened. And yes, I cant say every story is exactly factual and truthful. I encourage them to post anonymously because many of them are so afraid. A good many of these people are Jehovahs Witnesses who are afraid of the sanctions the church will place against them if they find out that they have spoken up about this. Anyone who can read this website and look at the victims page and not leave that page without knowing that these victims---something is terribly wrong here.

    Meria: Look, any therapist worth their salt knows that children generally are not lying when they talk about being molested. And its a sad thing that these children have to be abused twice and then ignored for just speaking out and protecting themselves.

    Now wasnt there two things; I know that Dateline is interested in doing a story on this. Is that still going ahead?

    Bill: The Dateline story is going forward and I have two other major media resources that are willing to take the ball if they drop it. It will be told. Theyre going to know what Jehovahs Witnesses do to children, what Jehovahs Witnesses organization -- Jehovahs Witnesses are not bad people, and I hope you dont take this away from this interview. Many good people in the organization; they are just not aware of what is going on. I was not aware. I would have fought tooth and toenail to say this is a fabrication and how could anyone make these claims against this organization. But I know now, I told the truth.

    Meria: And if you were an elder and you were not aware of it, Im sure the regular people that just attend the meetings etc are totally in the dark about it.

    Bill: I refer to the victims page and if you dont mind I would like to share with you a brief excerpt, to give you one story.

    Meria: No, go right ahead.

    Bill: This is a female individual. She says, "I am now 36 years old. I type that in caps because I feel one hundred. My body and mind have been broken over the years by the brothers. My story starts at a very young age when my father, an elder in the congregation, raped me. Did I state I was four at the time? Did I also say that my grandmother and aunt were both pioneers, knew of the sexual abuse. Perhaps I should say I know, for sure, my grandmother knew; I know my aunt suspected or just ignored IT. IT was a very strong word in my home. IT referred to my mothers suicide. IT referred to my grandfather getting caught touching my friend in an inappropriate manner. IT referred to my grandmothers alcoholism, also my father and grandfathers. Am I now left to sift through the Whys? WHY did my elder father rape me and beat my brother and sister? WHY didnt the elders do anything about it? WHY did my father stop at the age of thirteen? Wait; I know; I started my period! WHY did another elder join my father in sexually tormenting me? WHY did this same elder beat his dog to death in a fit of rage for barking and was not disfellowshipped? WHY, when I went to the elders, was I told I needed two witnesses? Do you think my dad and his friend would testify to the wrongdoing against me? WHY do I still suffer and wonder if I did the right thing by leaving the organization? WHY did my mother kill herself? WHY was my father not disfellowshipped when twelve years later he went to jail for sexually abusing my half-sister and some of her Witness friends? WHY? WHY? WHY? Because they do and continue to ignore sexual deviants."

    That person is lying? You think they just made that story up? To make the Witnesses look bad?

    Meria: Of course not! Generally children and young people are not going to make up stories of being molested. Thats just the way it is. And you know, a lot of times when I talk to people and counsel people who have been victims of abuse, I tell them "You know what the profile of a pedophile is?" And most people dont know. And they say, "No, I dont" And I say there really isnt one. Thats why you dont. It could be anybody."

    Bill: Thats right. And I did research on this too in the course of dealing with this local problem I looked up a tremendous amount of information concerning child molestation. And they say a child molester is never who you would suspect. Hes the upstanding man of the community; hes the coach, the scout leader, and the man of the town. He has a wonderful family life; he often has his own children. But he has this defect in his brain; that when he is given the opportunity he will molest children. And what stunned me the worst was; I took the most conservative figure I could find and they said that the most conservative figure that the average child molester would molest at least seventy children in their lifetime. The high side was up to four hundred, but the conservative figure is seventy. These people never stop. They will take every opportunity and advantage of every time that they can touch children. They cant just stop it one day and they wake up and they dont do it any more. They have either medication or they have to be monitored and if theyre not medicated or monitored they will continue to molest children.

    Meria: Right, and youre saying that even when they get brought before the committee of the Jehovahs Witnesses, theyre still allowed to go door to door and proselytize to other people?

    Bill: The 1997 Watchtower January the 1st, was an article written about child molestation issues. In that article they said they implied basically, I should temper that they implied that child molesters would not be given positions of responsibility in the congregation. At the end of that article, they made the statement: "A newly released child molester, to show that he has repentance, would go in the door to door field ministry." This is a man thats newly released from prison for child molestation. That is what it says in that 97 January 1st Watchtower. You cant get any clearer than that.

    Meria: Wow, I should think that would open them up to quite a few lawsuits if the unsuspecting public knew they had child molesters knocking on their door.

    Bill: The essence of that is, that "Well try them out on the other people, and if he doesnt molest their children, then well know hes repentant." Any Jehovahs Witness knows that youre required to go in the preaching work. The preaching work is the door-to-door activity. If you do not do that, then God is going to kill you at the end of time. So if youve molested children, if youre a murderer or whatever; if you become a Jehovahs Witness or you do this while youre a Jehovahs Witness, even if youre in prison, youre required to preach. When you get out of prison, youre required to preach. And there is no, absolutely not one sanction in the church to prevent child molesters from going in the door-to-door activity.

    Meria: Well I would think thats something everybody needs to know before they crack open their door to any Jehovahs Witness; they dont really know whats going to be on the other side of that.

    Bill: And the most insidious part of this: members of the congregation are not allowed to be informed who the child molesters are in their congregation. I was charged by Home Office to not tell anyone-- not even this mans wifethat he was a child molester. They told me not to tell her. When he goes out in my local area, door-to-door, the Jehovahs Witness he works with does not even know that hes a child molester.

    Meria: Wow, how messed up is that. When somebody moves into your neighborhood now thats served time for child molesting, you have the right to know.

    Bill: Thats exactly right. He was a fellow elder in the congregation. When he was removed for being a child molester in concordance with the 97 Watchtower, he told the congregation that he was tired and he wanted to take a rest, he had people hugging him and saying "oh were so sorry that youre so stressed out from being an elder. Well, that implication burns my soul.

    Meria: Well, what happens to the old Ten Commandments of thou shalt not lie? Dont they see that as lying and not being truthful?

    Bill: They dont see that though, Meria, who can see that? Im the only one that can see it and I have to keep my mouth shut, because the organization will move against me if I say anything.

    Meria: Well obviously you decided not to keep your mouth shut.

    Bill: Thats why I resigned in protest and thats why Im talking to you right now and Ill talk to anyone on the face of the earth about this---this has to be known. And because I speak out, yesI have suffered terribly from the organization and what theyve done to my family and me. But thats irrelevant.

    Meria: No, its relevant as you are really doing Gods work by protecting the children

    Bill: What is relevant is, what they have done to the victims. Can you picture if I was the molested child, and I was treated this way? It is devastating, the mental and emotional impact; shunned and treated like the bad one when you were the victim! Youre re-victimized over and over and over again within the organization. Ive heard stories of the child going to the elders and the next meeting, sometimes the next night, having to go and the child molester is sitting close to them and giving them smirks, like "You cant touch me."

    So, no more. These parents were Jehovahs Witnesses and their children need to be empowered to know -- they dont stop at the elders house. They dont stop at the Kingdom Hall. If your child is molested, you go straight to the police. If a church elder wants to read you a scripture, thats good; we should all listen to the Bible. But it should be in such a way that its offered as comfort, not as a measure of judiciating child molestation. Elders have not one right to judiciate crime. If they want to deal with a child molester in a church tribunal, that should be after the fact.

    Meria: Well, Im sure that a lot of my listeners are saying "Well Im sure child abuse doesnt only limit itself to the Jehovahs Witnesses; so why are they being singled out? And I think the point is, other religions instruct their parents to take legal action if anything like that happens. So I think the big difference in why were having this discussion is all is that, with Jehovahs Witnesses, their private religious judicious committees seem to overrule the law of the land.

    Bill: Thats very clearly stated; I believe that. I believe that. You will obey an elder. Theres a terminology in the organization that we use; we obey God first. And in some kind of twisted way, if an elder tells you to do something, then that comes direct from God. If you go beyond what he says, then you in effect are disobeying God. An elder gives bad advice, or he gives wrong direction then youre not allowed to question that. If you question that, then you might find yourself disfellowshippedand that has happened.

    Ill give you one example; I talked to an attorney, who was an elder, when a young girl was molested the elders tried to conduct the tribunal process. He fought them on that; he said that its wrong; she should go to the police first. They ignored him and put her through two investigative committees in front of the child molester who happened to be her father. And they made her tell every detail in front of him about what he did to her; while he sat there and berated her and said to her that "youre lying" and laughing at what she said acting like she was crazy. You can guess where this is going. In the end, they said, "Well, do you have two witnesses?" Do you know what happened to the man who fought them on this, who was an elder? He was disfellowshipped. He was disfellowshipped! For trying to get her to go to the police. This is how they deal with people that stand up on it. His only mistake was, he didnt go public like I did. If I had remained quiet, and spoken to members of the church about this, I would be disfellowshipped right now as Im speaking to you. Because they would have taken care of me in short order. But because I am becoming a public figure, then they dont know what to do with me. You know, from the start of this, this is just about telling the truth. You dont have to expand this. You dont have to add to this story. This is the truth!

    Meria: Well, arent they the ones that say, "The truth shall set you free?"

    Bill: These people, I have to tell you this; when victims call me, 90% of the time the first comment that comes out of their mouth was "I thought that I was the only one. I thought I was the only one!" It breaks my heart to know that these people have sat in silence, sitting alone, thinking that they were just an unusual case that happened to happen. They number thousands and thousands in this organization and they dont know the extent of how bad this problem is.

    Meria: Now didnt we in an earlier conversation, Bill; didnt you tell me that it seems to be more pedophilia goes on within the Watchtower organization than other religions?

    Bill: Well, now here we go were talking about opinions here; but if you just think about our conversation up to this point lets get this straight. If I were a child molester I would become a Jehovahs Witness as quickly as possible because I would have an entire organization to shield me from the authorities and from any justice being done. No why do I make that horribly gross statement? Well, all Id have to do is lie. And all child molesters lie. And if I lie, then I can get the elders to back me up, I can get the congregation to back me up. Now am I just making this as an idle statement?

    Ill give you an example. In a recent civil suit a sentencing hearing was held over a man that was convicted and sentenced to prison for 56 years for molesting his two daughters. At his sentencing hearing 29 Jehovahs Witnesses showed up and said "We think not only is he innocent," but a good portion said, "We would love for him to baby-sit our children." Now, you want to read that? Look at the front page of my website. I put it up; the Paul Berry sentencing hearing. And you can read what these 29 Jehovahs Witnesses had to say. Paul Berry went to prison as a Jehovahs Witness in good standing. Why? Because you know what; his two daughters were not there at the same time when he was molesting them. There were two witnesses, but they werent both there at the same time so thus a judicial committee would not be convened. So what Im telling you is, what would motivate 29 people to stand up at a sentencing hearing and declare a child molester innocent?

    Meria: Well its that whole cult-like mesmerism that those people fall into from even Jim Moon that I had on the show that leads that gay ex-Jehovahs Witness group. He had said it best, he said the Jehovahs Witnesses become your whole social outlet, your political outlet, your spiritual outlet and you dont want to be kicked out because you have no one else in your life because its so clannish.

    Bill: Im just here to say; in this case I read the transcripts of the trial. Not only was he convicted based on what the victims said, but also they went to the barn where he molested her; where they found the nail that he hung her from and evidence to show that hed molested her with animals. Thats what convicted him. And Jehovahs Witnesses went to this trial and then turned around and said that they thought he was innocent. He went out in field service the week before he went in.

    Meria: Oh my God; and he got 59 years in prison and these people were still backing him up.

    Bill: 56 years according to the records.

    Meria: Dont you see? A lot of times people ask me "Meria whats your idea or opinion on religion" and I have to say and Im going to stick with it that religion gives God a bad name. We got a world war going on right now over religion, and another crazy cult, the Taliban that treats women and children like dirt. And people forget that thats happening right here in America too, and this is a classic example of that; that parents can be so blind. Really their first job is to protect their child. And what youre telling me is that they can actually say to a child molester "Oh, Id have him baby-sit my child." Thats crazy.

    Bill: well, when this first happened, four elders in the church met me with when I first went on television with this. And they were so upset and the primary thing they were so upset about was that I had challenged the bible principle they called it of two witnesses to establish a matter. Once of those elders told me, if his own daughter was molested, and the man said it didnt happen, that he would have to not do anything. And Looked at him in the eye and I said "Are you crazy? You would believe a child molester over your daughter?" And he looked me right back in the eye and said "Bible principles would have to apply." So at that point I though "I cant reason on this matter, with Jehovahs Witnesses, with elders on this. They just dont see it."

    Meria: No, if theyre that fixed in their doctrine, which looks like an excuse to do whatever they want to do, theres nothing else you can do except what you did do, Bill and you really came out on the side of God, and thank God that you did what you did because all these people have someplace safe to go.

    Bill: Well, other churches I know have problems with molestation. We read articles in the newspaper about the Catholic Church and there have been settlements recently with the Mormon Church. My purpose is not to try to pound on religion and make them all appear to be bad; even as I said, there are many good Jehovahs Witnesses that arent even aware of this, this interview is to try and make them aware of that. What Im trying to say is, there has to be a line drawn about how much absolute control that a persons willing to pay for.

    Meria: Exactly, and someone also has to protect the children. Bill, I need to go to break, stay with me, well be right back, and I want to talk about that latest lawsuit that just happened, that you wrote to me. So Im going to ask my audience to stay with me; well be right back, and if you have any questions youre welcome to instant message me with them.

    Meria: Well, welcome back. Were here in the studio and I can see that some of my listeners are stunned; actually telling me theyre mouths are hanging open over what theyre hearing here. And thats a good thing, and I dont mean to shock you but its something that you need to know. Bill Bowen, a brave man, a guy whos really doing Gods work as far as Im concerned. Whos exposed all of this on his website which I want to give out; Ill have a live link to it on the show today; its Silentlambs.organd I just got a message board that Ill share with you, from another listener besides the one thats in shock.

    This one says "Im one of the people thats posted my story on the Silentlambs website. I just want you to know how much I appreciate you creating a forum for this message. I was an abused Silentlamb. The really sad thing is that because of the Jehovahs Witness organization so was one of my children. This victimization of children has to stop." And I of course have to agree with that and I thank that person for sending me that message.

    So Bill, obviously your work is catching on and this listener definitely wanted to thank you for that.

    Bill: Well I appreciate that. I receive numerous thank-you cards. But I tell people that the heroes are those that tell their stories. No one wants to tell their story of when they were molested. Thats a very private matter, a very private thing that people do not want to talk about.

    Meria: No. Of course not, everyone thinks thats something to be ashamed of and somehow or other they contributed to it. Almost the same as a victim of rape or any other kind of abuse.

    Bill: For every story posted on my site, theres five more people Ive talked to that are just too intimidated --or whatever word that youd like to usethat they feel they cant.

    Meria: Right!

    Bill: I feel that them telling their story is a part of their healing; its learning to speak out. And I have a part of my website called "Pinpoint a Pedophile". But of course if they want to post the story anonymously they can do that. But then I find that many of these folks will fill out the survey "pinpoint a pedophile," tells every detail about the person, who he was, what his name was, and we keep a file on these people.

    Meria: Oh Great! Thats available publicly, if someone wanted to go there and check, is Brother So-and-So and Sister So-and-So a pedophile? Because I do want to make a point; that its not just men that do this.

    Bill: Thats right.

    Meria: Thats its also women who abuse children as well. I dont want anybody saying that this is a man-hating show in any way of course. But you actually have a listing there where people can go in and check the names?

    Bill: For legal reasons I dont have the listing on the website; I keep that in private. But I use it for survey purposes; to show how many states pedophiles are from, what positions, how many elders were turned in as being child molesters, how many actually were turned into police and went to prison.

    Meria: Now let me ask you this; if somebody suspects someone say in some congregation say in Brooklyn, if they called you and said "I think Brother or Sister So-and-So is a child molester, can you check your list, is that something you can do?

    Bill: Sure.

    Meria: Okay well world you need to know that. And I know you have a phone number on your website. Is that the one youd want people to call you on?

    Bill: Yes. 877-WTABUSE. Watchtower Abuse.

    Meria: Watchtower Abuse. 1-877-WTAbuse. And I will post that on my site also so itll be here linked to your page so people can get through.

    Bill: I appreciate that.

    Meria: Well, you know what; Im a parent and Im a grandparent and I think the worst thing that anybody could ever do is hurt a child. And I dont think anything hurts a child more than stealing their soul, which is what pedophilia is all about. I mean its a violent vicious act and it breaks a childs spirit. And I should think that anybody that wants to claim any kind of religious affiliation to the Bible or God would know just how wrong that is. And protecting those kind of people is an incredible thing. I never really understood what the Watchtower Societys position was on child abuseand this is terrible.

    Bill: These men who molest children invariably move from child to child. I have cases that have been reported to me, as many as 60 Jehovahs Witness children have been molested by men who have yet to be disfellowshipped. Current cases, like one that just happened last year. Man molested 17 children went from congregation to congregation, and each time he only had one witness. So he continues to move freely, and to get away with this.

    Meria: Let me ask you this; where are the parents on this? Once they know that

    Somebodys done this, dont they react? Dont they get smart enough to go to the police?

    Bill: They go to their elders; the elders say, "You do not have two witnesses; you must follow theocratic direction which states that you have to treat this man as an innocent man. And until you can produce two witnesses theres nothing we can do.

    Meria: And they still wont consider changing their rule, to have these people go to the police, which is what they should do in the first place.

    Bill: I was contacted toward the end of last year by a person that worked in the Home Office of the Watchtower Society in the Writing Department. This individual said in 1992 they wrote an article regarding child molestation, and they were inundated with mail, and people from all across the country Witnesseswho wrote in and said it happened to me, it happened to me." They instigated an investigation, the Watchtower Society did, and they called therapists and Witnesses, and people that are learned about this subject; and they made a report to Brother Barry, the head of the Writing Department, a member of the Governing Body; to submit to the Governing Body; there were three recommendations made on this report in 1992. It said (1) when your child is molested we should tell our brothers and sisters to go to the police first. (2) A child molester should never have a position of authority or privilege in the congregation (3) a child molester should never be allowed to go in the door-to-door work.

    The Governing Body threw this in the trash. And it wasnt until 1997-- five years laterhow many children were molested in the meantime? 1997 they wrote an article that said you cant have privileges in the congregation; and they ignored the other two things. And then they turned around and wrote a letter to us elders personally in March of that same year and they said, "Wellsome guys can stay elders who were child molesters. We forgot to mention that to all the rest of the Jehovahs Witnesses. But us elders know, and I didnt even recognize it until I went back and reviewed the letter. But if its been a long time ago, and nobody remembers it, or knows about it, or youve lived it down, youll be an elder, and be a former child molester, and thats clearly stated in internal elder documents. You can see that on my website; look under Body of Elders letters. These people, they tell the brothers and sisters within the organizationthey all believe, I believed them, when I studied the articles, and you would never have a child molester be an elder or even carry a microphone. And then they turn around and tell them, "Oh well, yeah, you can use them." Even the guy that I dealt with here locally, they said, "in about five or ten years, you can put him back in again."

    Meria: Wow, what are they that desperate for elders, I should think theyd have to be to use somebody like that.

    Bill: Theres an appearance of something. Theres something, to me extremely insidious here. I do not understand on what basis that anyone, anyone in authority could say, "if its been ten, fifteen years ago the guy molested children, were going to make him an elder again.

    Meria: What do they think, he got over it?

    Bill: I guess they think hes repentant, hes reformed, but if you knew anyones does a study on pedophiliaNever reformed. Maybe thats my opinion about it, but from what I have seen, from the evidence thats been laid at my feet so to speak, I feel that people that molest children will always have to be watched.

    Meria: Well and people have to watch their children too, I mean surely there are signs and symptoms of a child thats being molested; that the parents need to be aware of. Can you name a few of those, Bill?

    Bill: Children that have been molested invariably have anger problems. Theyre often rebellious, thats the terminology that we use in the organization, "that that child is very rebellious." Well, they have anger problems, they react against authority. They oftentimes have self-destructive behaviors, like they cut themselves. Or as they grow older they become prone to things like tattoos and piercing, things of that nature. They have behavioral disorders such as eating disorders, sometimes even wetting the bed, things of that nature. Its a host of different symptoms they collectively say, you know you look at a child and you say, "Somethings not right here." Oftentimes their introverted, or extremely quiet, or they act out things in a sexual manner. Or they talk about things little children shouldnt normally talk about their private areas or things of that nature. Its a host of different things that collectively come together.

    Meria: Well, like that letter that you read from that woman that was molested and whose mother committed suicide, who obviously other family members knew this was going on; what is it that would make people protect a pedophile in their midst. Is it fear?

    Bill: I think that theres two dynamics at work here. One thing is, by and large, most of the brothers and sisters in the organization do not even know if a pedophile is in their congregation. Thats the first prime reason. Theyre not going to be informed by the elders, thats for sure. More than likely theyre not going to be reported.

    Secondly, is, when a pedophile has been accused and he denies it, then the organization has very strong things about gossip and speaking negatively about friends within the organization. If someone says something about someone else, and they deny it, then were clearly instructed: do not continue to speak it. And if you continue to talk about it, then youre the bad person because youre not following theocratic direction, the direction of the organization. So what happens is, if a child was molested and the family talks about it, the elders will go to them and says you need to not talk about this; its a confidential matter. The mans denied it, and hes an innocent man. And then theyve become the bad ones in the congregation, the ones with a bad attitude because theyre not following the elders direction. So the end result is, this child molester, hey whats he got to lose? He pretends to be innocent, he acts like hes being very seriously hurt by whats being said about him, how could they say this and the end result is he garners the love and adoration of the whole congregation in support of him; and heres the victim whos looked at as the bad person for talking about things hes not supposed to be talking about.

    Meria: And then of course, if nobody believes the child, the child is like wide open for more attack by anybody.

    Bill: Thats exactly right. Just to give you an example; I was in Washington state this last Monday where a young lady named Erica was molested from age 4 to age 12, by a man who toward the last was an elder of the congregation according to my understanding of the matter. He was a close friend of the family and it wasnt until she was 16 that she went and told her parents about what happened. She went to the elders in her congregation and they told her if she reported the matter to the police, she would be disfellowshipped. So, it wasnt until 19 that she said, "I dont care if I am disfellowshipped, Im going to turn him in." And she reported the matter; the matter went to trial in 1998.

    She went to the court; she had moved out of Washington State, she lived in California to get away from the situation. She came back to testify, it was her cousin and one other person came back with her. When she arrived at the courtroom, there was close to a hundred Jehovahs Witnesses there in support of the pedophile. Why? Because basically he was an elder in the congregation and they wanted to support him. No I take that back, he was not an elder at that time. But anyway, when she got to the court, she had dirty looks, dirty stares. He sat on the top steps of the courthouse and read scriptures about the trials of Jesus Christ, while about 40 or 50 Witness sat on the steps smiling up at adoration to him so to speak. He was convicted and sentenced. A pioneer sister yelled whore and slut at her across the room. She was completely victimized.

    And then later on in March of this year his appeal finally came forth and he was released from prison. He served two years in prison. The basis of his appeal was just on a technicality, it wasnt on his guilt or innocence, it was based on a technicality with the jury selection. So he went back to trial of August of this year and this time through Silentlambs we put the word out on the Internet and other places and we had probably close to 25 people there, in support of Erica this time. And it was completely different situation. Jehovahs Witnesses didnt show up this time. But last Monday at his sentencing hearing, we had this group come back, and did you know what happened? The judge was given a notebook before the sentencing hearing. And in this notebook were 29 pages of letters from Jehovahs Witnesses in support of the pedophile. Again they did it again. And we have access to these letters, and if any of those supporters think that thats in private, I just want them to know were going to put it up on the website so everyone can know what they said about how they loved this pedophile.

    Meria: Well yeah, theyre just as guilty and they should be exposed; I mean, what is wrong with them?

    Bill: Well, at Ericas original sentencing hearing two years ago, nine Jehovahs Witnesses stood up at that hearing and they said they thought not only that he was innocent, that hes repentant, but a good portion of them wanted him to baby-sit their children.

    Meria: Well, thats very sick.

    Bill: Well what it is; I think these people are being instructed to tell for the court that they feel comfortable with him. I mean, if my best friend were convicted of child molestation, I would not stand up in court and say I want him to keep my children. I have two children myself; I wouldnt want that to happen.

    Meria: Look, I dont even know that I could be as calm as to wait on the courts if something like that happened to one of my children.

    Bill: This now makes the third occasion that I have written documentationthis is not idle banter, this is not chat, this is not something I could possibly fabricatewhere multiple Jehovahs Witnesses have gone to court to testify for a convicted child molester and say that they believe that he should not go to jail. I do not understand that.

    Meria: I dont either. Its like I said, maybe theyre all used to the free meals they might be getting from him.

    Bill: Jehovahs Witnesses listen to this, I think you should say and mark in your minds; I dont care what the Watchtower Society tells me; I will never go to court and testify for a child molester, especially a convicted one.

    Meria: I have a note from that same listener and I want to share it with you Bill. She says "Meria; everything Bill is saying is true. My abuser finally admitted it. Two other victims came forward before he would. But the elders decided that because it had happened so many years before, no judicial action needed to be taken. I was told to keep my mouth shut and practice forgiveness. The congregation was never informed, and hes currently in good standing in his congregation. My heart aches for his potential and/or current victims. My childs abuse was reported and the abuser prosecuted. The elders for not following Biblical direction to not take my brother to court called me on the carpets. This is a serious problem within the Jehovahs Witnesses organization.

    Bill: I like to add something to that comment that she made. Every time a person comes forward with a charge of molestation, records are kept and put in congregation confidential files. Records are kept in New York City. If a way could be put forth to subpoena the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, they could push a button on a computer and tell you the names and address of thousands of child molesters across the United States and around the world that have never been reported to the police that are part of church records. These people need to fess up and turn these people in.

    Meria: Well I should think legally they would have to.

    Bill: There are criminals that are being harbored by the Watchtower organization. And Ill tell you why theyre not doing it. In the United States only 16 states do not honor ecclesiastical privilege. So the Watchtower Society is hiding behind ecclesiastical privilege to protect these people that hurt children. 34 states; If I go and Im an elder and Im in one of those states; a man comes to me and tells me he molested children, I call Watchtower Legal and they say every detail I tell them about what he told me happened and they say youre not in a reporting state; your obligation has been fulfilled. You do nothing. If he goes to court, if the parents bring charges against him in court and the judge subpoenas me to go to court the Watchtower Legal Department tells me to not say anything. Its morally and ethically wrong. Child molesters have walked when they have confessed to elders and then they turn around and they go to court and the elders do nothing to tell what he told them and they lie in court and they walk out an innocent man. That is a problem that this organizationthey got to get their morals and ethics straight.

    Meria: For sure. I mean if I was them Id certainly be worried about meeting my maker at the end of this roadand doing that in the name of God because every warning theyve given out is the warnings that will befall on them thats for sure.

    Bill: Its for one purpose only to protect Watchtower Corporation. To protect their money.

    Meria: Their money and their image.

    Bill: If an elder speaks up and opens up what he was confessed to, and he opens up the ecclesiastical privilege then it opens up their records for subpoena and theyre trying to prevent those records from being opened to the public. These thousands of child molesters that they have on file are being protected and shielded by the Watchtower Society.

    Meria: Well Bill, were about out of time and I have to tell you this was quite an eye-opening interview and definitely keep me posted any updates on this you know I can get it out to my group for sure. Im going to once again remind my audience gets over to Silentlambs.org. Read it for yourself. If you know anybody suffering from this kind of horror, the phone number is also on that site, Ill give it out again its 1-877-wtabuse. Please please, people the worst possible thing in the world are children being hurt. Please please look for the signs dont put anybody above your children. If you really believe in God know that God expects you to protect your children with your life if necessary. Bill one of my listeners asked when the show is going to be shown on TV; do you have any idea?

    Bill: With the World Trade Center disaster, that story needs to be given full report; I dont know, maybe the end of the year.

    Meria: Well when you know, let me know and Ill put it out on my Yahoo group so everybody can definitely connect to it.

    Bill: I will make one other comment. A civil lawsuit was filed against the Watchtower Society in January I mean July of this year, and others are stepping up right behind them. If they wont answer this problem morally, then we will answer this in the courts and lets see how they stand the litmus test of the United States justice system for what theyve done for children.

    Meria: Well good for you and definitely keep me posted on that well do an update on this story for sure. Thank you so very much Bill, not just for me but also for all the children and all the families that youre really helping.

    Bill: All right.

    Meria: All right, Ill talk with you again soon.

    Bill: Okay

    Meria: Thank you.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  • UnDisfellowshipped
    UnDisfellowshipped
    TCPalm.com News - September 8th 2001:

    Gregory Blackstock, 45, of Hollis, faces eight counts of rape, punishable by up to 20 years in prison. He is scheduled to be tried in late January.

    Before then, however, Judge Bernard Hampsey must determine whether church elders who met with Blackstock to discuss the accusations involving the sisters can be made to testify about their conversations.

    By court rules and state law, church ministers cant be made to disclose confessions.

    Hillsborough County Attorney Roger Chadwick argues that Blackstocks discussions with the elders does not qualify under the confessional privilege, because the elders also discussed Blackstocks statements with the girls mother.

    Blackstock and his lawyer, Richard Monteith, argue the meetings were confidential, and to intrude on that privacy violates his constitutional freedom to practice his religion.

    "Our procedure is a biblical procedure, and its designed to keep the congregation clean and to bring the wrongdoers to repentance. It is the tenet of our beliefs that everything is held in the strictest confidence," said Joseph Fuoco, an elder who has been subpoenaed to testify.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Telegraph (New Hampshire) News - September 7th 2001:

    Meaning of girls privates disputed

    By ANDREW WOLFE, Telegraph Staff
    [email protected]

    NASHUA A Hollis man asked a judge Thursday to throw out his conviction for molesting twin sisters, arguing the 10-year-old girls werent specific enough when they testified that he touched their privates.

    Gregory Blackstock, 45, formerly of 68 Flint Pond Drive, also argued that prosecutors failed to prove he acted with the purpose of sexual gratification.

    Blackstock was found guilty of three counts of aggravated felonious sexual assault July 26 after a trial in Hillsborough County Superior Court.

    If Judge William Groff upholds his conviction, Blackstock is scheduled to be sentenced Sept. 25. Groff did not immediately rule on the issue after hearing arguments Thursday.

    If Groff overturns Blackstocks convictions, prosecutors could seek to appeal his ruling, or request a new trial. On the other hand, Blackstock could argue that the case should be dismissed, and that double jeopardy bars the state from trying him again.

    Blackstock is currently serving a five- to 10-year prison sentence for sexually assaulting a 9-year-old East Kingston girl in that town. He also faces trial next month on charges that he sexually assaulted a Hollis girl, now 17, between 1989 and 1996.

    Blackstock was convicted of molesting the twin girls between October 1998 and June 1999 at his mothers home in Hollis.

    Blackstock met the girls and their family while living in East Kingston and attending the same Jehovahs Witness congregation as they. He became close with the family and lived with them for a time. The alleged assaults took place while the girls visited him in Hollis.

    The girls, who are now 10, both testified during the trial that Blackstock had touched their privates. The girls drew circles on an anatomically correct drawing to indicate the area to which they were referring.

    Blackstocks lawyer, Paul Garrity, argued that evidence wasnt enough to prove sexual contact with their genitalia.

    They circled an area on the body that encompassed stomach, groin, legs and genitalia, Garrity said.

    Assistant County Attorney Roger Chadwick disagreed, saying the drawings were somewhat more specific. In any case, he argued, the term privates is unambiguous.

    Were dealing with a very specific term, commonly used to refer to the genitalia, Chadwick said.

    Common sense seems to rule out any question as to where a 10-year-old girl . . . means when she says privates, Chadwick wrote in his response to Blackstocks motion. If you were to look up from this paper and see someone stumble into your room, bent at the waist and complaining of having been kicked in the privates, would you, could you, have any doubt as to where they had been harmed?

    In making their arguments, Chadwick and Garrity cited two previous state Supreme Court rulings. In a 1997 case, the court upheld a conviction based in part on testimony by the victim, who said she was touched in her privates, and used a stuffed bunny to point out what she meant.

    In a 1989 case, the Supreme Court upheld Groffs decision to overturn the sexual assault conviction of a Lowell, Mass., man, because the victim testified that the man stuck his fingers in my bum. The court found the word bum was too ambiguous to prove sexual penetration.

    Garrity argued the situation in Blackstocks case was akin to the 1989 case, while Chadwick likened it to the more recent case.

    Garrity also charged that prosecutors failed to prove that Blackstock acted for sexual gratification, as state law requires in such cases.

    Prosecutors offered no evidence of the circumstances surrounding the alleged assaults not even whether they happened at the same or different times, Garrity said. For all the jury knew, Blackstock could have stumbled into the girls by accident, or touched them while he was sleeping, Garrity said.

    You cant infer criminal intent from no evidence, Garrity said. They presented no evidence of the circumstances surrounding this touching.

    Its like this hand in the Addams Family, floating in the ozone, he said.

    Chadwick countered that the simple fact both girls were assaulted rules out an accident, and shows that the touching was purposeful.

    Blackstocks case already has produced other noteworthy legal rulings.

    Before the trial, Groff ruled that Blackstock couldnt be sentenced under the states three strikes rape law, because he committed all of the alleged offenses before he was charged with any of them. Some judges have interpreted the law differently, and the state Supreme Court has yet to decide the issue.

    In another pretrial ruling, Groff found that elders in Blackstocks Jehovahs Witness congregation couldnt be made to testify about his statements to them because of the religious privilege rule, which holds that religious leaders cant be required to disclose a confession or other statements made in confidence in their capacity as spiritual advisers.

    Andrew Wolfe can be reached at 594-6410.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    http://pages.globetrotter.net/mleblank/org/pedopointdevuea.html - August 25th 2001:

    JW Child Abuse: An Insider's Insight

    Barbara Anderson



    As a result of the newspaper report calling attention to my actions I feel compelled to provide further information that has come to light and deserves full exposure.

    The Society is very much aware of my intentions, because of a private e-mail I innocently wrote someone was forwarded to the Society without my permission. You can read it in its entirety, below. I wish to provide some background first, as to the reason for writing in the first place.

    I learned that a male Jehovahs Witness raped the daughter of a Witness friend when she was nine years old. Last year, the then 18-year-old victim pressed charges and in February 2001 the pedophile went to jail.

    The case is typical. Years earlier when the mother of the victim found out about the rape, she went to the elders as she was instructed to do. As any good Witness would, she believed that they would do the right thing. Did they?

    There is no record of a report by the elders to the authorities, even though the state they live in requires reporting molestation by anyone, including ministers. This lack of follow through served to protect the perpetrator, and he continued molesting before relatives of another victim notified the authorities.

    Phoning my friend and hearing the whole sordid molestation story, I decided to break my long silence and told her of my decision to talk to NBC Dateline about pedophilia (child molestation or abuse) within the congregations of Jehovah's Witnesses. Later, I decided to write an e-mail suggesting my friend to also speak to Dateline.

    Soon after, our local circuit overseer was somehow informed of my involvement with Dateline. The CO called my husband, suggesting he stop me from talking to Dateline, clearly telling him that he would lose his position as an elder if he did not stop me.

    Within a few weeks, my private e-mail was sent to the Service/Legal Department of the Christian Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses, which problem previously would have been handled by the Watchtower Society of New York Inc. Without permission, a relative of my friend, an elder, had sent the Society, the Christian Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses in Patterson, NY, a copy of the e-mail. A full copy of that e-mail is reproduced below for you to see its contents.

    The Society acted by means of the Christian Congregation. A copy of my e-mail and a letter of inquiry were sent to the congregation elders where my husband serves as an elder. The letter of inquiry asked the elders whether I had propagated my views locally. The only answer and reply from the body of elders had to be a very clear No.

    Last week, when I was at Ericas trial, another letter arrived from the Christian Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses requesting that local elders arrange to meet with me. For the record, I refused that invitation. Also, my friend turned down the invitation to appear on Dateline.

    Would you like to know what heresy could prompt such heavy-handed responses? Read for yourself. Publishing this once-private e-mail I hope will also be informative to others who have been injured by policies of Jehovahs Witnesses through their hierarchy of overseers and corporate entities such as the Christian Congregation of JWs, the Watch Tower Society of Pennsylvania and Watchtower Society of New York, whose inadequate and unenlightened sexual abuse policies result in the protection of pedophiles, even if unknown or not deliberately.

    Its purpose is also to entreat individuals who have been harmed to come forward and demand change.

    I urge you to write letters or make phone calls to the Governing Body of Jehovahs Witnesses, the Christian Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses, and to news media and to anybody who will listen, to protest the Watchtower policies which gravely injure children, their families and at the same time protect criminals.

    I believe that Elders of Jehovah's Witnesses have no business deciding who is criminally guilty or not guilty of the charge of molestation, or to access the genuineness of a childs charge, or that of a family member in a childs behalf. They are simply not qualified, no matter how many counseling sessions they have had with their traveling overseers or in their training sessions.

    The first order of business is the protection of children, not the purity of the congregation. The Societys press releases have called molestation a serious crime. They have not acted consistently with that clear recognition. Their actions belie their words. They must ACT accordingly. They must treat this matter as they do other serious crimes.

    Crimes should be placed in the hands of Caesar, the Superior Authorities, of Romans 13:1-6. For it is Gods minister for you. Secular authorities quite properly view it as their prerogative to examine charges and judge matters. Elders must not under any circumstance interfere with the absolute right of the family or family members to report to the proper authorities. Rather, they should proactively encourage such reporting. The Authority of Romans 13 could extend to the family physician, social services, school officials, health officials, including authorized mental health specialistsand obviously the police.

    I believe there are those at bethel who have similar feelings but are afraid to speak up for fear of lack of support.

    Herewith is the e-mail forwarded to the Society that prompted the actions above from the Christian Congregation of Jehovahs Witnesses. The text below is entirely unaltered from its original other than the names.

    **************************
    Dear -------,

    Maybe you don't want to talk to me after reading the newspaper articles I e-mailed you. [About Bill Bowen's resignation as an elder because of disagreement with how Jehovah's Witnesses deal with the problem of pedophilia within its ranks.] Perhaps what I have embarked upon is frightening to you. After all, we were trained not to run ahead, or to criticize God's organization. The training was meant to control us, to think for us. Is this the theme of the Bible? Do we allow injustice because we are told that it is not for us to be involved in the fight for
    truth and righteousness. I can't help but remember what Jesus told the seven congregations in the beginning of the book of Revelation. He condemned some of the congregations for allowing wickedness to exist. He scolded, he berated Christians for their apathy. We have this example of how not to be, so It is time we stand up and be counted by Jehovah God as fighters for righteousness and for justice for his little ones.

    Remember Matt. 18:1-6. Read those verses in different translations and the same thought comes through loud and clear: those who cause the little ones to stumble or sin will have a mill stone tied around their neck and be thrown into the sea. Children who are molested, who are raped, are stumbled. They have lost their innocence and it affects them for the rest of their life.

    When I was fighting for a change in the WT's policy regarding molestation in the organization in 1991-92 in Bethel, your dear child was being molested by a man who would never have been trusted by you if the Watchtower's secret policy was not in existence.

    I know that you and all the other JWs who might watch Dateline interview me will be shocked by what I have to say about the indifference and outright hostility by the leaders of Watchtower towards the victims of sexual abuse that I saw in Brooklyn. I can say before God that these men have blood on their hands for the misery and suicides that took place because of their protection of pedophile elders and ministerial servants.

    I can prove what I say. If all of the details don't make it on Dateline, because there will be so many others speaking out, I guarantee you, my information will make it into Time or Newsweek. Watchtower is in deep trouble and they were warned over and over that something like this would happen, but their arrogance knows no bounds.

    They will reap what they have sown and they sowed a whirlwind that shortly will begin to blow back in their faces.

    I gave your phone number to the Dateline producer who I'm working with. Please think how important it is for you to speak out about the damaging effects the policy of the WT caused in your family and all the other families in your town. I hope you read Silentlambs.org. [site on the Internet.] When the camera crew from Dateline read the victims' stories, two of them cried.

    The last thing in this world I wanted was to go public about the results of an awful policy that certainly God has to hate. I can't imagine a loving mediator, Christ Jesus, not caring what happens to the children all in the name of protecting God's organization from reproach.

    If you decide to speak publicly about your girl's nightmare of a childhood, Dateline would accommodate you and hide your identity, if you desired. Here is your chance to expose horrific wrongs that were done by predators and some misguided people. Think of all of the children you will have helped if you speak out. If the elders had done the right thing so long ago; if they had obeyed State law and the law of the Bible in Titus 3:1 "Continue reminding them to be in subjection and be obedient to governments and authorities as rulers..." so many children in your congregation wouldn't have lost their innocence during the past ten years.

    You're a gutsy gal. Stand up and be counted for your child's sake. If you don't, in the future you may live with regrets. Take the power and control in your hands that is offered you, which was taken away from your daughter, and talk to [producers name excised] from Dateline. His number is [name snipped for privacy].

    I spoke up and I anticipate the loss of loved ones over this, but I'm doing it for the victims. I'm doing it for my grandson, xxxx. To think he is not safe from being molested by cunning predators within the organization is more than I can bear. I will not go to my grave knowing that I could have spoken up and saved more children from molestation, but didn't. I made my choice, now it's up to you to make one too.

    My heart goes out to you and if I have put you in an awkward position, I apologize. But my Bible trained conscience made me do it.

    Love,

    Barb
    ****************************

    AlanF says:

    She was a primary research assistant to Karl Adams for the 1993 JW history book Jehovah's Witnesses: Proclaimers of God's Kingdom (Adams has held a number of important positions in Bethel: head of Writing Dept. from early 1960s to about 1980, head of writing teams that produced Insight, Reasoning and Proclaimers books, currently a Gilead Instructor; see Crisis of Conscience for more details).

    She was a research assistant to several other senior members of the Writing Dept., doing at times historical research, and research into complaints the Society received about its handling of child molestation and abuse of women by JW men.

    Likely this research contributed to the Society's change of policy stated in the January 1, 1997 Watchtower, where they for the first time recognized that child molestation was a serious matter and decided that a 'known molester' could no longer serve a congregation in any position of responsibility, or be a pioneer, or serve in any other special, full-time service (of course, the Society still gets around this 'rule' by keeping the definition of "known molester" unclear; a man can be convicted in court of multiple molestations but if a group of elders decides that the evidence that led to conviction is not 'scripturally based', they can ignore the court's findings and still appoint such a molester to some "special privilege").

    She wrote several articles that appeared in Awake!.

    Source: http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/forum/thread.asp?site=3&id=10496&page=2
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Tri-City Herald (Washington) News - August 16th 2001:

    Thursday-August 16, 2001

    By Shirley Wentworth

    RITZVILLE - Erica Rodriguez and her mother, Alejandra Garza, broke down and cried when the verdict came in.
    It took slightly less than four hours for a seven-man, five-woman Adams County Superior Court jury to declare Manuel Beliz, 48, of Othello guilty of two counts of first-degree child rape and two counts of first-degree child molestation. They reached their verdict about 7:45 p.m.
    "I'm thrilled," said Rodriguez after the victory. "I'm hoping the verdict will encourage another silent lamb to come forward and talk about (what happened to them). The best self-therapy you can have is to talk about it."

    Rodriguez said she believed Beliz, a Jehovahs Witness elder, had also molested other girls and her whole purpose in coming forward was to keep him from doing it to someone
    else. She said that even though her church disfellowshipped Belizor removed him from the church--for six months, church elders pressured her not to report him to the police. Jehovah's Witnesses say a member cannot be disfellowshipped unless that member has admitted the offense or crime.

    A jury convicted Beliz of two counts of first-degree child rape and two counts of first-degree child molestation in 1998. However, the state court of appeals granted Beliz the right to a new trial on the basis that then-deputy prosecutor Dennis Scott sought to exclude women from the jury panel.
    Security was tight in the courthouse because of death threats made against Rodriguez during the last trial.

    Rodriguez, now 22, was best friends with Beliz's daughter. She testified how as a child he would signal to her with two thumps of his hand, which meant for her to go and sit beside him. He would then allegedly begin to touch her and take her hand to touch him-- she not understanding what he was doing. This took place on a weekly basis throughout her childhood,
    Beliz denied ever having raped Rodriguez, or having had repeated sexual contact with her. He admitted to having touched her "boobs" on one occasion, but couldn't remember when. He said that a statement he made recorded in two Othello police officers' reports about touching her vaginal area during the time she was in town for a funeral was incorrect.

    Garza testified Tuesday her daughter first told her about Beliz in 1996. Garza also testified that Beliz had called her earlier in 1996 to apologize about what he had done to her daughter: He said, Im very sorry I have that problem, Im working on it.
    Defense attorney Dennis Morgan repeatedly challenged the soundness of Rodriguezs memory and tried to prove a rape couldnt have happened by calling three of Beliz's children to the stand, all of whom presented a time frame of events that contradicted Rodriguez's story.

    During closing arguments, Morgan tried to convince the jury of Belize's innocence because of holes in Rodriguez's memories. Adams County Prosecutor Gary Brueher, however, said memories aren't necessarily tied to specific dates and times.
    Barbara Anderson, part of a group fighting clergy-based sex crimes, is one of about 20 advocates from around the country who traveled to Adams County for the trial to lend support to Rodriguez. Anderson previously worked as a research assistant in the Jehovah's Witnesses New York headquarters. She said she gave the Dateline news show, which had a crew covering the Beliz trial, documentation describing how the church's
    leadership is well aware of sexual child abuse within its organization and helps cover it up.

    The Dateline show plans to air a program this fall detailing how the organization deals with child abuse.

    * Reporter Shirley Wentworth can be reached at 509-488-0657 or via
    e-mail at [email protected].
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Tri-City Herald - August 16th 2001:

    Thursday-August 16, 2001

    By Shirley Wentworth

    RITZVILLE - Erica Rodriguez and her mother, Alejandra Garza, broke down and cried when the verdict came in.
    It took slightly less than four hours for a seven-man, five-woman Adams County Superior Court jury to declare Manuel Beliz, 48, of Othello guilty of two counts of first-degree child rape and two counts of first-degree child molestation. They reached their verdict about 7:45 p.m.
    "I'm thrilled," said Rodriguez after the victory. "I'm hoping the verdict will encourage another silent lamb to come forward and talk about (what happened to them). The best self-therapy you can have is to talk about it."
    Rodriguez said she believed Beliz, a Jehovahs Witness elder, had also molested other girls and her whole purpose in coming forward was to keep him from doing it to someone
    else. She said that even though her church disfellowshipped Belizor removed him from the church--for six months, church elders pressured her not to report him to the police. Jehovah's Witnesses say a member cannot be disfellowshipped unless that member has admitted the offense or crime.
    A jury convicted Beliz of two counts of first-degree child rape and two counts of first-degree child molestation in 1998. However, the state court of appeals granted Beliz the right to a new trial on the basis that then-deputy prosecutor Dennis Scott sought to exclude women from the jury panel.
    Security was tight in the courthouse because of death threats made against Rodriguez during the last trial.
    Rodriguez, now 22, was best friends with Beliz's daughter. She testified how as a child he would signal to her with two thumps of his hand, which meant for her to go and sit beside him. He would then allegedly begin to touch her and take her hand to touch him-- she not understanding what he was doing. This took place on a weekly basis throughout her childhood,
    Beliz denied ever having raped Rodriguez, or having had repeated sexual contact with her. He admitted to having touched her "boobs" on one occasion, but couldn't remember when. He said that a statement he made recorded in two Othello police officers' reports about touching her vaginal area during the time she was in town for a funeral was incorrect.
    Garza testified Tuesday her daughter first told her about Beliz in 1996. Garza also testified that Beliz had called her earlier in 1996 to apologize about what he had done to her daughter: "He said, Im very sorry I have that problem, Im working on it."
    Defense attorney Dennis Morgan repeatedly challenged the soundness of Rodriguezs memory and tried to prove a rape couldnt have happened by calling three of Beliz's children to the stand, all of whom presented a time frame of events that contradicted Rodriguez's story.

    During closing arguments, Morgan tried to convince the jury of Belize's innocence because of holes in Rodriguez's memories. Adams County Prosecutor Gary Brueher, however, said memories aren't necessarily tied to specific dates and times.
    Barbara Anderson, part of a group fighting clergy-based sex crimes, is one of about 20 advocates from around the country who traveled to Adams County for the trial to lend support to Rodriguez. Anderson previously worked as a research assistant in the Jehovah's Witnesses New York headquarters. She said she gave the Dateline news show, which had a crew covering the Beliz trial, documentation describing how the church's
    leadership is well aware of sexual child abuse within its organization and helps cover it up.

    The Dateline show plans to air a program this fall detailing how the organization deals with child abuse.

    * Reporter Shirley Wentworth can be reached at 509-488-0657 or via e-mail at [email protected].
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Tri-City Herald - August 15th 2001:

    Wednesday-August 15, 2001

    By Shirley Wentworth

    RITZVILLE - Fifteen advocates from across the United States and Canada traveled to Ritzville to lend support to a woman who claims she was sexually abused and raped as a child by a Jehovah's Witness elder.

    A retrial began Tuesday in Adams County Superior Court. Members of the group say they are especially concerned with clergy-based sex crime.
    Evidently anticipating problems, a number of Adams County sheriff's deputies were stationed to be alert for trouble and searched people for weapons before they entered the courtroom.
    Manual L. Beliz, 49, was convicted by an Adams County Superior Court jury in 1998 for two counts of first-degree child rape and two counts of first-degree child molestation. The jury dismissed two other counts.

    According to the Washington Appellate Reports, Beliz unsuccessfully challenged the state's jury challenges, calling them racially motivated. Then-deputy prosecutor, Dennis Scott, contended his challenges were not made to exclude Hispanics, but to exclude women. The state admitted it was looking for a predominantly older male jury. While the court of appeals did not find racial bias, it did find that gender bias was grounds for a new trial.
    On Tuesday Jury selection took most of the day, but by 3 p.m. Adams County Prosecutor Gary Brueher gave his opening remarks to what is this time an eight-man, four-woman jury.
    Brueher told the jury that the most important testimony will be that of Erica Garza, now 22, who charges that Beliz molested and raped her on various occasions between the ages of 4 and 11. Brueher said she never came forward as a child because her family was close with the Beliz family and she was best friends with Beliz's daughter. Brueher also mentioned that both families belonged to a church that encouraged eldership.
    "I encourage you to listen to the details," he said.

    Defense attorney Dennis Morgan reserved his right to present an opening statement later.
    Othello police officer Dave Rehaume was called to the stand to recount his interrogation of Beliz after the Othello Police Department was informed by police in Sacramento, Calif., in December 1996 that Rodriguez made a report about Beliz. The Rodriguez family had moved to California in 1990.
    Rehaume said when he interviewed Beliz, Beliz first denied everything but later changed his story. Rehaume said he believed Beliz confessed to first-degree rape.

    Rodriguez, who is expected to testify in court today, said in an earlier interview, that she was heavily pressured by Jehovah's Witnesses elders not to take her story to the police. She said she was told she would not only be considered a family wrecker, but also
    would be condemned by God.
    Bill Bowen, a former Jehovah's Witness elder who traveled from Kentucky to Adams County for the trial, said he quit his job last year to devote his time to a campaign to change church policies. Bowen also says church leadership shields sex abusers and blames victims.

    Bowen formerly led the congregation of a Draffenville, Ky., church. He has dedicated a Website to the problem, www.silentlambs.org

    A lawsuit filed in New Hampshire last week claims the Jehovahs Witnesses church routinely encourages victims not to report sexual abuse because it would bring reproach to the organization.

    *Reporter Shirley Wentworth can be reached at 509-488-0657 or via e-mail at [email protected].
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Telegraph (New Hampshire) News - August 8th 2001:

    Groups elders targeted in sex abuse case

    ANDREW WOLFE, Telegraph Staff
    [email protected]

    Two sisters charge that elders from their Jehovahs Witness congregation in Wilton ignored their mothers complaints that her husband was sexually abusing them, and thus allowed the abuse to continue.

    A lawsuit on the womens behalf is expected to be filed today in Hillsborough County Superior Court in Manchester, lawyers in the case said.

    The suit stems from the case of Paul Berry, 45, formerly of Greenville, who was convicted of 17 counts of aggravated felonious sexual assault after a trial last year in Hillsborough County Superior Court. Berry was sentenced to serve 56 to 112 years in prison.

    Berry maintains his innocence, and the state Supreme Court agreed in March to hear his appeal, court records show.

    Berry was convicted of assaulting his stepdaughter, Holly Berry, 22, of Berkeley, Calif., repeatedly while she was between 4 and 10.

    The assaults included incidents where Berry hung her by her wrists from hooks on a barn wall and, on another occasion, tied her to a tree, according to court records.

    Berry also was charged with assaulting his biological daughter, Heather Berry, 19, of Charlestown, N.H., on several occasions while she was between 3 and 6. Prosecutors dropped charges in that case, however, after Berrys conviction and sentence in the first case, court records show.

    The sisters suit names Berry, the Wilton congregation of Jehovahs Witnesses and the national organization, the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of Brooklyn, N.Y.

    Though The Telegraph ordinarily doesnt identify victims of sexual abuse, the Berry sisters chose to go public, according to their lawyer, Jeffrey Anderson of St. Paul, Minn.

    This (case) is about truth-telling. This is about not keeping a secret, Anderson said Tuesday, adding, They bear no responsibility (for the abuse). They have no need to feel shame.

    An elder of the Wilton Jehovahs Witness congregation, Jeff Wrona, declined to comment on the case Tuesday, and said the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society will be defending the suit.

    No one returned a phone call to the societys public relations office Tuesday, but the group released a statement to The Associated Press condemning child abuse, and denying that the organization discourages people from reporting it.

    Jehovahs Witnesses condemn child molestation, and they do not tolerate such activity within their membership, the group said. If there is sufficient evidence that someone has exploited children in this way, he may be disfellowshipped.

    In at least one other local sexual assault case, Jehovahs Witness elders did report allegations of abuse to state authorities.

    The Berry sisters mother repeatedly told three elders in her congregation Bob Ward, Jim Hilton and Robert Michalowski about the abuse, their suit charges.

    Plaintiffs and their mother were taught to respect the teachings of the organization of Jehovahs Witnesses and to bring any problem with a fellow publisher (member) to the elders, the suit states.

    Based on Jehovahs Witness policy, the suit claims, the elders told her to keep the matter within the congregation.

    The elders told plaintiffs mother that she should be a better wife and that she should pray more about the situation, the suit states.

    The suit charges the elders violated state law, which requires religious leaders and other people in positions of authority or who work with children to immediately report any allegations of abuse to state authorities.

    The organizations long-standing policy and practice of minimizing, defending and tolerating abuse by congregation publishers (members) negligently permitted the abuse to occur and breached a legal duty to plaintiffs to protect them and prevent said abuse from occurring, the suit states.

    Some 32 members of Berrys Jehovahs Witness congregation spoke on his behalf during his sentencing hearing.

    Many said they had known him for more than a dozen years, and all expressed steadfast belief in his innocence.

    In contrast, the suit claims, the sisters mother was punished by the congregation for reporting her suspicions of Berrys abuse.

    I have seen a horrifying number of cases like this, said Anderson, a nationally known lawyer who has handled numerous other sexual-abuse lawsuits against churches.

    This (case) is, to me, representative of a very serious problem in that church, in that they believe they are above the law, and the rules dont apply to them with respect to protecting children, he said.

    When a member of a Jehovahs Witness congregation is accused of any sort of serious transgression, the elders convene a judicial committee to investigate the matter. By policy, however, unless there is a witness or evidence of the wrongdoing beyond the person complaining, the accused is considered innocent, the suit charges.

    It is an institutional practice and a policy, Anderson said. They believe that if there is a report of child abuse, it didnt happen unless there is a witness to it, or the perpetrator confesses. If there is neither, they believe that it didnt happen.

    I say when it comes to the protection of children, they can believe what they want, but they have to do what everyone else has to do, he said.

    There have been a handful of similar cases filed against other Jehovahs Witness congregations around the country, Anderson said, but other cases havent dealt as directly with the duty to report abuse, he said.

    Im not aware of any that are just like this (case), he said.

    Nashua attorney Janine Gawryl is working with Anderson as local counsel on the Berrys case.

    In another local case involving the Jehovahs Witnesses, a Hillsborough County Superior Court judge ruled earlier this year that elders of a congregation cant be forced to testify about disclosures made during judicial committee investigations.

    The accused in that case, Gregory Blackstock, 45, formerly of Hollis, was convicted last month and awaits sentencing. In that case, the elders of Blackstocks congregation reported the alleged abuse to the state Division of Children, Youth and Families.

    Andrew Wolfe can be reached at 594-6410.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Courier-Journal Newspaper - August 8th 2001:

    Local/Regional News Item Wednesday, August 8, 2001

    Jehovah's Witnesses shield sexual abusers, suit claims

    By Peter Smith
    The Courier-Journal

    The Jehovah's Witnesses church has shielded sexual predators from the law and humiliated their victims, according to a lawsuit expected to be filed today that challenges the church's policy on sexual molestation.

    Filed on behalf of an adult daughter and stepdaughter of Paul Berry, a Jehovah's Witness convicted last year of sexual assault, the lawsuit will name as defendants Berry, the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York -- the religion's national organization -- and Berry's Wilton, N.H., congregation.

    ''The victim/accuser is routinely encouraged and required not to report suspected abuse by a (member) to the authorities . . . as it would bring reproach on God and the organization,'' the lawsuit, to be filed in Hillsborough County Superior Court in Manchester, N.H., alleges.

    The lawsuit also alleges that church policies, practices and procedures -- enforced by elders -- have the effect of ''blaming, humiliating and disciplining victims'' instead of sexual predators.

    The suit seeks unspecified monetary damages, but the plaintiffs also want the church to change its policies.

    ''I hope that it gets enough coverage that people know that the Jehovah's Witnesses made a huge mistake,'' said Heather Berry of Charlestown, N.H., who, along with her stepsister, Holly Berry, of Berkeley, Calif., agreed to speak publicly.

    Church spokesman David Semonian defended the organization's policies.

    ''We do believe our principles and policies involved in the issue are very sound,'' he said, adding that church elders would never stop a member from going to the police.

    ''As elders, we're dealing with the sin,'' he said yesterday. ''The authorities are dealing with the crime, so we're not going to get in the way of that.''

    The Courier-Journal reported in February that critics say the Jehovah's Witnesses' secretive disciplinary proceedings have allowed pedophiles to go unreported and put the public at risk -- charges that church leaders emphatically deny.

    Jehovah's Witnesses leaders say they report allegations of child sexual abuse in states where the law requires it. In other states, they say they can better handle such allegations themselves and try not to violate what they say are confidential discussions between church members and their elders -- lay persons who lead local congregations.

    But attorney Jeffrey Anderson, who will file the Berrys' suit, alleged the Jehovah's Witnesses have a ''rigid patriarchal hierarchy that seems to believe it can operate above the law.

    ''This church is free to believe whatever they want, but this is about doing harm to children (and) giving sanctuary to pedophiles,'' said Anderson of St. Paul, Minn., whose firm has successfully sued the Roman Catholic Church and other religious organizations in cases of clergy sexual abuse nationwide.

    William Bowen, a former Kentucky Jehovah's Witnesses elder, said the case ''is simply about making Jehovah's Witnesses understand they have the same rules as everyone else.'' Bowen resigned Dec. 31 as leader of the Draffenville, Ky., congregation and is now campaigning to change church policies on sexual abuse.

    Jehovah's Witnesses, known for their door-to-door evangelism, have nearly 1 million American members and 6 million worldwide. The Brooklyn, N.Y.-based movement claims to teach the true version of Christianity.

    In internal disciplinary hearings, church officials say they use a biblical burden of proof that considers the accused innocent unless he or she admits guilt or is accused by at least two witnesses.

    The lawsuit argues that because sexual abuse usually happens in secret, ''victims often cannot offer the required proof.''

    Semonian said elders investigate all allegations, even if there is only one witness.

    Berry was convicted in July 2000 of repeatedly molesting his stepdaughter, Holly, from the time she was 4 through age 10. Among his offenses, Berry suspended her from hooks in a barn and strapped her to a tree during episodes of sexual abuse. He was sentenced to 56 years in prison.

    Berry also faced charges that he molested Heather Berry, but prosecutors did not try that case because he already received such a severe sentence. Heather did give a victim's impact statement at her father's sentencing.

    Twenty-nine elders and members of Berry's Wilton congregation proclaimed his innocence at his sentencing Oct. 31. Some said they would trust their children with him.

    But Sara Poisson, Berry's former wife and an ex-Jehovah's Witness, said she had told elders that her husband was beating their children and possibly molesting one of them. Elders told her ''be a better wife'' and ''pray more,'' she said.

    There is no evidence the elders ever reported the suspected abuse, despite New Hampshire law requiring them to do so.

    Roy King, an elder in the Wilton congregation, declined to comment, saying elders need to talk with church lawyers about the case.

    Jehovah's Witnesses officials say members are free to go to police if they choose.

    The lawsuit, however, said members would only do so on the guidance of their elders, who are considered ''appointed by Holy Spirit'' and ''specially endowed with wisdom and understanding.''

    The lawsuit was served on Watchtower and Wilton congregation officials in recent days and was expected to be served on Berry yesterday. New Hampshire law requires defendants to be served with a lawsuit before it is filed with the court.

    A Courier-Journal investigation earlier this year found other court challenges to Jehovah's Witnesses' handling of abuse cases.

    For example, a Houston family settled a lawsuit in 1999 with the church over claims that elders failed to alert authorities after learning that a teen-age boy was molesting his younger sister. The teen has since been convicted.

    In an Augusta, Maine, case, pretrial testimony indicated that elders secretly disciplined a molester but did not warn his congregation about him. The molester later abused an elder's stepson. The church, while not challenging any allegations in the victim's lawsuit, was cleared of legal liability in 1999 by the state's highest court.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Courier-Journal (Louisville) Newspaper - August 7th 2001:

    JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES SHIELD SEXUAL ABUSERS, SUIT CLAIMS

    By Peter Smith The Courier-Journal

    The Jehovah's Witnesses church has shielded sexual predators from the law and humiliated their victims, according to a lawsuit expected to be filed today that challenges the church's policy on sexual molestation.

    But attorney Jeffrey Anderson, who will file the Berrys' suit, alleged the Jehovah's Witnesses have a ''rigid patriarchal hierarchy that seems to believe it can operate above the law. ''This church is free to believe whatever they want, but this is about doing harm to children (and) giving sanctuary to pedophiles,'' said Anderson of St. Paul, Minn., whose firm has successfully sued the Roman Catholic Church and other religious organizations in cases of clergy sexual abuse nationwide.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NorthJersey.com News - August 7th 2001:

    Ringwood man held in killing of boy, 16

    Tuesday, August 7, 2001

    By JUSTO BAUTISTA and BARBARA WILLIAMS
    Staff Writers

    RINGWOOD -- A 16-year-old was stabbed to death early Monday during a fight with a 24-year-old Ringwood man who was charged with murder, authorities said.

    The suspect, Cole Dykstra of Skyline Lake Drive, surrendered to Wanaque police early Monday following the fight, authorities said.

    He was arraigned on murder and weapons charges in North Haledon Municipal Court on Monday night and was being held in the Passaic County Jail. Bail information was not available.

    The name of the victim, who also lives on Skyline Lake Drive, was not released as of Monday evening, apparently because a close relative had yet to be notified. Residents said he was a student at Lakeland Regional High School.

    Details of the slaying were incomplete Monday, including where the killing took place, and police said they were still investigating all aspects of the case.

    Ringwood police refused to provide information and deferred to county authorities. Police learned of the stabbing at 3:30 a.m. Monday, said Detective Sgt. James Wood, supervisor of the Passaic County Prosecutor's Homicide Squad.

    Wood said the fight was still under investigation to determine the motive and that a knife was recovered at the scene, which he would not pinpoint. He said the victim and the suspect were not related.

    Neighbors gathered outside their homes on Skyline Lake Drive in shock.

    "Things like that don't happen in this neighborhood. I'm just a little concerned," said one woman. "This is a very quiet, family-oriented neighborhood."

    Mayor Allan Van Eck said the stabbing occurred in the Skyline Lakes area and that "I'm deeply troubled by these events, and my sympathy goes out to both families."

    He said a crisis team will be available for Lakeland Regional students.

    Wood said police from Ringwood, Wanaque, and the Passaic County sheriff's Identification Unit were sent to the scene early Monday.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Associated Press (AP) News - August 7th 2001:

    New Hampshire women to file suit against Jehovahs Witnesses

    By HARRY R. WEBER

    Associated Press Writer

    CONCORD, N.H. (AP) In a challenge to the Jehovahs Witnesses belief in shunning secular authority, two young New Hampshire women have accused the order of concealing their sexual abuse allegations.

    A suit expected to be filed Wednesday in Hillsborough County Superior Court names as defendants the abuser, the Wilton congregation where they belonged and the religious orders governing body in New York City. It seeks unspecified damages.

    "The organization of Jehovahs Witnesses has specifically developed policies, practices and procedures which dictate that the elders are the appropriate authorities to whom abuse by (members) is to be reported," the suit states.

    "The victim and/or accuser is routinely encouraged and required not to report suspected abuse by a (member) to the authorities outside of the organization ... as it would bring reproach on God and the organization."

    Jeff Anderson, a St. Paul, Minn., lawyer who is the plaintiffs lead counsel, said such allegations have been made against the Jehovahs Witnesses in 20 states. The order has about 5.5 million members worldwide.

    "Whats more shocking is this is a practice that is employed throughout the church," Anderson said. "They have a practice of giving a sanctuary to known pedophiles."

    In a statement from the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, which oversees Jehovahs Witness congregations nationwide, the group said it does not condone sexual abuse.

    "Jehovahs Witnesses condemn child molestation, and they do not tolerate such activity within their membership," the group said. "If there is sufficient evidence that someone has exploited children in this way, he may be disfellowshipped."

    The group said it does not interfere in victims rights to report incidents of sexual abuse to police.

    Jehovahs Witnesses are taught the faith is the authority and the only way to salvation. They are to bring all problems to their religious leaders first.

    Members refuse to bear arms, salute the flag or participate in secular government. They also refuse to accept blood transfusions.

    The New Hampshire suit involves the case of Paul Berry, who was charged with molesting two girls during a six-year period in the 1980s when one was as young as 3 years old. Berry was convicted of molesting one of the girls and sentenced to 56 years in prison.

    The girls now are 22 and 19.

    Andersons office said the girls waited until the completion of the criminal case before pursuing their civil suit.

    The abuser and the girls belonged to a Jehovahs Witness congregation in Wilton, a town of 3,300 in southern New Hampshire.

    The suit said the girls mother repeatedly told Jehovahs Witness elders of the abuse. The elders in turn told the mother to keep the issue within the organization and that she should "be a better wife" and that she should "pray more about the situation," the suit said.

    "Plaintiffs mother was a devout Jehovahs Witness and was taught to respect the word of the elders as the word of Jehovah or God and follow the directions, guidance, policies and practices of the organization," the suit stated.

    The beliefs of the order have had consequences at other Jehovahs Witness congregations throughout the country.

    Late last year, William Bowen resigned as an elder at a western Kentucky congregation to protest how the denomination handles accusations of child molestation.

    Bowen said a Jehovahs Witnesses policy requiring two people to witness wrongdoing before it is acknowledged by leaders makes it nearly impossible to prove child molestation occurs.

    In New Jersey, a couple left the order after their 12-year-old daughter told them she was being molested by her grandfather, who also was a member of the faith. The daughter won a multimillion-dollar lawsuit last year against the grandfathers insurance company.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAP) News - August 7th 2001:

    Two Women Sue Jehovah's Witnesses Over Sexual Abuse

    Charge That National Church Policies "Protect" Predators

    New York Headquarters, Local Congregation and Convicted Molester Named As Defendants

    SOURCE: Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests

    MANCHESTER, N.H., Aug. 7 /PRNewswire/ --

    The official policies and practices of the Jehovah's Witnesses church violate New Hampshire's mandatory child abuse reporting laws and led to the sexual molestation of at least two girls, according to a civil lawsuit to be filed tomorrow in Hillsborough County Superior Court in Manchester NH.

    Holly and Heather Berry allege that their father sexually abused them for six years in the 1980s when they were between three and ten years old. Their mother, a devout Jehovah's Witness, brought her suspicions/concerns about the molestation to three church leaders, but was told to ``pray more about the situation'' and ``become a better wife,'' according to the lawsuit. No church official contacted state authorities about the allegation, in violation of New Hampshire's requirement that law enforcement agencies be notified of suspected child abuse.

    Defendants in the litigation include the denomination itself (officially known as the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc.), a local church (the Wilton Congregation in Wilton, NH), and the girls' father, Paul Berry, who was convicted of sexual abuse in October of last year and is currently serving a 56-year sentence at the Northern Correctional Facility in Berlin, NH.

    ``No organization, not even a religious one, is above the law,'' said David Clohessy of St. Louis, director of SNAP, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, a national support group. ``This is a potentially far-reaching case. Simply put, the question is whether society must tolerate so-called 'religious practices' that enable molesters to hurt kids, hamstring police, and violate our most sacred laws.''

    ``Like teachers, social workers and others in leadership positions, church figures must protect kids and help police stop predators,'' Clohessy maintained.

    According to the lawsuit, official Jehovah's Witness ``policies and practices'' require that any accusations against church members be reported to church leaders, not civil authorities. In child abuse allegations, those policies also require two eyewitnesses. Yet, church elders ``have no experience or training in child abuse investigations,'' the suit contends. As a result, the suit alleges that Jehovah Witness leaders ``failed to take reasonable steps'' to protect the Berrys and other youngsters.

    The suit blasts the denomination for its alleged ``minimizing, defending and tolerating abuse by (Jehovah's Witnesses)'' and claims that Witnesses accused of molestation ``are routinely given sanctuary, protection, sympathy and support from the organization.'' Church leaders and members, for example, spoke in support of Paul Berry at his criminal sentencing hearing.

    In addition to ``failure to report suspected child abuse,'' the defendants are also charged with deceit, battery, negligence, and breach of fiduciary duty. The suit seeks unspecified monetary damages.

    Three elders of the Wilton congregation, Bob Ward, Jim Hilton and Robert Michalowski, are mentioned in the legal complaint. Sarah Poisson, the Berry girls' mother, allegedly talked several times with the men, explaining her fears about her husband's abusive behavior. ``None of the elders reported the suspected abuse...to any designated authority,'' claims the lawsuit.

    The Berry sisters ``continue to suffer extreme, permanent emotional distress and psychological harm with accompanying physical manifestations,'' their attorneys say. Because they felt ``shame, guilt, and depression'' and doubted whether they would be believed, the two were ``unable or unwilling'' to report their abuse sooner, according to the lawsuit.

    Holly Berry, now 22, is a student in Berkeley, CA and Heather Berry, now 18, lives in Charlestown, NH.

    Attorneys Janine Gawryl of Nashua, N.H. and Jeffrey Anderson of St. Paul, Minn., represent the sisters. Anderson has handled more than 400 cases of abuse by religious figures across the countries.

    While virtually every faith group has experienced similar abuse litigation, this is believed to be one of only a handful against the Jehovah's Witnesses.

    A support group for men and women victimized by Jehovah's Witness members and leaders is being formed and can be reached at silentlambs, inc, PO Box 311, Calvert City, Kentucky 42029 (Telephone: 270-527-5350 or 270-559-5345).
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  • UnDisfellowshipped
    UnDisfellowshipped
    Clergy Crimes News - July 29th 2001:

    Jehovah's Witnesses accused of refusing to alert authorities to the extended sexual abuse

    HOUSTON A lawsuit has been filed accusing the national Jehovah's Witnesses organization of refusing to alert authorities to the extended sexual abuse of a minor by her brother while they were both members of the church.

    The plaintiff, a 19-year-old woman, said that she had been sexually abused by her brother, now 22, since the mid-1980s. In 1988, the family sought counseling by church elder Kerry "John" Landers. The suit claims that Landers was instructed by the national office to handle the matter in-house rather than to report the abuse to the authorities as required by Texas law.

    Despite counseling, the brother continued to molest his sister. In 1992 the local church leadership appointed Landers and two other elders to investigate. The brother confessed to them and apologized and the elders put the matter to rest. He was convicted of sexual abuse and sentenced to prison. In that trial, Landers testified under a grant of immunity about his instructions to keep it quiet.

    The attorney representing the church said it strongly believes it committed no wrongdoing and said they vowed to defend themselves vigorously. (3/24)
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Associated Press (AP) News - July 27th 2001:

    Man convicted of sexual assault without church testimony

    07/27/2001

    Associated Press Newswires

    Copyright 2001. The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.

    NASHUA, N.H. (AP) - A Hollis man has been convicted of molesting twin sisters although his apparent admission to church elders could not be used in the trial.

    A jury deliberated two hours Tuesday before convicting Gregory Blackstock, 45, in Hillsborough County Superior Court of three counts of rape. He already was serving a five- to 10-year sentence for sexually assaulting a 9-year-old East Kingston girl in that town.

    Blackstock's lawyers have moved to have the latest verdict set aside. No date has been set for a hearing on the motion or sentencing.

    "We're fairly confident that the verdict will be set aside," defense lawyer Paul Garrity said. "The evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. "I think the judge will take a close look at it."

    Assistant County Attorney Roger Chadwick said prosecutors believed the evidence supported the charges.

    "Obviously, we're very satisfied," Chadwick said.

    He said it was "a tremendous relief for me given the work that went into the case to see the jurors believe these girls, who were so courageous to get up and testify."

    The girls, now 10, testified in open court.

    More charges are pending against Blackstock in an unrelated case. He was accused of sexually assaulting a Hollis girl, who is now in her teens, between 1989 and 1996. A trial has been scheduled in October.

    Judge William Groff ruled that Blackstock can't be sentenced under the state's "three strike's" law although he was convicted of three counts of rape. However, he could face an enhanced minimum sentence of 15 years for each charge because of his earlier conviction in Rockingham County.

    Earlier, Groff found that elders in Blackstock's Jehovah's Witness congregation could not be made to testify about Blackstock's statements to them. He cited the "religious privilege" rule, which holds that religious leaders can't be required to disclose a confession or other statements made in confidence in their capacity as spiritual advisers.

    Prosecutors wanted to subpoena a minister and elders from Blackstock's congregation to testify about meetings at which they discussed the allegations.

    Blackstock became acquainted with the girls' families while living in East Kingston and attending a Jehovah's Witness church there. He worked with the parents, and lived with the family for a period of time, Chadwick said during the trial.

    The sisters' mother contacted her church elders after one of the girls disclosed the abuse, Chadwick said. One of the elders then contacted elders in the Hollis congregation.

    Blackstock was accused of molesting the twins between October 1998 and June 1999 at his mother's home in Hollis.

    The defense argued the girls' mother inadvertently misled them into making up the abuse charges by repeatedly questioning them and sharing with them her experience of sexual abuse.

    The mother spoke to the girls in general terms when she began to have concerns about Blackstock's relationship with them, Chadwick said. When she read them a children's story about sexual abuse - "No-No the Little Seal" - the girls confided to her about the abuse, Chadwick said.

    "She did what any mother would do," Chadwick said, adding later, "I'm glad the jury found that acceptable."
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    June 4th 2001:

    Various cases on JW Pedophiles in the press

    The following is an investigation by Peter Ackerman of the Asbury Park Press:

    Policies on reporting abuse allegations vary among religious denominations The Jehovah's Witnesses church is under growing attack by some of its members for policies they say can allow child molesters to go unreported, putting church members and the public at increased risk.

    Church officials say elders alert authorities to suspected abuse in states that require reporting. But in other states they prefer to take steps to protect children that don't breach what they see as confidential communication between elders and members. Church policy also allows some confessed molesters -- whose offenses are usually kept secret -- to stay in the church community, sometimes with tragic results.

    An examination by The Courier-Journal of court cases involving church members in Maine, New Hampshire and Texas showed that the confidential church disciplinary process was blamed by some victims for allowing molestation to continue.

    Among the cases:

    In Maine, a teen-age boy was molested between 1989 and 1992 by a church member after church elders disciplined the offender secretly for molesting another boy. Elders did not report the first case to authorities, and the law did not require them to. The second victim told a therapist, who notified authorities.

    In New Hampshire, a former church member said elders failed to act when she told them her husband was physically abusing their children. The man received a 56-year prison sentence in October 2000 for sexual abuse that continued years after the woman went to elders. New Hampshire law required clergy to report suspicions of abuse.

    In Texas, a prosecutor said church elders told a teen-age boy to stop molesting his younger sister in 1992 but failed to report it to police in apparent violation of state law. The boy later molested a second sister and in 1997 was sentenced to a 40-year prison term. Police were alerted when one victim reported the abuse to hospital staff following a suicide attempt.

    Church policy also allows molesters who are deemed repentant to continue evangelizing door to door -- accompanied by another member -- bringing them into contact with unsuspecting households that don't have the church's knowledge that a child molester is at their door.

    The church's policies on sexual abuse have come under scrutiny following the resignation of a Western Kentucky church elder who objected to them. The court cases have played out against the backdrop of a growing national consensus that all suspected child abuse must be reported and known molesters aggressively identified.

    A lawyer for the Jehovah's Witnesses church, which has nearly 1 million members nationally and 6 million worldwide, said it complies with those state laws that require church elders to report abuse.

    "If there is a law that mandates reporting, that takes precedent over any confidentiality, whether in church policy or statute," said Mario Moreno, associate general counsel for the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society, a legal corporation of the church.

    "I refuse to support a pedophile refuge mentality." William H. Bowen in his letter resigning his church leadership post in Draffenville, Ky. "In states where there is no reporting requirement, it's a different scenario," Moreno said.

    Elders might have the victim relocated away from the abuser or have the parent or guardian of the victim, or even the accused person, report the abuse to police, he said. "The laws of this country, as well as people's moral values, tell you there are some things that should be kept private. That's why laws protect confidential communications between clergy and their flock." But Moreno said elders who contact the church's legal department with cases of suspected sexual abuse -- as they must do -- are often advised to refer victims to police or other outside help, even if the law doesn't require it. Victims and their parents are free, Moreno said, to seek help from police or therapists and should not blame the church if they choose not to do so. "Parents are encouraged to do whatever they need to do to protect their child," said Moreno.

    However, some abuse victims and their advocates, in lawsuits and in interviews, said that fear of reprisals by church leaders, coupled with the importance of the church in their lives, made them reluctant to report abuse outside the church. William H. Bowen resigned Dec. 31 as presiding overseer (chief elder) of the Draffenville congregation near Paducah, saying he could no longer support church policies that he felt allowed child molesters to go undetected. "I refuse to support a pedophile refuge mentality that is promoted among bodies of elders around the world," wrote Bowen in his letter of resignation. "Criminals should be ousted, identified and punished to protect the innocent and give closure to the victim."

    Woman felt punished for accusing husband

    Sara Poisson of Claremont, N.H., said she never considered turning to anyone but her church elders when then-husband Paul Berry began physically abusing some of her children. Berry would eventually receive a 56-year prison term.

    "Whatever issues might arise that required guidance were to be handled within the congregation by the body of elders," Poisson said at her ex-husband's sentencing for molestation on Oct. 31, 2000. Bowen said members of the Jehovah's Witnesses are continually told that if they have any problems within the family, they are to go to the elders for help.
    "You have to understand the Jehovah's Witnesses organization," Bowen said. "Their life revolves around following the direction of what the local elders and the organization say." But Sam Neal, an elder in the congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses in Jeffersontown, Ky., said church members are not sheltered. "All of us have access to all of the things in the community," said Neal, retired associate dean of the University of Louisville's School of Social Work. "Whatever we need, we know where to go."

    Church attorney Moreno said church members know they can go to the authorities on a matter of abuse. "They haven't committed a sin by turning in a Jehovah's Witness to the authorities," he said. "It's a very personal decision." But Poisson said in Hillsborough County Superior Court at her ex-husband's sentencing that when she went to elders with her concerns, they repeatedly told her that she "needed to be a better wife" and "needed to pray more." "Each time I spoke to the elders I was sanctioned in some way," Poisson told the court. "Some privilege was removed because I had dared to usurp the authority of my husband." Poisson later told a reporter she was barred from speaking at some meetings and restricted in the amount of door-to-door evangelism she could do. New Hampshire law since the late 1970s has said that any "person having reason to suspect that a child has been abused or neglected shall report the same."

    There is no evidence in court records or elders' public comments that the church reported Poisson's allegations. Poisson said in court that while she did not know of Berry's sexual abuse, she knew of and didn't report the physical abuse, and "this I have to live with for the rest of my life." Authorities found out, Poisson said, when her son went to school one day with the imprint of a fly swatter on his leg. Poisson said a social worker gave her an ultimatum: Have Berry leave the house or lose custody of their children. She chose the former and said the congregation shunned her.

    Some time later, one of Poisson's daughters ran away. She returned 18 months later, frail and sick, with the words, "Why did you let that happen?" Poisson said in court. The girl informed her mother that Berry had sexually abused her from age 4 to 10. Mother and daughter went to police to launch the sexual abuse investigation. Berry was arrested and in July 2000 was convicted of 17 counts of sexual assault. Among his offenses, Berry suspended one of his daughters from hooks in a barn and strapped her to a tree during episodes of sexual abuse. When Berry showed up for sentencing, so did 29 members of his Jehovah's Witnesses congregation in Wilton, N.H., all of whom spoke in his favor, often in glowing terms, according to court records.

    "Whatever charges that have been brought against him have been somehow misconstrued," said Robert Michalowski, a former Wilton elder. "Elders in the congregation would have picked up on (sexual abuse) in a minute." In sentencing Berry, Judge Arthur Brennan said the church might have done more to help the victim. "The church didn't help her and the state didn't help her,"

    Brennan said. ". . . Perhaps if somebody had spoken years ago, if somebody had inquired, instead of relying perhaps on Jehovah . . . maybe it would have been . . . a lot less cruel for that child." Brennan said he was "not talking against anybody's religion. I'm saying I've seen this happen in any number of different congregations."

    The victim, Holly Brewer, of Berkeley, Calif., agreed to have her story told. Berry maintains his innocence and is appealing the conviction, his lawyer, Mark Sisti, said. Moreno would not comment on whether elders violated the law in this case but said, "Once in a while, in a small minority cases, elders screw up. They screw up because they don't call here (the Watch Tower legal department). When they call here, they don't screw up."

    The Hillsborough County attorney's office said it did not investigate whether elders broke the law by failing to report the suspected physical abuse. By the time prosecutors investigated, more than one year had passed since the elders' involvement, beyond the statute of limitations for prosecuting a misdemeanor such as failing to report.

    Three years ago, similar questions about elders' actions arose in a Texas case. When a family in the Houston-area church reported that a teen-age son was molesting his younger sister, elders visited the home, counseled the family and received the boy's assurance he would stop, according to allegations in the family's lawsuit against the church. Instead, the abuse continued, the lawsuit said. A criminal court jury in 1997 convicted the then-22-year-old for abuse committed as an adult. He was given a 40-year sentence for aggravated sexual assault.

    "The elders sat at that kitchen table and listened to her tell what her brother had done," said Kelly Siegler, an assistant district attorney for Harris County. "All they did is tell him to stop and they prayed about it. They just blew it off. No one ever told the police." Siegler said she would have prosecuted elders for failing to report abuse if the two-year statute of limitations hadn't expired. The family sued the church in civil court and in 1999 reached a settlement that bars both sides from discussing the case. Houston lawyer Jeffrey Parsons, who represented the Jehovah's Witnesses, said he was convinced the church conducted itself properly. "It was really an unfortunate circumstance, but (the family's lawsuit) was not a well-founded case."

    Strict burden of proof needed for discipline

    Taking a sexual abuse complaint to Jehovah's Witnesses church elders puts members in contact with a secretive church process that has a burden of proof that is much greater than in a civil court. If a church member is accused of any offense, elders follow a strict biblical standard. They require either the member's confession or the testimony of at least two witnesses, including the accuser, to prove the member's guilt, according to church attorney Moreno and church publications. This applies even in cases of sexual abuse, when there often are no "outside" witnesses.

    For victims who can't produce witnesses or persuade the accused person to confess, elders are instructed to "explain to the accuser that nothing more can be done in a judicial (church disciplinary) way," according to a 1995 article in the Jehovah's Witnesses' Watchtower -- a magazine with a circulation of 22 million in 132 languages. "And the congregation will continue to view the one accused as an innocent person," the article continued. The article offers one other avenue of justice: "The question of his guilt or innocence can be safely left in Jehovah's (God's) hands." Moreno said that eventually, the truth comes out. "Somebody else comes out of the woodwork and now you can take action," he said.

    Moreno said two separate accusers would count as two witnesses when making a sexual abuse accusation. Church policy neither encourages nor discourages members to report suspected or admitted sexual abuse to police, Moreno said. Elders are instructed to always call the central legal department of the church in Carmel, N.Y., upon receiving an accusation. When elders call, church lawyers tell them whether state law requires them to report abuse to police, Moreno said.

    A still-valid 1989 church memo also tells elders to call for legal advice before being interviewed by police, responding to a subpoena or voluntarily turning over confidential church records, unless police have a search warrant. Moreno said church lawyers might advise elders to refer victims to police or other outside help. "That's a personal decision." If elders suspect sexual abuse has occurred, they can begin church disciplinary hearings, in which what is said and written is held confidential. No one but elders may take notes, which are collected and kept in a secure place, according to the 1989 memo. It is a process intended to safeguard reputations and protect the church against lawsuits, according to the memo. The church memo warns of lawsuits by "vindictive or disgruntled ones" and "some who oppose the Kingdom preaching work" if accusations are leaked. No tape recordings of these proceedings are permitted.

    A Jan. 2 statement from J.R. Brown, director of public affairs for the Jehovah's Witnesses, said church elders "encourage the wrongdoers to do everything they can to set the matter straight with the authorities." But the strict rules of confidentiality -- in which elders are warned not to tell even their own family about disciplinary proceedings -- can leave a molester's identity shielded from those not involved.

    Bryan Rees, formerly of Augusta, Maine, said in a lawsuit that his stepfather, Alan Ayers, never warned him to stay clear of his next-door neighbor, church member Larry Baker. Baker had confessed to Ayers and other elders that he had molested another boy. The elders had secretly disciplined Baker, giving him "some real strict, severe counsel . . . and that was essentially it," Baker later testified. Maine didn't require church officials to notify authorities and the elders in Augusta never informed police or anyone else. Though they warned Baker to stay away from children, the molester testified that elders knew he was going door to door with Rees. "I'm sure they must have known," Baker testified. "There wasn't anything secret about it."

    Baker went on to molest Rees at least 30 times by his own admission between 1989 and 1992. He was convicted of unlawful contact with a minor and served about a 90-day jail term. Rees, who could not be reached for comment, won a $1.2 million judgment against Baker but has not been able to collect, according to Rees' lawyer, Michael Waxman. Rees later went public with his story after suing the Jehovah's Witnesses unsuccessfully in 1998. He alleged the church breached its fiduciary responsibility when it failed to warn him about Baker and when it failed to exert some type of control over Baker's actions. But Maine's highest court rejected such arguments in 1999. "The mere fact that one individual knows that a third party is or could be dangerous to others does not make that individual responsible for controlling the third party," the Supreme Judicial Court ruled. Ayers, Rees' stepfather, declined to comment, but church lawyer Moreno applauded the decision. "There is no duty to announce to people that 'John Brown' is a child abuser," he said. If the court had ruled otherwise, he said, it "would basically discourage people from going to their ministers and getting help." "If people could not count on confidentiality when they go and confess to a Catholic priest, there's going be quite a chilling effect on religion," he said.

    The Jehovah's Witnesses say the privilege of clergy confidentiality applies to any confidential communication with members, including disciplinary hearings that involve multiple elders and witnesses. A prosecutor in Hillsborough County, N.H., is currently seeking to force an elder to testify to what Gregory Blackstock, already convicted in one child molestation case, confessed to elders in the case of two other girls who were allegedly molested. The congregation involved was not the same as the one in the Paul Berry case. Assistant County Attorney Roger Chadwick said because more than one elder was involved, and one elder regularly phoned the alleged victims' mother with updates, the church couldn't claim exemption under the state's confidentiality law. "Simply put, (church) judicial investigations and telephone timeouts to confirm confessional details were not the types of speech that (clergy confidentiality laws) intended to protect," Chadwick said in a written brief filed in Hillsborough County Superior Court. But Attorney Paul Garrity, representing Blackstock, argued that just because Jehovah's Witnesses don't use the one-on-one confessional process of other religions, the state can't strip its right to confidentiality based on "theological differences as to how reconciliation with God is to be achieved." The case is pending.

    Kentuckian resigns over how suspicions handled

    The Jehovah's Witnesses, whose organization was founded in the 19th century, part company with traditional Christian groups on some key doctrines. They are best known for their door-to-door evangelism and their expectation that Jesus will soon establish the kingdom of God. They do not serve in the military or pledge allegiance to political symbols -- facts that have brought them persecution here and abroad -- though they preach obedience to the law. And it was the church's focus on the letter of the law that led elder and presiding overseer Bowen to publicly resign his church position in the Marshall County town of Draffenville. Bowen had been alerted to possible sexual abuse involving a family in his area. When he called the church's legal department, as required, lawyers told him Kentucky law did not require him to report the suspected abuse. After hearing details of the allegations, a separate church department then advised against a disciplinary hearing, Bowen said. He said elders go against such advice at the risk of losing their position. After he resigned, he said he reported the allegations of abuse to police. Bowen said he was told by police the case is under investigation.

    Bowen is still technically a member. Thomas Carrothers, the Jehovah's Witnesses' city overseer for nearby Paducah, said last month he saw no grounds for expelling Bowen. "People are allowed to express their points of view," he said. In a talk to the congregation about Bowen's criticism of church policies, Carrothers urged church members to respond with love to "opposers" and "the slanderous statements of lying apostates." Carrothers said he wasn't referring to Bowen. "I was quoting from Watchtower articles. I wasn't accusing him of it," he said. Bowen's father, Bill J. Bowen, denounced his son's actions in a videotaped interview produced and distributed by the church. "What (my son) is saying is just absurd," the older Bowen, a longtime church member, said. "I've got to hope that my son will turn around, change his mind."

    Elder David King of Edmonds, Wash., said he also resigned his church position in 1997, partly because of his disillusionment with the church's attention to "legal ramifications." When investigating an allegation of sexual abuse several years ago, King said, elders called a lawyer at church headquarters. "The moment we identified who we were, he immediately knew state law (in Washington) and said we didn't have to report it," King said. That was almost the first thing he said. "At the time, I was a true believer, but it shook me to think they were more concerned about legal ramifications than getting some kind of healthy recovery." The victims' parents later called police. King said he gradually stopped attending the church.

    Members say church discouraged efforts

    Church writings say members are allowed to seek outside help when they suspect abuse. Some members, such as Poisson, say they were intimidated by elders when they tried.

    In Keene, N.H., the guardian of a 15-year-old girl sued a Jehovah's Witnesses congregation in 1987, alleging that elders threatened the girl's parents with "religious excommunication and eternal damnation" if they sought police intervention or counseling for their daughter, who was sexually abused from 1975 to 1985. The lawsuit was settled, and the girl's lawyer, Charles Donahue, said he could not comment on it. The abuser -- the girl's father -- was later sentenced to three to eight years in prison in 1986 after pleading guilty to two counts of aggravated felonious sexual assault, according to records in Cheshire County Superior Court.
    Church lawyer Moreno said it would be "ridiculous" for any elder to make such a threat, and if one did, it would contradict church policy. "That's not scriptural," he said. "We teach the Scriptures. The Scriptures don't say, 'If you file criminal charges against an abuser you're going to have eternal damnation.' The one in danger of eternal damnation is the abuser." Church literature also says victims and other church members can seek professional therapy, as long as the counselor respects their beliefs and victims don't reveal names of alleged abusers in group therapy. But former Jehovah's Witnesses elder J. Michael Terry, of Conway, Ark., said his experience didn't match the policy. He said that about three or four years ago, he steered the mother of an abuse victim to a therapist, who then reported the crime. "I got jumped on pretty bad" by two fellow elders, Terry said. "I did what my conscience told me to do," said Terry, who is no longer active in the church. "They said I should have done nothing but listen."

    Arkansas law does not require clergy to report abuse to authorities but it does require social workers to. Terry is a social worker. He said the incident soured his working relationship with elders, and about three years later he was stripped of his elder's position for being uncooperative. One of the elders whom Terry said had criticized his actions declined to comment on his dealings with Terry.

    Repentant molesters can go door to door

    Watch Tower officials are not consistent on how the church punishes child molesters. In a Jan. 2 statement, church public affairs director Brown Church said that child abusers are "disfellowshipped," or expelled from the congregation. Later, he acknowledged the church can use less severe penalties. He defended his original statement, saying that for "mass consumption it conveys the thought (that elders) do institute this discipline. They're not soft on abusers." But an Aug. 1, 1995, church memo shows that repentant pedophiles can avoid excommunication and remain church members, as happened with Baker. The document also says elders can restore church memberships to pedophiles who convince elders they have repented. That's what happened in the case of Clement Pandelo of Paramus, N.J. In fact, Pandelo, who admitted to police he had molested young girls for 40 years, was twice disfellowshipped and twice reinstated, according to court documents. Pandelo pleaded guilty in 1988 to molesting his 12-year-old granddaughter and two other girls. His granddaughter, Corinne Holloway, now 24, said Pandelo's reinstatements compounded her physical and psychological trauma.

    Church elders "validated the perpetrator rather than the victim," said Holloway, of Spring Lake Park, N.J. "He had the privileges (of membership) and we were in this long, drawn-out process." Said Moreno: "I wouldn't be too happy myself if somebody abused my child and was reinstated. The bottom line is if an elder determines a former child abuser has demonstrated repentance, (he has) a scriptural obligation to reinstate him." Church policy permits Pandelo, as a member in good standing, to go door to door, spreading the Jehovah's Witnesses' message. Barbara Pandelo, Holloway's mother, said she finds that policy potentially harmful. "These perverts are still allowed to go door to door to unknowing householders," said Barbara Pandelo, of Belmar, N.J. "The Watch Tower Society doesn't make itself bothered with the danger it exposes families (to)."

    Brown said pedophiles are restricted from working with minors and must also be with a well-respected church member when they go door to door. Pedophiles also might not be sent into neighborhoods where they might be recognized as molesters, Brown said. Church memos tell elders that molesters who remain in the church should be warned not to touch children or be alone with them. But David Richart, of the National Institute on Children, said a strictly spiritual approach to child molestation is inadequate. "The whole idea of child sexual abuse is that it generally is an invisible kind of crime and it generally doesn't go away without in some cases treatment and in other cases imprisonment," said Richart, who reviewed Jehovah's Witnesses literature on the subject at The Courier-Journal's request. "The whole idea implicit in their response is that somebody can be persuaded or guilt-tripped into changing their behavior. It's generally a much more sophisticated problem than that. "Prayer can do a lot of things, and in the case of child sexual abuse it can be a powerful instrument for change, but it's no substitute for a societal intervention." Richart said he believes other religious groups have similar problems. "A lot of churches deal internally with allegations of child sexual abuse and refer to Scripture in ways which seem to encourage the children to be compliant."

    Some victims and their advocates want Jehovah's Witnesses to do what civil society has done -- adopt so-called "Megan's Laws," named for the New Jersey murder victim of a neighbor who had two previous sexual-abuse convictions. Such laws establish sexual-offender registries enabling the public to learn if their neighbors are pedophiles, though few churches of any denomination have such a policy. "People in the church have the right to know (a member is) a pedophile," said Carl Pandelo of Belmar, N.J., son of Clement Pandelo. Attorney Waxman, who represented molestation victim Rees in the Maine lawsuit, agreed. "The churches are going to say one of their main tenets is forgiveness," he said. "Let's assume there is a real, direct confrontation between a church's ideals and the state's interest in protecting kids from being abused. In my view, the kids win." Neal, the social worker and elder of the Jeffersontown Jehovah's Witnesses congregation, said if a member confessed to child molestation, he would tell the full body of elders and was confident the board would make members aware. "Nobody has a right to keep matters that really put other folks at risk secret," he said. "We're concerned about every member of the organization, and their best interest, their welfare, their security and safety are matters of concern. "We don't feel we would be discharging our spiritual responsibility if we held something secret that has a direct impact on the safety and welfare of others."

    Rule is to report cases when states require it

    When Jehovah's Witnesses elders call the central legal office, lawyers advise them on their state's reporting laws. Some states, like Kentucky, require citizens to report suspicions of abuse but provide exceptions for clergy-penitent conversations. Other states, like Indiana, allow no exceptions. Still others only require professionals in certain fields, mainly those dealing with children, to report abuse. In Boulder, Colo., in December 1991, elders in a Jehovah's Witnesses congregation publicly reprimanded member Leland Elwyn Davies after finding that he had fondled several teen-age girls, according to a report filed by the Boulder County sheriff's office, which investigated after the mother of three victims had alerted police.

    One victim, who spoke to police in January 1992, said she was "displeased that the behavior had not been reported by the elders to the authorities," according to the police report. Police contacted an elder in the congregation who said he could not give out confidential information from the disciplinary process. Colorado does not mandate that clergy give out such information. Police arrested Davies in July 1992 -- about six months after the church imposed discipline. He pleaded guilty to two counts of third-degree sexual assault and was placed on probation, according to the criminal court clerk in Colorado's 20th Judicial District. Davies died in August 2000. According to church lawyer Moreno, the system worked. Elders did their job, and victims and police did theirs, he said. "What was the harm?" Moreno said. "The report got made. "You've got a teen, who has been molested, upset at the elders for not calling the police?" he said. "You can call the police. You're the one injured. "Who makes the laws? Not us. Don't blame us for the laws, please. Talk to the state legislators of Colorado."
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Telegraph.co.uk News - May 26th 2001:

    Anger as 'exile' paedophile is spared prison

    RESIDENTS of the Western Isles are considering legal action after a court ruled that a paedophile need not go to jail because he had already gone into "voluntary exile" in the Outer Hebrides.

    By Tara Womersley

    Thomas Maxwell, 60, a blacksmith, was placed on the sex offenders' register after he was found guilty yesterday of two counts of shameless indecency towards a 12-year-old girl. Sheriff William Reid, at Alloa Sheriff Court, said that he believed a prison sentence, likely to last three months, would be of no benefit to Maxwell, or society.

    He told Maxwell, of Leverburgh, Harris: "I also take into account that you have voluntarily exiled yourself to some remote part of the Western Isles."

    His comments have caused outrage among Harris residents who are protesting about Maxwell living close to a primary school. Independent councillor for the west of Harris, Morag Munro, said she was considering taking the matter up with the Lord Advocate.

    She said: "If the fact that this man has come to live in Harris has been a factor in the sheriff not sending him to prison, that is outrageous. This is not some remote castaway island. The sheriff must be pretty ignorant if he thinks that this is some kind of uninhabited island. This man is living just a stone's throw away from the local primary school with 60 five to 11-year-olds in it and right next door to a house that has two young girls in it. Can you imagine what that family is going through?"

    Maxwell, a Jehovah's Witness for more than 30 years, committed the offences while living in Sauchie, near Alloa, between 1994 and 1996 after befriending the girl's parents. He has been put on three years' probation and given 240 hours' community service.

    His lawyer, April Campbell, told the court that her client had pleaded guilty to the charges on two separate occasions but the crown rejected the pleas and the trial went ahead.

    She said: "His life has been irrevocably shattered as a result of this. His marriage has broken down, he has been rejected by his family and rejected by the congregation of the church he was a member of. He has been compelled to leave this community and lives in complete isolation in the Western Isles. He has become a virtual recluse."
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Associated Press (AP) News - May 14th 2001:

    05/14/2001

    Associated Press Newswires

    Copyright 2001. The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.

    NASHUA, N.H. (AP) - A Hollis man's apparent admissions to religious elders about molesting two sisters can't be used as evidence in his trial, a judge has ruled.

    Gregory Blackstock, 45, is scheduled to go to trial next Monday on charges he molested two East Kingston sisters.

    Even without the admissions to elders at his Jehovah's Witness congregation, prosecutors say there's enough evidence to bring the case to trial.

    The state wanted to subpoena a minister and elders from Blackstock's congregation to testify about meetings at which they discussed the allegations.

    Judge William Groff ruled last week the meetings were confidential and protected by religious privilege.

    Blackstock faces eight counts of rape, punishable by up to 20 years in prison.

    He has been jailed since October, when he was convicted in Rockingham County Superior Court on a charge involving another girl in East Kingston.

    In Hillsborough County, Blackstock is charged with assaulting two East Kingston sisters at his home in Hollis between June 1996 and October 1998, and with assaulting a Hollis girl at his home at various times between September 1989 and June 1996.

    The two cases are to be tried separately, the first next Monday and the second on June 25.

    Hillsborough County Attorney Roger Chadwick had argued that Blackstock's discussions with the elders does not qualify under the confessiona privilege, because the elders also discussed Blackstock's statements with the girls' mother.

    Blackstock and his lawyer, Richard Monteith, argued the meetings were confidential, and to intrude on that privacy violates Blackstock's constitutional freedom to practice his religion.

    Blackstock became acquainted with the girls' families while living in East Kingston and attending a Jehovah's Witness church there.

    The sisters' mother contacted her church elders after one of the girls disclosed the abuse, Chadwick said. That elder then contacted elders in the Hollis congregation.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Priority2.org News - May 13th 2001:

    COURT HEARS CHURCH CONFESSION

    -JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. - Texas County Prosecutor Doug Gaston asked the state Supreme Court to allow him to subpoena Jehovah's Witness church officials, who listened Robert Eisenhour allegedly confessed to sexually abusing two children. Eisenhouer faces rape and sodomy charges. Eisenhouer's wife allegedly told investigators that Eisenhouer confessed his sexual involvement with the children to church elders.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    May 9th 2001:

    Adelanto man takes molestation plea for weekends in jail

    court: The parents of one young victim say they expected harsher sentence.

    By SCOTT VANHORNE/Staff Writer

    VICTORVILLE A 20-year-old Adelanto man accused of molesting two young girls accepted a plea bargain allowing him to admit to a misdemeanor charge and serve 210 days in jail on weekends.

    Scott Gilmans sentence, handed down in Victorville Superior Court Friday, infuriated one victims family.

    I was thinking he would get three to five years in state prison; no less, Winford Roberson said.

    It makes me feel like hes doing a part-time job at his own convenience, Kim Roberson said.

    In 1998 when the couples daughter was 3 years old, Gilman reportedly took the girl into a bathroom at the Jehovahs Witnesses Kingdom Hall in Adelanto and molested her in one of the stalls.

    Church officials did an internal investigation of the incident and determined nothing had happened. The girls parents later reported the molestation to the Adelanto Police Department, according to court records.

    Gilman was also accused of molesting a 4-year-old girl in her playhouse. The District Attorneys office filed two charges of lewd acts with a child against Gilman in April 1999, and the case dragged on until the defendant pleaded guilty to annoying or molesting a child, a misdemeanor, earlier this year.

    The other felony charge was dropped in accordance with the plea bargain.

    If Gilman had been convicted on both of the original charges, he would have faced three to 10 years in state prison. Gilmans attorney, Rollin Rauschl, said his client has maintained his innocence since the beginning of the ordeal.

    Rather than go to trial, my client agreed to take a plea bargain, Rauschl said. In his wildest dreams, he never thought picking up a child would be child annoyance.

    Rauschl said prosecutors offered the deal because they knew the case against Gilman was weak. Both victims were very young, and the investigation into the allegations didnt start until more than nine months after the incidents reportedly occurred, he said.

    Deputy District Attorney Connie Standley, who handled the case, was not available for comment.

    Probation Officer Monica Stidham interviewed Gilman before he was sentenced and recommended that he serve more time in jail than the plea bargain allowed.

    The truth is Mr. Gilman could still be a danger to the community if allowed to do weekends without getting some counseling before he is released to the community, she wrote. It is strongly recommended that Mr. Gilman serve 360 straight days in county jail.

    Besides the jail time, Gilman must also register as a sex offender for the rest of his life, pay the Robersons more than $3,000 in restitution and serve three years supervised probation.

    Meanwhile, the Robersons have moved to Los Angeles County. They said they wanted to get away from the High Desert and all the memories it holds.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    German Radio Interview - May 3rd 2001:

    B.TV Talk Focus: Jehovahs Witnesses

    Broadcast of May 03, 2001 B.TV 8:35 P.M. broadcasting time 26 minutes

    Presenter: Axel Drr
    Guests: Dr. Jan Badewin, Prof. Gerhard Besier, Bernd Klar spokesman of Jehovahs Witnesses

    Drr: Welcome to a new broadcast of B.TV talk. Im glad that you at home have got time for us. Today we want to talk about Jehovahs Witnesses. You all know those ladies and gentlemen who preferably stand in the pedestrian areas and hold up magazines: The Watchtower, Awake! . Today wed like to deal with Jehovahs Witnesses. What is the idea behind them, what is their world-view? There are competent guests here in the studio. I welcome Professor Gerhard Besier. You are a theologian at the Heidelberg university, fine that you are here. Then there is Bernd Klar, spokesman of Jehovahs Witnesses, fine that you are here. Next to me is Dr. Jan Badewin, representative for sect affairs of the Protestant Church in Baden, fine that you are here. Well, perhaps a short definition of your position at the beginning? Would you please begin? What are Jehovahs Witnesses?

    Klar: It really pleases me that you said in your introducing that Jehovahs Witnesses are generally known. We are known for our standing in the streets and speaking to people. But especially for our going from door to door and speaking about Gods kingdom.

    Drr: That means mission ?

    Klar: Although there are relatively few of us. Few Witnesses here in Germany. We count some 190,000 who feel close to us, we are known through our magazines, Watchtower and Awake!. We endeavour to bring the message of the bible to the people. Worldwide, there are some 6,000,000 of us, somewhat more than 6,000,000 Jehovahs Witnesses, and we are represented in nearly every country.

    Drr: What are Jehovahs Witnesses?

    Besier: A religion. There are great and small, older and newer religions, and Jehovahs Witnesses are a late product of an awakening in the 19th century. Compared with other great religions, Jehovahs Witnesses are rather a small religion.

    Drr: What are Jehovahs Witnesses?

    Badewin: Jehovahs Witnesses are a classical sect, originated at the end of the 19th century, with quite special characteristics. They consider only themselves as true Christians, they think that no one except themselves can be saved, can survive the Final Judgement. They speak about the coming end times in a way that many people feel to be very threatening. And there are many problems in the Jehovahs Witness milieu, and problems with those who try or have tried to leave the group.

    Drr: Now we have got a problem: Religion, sect, we already notice that there a differences as to the assessment. Now, the Christian churches Protestants, Catholics unite many different groups under the roof of these churches. Jehovahs Witnesses do not belong. Why not?

    Besier: There are many groups that do not belong. We must imagine that there are indeed many religions. There are Free Churches that are not included in the Land churches, and there are many small denominations. The term sect is negative in itself, and the whole description is negative. When speaking about this subject, we must consider the differences. In the mainstream churches there are many liberal people who are absolutely no devout Christians, and when they leave it does not pain anyone. The more intensive a religion is, and the more people invest into such a religion, the more painful is it if people are disappointed and leave. And that may be one of the phenomena that appear so amazing to the liberal mainstream church member. Not that anyone says: For heavens sake, why does it grieve him if he leaves? There are hundred thousands who leave the mainstream churches, and most of them do it without regret.

    Drr: Mr. Badewin has listed some characteristics as to why he tends to say sect, and says: This is a sect. Why do you tend to say: religion? Do you emphasize what Mr. Badewin just said, or do you say: What he says is not correct?

    Besier: In my opinion most of it is not correct, and there exist no empirical data. There is always a tendency that majorities project something into minorities, that they say: such a minority is dangerous, those people are different. In most cases this is not true. It is a classical example of forming a prejudice, and it is quite amazing here in Germany: We have got a problem with right-wing radicalism, and everyone says: Why does such a thing exist? They say there is a hierachization in the religious sphere, at the top there are the great mainstream religions, then it goes to the bottom, and there are the worst, Scientology in our case. Presumably all of this is not very truthful. It serves the great religions. But if we look at America, things are quite different there. In America, religions are listed according to their size, not according to a hierarchy. For who is he who determines a hierarchy? In our Federal Republic there is a constitutionally established separation of state and church, and it cannot be that the great churches are fed up on the quiet, and the small ones are defamed as minorities. In my view that is the real problem.

    Drr: Does that mean that tolerance is lacking? Or do you have some questions Id like to ask you to put them to the representative of Jehovahs Witnesses? That you say: This is a sect, and he must give me an answer to my questions?

    Badewin: I have been asked to give a very short assessment, and I have just answered very pithily. I do know that the word sect is a term that is not used by any denomination to depict themselves, that it is a problematic term. That is quite clear to me. You asked why Jehovahs Witnesses are not united under the roof of the other churches. The roof of no church does matter. Nobody expects that Jehovahs Witnesses become Protestants or Catholics, but there are ecumenical unions. There are the Association of Christian Churches, the Evangelical Alliance, the Ecumenical Council of Churches. Jehovahs Witnesses, however, are not able to relate to these unions, since they are of the opinion you can read that in their literature, it is no wickedness that they alone are the true religion, that anyone else is on an erroneous way.

    Drr: Is that true? Do you say about yourselves that you are the only true religion?

    Klar: Well, you do not expect something different from a representative of the Protestant Church, do you? We often hear in the media that we are depicted as a sect. I think that we have quite a different perception. We speak very intensely with people we visit in our service from door to door or in the streets. I think this is absolutely not the opinion of the majority. We are very much interested in having a dialogue with people.

    Drr: Any other denomination says this, too

    Klar: When I speak about my faith and as a Jehovahs Witness I do speak about my faith and explain it actively I am convinced, of course, that this is the true faith. But you will never read in our literature that Jehovahs Witnesses believe, for example, that they alone will be saved. It is God who determines this, not Jehovahs Witnesses. The apostle Paul, for example, says this quite clearly at Romans Ive got my bible it is made quite clear that God alone determines who will be saved.

    Drr: Well, we must ... so that the viewers know (drowns out Mr. Klar who is going on speaking) what this is about. Jehovahs Witnesses say that there are first of all 144,000 people, and then some others too, who will enter the kingdom of heavens, that means who are saved. And all the other ones will not be saved. There are some criteria.

    Klar: Id like to interrupt you. At the beginning I said that there are more than 6 million Jehovahs Witnesses worldwide, so this is a miscalculation. It is a problem with this kind of discussions that things are simplified, and as you said yourself, it was said quite pithily. But then there remains only little substance. The bible clearly speaks and now we have reached the stage of a theological consideration about two hopes for men: a heavenly government made of kings and priests who are responsible for creating a paradise here on earth, and here on earth people who live here, the number of which is not named, a great crowd living here on earth under good conditions. We are awaiting this paradise which had already existed at the beginning of mankind, and we point out to the people that this kingdom, as we depict it, will exist here on earth. And this has nothing to do with a threatening message or so. We are enthusiastic that this kingdom will constantly exist here on earth, and we go to the people and point out to this wonderful hope. And from the reaction of the people we see that they regard this hope highly.

    Drr: So, great consent for Jehovahs Witnesses? Mr. Badewin?

    Badewin: On the other hand the battle of Armageddon plays a great role in your literature, and this is anything else than a positive description. Here, very brutal things come into play. To me, the problem lies in your statement you say that other people can be saved, too. In your literature I can read: Long before Jehovahs Witnesses existed, millions of other people could be saved. But can you really accept Protestants, Catholics, Methodists, New Apostolics as Christians who likewise get full salvation?

    Besier: Sorry now, but our discussion is distorted. The Roman-Catholic Church does not recognize our Land church as a church we are both in the same, the Protestant, Land church but as an ecclesiastical community only. And on the verge of the Protestant Church there are evangelical groupings that believe similarly intensely, and that is the problem. He who finds such a complete fulfilment in his religion has it hard to perceive elements of truth in other religions. Only if religions become liberal if you can compare them then you are able to speak with another, in liberal surroundings oh, you think this way, well, I think differently. On the other side it is clear that the great mainstream churches join forces if it goes against Jehovahs Witnesses or the New Apostolic Church. And it would be a completely confused and incorrect picture if you said that all the Christian Churches get on well together, and that there are only some wicked sects that believe complete nonsense. We must accept that part of the doctrines that are teachings generally accepted by Jehovahs Witnesses, can well be found in the history of the Christian churches. We come across something, and we say: We know this, we know this. The blood issue or similar subjects these are things which already played a role with Bengel and in Pietism. And we shall not classify; we shall not present things as criminal; we shall not psychologize and say, those people are sick, etc. that is nowhere proven. That is the classical I repeat that example of forming a prejudice.

    Klar: Perhaps I may add: If you mention the battle of Armageddon, for example, you must of course decide whether you move away from what the bible says I have got my bible with me, and I could read out the story of ...

    Badewin: No, we dont need that ... Well, yes ...

    Klar: Here we have a theological conflict. If you say that what the bible says has no value to you, and we are therefore worth condemning, we can live with it. If we, however, refer to the bible, and as Jehovahs Witnesses we do that, then we must accept what the bible says.

    Drr: Could the real problem be that you do not only refer to the bible, but that you take it in a literal sense?

    Klar: We do not take everything from the bible in a literal sense, for the bible has many visions, prophecies only one example: bringing up children. People reproach us with using rigid methods in rearing children, but it is clear to every Jehovahs Witness that rearing children is the focal point, and love is the principle underlying the bringing up of children. If we took a look into the Catechism we would find the very same scripture quoted there: The one holding back his rod is hating his son. This is a statement from the bible, and now it is the responsibility of the parents to educate their children according to the principle of love.

    Drr: If you love your son you will be prompt to chastise him. And thats saying a lot.

    Klar: Yes, that is even contained in the Catechism, you can read it there. This is something taken from the bible. And now parents, who are responsible for educating their children, bear the responsibility to educate their children according to its standards and principles.

    Drr: We shall immediately go on speaking about the bible; we must just make a pause, then we shall be back again.

    ADVERTISING

    Drr: Now we continue to speak about Jehovahs Witnesses, and we just spoke about the bible and whether it is to be taken in a literal sense. How must we take it, how must we interpret it in our time? Mr. Badewin please...

    Badewin: Well, I think that there are, of course, many methods of bible interpretation and many different ways to read the bible, even within the Protestant Church, within the Catholic Church, which, as you rightly say, Mr. Besier, are no monoliths and this is even true for the Catholic Church but have many wings. But all those who live and believe there together, know that they are not alone, that they are not the only Christians, that there is a spectrum of different forms of belief, and that there is a certain spectrum as to the responsibility to live as Christians. And that is not a question of comparability, Mr. Besier, but a question of tolerance, and a question as to how far tolerance is a chance of religions. It is our task to introduce this tolerance and this rule of tolerance into religion again and again, for that is the very essence of the constitutional freedom of worship. And here, at this point, Id like to ask you again: What can you say to a Protestant or a Catholic Christian? Must he become a Jehovahs Witnesses in order to be saved?

    Klar: May I answer in short? Look, the willingness of Jehovahs Witnesses to have a dialogue with people is, I think, as clearly to discern as in no other denomination. We are those and this was Mr. Drrs introducing who speak at the doors, who stand in the streets, who hold up the Watchtower magazines. And these are no monologues; instead, we seek to speak with people. And if anyone says at the door that he is a Protestant Christian and takes his faith seriously, then I will reply that I value that I have met a faithful person. And I mean that honestly, this is no farce. This is our attitude towards people who practise their faith, and you will read nowhere in our literature that we make a joke out of their faith. Instead, we try of course to read the bible, we study it, not only now and then, but daily. I for myself read in the bible daily and then try, of course, to live according to my faith.

    Drr: Now were on the religious level. Id like to go to the social level, for man is not only a religious but a social creature, too, who lives in certain groups within the society. And now it is the case that with Jehovahs Witnesses in normal social life, the one or other thing is prescribed or banned. I do not believe that the children of Jehovahs Witnesses are allowed to go to rock concerts; or at least there are great events of Jehovahs Witnesses in stadiums where stage plays are performed, and a mother says: You must not be sad, dear son, if you are excluded at school. You have the true faith, and rock music is wicked. Rather listen to other music, to Christian songs. This is the case, isnt it?

    Klar: Of course we try to live according to the bible. And it is true that the denomination of Jehovahs Witnesses accepts advice from the bible and tries to translate it into modern life

    Drr: This means that you say to children who go to school: Give pop music or rock music a wide berth!

    Klar: No, any parents that have children decide for themselves what is appropriate for their children or not. I have experienced this for myself, for I was reared as a Jehovahs Witness, and according to the guidelines of the parents certain things were possible and certain things not.

    Drr: On the one hand you organize these big events, in the great stadiums you perform those amateur plays where you say: This is good, we can live according to it and we do want it that way; on the other hand you leave it to people and say that they may do it this way, but somehow you prescribe it

    Besier: I am sorry, but I must interfere...

    Drr: Im talking about the social...

    Besier: Indeed, this is the very problem. We must differentiate the dogmatic teachings from the behaviour, from the actual behaviour, there is a big gap between the Protestant and the Catholic Church, as it is here, too. One example: We have just analysed an empirical survey, and it shows that it is perfectly usual to have childrens parties. And look, if a Jew were your guest you would certainly not serve him an escalope of pork. Thats just the way it is, and we must this belongs to tolerance we must respect that Jehovahs Witnesses just do not have birthday parties. But there are other childrens parties.

    Drr: But no disco? Disco, what about disco?

    Klar: That rests with the parents. We cannot reduce this to one single case, since it is the responsibility of the parents. This becomes clear when you read our literature, Mr. Badewin, and I hope you have done this then you will see that it is not the denomination that is responsible for the education of the children. It is not Jehovahs Witnesses who say this or that the parents are responsible. But of course Jehovahs Witnesses want parents to educate their children according to their standards.

    Drr: Everybody does that!

    Klar: Every Protestant or Catholic person does that ...

    Drr: In the bible we do not find the word disco.

    Klar: No, but we can find there a standard, and we try to let our behaviour be governed by standards. For example, there is a biblical standard: Bad associations spoil useful habits.

    Drr: Disco...

    Klar: That may be the case with some parents. Precisely, yes!

    Badewin: But I think this involves not only discos, it already begins in the kindergarten that children are not allowed to have a birthday party, and they cannot expect the whole kindergarten group to cancel any birthday party just for the reason that there is a Witness child present that is not allowed to celebrate. They are not allowed to participate in dramas, they are not allowed to be elected as class spokesmen in school administration.

    Besier: ... this is not true ...

    Badewin: ... but of course ...

    Besier: ... no ...

    Badewin: But that are prejudices, Mr. Besier, you constantly speak about prejudices. Day after day we have to do with people who suffer from these points, who call us for this very reason, who want to speak with us from this very reason because they are not able to cope with these things from their personal experience.

    Besier: Precisely, because there is no tolerance the tolerance you just upheld.

    Badewin: That has nothing to do with tolerance. These are people who suffer from these things.

    Besier: You really do not suffer if you cannot have a birthday party, do you?

    Badewin: But children suffer.

    Besier: If there is no Christmas.

    Klar: Perhaps I may refer to this issue. My parents were dedicated Jehovahs Witnesses when I was a child. I experienced this myself. Well, even as a boy I was able to explain my personal beliefs to my school-fellows, they accepted it. I just said that I did not want to participate from this or that reason, but I was nevertheless part of the class. In no way I was an outsider. As I just mentioned I was part of the class through sports; we had much fun, and I had real friends in the class. It is not correct to latch on to birthday parties and say that our children are outsiders, and ... There are many denominations that do not know birthday, and their children have no birthday parties and yet are in no way outsiders. I even think that it is a task of the society to integrate such things and make the children no outsiders we are really not interested to become outsiders. Its a pity that this happens sometimes if it becomes a problem.

    Besier: In other societies like in the United States this is quite natural. There are Jews and Christians together. Of course you cannot celebrate Christmas as a Jew, can you? They are not willing to do this. And then you have to explain that only one group will celebrate Christmas, and the other group will have another feast. And then you can live together quite well. Tolerance which is always demanded, is a one-sided thing. It is demanded from the minorities, but instead it is a task of society as a whole. And we are just speaking about this issue: society. And this open society can take ... that distinguishes it from dictatorships it can quite well take this juxtaposition, a tolerance that is practised in daily life. That is the special thing about it. Just talk about tolerance is something anyone can do.

    Badewin: But this childrens birthday is only a sign of exclusion, and I know that many persons experienced that as an exclusion, and you cannot simply argue away this fact.

    Drr: What is your experience as a representative of the church for sect affairs? Just now you described it as exclusion, even as pressure. Is there any pressure? Can you generally say that all the members of Jehovahs Witnesses are under that pressure, or how does this become manifest?

    Badewin: Probably it is varying. Certainly there are people that feel quite well there and are absolutely socialized. But on the other hand all those, who get into conflict with the rules, experience the severity of that denomination. They experience to be disfellowshipped from that group, they experience no longer to be admitted. They experience what it means not to be treated as a normal ex-, but as an apostate. They experience what it means if all social contacts are called off.

    Drr: How simple is it then to leave the Protestant or Catholic church, how simple is it to leave Jehovahs Witnesses?

    Besier: There is an essential difference. It is difficult to become a Jehovahs Witness, and it is very simple to leave. With the Protestant church it is the opposite: As it were, you have ever belonged, and when you leave you have to undergo some administrative acts to get out, and ... Id merely like to point out to the formulation of your question: there are many representatives for sect affairs but no representatives for church affairs. We do indeed know that there are persons who suffer from the mainstream churches. There is something like ecclesiastically generated neuroses. Religion simply has two sides, thats the point. There is one side that sustains, builds up, and there is that dark side. And the weaker a religion is ... and the mainstream religions are weak religions, in the Protestant church there are only 5% participants in the services I do not know the precise number for the Catholic church only 5 % regularly participate in ecclesiastical life. Those are weak religions, they do not bind, they do not sustain, but of course they cause only little suffering. That is clear. And if we understand this correlation it becomes clear that it causes great pain when Jehovahs Witnesses are expelled because they misbehaved morally and did not repent. Here Mr. Klar can certainly say some words. Or when they leave because they say: I had put my hope in that religion and became disappointed. Such things happen, but: If you do not put your hope in any religion you can, of course, not become disappointed.

    Badewin: We do not speak about hope merely, it matters that contacts are called off, it matters that people can no longer be the friends of persons they formerly associated with. Here it comes to loneliness and isolation, and unfortunately there are suicides of persons who left Jehovahs Witnesses and were not able to cope with the problem of isolation.

    Besier: Such cases must be controlled very accurately!

    Badewin: Precisely!

    Besier: And there happen suicides in the mainstream churches too!

    Badewin: But of course.

    Besier: We must keep this in mind, too, this is the problem, and therefore I always come back to that subject. If you devote yourself to one particular group and have a particular prejudice in mind, you will always find reinforcing arguments. We know that very well from German history.

    Klar: Perhaps I may add something? Well, Mr. Badewin, I think we do absolutely agree that any suicide is one suicide too much. I think we need not speak about this. But of course, if a person is no longer a Jehovahs Witness as Mr. Besier just said; we made a survey, and it showed that it takes some 3 years until someone can be a Jehovahs Witness. It is preceded by an intense bible study, we take it seriously. A simple registration is not enough. It takes some 3 years before someone is baptized as a Jehovahs Witness, before he can call himself a Jehovahs Witness. And now, if we considered the matter logically it would not be very logical to say that we are interested in disfellowshipping persons. But of course, Mr. Badewin, I must be quite blunt: if, for example, a child molester showed up in a congregation and did not change his habit and showed no works of repentance, then we would no longer call him a Jehovahs Witness. Then the person will be disfellowshipped, for wed like to dissociate ourselves from such actions.

    Badewin: Critics matter, not child molesters, we must really make a clear difference here.

    Klar: Yes, but the bible determines the span of points why someone can no longer be a Jehovahs Witness. But, Mr. Badewin, I myself am an elder in a congregation of Jehovahs Witnesses. We really do not make it easy for ourselves to disfellowship a person. For we have intense feelings towards that person. We regard ourselves as a worldwide brotherhood, and so we fight for every single person, that he may keep his faith and we can continue to regard him as a Jehovahs Witness. As a rule: If I were saying today that I do no longer want to be a Witness, that I want to leave the Kingdom Hall, nothing would happen to me. My brothers would speak to me, they would visit me and ask why I do no longer want to be a Witness ...

    Badewin: The ex-Witnesses do see this differently ... the ex-Witnesses do see this differently!

    Klar: If I were actively working against the denomination and not keeping critical thoughts for myself but were making statements in the public, then this would have a different dimension.

    Badewin: Do you have it out with your critics?

    Klar: Yes, of course!

    Badewin: Why, then, dont you want to have critics in this discussion?

    Klar: The bible says this quite clearly ...

    Badewin: Oh, really?

    Klar: ... that anyone who leaves us ... take, for example, the Letter of Peter, it says that we dont have contact with those people.

    Badewin: Thats precisely what I wanted to hear.

    Klar: But before this happens, Mr. Badewin, there is an intense discussion and treatment of the problem with the concerned person. We do not take it easy to disfellowship persons, that must be said.

    Besier: I know that from other denominations. You should better not ask a runaway priest about the Catholic Church.

    Drr: Unfortunately our time is up, we shall go on discussing, perhaps you at home will go on too, but what has been said was clear. We had invited a critic, too, and he was not permitted to come. You say this is in the bible. What a pity, for to me that is a form of democracy to discuss with critics, too. Thank you. This was B.TV talk, have a nice time at home.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  • UnDisfellowshipped
    UnDisfellowshipped
    ThisIsDerbyshire.co.uk News - April 30th 2001:

    OAP made threats before raping girl

    This history from the newspaper This Is Darbyshire shows how horrible the JW children are brought up. It's a guilt-trip nobody can believe!

    by Mark Prissell

    A 72 year old man raped a teenage girl after threatening to "crush her neck" if she resisted, a court heard.

    Father-of-two Edward Reitzer, of Hillcrest Road, Chaddesden, had subjected the girl to months of sexual abuse before raping her, Derby Crown Court was told yesterday.

    The girl, who wept while giving evidence, said that grey-haired Reitzer vowed to tell everyone it was her fault if she did not submit.

    The girl is a devout Jehovah's Witness and she feared being banished from her church and losing her friends if Reitzer's allegations were believed.

    Reitzer, who uses a walking cane, is alleged to have indecently assaulted the girl between September, 1995, and November, 1996, when she was aged 14 and 15.

    The prosecution said that Reitzer he raped the girl between November, 1996, and July, 1998, after she had turned 16.

    While giving evidence, the girl, who cannot be named for legal reasons, said Reitzer had touched her and frequently got her to perform sex acts on him before committing the rapes.

    She said that the threats gradually got worse and he threatened to shoot her cat and take her computer away if she did not continue doing what he wanted.

    The girl told the court that Reitzer had guns in his bedroom and had claimed that he had shot someone at point-blank range.

    She said: "I didn't know what to do. I didn't see that I had a choice. I didn't want anyone to know."

    The girl said Reitzer then wanted to have full sex when she turned 16.

    She told the court that he vowed to crush her neck with his bare hands if she did not do what he wanted or made him upset.

    She said: "I said it wasn't right. He said that, in God's eyes, we were already married."

    Reitzer also threatened to "put it in the papers" that she wanted and instigated sex with him.

    She said that, as a Jehovah's Witnesses, sex was banned before marriage.

    She feared this would mean that, if her fellow church members thought she had instigated sex, they would not be allowed to talk to her.

    The girl told the court that Reitzer did not wear a condom the first time she was raped.

    The attack happened when she was a virgin.

    Reitzer denies three charges of indecent assault and four of rape.

    Adrian Reynolds, prosecuting, told the court that the girl said there were more than seven incidents of sexual behaviour between her and Reitzer.

    The trial continues.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    SeattleWeekly.com News - April 25th 2001:

    Skeletons in the closet

    Catholics aren't the only ones with something to hide.

    BY RICK ANDERSON

    ERICA RODRIGUEZ, now 23, was 4 years old when her Eastern Washington church leader, Manuel Beliz, began abusing her. She says she was molested or raped once a week until she was 11.

    When a teenage girl asked her bishop to stop her stepfather's sexual attacks, the church in Federal Way allegedly refused to help or call police.

    Jeremiah Scott was in grade school when he was first molested by Franklin Curtis, an elderly man placed in his home by a Portland church despite allegations that he was a pedophile.

    None of the above is Roman Catholic.

    "It's not just the Catholic Church in crisis," says attorney Timothy Kosnoff, who represents the aforementioned claimants in their lawsuits--Rodriguez's is against the Brooklyn-based Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York Inc. (Jehovah's Witnesses) and both Jane Doe's and Scott's are against the Salt Lake City- based Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormon Church). "Abuse can be widespread regardless of denomination."

    Kosnoff, a Bellevue attorney, has been working with lawyers across the U.S. for the past two years, targeting Protestant church leaders and even members with abuse claims. He represents more than a dozen non-Catholic plaintiffs in current suits, with more to come.

    "We have probably three or four cases in various stages of preparation we'll file in Oregon in the next 60 days and up to a dozen cases involving multiple victims we'll file in Utah, both against the Mormons," Kosnoff said last week. In January, he filed one of his largest suits, seeking $120 million from the Mormon Church for 12 people who claim that Franklin Curtis molested them in the late '70s and '80s.

    The Mormon Church paid $3 million to Jeremiah Scott last September. Scott claimed that church officials knew that Curtis was a pedophile when they arranged for him to move into Scott's home with the then-grade-schooler and his mother. Curtis was later convicted of repeatedly sexually abusing Scott, now 22.

    Officials of the 11 million-member Mormon Church admitted no wrongdoing and insist they have no Catholic-sized abuse problem. As in the Catholic scandal, reputations and millions of dollars in potential settlements are at stake for Protestant institutions as more claims emerge. The potential liability they face is also shifting. In the Scott case, a federal court in Portland decided that the Mormon Church could be held responsible for the actions of not just church officials but its membership. It was the first such ruling in the U.S., and the Mormon Church said it settled to head off a possibly larger jury award.

    IN THIS CLIMATE, almost all denominations are thought to be consulting with attorneys as a precaution. According to The Boston Globe, some Hare Krishna temples have gone so far as to file for bankruptcy in anticipation of facing sizable abuse claims.

    Though rabbis, ministers, and religious gurus have all been charged with molesting congregation members in recent years, the Globe said there's likely no equivalent to the Catholic Church's scandal. After all, an estimated 2,000 U.S. priests have been accused of abuse in the past half-century.

    But one of Kosnoff's fellow attorneys, Jeffrey Anderson of St. Paul, who has filed more than 400 sexual abuse cases against mostly Catholic clergy in the U.S. since the 1980s, says his targets are increasingly non-Catholic institutions and predicts a tide of Protestant victims is about to sweep in.

    An example, he says, is the Jane Does case Kosnoff recently filed here against a Mormon ward in Federal Way. The victims, two sisters, have asked that their names not be publicly known.

    The older girl endured years of molestation by her stepfather (now in prison for the attacks). When the younger sister was attacked, she sought the help of a Mormon bishop, according to the suit. The bishop allegedly neither alerted authorities nor informed the girls' mother, who was also a church member, and the abuse continued. The church is contesting the allegations.

    Erica Rodriguez's Spokane lawsuit against the 6 million-member Jehovah's Witnesses breaks new ground, says Kosnoff, as one of the first abuse cases filed against that church. Rodriguez sued after Manuel Beliz, an elder of the Spanish-speaking congregation in Othello, was convicted last year of raping and molesting the girl and sentenced to 11 years in prison.

    Her seven years of abuse ended only when her family moved away, says Rodriguez, who now lives in Sacramento. Rodriguez says she reported the abuse to church elders in California but was pressured to remain silent under threat of "disfellowship" (excommunication). The Othello congregation eventually heard of the accusations against Beliz but protected him, her lawsuit claims (several members testified about Beliz's good character during his criminal trial).

    Bill Bowen, a former Witnesses elder who resigned last year after criticizing the church for covering up what he called its pedophilia problem, says Rodriguez "should be praised for helping to save other children. Instead, her church has vilified her." He offers advice and support on a new Web site (silentlambs.org); he says he has already had 1,000 inquiries from possible victims. "Our denomination is now where the Catholic Church was 20 years ago," says Bowen, "right on the edge of a crisis."

    [email protected]
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Express Newspaper - March 25th 2001 - Page 25:

    "Ten-year sex ordeal of silent Witnesses "

    - Evil father abused his 3 children

    The children of an evil Jehovah's Witness told yesterday how they each submitted to 10 years of sexual abuse to protect the others.

    By day, Dennis Atwell, 58, posed as a family man who preached Christian values. But by night he used his son and two daughters as his "personal playthings".

    Each of the children endured this, believing they were protecting the others. The full story only emerged as the result of a chance comment at a family get-together last September.

    Eldest daughter, Kathy May, now 35, was just six when the abuse began. By the time she was 11, Atwell was having full sex with her. He kept her silent by threatening to abuse the others.

    Kathy, sister Annette Manlow, 29, and brother William, 24, were in court on Friday as their father was jailed for eight years.

    The minister's servant [sic - ministerial servant?] from Burham-on-Sea, Somerset, admitted 12 counts of indecent assault, indecency with a child, incest and another serious sexual offence.

    Annette was seven when Atwell forced her into his bed for full sex.
    "I kept asking Dad why he was doing this to me when we were taught in [the congregation] that sex outside marriage was wrong," she said.
    "But Dad just twisted it around saying that in the Bible Lot had sex with his daughters when his wife died, so it was allowed."

    Atwell admitted the offences as soon as his children told the police. His wife was not in court - she claims to her children that she didn't know what was happening."
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Murray Ledger Newspaper - March 12th 2001:

    Bowen criticizes Church's policies

    After being the focus of articles published in Christianity Today, on the MSNBC Internet site and across the Associated Press wire, it might seem as if William H. Bowen, a former elder in the Jehovahs Witness church, is everywhere.

    By EDWARD SHERIDAN
    Staff Writer

    And that is exactly where he wants to be - everywhere.

    Bowen resigned from his position as presiding overseer (chief elder) at the Draffenville Congregation of Jehovahs Witnesses Dec. 31 over what he called a pedophile refuge mentality in the church. He said his resignation was meant to stir the Jehovahs Witness denomination to action.

    Their response to me was, We accept your resignation, he said. At that point, they forced my hand, which was to go public with the matter.
    I want the whole world to know what these people are doing to children.

    Bowen, who moved to Draffenville from Seattle in 1994 with his wife, Sheila, and two children, Rex, 8, and Jessica, 13, is a lifetime Jehovahs Witness.

    He attained the status of elder at the age of 28, a rarity since most are at least 30 before they attain the position. Since that time, he has served as presiding overseer in two different congregations, including the one in Draffenville.

    During his time as an elder, Bowen said he became aware of several instances of child sexual abuse within the church, but did not question the churchs policy, which is set forth by the Brooklyn-based Watchtower Society, until becoming involved with a case in Draffenville.

    Although Bowen will not divulge details of the incident he became involved with in Draffenville, he will say that began to become increasingly disturbed by the Watchtower Societys policies on dealing with pedophiliacs.

    Its something thats completely protective of the pedophile, Bowen said. Once I discovered what the policy was, I could no longer remain silent. I could not live with myself as an elder and know that I was supporting or condoning such a stance.

    Particularly at issue with Bowen was that there had been occurrences of child molestation being reported to the elders of the church, but that the information was never passed on to law enforcement authorities.

    Under the Jehovahs Witness system, there must be two eyewitnesses to an offense before a complaint is considered valid. Even though the policy states that the two witnesses do not have to have witnessed the same event at the same time in cases of child molestation, Bowen said it places the burden of proof squarely on the shoulders of the victim.

    How can there be supporting evidence of child molestation when 90 percent of the time the crime is reported weeks or sometimes years later? he said. How many pedophiles will tell the truth, knowing if they do they could go to jail?

    Bowen said in many instances where the accused will not confess to church elders, crimes go unreported because of the churchs policy of not wishing to slander an innocent person.

    In many cases, accused pedophiles remain in positions of responsibility within the church, while their victims are threatened and told to suffer in silence or face church sanctions, he said. As it stands now, if my child were to accuse a Jehovahs Witness of molestation, all he or she would have to do is deny it.

    If the molester repents in private to church elders, the victim or the family of the victim is not encouraged to report the molestation to the police. If not reported, then church authorities demand the victim remain silent.

    Jeff Steen, an elder in the Murray denomination of Jehovahs Witnesses, spent several years as a deputy sheriff. He still does not consider himself an expert on state laws concerning sexual crimes against children, though.

    Every state has a little nuance on how these things are handled, Steen said. Because this is such a rare occurrence, this is not the type of thing that Im up on. Its not the kind of thing we handle on a regular basis. Its not an every day or week or year occurrence.

    As a result, Steen is thankful for the services of Watchtower Legal Services, which also operates out of the organizations Brooklyn headquarters.

    According to Jehovahs Witness policy, any time a legitimate instance of child sexual abuse is reported to a church elder, that elder is required to consult Watchtower Legal on what the state laws are on reporting such offenders.

    Kentucky, for example, requires its citizens to report suspected child abuse, but allows exceptions for clergy-penitent and attorney-client privilege. In contrast, Indiana allows no exceptions.

    A recent press release from the Watchtower Society stated, If child abuse becomes known to our church elders, they strictly comply with applicable child abuse reporting laws. Furthermore, we do not prohibit or discourage the victim or the victims parents from reporting child abuse to the authorities even if the alleged perpetrator is one of Jehovahs Witnesses.

    Usually, were made aware of the situation by a guardian or parent, Steen said. Its their legal responsibility to make that information known and not necessarily the church elders. Were not law enforcement.

    Steen said those who come to church elders with an issue are given confidentiality in much the same way a Catholic priest ensures confidentiality during confession. That policy, he said, can sometimes lead to some gray areas.

    You have a boy whos 18 and hes dating a girl whos 17-years-old, so now you have an adult whos dating a minor, he said. Lets say they go out and he gives her a kiss on the doorstep. If mom wants to report that to the authorities, Im not going to stop her but Im not going to report that.

    There are documented cases of Jehovahs Witnesses being convicted for child molestation in instances where the behavior was not reported to the authorities by church elders. Some of those cases include:

    A teen-age boy in Maine who was molested between 1989 and 1992 by a church member after elders disciplined the offender secretly for molesting another boy. The law did not require child abuse to be reported. The second victim told a therapist, who notified authorities.

    A man in New Hampshire who was given a 56-year prison sentence for physically abusing children. Elders did not report the abuse to the authorities, even after an accusation by the mans wife. New Hampshire law, however, required clergy to report suspicions of abuse.

    Although more documented court cases exist, Bowen said there are literally hundreds of similar cases that never see the light of day in a court of law.

    I posted my letter (of resignation) to the Watchtower Society on the Internet on one forum, he said. In two days, I had 15 pages of victims who wrote me. Each day, I receive new calls from victims.

    My religion has become saturated with pedophiles holding positions from top to bottom. In my 40-plus years as a member, I have yet to find one church among Jehovahs Witnesses that does not have problems with child molestation.

    While court documents are public, however, instances in which the Jehovahs Witness policy of turning to an elder for help worked will never be known because of the ecclesiastic privilege, according to Steen.

    We have a million people, approximately, in the United States, he said. We have, literally, thousands of congregations. Because you have a million people in our organization, it would be prudent to have some policy for dealing with people if child abuse were to happen.

    In the end, Steen said, instances in which elders mishandled matters come down to the basis of relying on a religion itself - imperfection.
    Im here to tell you were not perfect human beings.

    To be disfellowshipped is to cast your lot with the world and die, according to Jehovahs Witness doctrine.

    Those who are disfellowshipped are not allowed to communicate with their former church members or vice versa. They are not allowed to attend meetings. The excommunicated apostate is told he or she will not rise from the grave on Judgment Day.

    According to Bowen, it is this fear that keeps many victims of child abuse from coming forward in the church.

    Every breath we take operates under the eye of the Watchtower organization, he said. The function and purpose of Watchtower Legal is not to protect children. Its to avoid lawsuits.

    Still, Bowen considers himself a Jehovahs Witness today. His recent declarations have come with a price, however.

    I have no intention of being disfellowshipped because I am telling the truth, he said. I have been completely ostracized by my local congregation. Most members now shun me. They cannot excommunicate me for telling the truth.

    In the end, Bowen and Steen want the same thing - the protection of the victim - and while they seem to differ on the Watchtower Societys policies, they both place a strong emphasis on involving law enforcement authorities in all cases of alleged abuse.

    My recommendation is to first go to the police, Bowen said. Its not the elders business to investigate. They have no training in this area.

    We dont block or delay in any way the investigation of legal authorities, Steen said. Within the congregation, we dont protect (the accused) from the police at all. There is a confidentiality that exists, but we make sure that if a child is being abused, we make sure the authorities know about it.

    While Steen still supports Watchtower Society policies, however, Bowen remains on his mission to force the organization to revamp its position on the issue.

    The overall point is this: Not once have they acknowledged that they have made a mistake, Bowen said. Children are being hurt, and they should come out a do whats right for the children.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Daily Collegian (Pennsylvania State U.) Newspaper - February 27th 2001:

    COLUMN: Religion used as hurtful tool in some cases

    (U-WIRE) UNIVERSITY PARK, Pa. -- Last week I read an article on MSNBC's Web site about a major conflict that has emerged among Jehovah's Witnesses. An elder of the church in western Kentucky has criticized the way that the problems of pedophilia and sexual molestation have been handled. One of the basic tenets of the faith is the need to shun the outside world, and therefore, secular law. Rather, they are dealt with internally, and this disturbed the elder. He said publicly that many do not wish to recognize that sexual crimes against children exist, and thus, many go unpunished. Having gone public with this criticism, this man has been ostracized by those he might call friends, because he broke a rule of his religion.

    By Tom Lazzeri
    Daily Collegian (Pennsylvania State U.)

    02/27/2001

    This really got me thinking of the problems that religion brings to this country. It appears to me that religion is used just as much as a tool to hurt people as it is a means of spiritual enrichment. Now, I do recognize the positive aspects of organized religion. Much of the charity that goes on in this country does so through religious channels. And if people derive comfort from their respective religions, that's fine. However, there seems to be more and more religion jammed down our throats in the public arena and this is creating more conflict than calmness.

    The first issue that I find bothersome is school prayer. It was our third president, Thomas Jefferson, who said, "I have considered (religion) as a matter between every man and his Maker in which no other, and far less the public, had a right to intermeddle." Jefferson's idea that religion means the most when it is kept private is a powerful one. Can anyone justify for me the need to make one's religion public? Does faith mean more if you choose to burden other people with it? Being raised as a Roman Catholic, it has always been my belief that faith means more if it can be something special between an individual and his god. Sharing religion with people who could probably care less is simply a means of maintaining the status quo. Throughout history, humans, particularly men, have lusted for power. Once power has been attained, tools such as religion have been used to keep rulers in power. And this is all that school prayer is meant to accomplish when you get down to it. It is a method of indoctrination so that wealthy white people can get everyone believing the same things and maintain control over this country's political and commercial institutions.

    This constant debate over the morality of society has also wasted everyone's time. Certain kinds of television shows, movies, art, etc. have all been labeled as immoral by the religious establishment in this country. It is outrageous that in a country with explicit freedom of speech and implicit freedom of expression that censorship exists because small groups of people find certain items offensive. Morality is a standard that varies from person to person and cannot be used legitimately as a tool to suppress certain unpopular ideas. And the fact that religious leaders have any opinion about the influence of violence on children is laughable. For centuries, wars have been fought based on religious hatred (do the Crusades ring a bell?). This debate over the morality or immorality of sex and violence is simply another way of infecting people's minds with the idea that they are evil or wrong and should not be what they choose to be, but rather what Jerry Falwell or Pat Robertson wants them to be. For a closer example, look at what's going on in Harrisburg.

    This is a clear illustration of what generalized morals that are derived from religion can do to people. Some idiot named John Lawless has decided he was offended by the Sex Faire event that went on at Penn State a couple of weeks ago. So now, because of an isolated incident, he is going to go before the Appropriations Committee and tell them that Penn State should receive a cut in funding. Religion is not something that should be outlawed. It does some wonderful things for our society, and I would be a hypocrite if I told people that they were wrong for what they believe.

    But religion is dangerous when brought to the public stage. It is used as a tool to persecute certain people because they happen to disagree.

    And we Americans must reverse this tide of public censorship and intimidation. We must take more responsibility for the choices we make and be willing to defend those choices so that narrow-minded people cannot exert authority over us. We must stop looking to books that were written thousands of years ago for a moral compass. Instead, you should be your own moral authority. If you don't like something, don't pay it any attention. Don't let your children have anything to do with it. And most importantly, we should not let these people who claim to be moral authorities damage your life because of their beliefs.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NotWithMyChild.com News - February 13th 2001:

    The Maine Supreme Court has rejected an appeal by a Portland man

    The Maine Supreme Court has rejected an appeal by a Portland man who wanted the Jehovah's Witnesses held responsible for sexual abuse committed by one of their members. Bryan Rees already won a judgement against the man who abused him while he was a teenager, but he sued the Augusta church and three of its elders, as well as the New York-based "Watchtower Bible and Tract Society." The suit claimed the church failed to protect its members from a known pedophile. Rees says he will now appeal the case to the U-S Supreme Court.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Paducah Sun (Kentucky) Newspaper - February 12th 2001:

    Are pedophiles protected by policy of Jehovah's Witnesses?

    Letters to editor page

    Paducah Sun 2-12-01

    EDITOR:

    Letters to editor page

    Are pedophiles protected by policy of Jehovah's Witnesses?

    I was recently mentioned in the public media as a minister who resigned because of not condoning the church policy of the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society which, in my opinion, protects pedophiles within the organization. Local Watchtower officials have chosen to respond to local congregations of Jehovah's Witnesses with a local needs talk that basically requires the following of its members:

    1. Forbidding church members to speak with me about this matter.

    2. Forbidding me to speak with anyone within the church with the threat of disfellowshipment.

    3. Telling church members I have been untruthful about the facts.

    4. Instructing church members to tell anyone they meet in door-to-door witnessing work that I have lied about Watchtower policy with regard to pedophiles.

    The question that begs to be answered is, who is telling the truth? Does the Watchtower organization really protect pedophiles? I would like to offer you, the public, five simple questions to ask any Jehovah's Witness you meet to define what the truth is.

    1. If a pedophile were to move into your congregation, would you be informed?

    2. If a pedophile molested your child, would you be allowed to warn other parents in your congregation?

    3. If a pedophile denied he molested your child, and you could not produce two witnesses to the act of molestation, would the church discipline him/her in any way?

    4. If the state where you reside does not require reporting a pedophile who has molested a minor, will church officials report it?

    5. If, as an adult, you charge a pedophile with molesting you when you were a child and he denies it, would he discontinue serving as an elder?

    The truthful answers to the above questions are no, on each account. If any Jehovah's Witness says otherwise, he is not being truthful.

    I base the answers to the questions above not on my opinion, but my personal experience with Watchtower Legal Department, Watchtower Service Department, letters to body of elders and the personal experience of those whose children have been molested within the Watchtower organization.

    If this is the reality for Jehovah's Witness congregations, then I ask you, the public, are pedophiles protected within the Watchtower organization?

    WILLIAM BOWEN

    Benton


    Protection of children priority in Watchtower organization

    EDITOR:

    EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a response to the Bowen letter by J.R. Brown, director, Public Affairs Office of the Jehovah's Witnesses, located in Brooklyn, N.Y.

    We are writing regarding allegations made concerning our policy about handling accusations of child molestation. Some of these allegations have been reported in the media.

    We were very surprised to see that these statements were made, and we noted how inaccurate they are. Our position on pedophilia has been well-publicized for decades. Back in 1985, the Jan. 22 issue of Awake! devoted several pages to the subject and stated that the priority was protection of the child. It stated:

    "First, the child and other children too must be protected from any further abuse. This must be done, whatever the cost. In many cases the accused molester will have to be confronted. But whatever it takes, it is important that the child should feel confident that the molester will never be able to get at her (or him) again."

    Our Oct. 8, 1993, issue of Awake! featured a cover series of 14 pages entitled, "Protect Your Children!" In part it stated:

    "If your child discloses sexual abuse, you will no doubt feel shattered ... Praise the child for being so brave as to tell you what happened. Repeatedly reassure the child that you will do your best to provide protection; that the abuse was the abuser's fault, not the child's; that the child is not bad; that you love the child.

    "Some legal experts advise reporting the abuse to the authorities as soon as possible. In some lands the legal system may require this.

    "Parents must therefore make every reasonable effort to protect their children! Many responsible parents choose to seek out professional help for an abused child. Just as you would with a medical doctor, make sure that any such professional will respect your religious views. Help your child rebuild his or her shattered self-esteem through a steady outpouring of parental love."

    Following are excerpts from the Jan. 1, 1997, issue of The Watchtower:

    "Depending on the law of the land where he lives, the molester may well have to serve a prison term or face other sanctions from the state. The congregation will not protect him from this."

    "A child molester is subject to severe congregational discipline and restrictions."

    "For the protection of our children, a man known to have been a child molester does not qualify for a responsible position in the congregation."

    In conclusion, we reiterate that Jehovah's Witnesses do not shy away from informing people about pedophilia. We abhor the practice and actively work to keep our congregations free from such harmful influences. Millions of copies of our journals, which contain numerous articles that decry child abuse in any form and instead promote safe, trusting, and strong family relationships, have been read by our members and distributed to the public internationally. (Currently, The Watchtower has a circulation of more than 23 million copies per issue, and for Awake! it is more than 20 million.) Through these magazines and in other ways, Jehovah's Witnesses strive to contribute to the safety of children and to the building of strong families in the community.

    J.R. BROWN

    Director, Public Affairs Office

    Jehovah's Witnesses
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  • UnDisfellowshipped
    UnDisfellowshipped
    Associated Press (AP) News - February 11th 2001:

    Elder resigns, protests faith's policy on abuse charges

    Jehovah's Witness: Child abuse claims can go unreported

    11 February 2001

    By Kimberly Hefling

    Associated Press

    BENTON -- As a boy, William Bowen sat quietly in his seat while his classmates recited the Pledge of Allegiance.

    As a member of Jehovah's Witnesses, he spent years going door-to-door evangelizing and serving the denomination. In time, he became an elder, a position of authority, in his western Kentucky congregation.

    But as an elder, he was privy to information that caused him to question the Jehovah's Witnesses faith -- and to question it publicly, an ultimate transgression in the denomination.

    In a letter dated Dec. 31, Bowen resigned as an elder, in protest of how the denomination, a society that shuns the outside world, handles accusations of child molestation. His claim is that in such a culture, accusations of child sex abuse can go unreported to secular authorities by Jehovah's Witnesses members who don't want to go against their faith. The claims of abuse victims are discredited, he said.

    "They want to act like pedophilia doesn't exist. Shame on them," Bowen, 43, said in an interview from his Draffenville home where he runs a candlemaking business with his wife, Sheila.

    Though Bowen expects to be kicked out of Jehovah's Witnesses -- or disfellowshipped -- for speaking out, no disciplinary action has been taken by his congregation. Still, some members refuse to shake his hand or associate with him outside the church.

    "They treat us like we have the plague," Sheila Bowen said. "You don't go against God, and they think the organization is God."

    Bowen's decision to resign has made him a hero among the denomination's dissidents.

    "People have been intimidated into not saying anything. There are pieces of this all over the country where one person has a piece of evidence and another has a piece of evidence, but they're scared to bring it up because they'll be disfellowshipped," Bowen said. "So these people stay silent and they think, 'I'm the only one.' "

    A person who is disfellowshipped is considered invisible by denomination members and may even be shunned by members of his own family.

    "It's not just being out of a health club," said Steve Hassan, a former Unification Church member who is now a therapist and author. "It's losing your connection to God and members of your family inside the group."

    Bowen chose to speak out anyway, and his story has appeared in religious publications and the secular media. In Kentucky, The Paducah Sun and WPSD-TV covered it. The (Louisville) Courier-Journal published a story in which it examined court records in seven child molestation cases around the nation involving members of Jehovah's Witnesses.

    Bowen said a Jehovah's Witnesses policy requiring two people to witness wrongdoing before it is acknowledged by leaders makes it nearly impossible to prove child molestation occurs. Victims who do come forward confident they will receive help from church leaders are often left feeling betrayed, Bowen said.

    Bowen said he became interested a couple of years ago after reading a confidential file alleging a member had molested a child in the early 1980s. He said he disapproved of the way the case was handled by church officials even after he spoke up about it.

    J.R. Brown, spokesman at the Jehovah's Witnesses' headquarters in the New York City borough of Brooklyn, said he believes Bowen does not have a full understanding of church policies.

    Members are free at all times to report abuse to secular authorities, Brown said. "This is a personal decision on how you want to handle this," he said.

    What is revealed to church leaders is generally kept confidential unless state law requires that allegations of abuse be turned over to police, he said.

    "We deal with sin, and law enforcement deals with crime," Brown said.

    In some cases, however, the matter is turned over to secular authorities regardless of the law, Brown said.

    Of Bowen, he said: "He's concerned about victims of child abuse, and we are, too."

    Brown said the faith does require at least two witnesses to prove any kind of wrongdoing -- including child molestation -- because that is what is taught in the Bible. But corroborating evidence can be used instead of a second witness to prove wrongdoing, Brown said.

    James Bonnell, an elder in Bowen's congregation, said the faith reaches out and helps people in need. It is not controlling, he said.

    "It's a free choice," said Bonnell, of nearby Gilbertsville. "Everything you do is based on love of God and your neighbor."

    'An identity thing'

    The Jehovah's Witnesses denomination has 89,985 congregations and 5.5 million members worldwide, according to its Web site. It was founded in Pittsburgh in 1872 by Charles Taze Russell, a former Congregationalist layman.

    Members refuse to bear arms, salute the flag or participate in secular government. They also refuse to accept blood transfusions. They reject a number of doctrines taught by traditional Christianity, including the divinity of Jesus Christ.

    Jehovah's Witnesses are taught that the faith is the authority and the only way to salvation. They are to bring all problems to their religious leaders first.

    Members attend numerous meetings, do Bible lessons and go door-to-door to evangelize, and some who have left the faith say that schedule leaves little time to think individually.

    "It's like an identity thing," said Marilyn Zweifel, an ex-Jehovah's Witness in New Berlin, Wis., who runs a telephone helpline for current members. "Somewhere along the way, you lose your identity."

    Debbie Shard, an ex-member who also operates a helpline from Ocoee, Fla., said members are told going outside the religion could hurt the faith's image and make it difficult to recruit and retain new members.

    "If there's a fire, you'd call the fire department," Shard said. "If it's something that's not a life-threatening emergency, then the elders would be the first line of defense."

    She agreed with Bowen, saying: "If you go to the elders, they will generally discourage you from going to (secular) authorities because it will bring reproach on the organization."

    A former elder agreed. "Denial and secrecy are elemental to the way the society operates," said Mike Terry, of Conway, Ark.

    Raymond Franz, a high-ranking Jehovah's Witness who was disfellowshipped and then wrote two books about the inner workings of the faith, said he doesn't believe cases of pedophilia are any more prevalent in the denomination than in others. But the religion's insularity leads to problems, he said.

    "The thing is to keep everything within the system," Franz said. "That's a natural reaction for Witnesses because they are essentially a closed community . . . "
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Paducah, Kentucky News Channel 6 Report - February 10th 2001:

    Jehovahs witnesses, resigned pastor draw battle line over child molestation coverup charges

    Last month, Bill Bowen not only resigned as presiding overseer of Jehovahs Witnesses at Draffenville. Bowen charged his denomination with a national policy of elders not reporting confessions made by child molesters to police.

    Jehovahs Witnesses, officially called the Watchtower Bible Tract Society, have been drawing battle lines to counter Bowens charges. Bowen is also gearing up for the fight.

    Bowen resigned, saying he wanted to expose a dirty little secret about Jehovahs witnesses, their silence when child molesters confess. He held up a church directive on the subject, saying Not one word is said in this entire article about going to the authorities.

    Silent at first about Bowens charges, Jehovahs Witnesses later publicly denied shielding offenders. Church leader Tom Carrothers says its okay for a parent to inform police if their child is molested. But as far as the local elders, it would depend on what the legal department suggested.

    Carrothers referred to the legal department at Watch Tower headquarters in New York City. Bowen says officials at legal only tell elders whether their state requires reporting molesters. Watch Tower says local leaders are then told to follow the law.

    Word of Bowens charges brought messages of support by E-mail from around the nation. One thanked NewsChannel 6 for exposing the Witnesses policy, claiming many in the church were sexually abused. One stated an elders son was caught with his hand in the panties of an 8-year old girl.

    One E-mail came from a woman who claimed her husband, a Jehovahs Witness elder, didnt turn a child abuser in. Another woman wrote that when her child was victimized, elders told her to wait on Jehovah rather to inform police.

    When Jehovahs Witnesses decided to refute Bowens charges, they produced a videotape featuring denials. Cape Girardeau business leader Earl Norman appears on the tape.

    Norman, an elder who says he has been a Witness for 50 years, says, Ive not at any time ever dealt with, or handled a matter like this. And to be accused of this being prevalent is ridiculous.

    Also from Cape Girardeau, police Lt. Carl Kinnison is seen on tape saying, I have never known any Jehovahs Witnesses or anyh group that has ever attempted to cover up.

    Jehovahs Witness officials telephoned NewsChannel 6 asking when excerpts of their videotape would be aired. Meanwhile, Bowens supporters sent more E-mail messages. With each side trying to get the last word, its like a ping-pong match with the media as the table.

    The nation may hear more of Bill Bowens charges. Bowen says NBCs Dateline will start interviewing people for a report.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Associated Press (AP) News - February 10th 2001:

    Crisis of faith

    Elder resigns to protest Jehovah's Witnesses policies on child molesting reports

    By KIMBERLY HEFLING
    Associated Press

    BENTON, Ky. -- As a boy, William Bowen sat quietly in his seat while his classmates recited the Pledge of Allegiance.

    As a member of Jehovah's Witnesses, he spent years going door-to-door evangelizing and serving the denomination. In time, he became an elder, a position of authority, in his western Kentucky congregation.

    But as an elder, he was privy to information that caused him to question the Jehovah's Witnesses faith -- and to question it publicly, an ultimate transgression in the denomination.

    In a letter dated Dec. 31, Bowen resigned as an elder, in protest of how the denomination, a society that shuns the outside world, handles accusations of child molestation. His claim is that in such a culture, accusations of child sex abuse can go unreported to secular authorities by Jehovah's Witnesses members who don't want to go against their faith. The claims of abuse victims are discredited, he said.

    "They want to act like pedophilia doesn't exist. Shame on them," said Bowen, 43, in an interview from his home in Draffenville where he runs a candlemaking business with his wife, Sheila.

    Though Bowen expects to be kicked out of Jehovah's Witnesses -- or disfellowshipped -- for speaking out, no disciplinary action has been taken by his congregation. Still, some members refuse to shake his hand or associate with him outside the church.

    "They treat us like we have the plague," said Sheila Bowen. "You don't go against God, and they think the organization is God."

    Bowen's decision to resign has made him a hero among the denomination's dissidents.

    "People have been intimidated into not saying anything. There are pieces of this all over the country where one person has a piece of evidence and another has a piece of evidence, but they're scared to bring it up because they'll be disfellowshipped ...," Bowen said. "So these people stay silent and they think, 'I'm the only one."'

    A person who is disfellowshipped is considered invisible by denomination members and may even be shunned by members of his or her own family.

    "It's not just being out of a health club," said Steve Hassan, a former Unification Church member who is now a therapist and author. "It's losing your connection to God and members of your family inside the group."

    Bowen chose to speak out anyway, and his story has appeared in religious publications and the secular media. In Kentucky, The Paducah Sun and WPSD-TV covered it. The (Louisville) Courier-Journal published a story in which it examined court records in seven child molestation cases around the nation involving members of Jehovah's Witnesses.

    Bowen said a Jehovah's Witnesses policy requiring two people to witness wrongdoing before it is acknowledged by leaders makes it nearly impossible to prove child molestation occurs. Victims who do come forward confident they will receive help from church leaders are often left feeling betrayed, Bowen said.

    Bowen said he became interested a couple of years ago after reading a confidential file alleging a member had molested a child in the early 1980s. He said he disapproved of the way the case was handled by church officials even after he spoke up about it.

    J.R. Brown, spokesman at the Jehovah's Witnesses' headquarters in the New York City borough of Brooklyn, said he believes Bowen does not have a full understanding of church policies.

    Members are free at all times to report abuse to secular authorities, Brown said. "This is a personal decision on how you want to handle this," he said.

    What is revealed to church leaders is generally kept confidential unless state law requires that allegations of abuse be turned over to police, he said.

    "We deal with sin, and law enforcement deals with crime," Brown said.

    In some cases however, the matter is turned over to secular authorities regardless of the law, Brown said.

    Of Bowen, he added: "He's concerned about victims of child abuse and we are, too." Brown said the faith does require at least two witnesses to prove any kind of wrongdoing -- including child molestation -- because that is what is taught in the Bible.

    But corroborating evidence can be used instead of a second witness to prove wrongdoing, Brown said.

    James Bonnell, an elder in Bowen's congregation, said the faith reaches out and helps people in need. It is not controlling, he said.

    "It's a free choice," said Bonnell, of nearby Gilbertsville, Ky. "Everything you do is based on love of God and your neighbor."

    The Jehovah's Witnesses denomination has 89,985 congregations and 5.5 million members worldwide, according to its Web site. It was founded in Pittsburgh in 1872 by Charles Taze Russell, a former Congregationalist layman.

    Members refuse to bear arms, salute the flag or participate in secular government. They also refuse to accept blood transfusions. They reject a number of doctrines taught by traditional Christianity, including the divinity of Jesus Christ.

    Jehovah's Witnesses are taught that the faith is the authority and the only way to salvation. They are to bring all problems to their religious leaders first.

    Members attend numerous meetings, do Bible lessons and go door-to-door to evangelize, and some who have left the faith say that schedule leaves little time to think individually.

    "It's like an identity thing," said Marilyn Zweifel, an ex-Jehovah's Witness in New Berlin, Wis., who runs a telephone helpline for current members. "Somewhere along the way, you lose your identity."

    Debbie Shard, an ex-member who also operates a helpline from Ocoee, Fla., said members are told going outside the religion could hurt the faith's image and make it difficult to recruit and retain new members.

    "If there's a fire, you'd call the fire department," Shard said. "If it's something that's not a life-threatening emergency, then the elders would be the first line of defense."

    She agreed with Bowen, saying: "If you go to the elders, they will generally discourage you from going to (secular) authorities because it will bring reproach on the organization."

    A former elder agreed.

    "Denial and secrecy are elemental to the way the society operates," said Mike Terry, of Conway, Ark.

    Raymond Franz, a high-ranking Jehovah's Witness who was disfellowshipped and then wrote two books about the inner workings of the faith, said he doesn't believe cases of pedophilia are any more prevalent in the denomination than in others. But the religion's insularity leads to problems, he said.

    "The thing is to keep everything within the system," Franz said. "That's a natural reaction for Witnesses because they are essentially a closed community..."

    It took several years before Carl and Barbara Pandelo of New Jersey left Jehovah's Witnesses.

    In 1988, their 12-year-old daughter told them she was being molested by her grandfather, Clement Pandelo of Paramus, N.J., who was also a member of the faith.

    As part of a plea agreement, Clement Pandelo pleaded guilty to two counts of endangering the welfare of a child and one count of criminal sexual conduct. Court documents reveal Clement Pandelo admitted to having fondled girls for 40 years.

    He was placed on five years' probation. He did not return phone messages seeking comment.

    Carl and Barbara Pandelo said they wish they had pushed the case more so he served prison time, but they decided to allow the plea bargain because church leaders told them to do so -- a claim disputed by Anthony Valenti, an elder in the Hackensack, N.J., congregation.

    Despite the denomination's opposition to suing other members, the couple later decided to sue the grandfather's homeowner's insurance policy for funds to help pay for the daughter's therapy. A multimillion-dollar verdict was returned last year to the daughter, now Corinne Pandelo-Holloway. It is being appealed.

    She and her parents are angry that Clement Pandelo -- after being disfellowshipped at least once -- is now a member of a Jehovah's Witnesses congregation in Hawthorne, N.J., and is allowed to evangelize door-to-door.

    "It really does anger me," said Pandelo-Holloway, now 24 and married. "People don't know what he is, and I think they should be warned he's a convicted pedophile in your neighborhood."
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Courier-Journal Newspaper - February 4th 2001:

    Jehovah's Witnesses Accused of Harboring Abusers

    Those door-to-door missionaries may have a hidden history

    The Jehovah's Witnesses organization is under growing attack by some of its members for policies they say can allow child molesters to go unreported, putting church members and the public at increased risk.

    Church officials say elders alert authorities to suspected abuse in states that require reporting. But in other states they prefer to take steps to protect children that don't breach what they see as confidential communication between elders and members.

    Church policy also allows some confessed molesters - whose offenses are usually kept secret - to stay in the church community, sometimes with tragic results.

    An examination by The Courier-Journal of court cases involving church members in Maine, New Hampshire and Texas showed that the confidential church disciplinary process was blamed by some victims for allowing molestation to continue.

    Among the cases:

    o In Maine, a teen-age boy was molested between 1989 and 1992 by a church member after church elders disciplined the offender secretly for molesting another boy. Elders did not report the first case to authorities, and the law did not require them to. The second victim told a therapist, who notified authorities.
    o In New Hampshire, a former church member said elders failed to act when she told them her husband was physically abusing their children. The man received a 56-year prison sentence in October 2000 for sexual abuse that continued years after the woman went to elders. New Hampshire law required clergy to report suspicions of abuse.
    o In Texas, a prosecutor said church elders told a teen-age boy to stop molesting his younger sister in 1992 but failed to report it to police in apparent violation of state law. The boy later molested a second sister and in 1997 was sentenced to a 40-year prison term. Police were alerted when one victim reported the abuse to hospital staff following a suicide attempt.

    Church policy also allows molesters who are deemed repentant to continue evangelizing door to door - accompanied by another member - bringing them into contact with unsuspecting households that don't have the church's knowledge that a child molester is at their door.

    The church's policies on sexual abuse have come under scrutiny following the resignation of a Western Kentucky church elder who objected to them.

    The court cases have played out against the backdrop of a growing national consensus that all suspected child abuse must be reported and known molesters aggressively identified. A lawyer for the Jehovah's Witnesses church, which has nearly 1 million members nationally and 6 million worldwide, said it complies with those state laws that require church elders to report abuse.

    "If there is a law that mandates reporting, that takes precedent over any confidentiality, whether in church policy or statute," said Mario Moreno, associate general counsel for the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society, a legal corporation of the church.

    "I refuse to support a pedophile refuge mentality." William H. Bowen in his letter resigning his church leadership post in Draffenville, Ky. "In states where there is no reporting requirement, it's a different scenario," Moreno said.

    Elders might have the victim relocated away from the abuser or have the parent or guardian of the victim, or even the accused person, report the abuse to police, he said.

    "The laws of this country, as well as people's moral values, tell you there are some things that should be kept private. That's why laws protect confidential communications between clergy and their flock."

    But Moreno said elders who contact the church's legal department with cases of suspected sexual abuse - as they must do - are often advised to refer victims to police or other outside help, even if the law doesn't require it.

    Victims and their parents are free, Moreno said, to seek help from police or therapists and should not blame the church if they choose not to do so.

    "Parents are encouraged to do whatever they need to do to protect their child," said Moreno.

    However, some abuse victims and their advocates, in lawsuits and in interviews, said that fear of reprisals by church leaders, coupled with the importance of the church in their lives, made them reluctant to report abuse outside the church.

    William H. Bowen resigned Dec. 31 as presiding overseer (chief elder) of the Draffenville congregation near Paducah, saying he could no longer support church policies that he felt allowed child molesters to go undetected.

    "I refuse to support a pedophile refuge mentality that is promoted among bodies of elders around the world," wrote Bowen in his letter of resignation.

    "Criminals should be ousted, identified and punished to protect the innocent and give closure to the victim."

    Elders Approached

    Woman felt punished for accusing husband

    Sara Poisson of Claremont, N.H., said she never considered turning to anyone but her church elders when then-husband Paul Berry began physically abusing some of her children. Berry would eventually receive a 56-year prison term.

    "Whatever issues might arise that required guidance were to be handled within the congregation by the body of elders," Poisson said at her ex-husband's sentencing for molestation on Oct. 31, 2000.

    Bowen said members of the Jehovah's Witnesses are continually told that if they have any problems within the family, they are to go to the elders for help.

    "You have to understand the Jehovah's Witnesses organization," Bowen said. "Their life revolves around following the direction of what the local elders and the organization say."

    But Sam Neal, an elder in the congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses in Jeffersontown, Ky., said church members are not sheltered.

    "All of us have access to all of the things in the community," said Neal, retired associate dean of the University of Louisville's School of Social Work. "Whatever we need, we know where to go."

    Church attorney Moreno said church members know they can go to the authorities on a matter of abuse. "They haven't committed a sin by turning in a Jehovah's Witness to the authorities," he said. "It's a very personal decision."

    But Poisson said in Hillsborough County Superior Court at her ex-husband's sentencing that when she went to elders with her concerns, they repeatedly told her that she "needed to be a better wife" and "needed to pray more."

    "Each time I spoke to the elders I was sanctioned in some way," Poisson told the court. "Some privilege was removed because I had dared to usurp the authority of my husband." Poisson later told a reporter she was barred from speaking at some meetings and restricted in the amount of door-to-door evangelism she could do.

    New Hampshire law since the late 1970s has said that any "person having reason to suspect that a child has been abused or neglected shall report the same."

    There is no evidence in court records or elders' public comments that the church reported Poisson's allegations.

    Poisson said in court that while she did not know of Berry's sexual abuse, she knew of and didn't report the physical abuse, and "this I have to live with for the rest of my life."

    Authorities found out, Poisson said, when her son went to school one day with the imprint of a fly swatter on his leg.

    Poisson said a social worker gave her an ultimatum: Have Berry leave the house or lose custody of their children. She chose the former and said the congregation shunned her.

    Some time later, one of Poisson's daughters ran away. She returned 18 months later, frail and sick, with the words, "Why did you let that happen?" Poisson said in court. The girl informed her mother that Berry had sexually abused her from age 4 to 10.

    Mother and daughter went to police to launch the sexual abuse investigation.

    Berry was arrested and in July 2000 was convicted of 17 counts of sexual assault. Among his offenses, Berry suspended one of his daughters from hooks in a barn and strapped her to a tree during episodes of sexual abuse.

    When Berry showed up for sentencing, so did 29 members of his Jehovah's Witnesses congregation in Wilton, N.H., all of whom spoke in his favor, often in glowing terms, according to court records.

    "Whatever charges that have been brought against him have been somehow misconstrued," said Robert Michalowski, a former Wilton elder. "Elders in the congregation would have picked up on (sexual abuse) in a minute."

    In sentencing Berry, Judge Arthur Brennan said the church might have done more to help the victim.

    "The church didn't help her and the state didn't help her," Brennan said. ". . . Perhaps if somebody had spoken years ago, if somebody had inquired, instead of relying perhaps on Jehovah . . . maybe it would have been . . . a lot less cruel for that child."

    Brennan said he was "not talking against anybody's religion. I'm saying I've seen this happen in any number of different congregations."

    The victim, Holly Brewer, of Berkeley, Calif., agreed to have her story told.

    Berry maintains his innocence and is appealing the conviction, his lawyer, Mark Sisti, said.

    Moreno would not comment on whether elders violated the law in this case but said, "Once in a while, in a small minority cases, elders screw up. They screw up because they don't call here (the Watch Tower legal department). When they call here, they don't screw up."

    The Hillsborough County attorney's office said it did not investigate whether elders broke the law by failing to report the suspected physical abuse. By the time prosecutors investigated, more than one year had passed since the elders' involvement, beyond the statute of limitations for prosecuting a misdemeanor such as failing to report.

    Three years ago, similar questions about elders' actions arose in a Texas case.

    When a family in the Houston-area church reported that a teen-age son was molesting his younger sister, elders visited the home, counseled the family and received the boy's assurance he would stop, according to allegations in the family's lawsuit against the church.

    Instead, the abuse continued, the lawsuit said. A criminal court jury in 1997 convicted the then-22-year-old for abuse committed as an adult. He was given a 40-year sentence for aggravated sexual assault.

    "The elders sat at that kitchen table and listened to her tell what her brother had done," said Kelly Siegler, an assistant district attorney for Harris County. "All they did is tell him to stop and they prayed about it. They just blew it off. No one ever told the police."

    Siegler said she would have prosecuted elders for failing to report abuse if the two-year statute of limitations hadn't expired.

    The family sued the church in civil court and in 1999 reached a settlement that bars both sides from discussing the case.

    Houston lawyer Jeffrey Parsons, who represented the Jehovah's Witnesses, said he was convinced the church conducted itself properly. "It was really an unfortunate circumstance, but (the family's lawsuit) was not a well-founded case."

    Church Process

    Strict burden of proof needed for discipline

    Taking a sexual abuse complaint to Jehovah's Witnesses church elders puts members in contact with a secretive church process that has a burden of proof that is much greater than in a civil court.

    If a church member is accused of any offense, elders follow a strict biblical standard. They require either the member's confession or the testimony of at least two witnesses, including the accuser, to prove the member's guilt, according to church attorney Moreno and church publications.

    This applies even in cases of sexual abuse, when there often are no "outside" witnesses.

    For victims who can't produce witnesses or persuade the accused person to confess, elders are instructed to "explain to the accuser that nothing more can be done in a judicial (church disciplinary) way," according to a 1995 article in the Jehovah's Witnesses' Watchtower - a magazine with a circulation of 22 million in 132 languages.

    "And the congregation will continue to view the one accused as an innocent person," the article continued.

    The article offers one other avenue of justice: "The question of his guilt or innocence can be safely left in Jehovah's (God's) hands."

    Moreno said that eventually, the truth comes out. "Somebody else comes out of the woodwork and now you can take action," he said. Moreno said two separate accusers would count as two witnesses when making a sexual abuse accusation.

    Church policy neither encourages nor discourages members to report suspected or admitted sexual abuse to police, Moreno said. Elders are instructed to always call the central legal department of the church in Carmel, N.Y., upon receiving an accusation.

    When elders call, church lawyers tell them whether state law requires them to report abuse to police, Moreno said. A still-valid 1989 church memo also tells elders to call for legal advice before being interviewed by police, responding to a subpoena or voluntarily turning over confidential church records, unless police have a search warrant.

    Moreno said church lawyers might advise elders to refer victims to police or other outside help. "That's a personal decision."

    If elders suspect sexual abuse has occurred, they can begin church disciplinary hearings, in which what is said and written is held confidential. No one but elders may take notes, which are collected and kept in a secure place, according to the 1989 memo.

    It is a process intended to safeguard reputations and protect the church against lawsuits, according to the memo. The church memo warns of lawsuits by "vindictive or disgruntled ones" and "some who oppose the Kingdom preaching work" if accusations are leaked.

    No tape recordings of these proceedings are permitted.

    A Jan. 2 statement from J.R. Brown, director of public affairs for the Jehovah's Witnesses, said church elders "encourage the wrongdoers to do everything they can to set the matter straight with the authorities."

    But the strict rules of confidentiality - in which elders are warned not to tell even their own family about disciplinary proceedings - can leave a molester's identity shielded from those not involved.

    Bryan Rees, formerly of Augusta, Maine, said in a lawsuit that his stepfather, Alan Ayers, never warned him to stay clear of his next-door neighbor, church member Larry Baker. Baker had confessed to Ayers and other elders that he had molested another boy.

    The elders had secretly disciplined Baker, giving him "some real strict, severe counsel . . . and that was essentially it," Baker later testified.

    Maine didn't require church officials to notify authorities and the elders in Augusta never informed police or anyone else. Though they warned Baker to stay away from children, the molester testified that elders knew he was going door to door with Rees.

    "I'm sure they must have known," Baker testified. "There wasn't anything secret about it."

    Baker went on to molest Rees at least 30 times by his own admission between 1989 and 1992. He was convicted of unlawful contact with a minor and served about a 90-day jail term.

    Rees, who could not be reached for comment, won a $1.2 million judgment

    Rees later went public with his story after suing the Jehovah's Witnesses unsuccessfully in 1998. He alleged the church breached its fiduciary responsibility when it failed to warn him about Baker and when it failed to exert some type of control over Baker's actions.

    But Maine's highest court rejected such arguments in 1999.

    "The mere fact that one individual knows that a third party is or could be dangerous to others does not make that individual responsible for controlling the third party," the Supreme Judicial Court ruled.

    Ayers, Rees' stepfather, declined to comment, but church lawyer Moreno applauded the decision.

    "There is no duty to announce to people that 'John Brown' is a child abuser," he said. If the court had ruled otherwise, he said, it "would basically discourage people from going to their ministers and getting help."

    "If people could not count on confidentiality when they go and confess to a Catholic priest, there's going be quite a chilling effect on religion," he said.

    The Jehovah's Witnesses say the privilege of clergy confidentiality applies to any confidential communication with members, including disciplinary hearings that involve multiple elders and witnesses.

    A prosecutor in Hillsborough County, N.H., is currently seeking to force an elder to testify to what Gregory Blackstock, already convicted in one child molestation case, confessed to elders in the case of two other girls who were allegedly molested. The congregation involved was not the same as the one in the Paul Berry case.

    Assistant County Attorney Roger Chadwick said because more than one elder was involved, and one elder regularly phoned the alleged victims' mother with updates, the church couldn't claim exemption under the state's confidentiality law.

    "Simply put, (church) judicial investigations and telephone timeouts to confirm confessional details were not the types of speech that (clergy confidentiality laws) intended to protect," Chadwick said in a written brief filed in Hillsborough County Superior Court.

    But Attorney Paul Garrity, representing Blackstock, argued that just because Jehovah's Witnesses don't use the one-on-one confessional process of other religions, the state can't strip its right to confidentiality based on "theological differences as to how reconciliation with God is to be achieved."

    The case is pending.

    An Elder Protests

    It was the church's focus on the letter of the law that led elder and presiding overseer Bowen to publicly resign his church position in the Marshall County town of Draffenville, Kentucky.

    William Bowen had been alerted to possible sexual abuse involving a family in his area. When he called the church's legal department, as required, lawyers told him Kentucky law did not require him to report the suspected abuse.

    After hearing details of the allegations, a separate church department then advised against a disciplinary hearing, Bowen said.

    He said elders go against such advice at the risk of losing their position. After he resigned, he said he reported the allegations of abuse to police. Bowen said he was told by police the case is under investigation.

    Bowen said a Jehovah's Witnesses policy requiring two people to witness wrongdoing before it is acknowledged by leaders makes it nearly impossible to prove child molestation occurs. Victims who do come forward confident they will receive help from church leaders are often left feeling betrayed, he said.

    Bowen is still technically a member. Thomas Carrothers, the Jehovah's Witnesses' city overseer for nearby Paducah, said he saw no grounds for expelling Bowen. "People are allowed to express their points of view," he said.

    In a talk to the congregation about Bowen's criticism of church policies, Carrothers urged church members to respond with love to "opposers" and "the slanderous statements of lying apostates."

    Carrothers said he wasn't referring to Bowen.

    "I was quoting from Watchtower articles. I wasn't accusing him of it," he said.

    Bowen's father, Bill J. Bowen, denounced his son's actions in a videotaped interview produced and distributed by the church.

    "What (my son) is saying is just absurd," the older Bowen, a longtime church member, said. "I've got to hope that my son will turn around, change his mind."

    Elder David King of Edmonds, Wash., said he also resigned his church position in 1997, partly because of his disillusionment with the church's attention to "legal ramifications."

    When investigating an allegation of sexual abuse several years ago, King said, elders called a lawyer at church headquarters.

    "The moment we identified who we were, he immediately knew state law (in Washington) and said we didn't have to report it," King said. "That was almost the first thing he said.

    "At the time, I was a true believer, but it shook me to think they were more concerned about legal ramifications than getting some kind of healthy recovery."

    The victims' parents later called police. King said he gradually stopped attending the church.
    Outside Help

    Church writings say members are allowed to seek outside help when they suspect abuse, but members say church discouraged efforts.

    Some members, such as Poisson, say they were intimidated by elders when they tried.

    In Keene, N.H., the guardian of a 15-year-old girl sued a Jehovah's Witnesses congregation in 1987, alleging that elders threatened the girl's parents with "religious excommunication and eternal damnation" if they sought police intervention or counseling for their daughter, who was sexually abused from 1975 to 1985.

    The lawsuit was settled, and the girl's lawyer, Charles Donahue, said he could not comment on it. The abuser - the girl's father - was later sentenced to three to eight years in prison in 1986 after pleading guilty to two counts of aggravated felonious sexual assault, according to records in Cheshire County Superior Court.

    Church lawyer Moreno said it would be "ridiculous" for any elder to make such a threat, and if one did, it would contradict church policy.

    "That's not scriptural," he said. "We teach the Scriptures. The Scriptures don't say, 'If you file criminal charges against an abuser you're going to have eternal damnation.' The one in danger of eternal damnation is the abuser."

    Church literature also says victims and other church members can seek professional therapy, as long as the counselor respects their beliefs and victims don't reveal names of alleged abusers in group therapy.

    But former Jehovah's Witnesses elder J. Michael Terry, of Conway, Ark., said his experience didn't match the policy.

    He said that about three or four years ago, he steered the mother of an abuse victim to a therapist, who then reported the crime. "I got jumped on pretty bad" by two fellow elders, Terry said.

    "I did what my conscience told me to do," said Terry, who is no longer active in the church. "They said I should have done nothing but listen."

    Arkansas law does not require clergy to report abuse to authorities but it does require social workers to. Terry is a social worker.

    He said the incident soured his working relationship with elders, and about three years later he was stripped of his elder's position for being uncooperative.

    One of the elders whom Terry said had criticized his actions declined to comment on his dealings with Terry.
    Range of Penalties
    Repentant molesters can go door to door

    Watch Tower officials are not consistent on how the church punishes child molesters. In a Jan. 2 statement, church public affairs director Brown Church said that child abusers are "disfellowshipped," or expelled from the congregation. Later, he acknowledged the church can use less severe penalties.

    He defended his original statement, saying that for "mass consumption it conveys the thought (that elders) do institute this discipline. They're not soft on abusers."

    But an Aug. 1, 1995, church memo shows that repentant pedophiles can avoid excommunication and remain church members, as happened with Baker.

    The document also says elders can restore church memberships to pedophiles who convince elders they have repented.

    That's what happened in the case of Clement Pandelo of Paramus, N.J.

    In fact, Pandelo, who admitted to police he had molested young girls for 40 years, was twice disfellowshipped and twice reinstated, according to court documents. Pandelo pleaded guilty in 1988 to molesting his 12-year-old granddaughter and two other girls.

    His granddaughter, Corinne Holloway, now 24, said Pandelo's reinstatements compounded her physical and psychological trauma.

    Church elders "validated the perpetrator rather than the victim," said Holloway, of Spring Lake Park, N.J. "He had the privileges (of membership) and we were in this long, drawn-out process."

    Said Moreno: "I wouldn't be too happy myself if somebody abused my child and was reinstated. The bottom line is if an elder determines a former child abuser has demonstrated repentance, (he has) a scriptural obligation to reinstate him."

    Church policy permits Pandelo, as a member in good standing, to go door to door, spreading the Jehovah's Witnesses' message.

    Barbara Pandelo, Holloway's mother, said she finds that policy potentially harmful.

    "These perverts are still allowed to go door to door to unknowing householders," said Barbara Pandelo, of Belmar, N.J. "The Watch Tower Society doesn't make itself bothered with the danger it exposes families (to)."

    Brown said pedophiles are restricted from working with minors and must also be with a well-respected church member when they go door to door.

    Pedophiles also might not be sent into neighborhoods where they might be recognized as molesters, Brown said.

    Church memos tell elders that molesters who remain in the church should be warned not to touch children or be alone with them.

    But David Richart, of the National Institute on Children, said a strictly spiritual approach to child molestation is inadequate.

    "The whole idea of child sexual abuse is that it generally is an invisible kind of crime and it generally doesn't go away without in some cases treatment and in other cases imprisonment," said Richart, who reviewed Jehovah's Witnesses literature on the subject at The Courier-Journal's request.

    "The whole idea implicit in their response is that somebody can be persuaded or guilt-tripped into changing their behavior. It's generally a much more sophisticated problem than that.

    "Prayer can do a lot of things, and in the case of child sexual abuse it can be a powerful instrument for change, but it's no substitute for a societal intervention."

    Richart said he believes other religious groups have similar problems.

    "A lot of churches deal internally with allegations of child sexual abuse and refer to Scripture in ways which seem to encourage the children to be compliant."

    Some victims and their advocates want Jehovah's Witnesses to do what civil society has done - adopt so-called "Megan's Laws," named for the New Jersey murder victim of a neighbor who had two previous sexual-abuse convictions.

    Such laws establish sexual-offender registries enabling the public to learn if their neighbors are pedophiles, though few churches of any denomination have such a policy.

    "People in the church have the right to know (a member is) a pedophile," said Carl Pandelo of Belmar, N.J., son of Clement Pandelo.

    Attorney Waxman, who represented molestation victim Rees in the Maine lawsuit, agreed.

    "The churches are going to say one of their main tenets is forgiveness," he said. "Let's assume there is a real, direct confrontation between a church's ideals and the state's interest in protecting kids from being abused. In my view, the kids win."

    Neal, the social worker and elder of the Jeffersontown Jehovah's Witnesses congregation, said if a member confessed to child molestation, he would tell the full body of elders and was confident the board would make members aware.

    "Nobody has a right to keep matters that really put other folks at risk secret," he said. "We're concerned about every member of the organization, and their best interest, their welfare, their security and safety are matters of concern.

    "We don't feel we would be discharging our spiritual responsibility if we held something secret that has a direct impact on the safety and welfare of others."
    Telling authorities

    When Jehovah's Witnesses elders call the central legal office, lawyers advise them on their state's reporting laws. Some states, like Kentucky, require citizens to report suspicions of abuse but provide exceptions for clergy-penitent conversations. Other states, like Indiana, allow no exceptions. Still others only require professionals in certain fields, mainly those dealing with children, to report abuse.

    In Boulder, Colo., in December 1991, elders in a Jehovah's Witnesses congregation publicly reprimanded member Leland Elwyn Davies after finding that he had fondled several teen-age girls, according to a report filed by the Boulder County sheriff's office, which investigated after the mother of three victims had alerted police.

    One victim, who spoke to police in Jan. 1992, said she was "displeased that the behavior had not been reported by the elders to the authorities," according to the police report.

    Police contacted an elder in the congregation who said he could not give out confidential information from the disciplinary process. Colorado does not mandate that clergy give out such information.

    Police arrested Davies in July 1992 - about six months after the church imposed discipline. He pleaded guilty to two counts of third-degree sexual assault and was placed on probation, according to the criminal court clerk in Colorado's 20th Judicial District. Davies died in August 2000.

    According to church lawyer Moreno, the system worked. Elders did their job, and victims and police did theirs, he said.

    "What was the harm?" Moreno said. "The report got made.

    "You've got a teen, who has been molested, upset at the elders for not calling the police?" he said. "You can call the police. You're the one injured.

    "Who makes the laws? Not us. Don't blame us for the laws, please. Talk to the state legislators of Colorado."
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  • UnDisfellowshipped
    UnDisfellowshipped
    The Courier-Journal Newspaper - February 4th 2001:

    News Items on Pedophiles inside the Watchtower

    News Item Sunday, February 4, 2001

    Jehovah's Witnesses' policy on child molesters attacked

    Church says it follows laws on reporting suspected abuse

    By PETER SMITH, The Courier-Journal

    New Jersey residents Barbara Pandelo, left, and daughter Corinne Holloway are unhappy that Holloway's grandfather, who sexually abused her, was reinstated twice after being expelled by Jehovah's Witnesses' congregations. Church policy also allows him to go door to door as an evangelist.

    BY PETER ACKERMAN,
    ASBURY PARK PRESS

    In Focus
    Molestation victim, parents think church elders let them down
    Policies on reporting abuse allegations vary among religious denominations

    The Jehovah's Witnesses church is under growing attack by some of its members for policies they say can allow child molesters to go unreported, putting church members and the public at increased risk.

    Church officials say elders alert authorities to suspected abuse in states that require reporting. But in other states they prefer to take steps to protect children that don't breach what they see as confidential communication between elders and members.

    Church policy also allows some confessed molesters -- whose offenses are usually kept secret -- to stay in the church community, sometimes with tragic results.

    An examination by The Courier-Journal of court cases involving church members in Maine, New Hampshire and Texas showed that the confidential church disciplinary process was blamed by some victims for allowing molestation to continue.

    Among the cases:

    In Maine, a teen-age boy was molested between 1989 and 1992 by a church member after church elders disciplined the offender secretly for molesting another boy.

    Elders did not report the first case to authorities, and the law did not require them to. The second victim told a therapist, who notified authorities.

    In New Hampshire, a former church member said elders failed to act when she told them her husband was physically abusing their children. The man received a 56-year prison sentence in October 2000 for sexual abuse that continued years after the woman went to elders.
    New Hampshire law required clergy to report suspicions of abuse.

    In Texas, a prosecutor said church elders told a teen-age boy to stop molesting his younger sister in 1992 but failed to report it to police in apparent violation of state law. The boy later molested a second sister and in 1997 was sentenced to a 40-year prison term. Police were alerted when one victim reported the abuse to hospital staff following a suicide attempt.

    Church policy also allows molesters who are deemed repentant to continue evangelizing door to door -- accompanied by another member -- bringing them into contact with unsuspecting households that don't have the church's knowledge that a child molester is at their door.

    The church's policies on sexual abuse have come under scrutiny following the resignation of a Western Kentucky church elder who objected to them.

    The court cases have played out against the backdrop of a growing national consensus that all suspected child abuse must be reported and known molesters aggressively identified.

    A lawyer for the Jehovah's Witnesses church, which has nearly 1 million members nationally and 6 million worldwide, said it complies with those state laws that require church elders to report abuse.

    "If there is a law that mandates reporting, that takes precedent over any confidentiality, whether in church policy or statute," said Mario Moreno, associate general counsel for the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society, a legal corporation of the church.

    "I refuse to support a pedophile refuge mentality."

    William H. Bowen in his letter resigning his church leadership post in Draffenville, Ky.

    "In states where there is no reporting requirement, it's a different scenario," Moreno said.

    Elders might have the victim relocated away from the abuser or have the parent or guardian of the victim, or even the accused person, report the abuse to police, he said.

    "The laws of this country, as well as people's moral values, tell you there are some things that should be kept private. That's why laws protect confidential communications between clergy and their flock."

    But Moreno said elders who contact the church's legal department with cases of suspected sexual abuse -- as they must do -- are often advised to refer victims to police or other outside help, even if the law doesn't require it.

    Victims and their parents are free, Moreno said, to seek help from police or therapists and should not blame the church if they choose not to do so.

    "Parents are encouraged to do whatever they need to do to protect their child," said Moreno.

    However, some abuse victims and their advocates, in lawsuits and in interviews, said that fear of reprisals by church leaders, coupled with the importance of the church in their lives, made them reluctant to report abuse outside the church.

    William H. Bowen resigned Dec. 31 as presiding overseer (chief elder) of the Draffenville congregation near Paducah, saying he could no longer support church policies that he felt allowed child molesters to go undetected.

    "I refuse to support a pedophile refuge mentality that is promoted among bodies of elders around the world," wrote Bowen in his letter of resignation.

    "Criminals should be ousted, identified and punished to protect the innocent and give closure to the victim."

    ELDERS APPROACHED

    Woman felt punished for accusing husband

    Sara Poisson of Claremont, N.H., said she never considered turning to anyone but her church elders when then-husband Paul Berry began physically abusing some of her children. Berry would eventually receive a 56-year prison term.

    "Whatever issues might arise that required guidance were to be handled within the congregation by the body of elders," Poisson said at her ex-husband's sentencing for molestation on Oct. 31, 2000.

    Bowen said members of the Jehovah's Witnesses are continually told that if they have any problems within the family, they are to go to the elders for help.

    "You have to understand the Jehovah's Witnesses organization," Bowen said. "Their life revolves around following the direction of what the local elders and the organization say."

    But Sam Neal, an elder in the congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses in Jeffersontown, Ky., said church members are not sheltered.

    "All of us have access to all of the things in the community," said Neal, retired associate dean of the University of Louisville's School of Social Work. "Whatever we need, we know where to go."

    Church attorney Moreno said church members know they can go to the authorities on a matter of abuse. "They haven't committed a sin by turning in a Jehovah's Witness to the authorities," he said. "It's a very personal decision."

    But Poisson said in Hillsborough County Superior Court at her ex-husband's sentencing that when she went to elders with her concerns, they repeatedly told her that she "needed to be a better wife" and "needed to pray more."

    "Each time I spoke to the elders I was sanctioned in some way," Poisson told the court. "Some privilege was removed because I had dared to usurp the authority of my husband." Poisson later told a reporter she was barred from speaking at some meetings and restricted in the amount of door-to-door evangelism she could do.

    New Hampshire law since the late 1970s has said that any "person having reason to suspect that a child has been abused or neglected shall report the same."

    There is no evidence in court records or elders' public comments that the church reported Poisson's allegations.

    Poisson said in court that while she did not know of Berry's sexual abuse, she knew of and didn't report the physical abuse, and "this I have to live with for the rest of my life."

    Authorities found out, Poisson said, when her son went to school one day with the imprint of a fly swatter on his leg.

    Poisson said a social worker gave her an ultimatum: Have Berry leave the house or lose custody of their children. She chose the former and said the congregation shunned her.

    Some time later, one of Poisson's daughters ran away. She returned 18 months later, frail and sick, with the words, "Why did you let that happen?" Poisson said in court. The girl informed her mother that Berry had sexually abused her from age 4 to 10.

    Mother and daughter went to police to launch the sexual abuse investigation.

    Berry was arrested and in July 2000 was convicted of 17 counts of sexual assault. Among his offenses, Berry suspended one of his daughters from hooks in a barn and strapped her to a tree during episodes of sexual abuse.

    When Berry showed up for sentencing, so did 29 members of his Jehovah's Witnesses congregation in Wilton, N.H., all of whom spoke in his favor, often in glowing terms, according to court records.

    "Whatever charges that have been brought against him have been somehow misconstrued," said Robert Michalowski, a former Wilton elder. "Elders in the congregation would have picked up on (sexual abuse) in a minute."

    In sentencing Berry, Judge Arthur Brennan said the church might have done more to help the victim.

    "The church didn't help her and the state didn't help her," Brennan said. ". . . Perhaps if somebody had spoken years ago, if somebody had inquired, instead of relying perhaps on Jehovah . . . maybe it would have been . . . a lot less cruel for that child."

    Brennan said he was "not talking against anybody's religion. I'm saying I've seen this happen in any number of different congregations."

    The victim, Holly Brewer, of Berkeley, Calif., agreed to have her story told.

    Berry maintains his innocence and is appealing the conviction, his lawyer, Mark Sisti, said.

    Moreno would not comment on whether elders violated the law in this case but said, "Once in a while, in a small minority cases, elders screw up. They screw up because they don't call here (the Watch Tower legal department). When they call here, they don't screw up."

    The Hillsborough County attorney's office said it did not investigate whether elders broke the law by failing to report the suspected physical abuse. By the time prosecutors investigated, more than one year had passed since the elders' involvement, beyond the statute of limitations for prosecuting a misdemeanor such as failing to report.

    Three years ago, similar questions about elders' actions arose in a Texas case.

    When a family in the Houston-area church reported that a teen-age son was molesting his younger sister, elders visited the home, counseled the family and received the boy's assurance he would stop, according to allegations in the family's lawsuit against the church.

    Instead, the abuse continued, the lawsuit said. A criminal court jury in 1997 convicted the then-22-year-old for abuse committed as an adult. He was given a 40-year sentence for aggravated sexual assault.

    "The elders sat at that kitchen table and listened to her tell what her brother had done," said Kelly Siegler, an assistant district attorney for Harris County. "All they did is tell him to stop and they prayed about it. They just blew it off. No one ever told the police."

    Siegler said she would have prosecuted elders for failing to report abuse if the two-year statute of limitations hadn't expired.

    The family sued the church in civil court and in 1999 reached a settlement that bars both sides from discussing the case.

    Houston lawyer Jeffrey Parsons, who represented the Jehovah's Witnesses, said he was convinced the church conducted itself properly. "It was really an unfortunate circumstance, but (the family's lawsuit) was not a well-founded case."

    CHURCH PROCESS

    Strict burden of proof needed for discipline

    Taking a sexual abuse complaint to Jehovah's Witnesses church elders puts members in contact with a secretive church process that has a burden of proof that is much greater than in a civil court.

    If a church member is accused of any offense, elders follow a strict biblical standard. They require either the member's confession or the testimony of at least two witnesses, including the accuser, to prove the member's guilt, according to church attorney Moreno and church publications.

    This applies even in cases of sexual abuse, when there often are no "outside" witnesses.

    For victims who can't produce witnesses or persuade the accused person to confess, elders are instructed to "explain to the accuser that nothing more can be done in a judicial (church disciplinary) way," according to a 1995 article in the Jehovah's Witnesses' Watchtower -- a magazine with a circulation of 22 million in 132 languages.

    "And the congregation will continue to view the one accused as an innocent person," the article continued.

    The article offers one other avenue of justice: "The question of his guilt or innocence can be safely left in Jehovah's (God's) hands."

    Moreno said that eventually, the truth comes out. "Somebody else comes out of the woodwork and now you can take action," he said. Moreno said two separate accusers would count as two witnesses when making a sexual abuse accusation.

    Church policy neither encourages nor discourages members to report suspected or admitted sexual abuse to police, Moreno said. Elders are instructed to always call the central legal department of the church in Carmel, N.Y., upon receiving an accusation.

    When elders call, church lawyers tell them whether state law requires them to report abuse to police, Moreno said. A still-valid 1989 church memo also tells elders to call for legal advice before being interviewed by police, responding to a subpoena or voluntarily turning over confidential church records, unless police have a search warrant.

    Moreno said church lawyers might advise elders to refer victims to police or other outside help. "That's a personal decision."

    If elders suspect sexual abuse has occurred, they can begin church disciplinary hearings, in which what is said and written is held confidential. No one but elders may take notes, which are collected and kept in a secure place, according to the 1989 memo.

    It is a process intended to safeguard reputations and protect the church against lawsuits, according to the memo. The church memo warns of lawsuits by "vindictive or disgruntled ones" and "some who oppose the Kingdom preaching work" if accusations are leaked.

    No tape recordings of these proceedings are permitted.

    A Jan. 2 statement from J.R. Brown, director of public affairs for the Jehovah's Witnesses, said church elders "encourage the wrongdoers to do everything they can to set the matter straight with the authorities."

    But the strict rules of confidentiality -- in which elders are warned not to tell even their own family about disciplinary proceedings -- can leave a molester's identity shielded from those not involved.

    Bryan Rees, formerly of Augusta, Maine, said in a lawsuit that his stepfather, Alan Ayers, never warned him to stay clear of his next-door neighbor, church member Larry Baker. Baker had confessed to Ayers and other elders that he had molested another boy.

    The elders had secretly disciplined Baker, giving him "some real strict, severe counsel . . . and that was essentially it," Baker later testified.

    Maine didn't require church officials to notify authorities and the elders in Augusta never informed police or anyone else. Though they warned Baker to stay away from children, the molester testified that elders knew he was going door to door with Rees.

    "I'm sure they must have known," Baker testified. "There wasn't anything secret about it."

    Baker went on to molest Rees at least 30 times by his own admission between 1989 and 1992. He was convicted of unlawful contact with a minor and served about a 90-day jail term.

    Rees, who could not be reached for comment, won a $1.2 million judgment against Baker but has not been able to collect, according to Rees' lawyer, Michael Waxman.

    Rees later went public with his story after suing the Jehovah's Witnesses unsuccessfully in 1998. He alleged the church breached its fiduciary responsibility when it failed to warn him about Baker and when it failed to exert some type of control over Baker's actions.

    But Maine's highest court rejected such arguments in 1999.

    "The mere fact that one individual knows that a third party is or could be dangerous to others does not make that individual responsible for controlling the third party," the Supreme Judicial Court ruled.

    Ayers, Rees' stepfather, declined to comment, but church lawyer Moreno applauded the decision.

    "There is no duty to announce to people that 'John Brown' is a child abuser," he said. If the court had ruled otherwise, he said, it "would basically discourage people from going to their ministers and getting help."

    "If people could not count on confidentiality when they go and confess to a Catholic priest, there's going be quite a chilling effect on religion," he said.

    The Jehovah's Witnesses say the privilege of clergy confidentiality applies to any confidential communication with members, including disciplinary hearings that involve multiple elders and witnesses.

    A prosecutor in Hillsborough County, N.H., is currently seeking to force an elder to testify to what Gregory Blackstock, already convicted in one child molestation case, confessed to elders in the case of two other girls who were allegedly molested. The congregation involved was not the same as the one in the Paul Berry case.

    Assistant County Attorney Roger Chadwick said because more than one elder was involved, and one elder regularly phoned the alleged victims' mother with updates, the church couldn't claim exemption under the state's confidentiality law.

    "Simply put, (church) judicial investigations and telephone timeouts to confirm confessional details were not the types of speech that (clergy confidentiality laws) intended to protect," Chadwick said in a written brief filed in Hillsborough County Superior Court.

    But Attorney Paul Garrity, representing Blackstock, argued that just because Jehovah's Witnesses don't use the one-on-one confessional process of other religions, the state can't strip its right to confidentiality based on "theological differences as to how reconciliation with God is to be achieved."

    The case is pending.

    AN ELDER PROTESTS

    Kentuckian resigns over how suspicions handled

    The Jehovah's Witnesses, whose organization was founded in the 19th century, part company with traditional Christian groups on some key doctrines.

    They are best known for their door-to-door evangelism and their expectation that Jesus will soon establish the kingdom of God.

    They do not serve in the military or pledge allegiance to political symbols -- facts that have brought them persecution here and abroad -- though they preach obedience to the law.

    And it was the church's focus on the letter of the law that led elder and presiding overseer Bowen to publicly resign his church position in the Marshall County town of Draffenville.

    Bowen had been alerted to possible sexual abuse involving a family in his area. When he called the church's legal department, as required, lawyers told him Kentucky law did not require him to report the suspected abuse.

    After hearing details of the allegations, a separate church department then advised against a disciplinary hearing, Bowen said.

    He said elders go against such advice at the risk of losing their position. After he resigned, he said he reported the allegations of abuse to police. Bowen said he was told by police the case is under investigation.

    Bowen is still technically a member. Thomas Carrothers, the Jehovah's Witnesses' city overseer for nearby Paducah, said last month he saw no grounds for expelling Bowen. "People are allowed to express their points of view," he said.

    In a talk to the congregation about Bowen's criticism of church policies, Carrothers urged church members to respond with love to "opposers" and "the slanderous statements of lying apostates."

    Carrothers said he wasn't referring to Bowen.

    "I was quoting from Watchtower articles. I wasn't accusing him of it," he said.

    Bowen's father, Bill J. Bowen, denounced his son's actions in a videotaped interview produced and distributed by the church.

    "What (my son) is saying is just absurd," the older Bowen, a longtime church member, said. "I've got to hope that my son will turn around, change his mind."

    Elder David King of Edmonds, Wash., said he also resigned his church position in 1997, partly because of his disillusionment with the church's attention to "legal ramifications."

    When investigating an allegation of sexual abuse several years ago, King said, elders called a lawyer at church headquarters.

    "The moment we identified who we were, he immediately knew state law (in Washington) and said we didn't have to report it," King said. "That was almost the first thing he said.

    "At the time, I was a true believer, but it shook me to think they were more concerned about legal ramifications than getting some kind of healthy recovery."

    The victims' parents later called police. King said he gradually stopped attending the church.

    OUTSIDE HELP

    Members say church discouraged efforts

    Church writings say members are allowed to seek outside help when they suspect abuse.

    Some members, such as Poisson, say they were intimidated by elders when they tried.

    In Keene, N.H., the guardian of a 15-year-old girl sued a Jehovah's Witnesses congregation in 1987, alleging that elders threatened the girl's parents with "religious excommunication and eternal damnation" if they sought police intervention or counseling for their daughter, who was sexually abused from 1975 to 1985.

    The lawsuit was settled, and the girl's lawyer, Charles Donahue, said he could not comment on it. The abuser -- the girl's father -- was later sentenced to three to eight years in prison in 1986 after pleading guilty to two counts of aggravated felonious sexual assault, according to records in Cheshire County Superior Court.

    Church lawyer Moreno said it would be "ridiculous" for any elder to make such a threat, and if one did, it would contradict church policy.

    "That's not scriptural," he said. "We teach the Scriptures. The Scriptures don't say, 'If you file criminal charges against an abuser you're going to have eternal damnation.' The one in danger of eternal damnation is the abuser."

    Church literature also says victims and other church members can seek professional therapy, as long as the counselor respects their beliefs and victims don't reveal names of alleged abusers in group therapy.

    But former Jehovah's Witnesses elder J. Michael Terry, of Conway, Ark., said his experience didn't match the policy.

    He said that about three or four years ago, he steered the mother of an abuse victim to a therapist, who then reported the crime. "I got jumped on pretty bad" by two fellow elders, Terry said.

    "I did what my conscience told me to do," said Terry, who is no longer active in the church. "They said I should have done nothing but listen."

    Arkansas law does not require clergy to report abuse to authorities but it does require social workers to. Terry is a social worker.

    He said the incident soured his working relationship with elders, and about three years later he was stripped of his elder's position for being uncooperative.

    One of the elders whom Terry said had criticized his actions declined to comment on his dealings with Terry.

    RANGE OF PENALTIES

    Repentant molesters can go door to door

    Watch Tower officials are not consistent on how the church punishes child molesters.

    In a Jan. 2 statement, church public affairs director Brown Church said that child abusers are "disfellowshipped," or expelled from the congregation. Later, he acknowledged the church can use less severe penalties.

    He defended his original statement, saying that for "mass consumption it conveys the thought (that elders) do institute this discipline. They're not soft on abusers."

    But an Aug. 1, 1995, church memo shows that repentant pedophiles can avoid excommunication and remain church members, as happened with Baker.

    The document also says elders can restore church memberships to pedophiles who convince elders they have repented.

    That's what happened in the case of Clement Pandelo of Paramus, N.J.

    In fact, Pandelo, who admitted to police he had molested young girls for 40 years, was twice disfellowshipped and twice reinstated, according to court documents. Pandelo pleaded guilty in 1988 to molesting his 12-year-old granddaughter and two other girls.

    His granddaughter, Corinne Holloway, now 24, said Pandelo's reinstatements compounded her physical and psychological trauma.

    Church elders "validated the perpetrator rather than the victim," said Holloway, of Spring Lake Park, N.J. "He had the privileges (of membership) and we were in this long, drawn-out process."

    Said Moreno: "I wouldn't be too happy myself if somebody abused my child and was reinstated. The bottom line is if an elder determines a former child abuser has demonstrated repentance, (he has) a scriptural obligation to reinstate him."

    Church policy permits Pandelo, as a member in good standing, to go door to door, spreading the Jehovah's Witnesses' message.

    Barbara Pandelo, Holloway's mother, said she finds that policy potentially harmful.

    "These perverts are still allowed to go door to door to unknowing householders," said Barbara Pandelo, of Belmar, N.J. "The Watch Tower Society doesn't make itself bothered with the danger it exposes families (to)."

    Brown said pedophiles are restricted from working with minors and must also be with a well-respected church member when they go door to door.

    Pedophiles also might not be sent into neighborhoods where they might be recognized as molesters, Brown said.

    Church memos tell elders that molesters who remain in the church should be warned not to touch children or be alone with them.

    But David Richart, of the National Institute on Children, said a strictly spiritual approach to child molestation is inadequate.

    "The whole idea of child sexual abuse is that it generally is an invisible kind of crime and it generally doesn't go away without in some cases treatment and in other cases imprisonment," said Richart, who reviewed Jehovah's Witnesses literature on the subject at The Courier-Journal's request.

    "The whole idea implicit in their response is that somebody can be persuaded or guilt-tripped into changing their behavior. It's generally a much more sophisticated problem than that.

    "Prayer can do a lot of things, and in the case of child sexual abuse it can be a powerful instrument for change, but it's no substitute for a societal intervention."

    Richart said he believes other religious groups have similar problems.

    "A lot of churches deal internally with allegations of child sexual abuse and refer to Scripture in ways which seem to encourage the children to be compliant."

    Some victims and their advocates want Jehovah's Witnesses to do what civil society has done -- adopt so-called "Megan's Laws," named for the New Jersey murder victim of a neighbor who had two previous sexual-abuse convictions.

    Such laws establish sexual-offender registries enabling the public to learn if their neighbors are pedophiles, though few churches of any denomination have such a policy.

    "People in the church have the right to know (a member is) a pedophile," said Carl Pandelo of Belmar, N.J., son of Clement Pandelo.

    Attorney Waxman, who represented molestation victim Rees in the Maine lawsuit, agreed.

    "The churches are going to say one of their main tenets is forgiveness," he said. "Let's assume there is a real, direct confrontation between a church's ideals and the state's interest in protecting kids from being abused. In my view, the kids win."

    Neal, the social worker and elder of the Jeffersontown Jehovah's Witnesses congregation, said if a member confessed to child molestation, he would tell the full body of elders and was confident the board would make members aware.

    "Nobody has a right to keep matters that really put other folks at risk secret," he said. "We're concerned about every member of the organization, and their best interest, their welfare, their security and safety are matters of concern.

    "We don't feel we would be discharging our spiritual responsibility if we held something secret that has a direct impact on the safety and welfare of others."

    TELLING AUTHORITIES

    Rule is to report cases when states require it

    When Jehovah's Witnesses elders call the central legal office, lawyers advise them on their state's reporting laws.

    Some states, like Kentucky, require citizens to report suspicions of abuse but provide exceptions for clergy-penitent conversations. Other states, like Indiana, allow no exceptions. Still others only require professionals in certain fields, mainly those dealing with children, to report abuse.

    In Boulder, Colo., in December 1991, elders in a Jehovah's Witnesses congregation publicly reprimanded member Leland Elwyn Davies after finding that he had fondled several teen-age girls, according to a report filed by the Boulder County sheriff's office, which investigated after the mother of three victims had alerted police.

    One victim, who spoke to police in January 1992, said she was "displeased that the behavior had not been reported by the elders to the authorities," according to the police report.

    Police contacted an elder in the congregation who said he could not give out confidential information from the disciplinary process. Colorado does not mandate that clergy give out such information.

    Police arrested Davies in July 1992 -- about six months after the church imposed discipline. He pleaded guilty to two counts of third-degree sexual assault and was placed on probation, according to the criminal court clerk in Colorado's 20th Judicial District. Davies died in August 2000.

    According to church lawyer Moreno, the system worked. Elders did their job, and victims and police did theirs, he said.

    "What was the harm?" Moreno said. "The report got made.

    "You've got a teen, who has been molested, upset at the elders for not calling the police?" he said. "You can call the police. You're the one injured.

    "Who makes the laws? Not us. Don't blame us for the laws, please. Talk to the state legislators of Colorado."

    News Item Sunday, February 4, 2001

    Policies on reporting abuse allegations vary among religious denominations

    By PETER SMITH, The Courier-Journal

    Like the Jehovah's Witnesses, seven other religious denominations surveyed by The Courier-Journal expect their clergy to report all suspected child abuse in states where they are required to by law.

    The approach among religions varies in states that do not mandate reporting.

    Even in reporting states, variations are possible. For example, Kentucky and Indiana require citizens to report suspected child abuse. Indiana allows no exceptions. Kentucky allows exceptions for clergy-penitent and attorney-client privilege.

    Roman Catholic Church: Policies vary by diocese. The archdioceses of Louisville and Indianapolis require priests to report suspected child abuse in all circumstances except when they learn of it in confession. Even in that setting, priests can counsel someone confessing a crime to go to a counselor or police. Archdiocese of Indianapolis spokeswoman Susan Schramm knew of no instance where that exception conflicted with Indiana law.

    Southern Baptist Convention: Churches are self-governing, so regional bodies do not dictate policies. However, the Kentucky Baptist Convention trains staff and volunteers to recognize and report suspected child abuse to authorities, according to Wendy Dever, preschool and children's associate for the convention.

    Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.): Policies vary by regional governing body but are often shaped to follow state law. Pastors in the Louisville-based denomination are forbidden to reveal anything told them in confidence. The church does not make an explicit exception for suspected child abuse but pastors can violate confidentiality when there is a "risk of imminent bodily harm to any person."

    Rabbinical Assembly (Conservative Judaism): Congregations are self-governing, but rabbis are expected to do everything to protect an abuse victim, including calling authorities. "One doesn't need a specific secular mandate that says protect somebody in trouble," said Rabbi Joel Meyers, executive vice president of the Rabbinical Assembly.

    Evangelical Lutheran Church in America: Policies are determined by regional governing bodies but often follow state law on who is required to report, according to the Rev. Lowell Almen, secretary of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America.

    United Methodist Church: The church does not have a policy that requires clergy to report suspicions of child abuse, but clergy training emphasizes that laws often mandate reporting. If a pastor learns of abuse in a confidential setting such as a counseling session, "that's a decision a pastor would make on a case-by-case basis," Robert Kohler, assistant general secretary of the Division of Ordained Ministry.

    The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormons): Church leaders are instructed to call a denominational help line if abuse issues arise in the congregation. Those staffing the phone lines include professional counselors as well as lawyers who advise local ministers on their state's laws. "The law of the land must be obeyed," said a statement from the Latter-day Saints public affairs department. "If a report is required, help line personnel assist the local church leader . . . as who should make the report -- whether . . . a family member, whether the perpetrator can be persuaded to self-report, etc."

    No religious denomination contacted has even considered what some Jehovah's Witnesses are demanding of their church: that congregations be told of pedophiles in their midst.

    But many churches bar sex offenders from working with children, according to Dever of the Kentucky Baptist Convention.

    And they increasingly conduct criminal background checks of potential pastors, youth workers and other volunteers.

    "Small churches have a hard time with that, because they know everybody," Dever said. "But we really don't know everybody. We live in 2001. We have to be concerned about this."

    Staff writer Megan Woolhouse contributed to this story.

    News Item Sunday, February 4, 2001

    Molestation victim, parents think church elders let them down

    By PETER SMITH, The Courier-Journal

    In Focus
    Jehovah's Witnesses' policy on child molesters attacked
    Policies on reporting abuse allegations vary among religious denominations

    When Corinne Pandelo was 12, court records show, she told her parents that her grandfather had molested her during a visit to his home in Paramus, N.J., in August 1988.

    That episode launched a chain of events that ultimately alienated Corinne and her parents from the church to which they had been devoted.

    Carl and Barbara Pandelo, now of Belmar, N.J., went to the elders in their Jehovah's Witnesses congregation in Fair Lawn, N.J., with their daughter's accusation, according to court records.

    New Jersey law required clergy to report suspected child abuse. Elders told Carl Pandelo's father, Clement Pandelo, to turn himself in to authorities, Carl Pandelo said. Clement Pandelo confessed the molestation to police on Aug. 24, 1988.

    But Carl and Barbara Pandelo said local elders also urged them to agree to a plea bargain for Clement Pandelo, saying they wanted to spare Corinne the trauma of a trial. The Pandelos agreed.

    Anthony Valenti of Maywood, N.J., who was an elder in the Fair Lawn congregation at the time, said in an interview that was not his recollection. "To my knowledge, we did not advise them that way," he said.

    Clement Pandelo was placed on probation after pleading guilty in February 1989 in Superior Court in Bergen County, N.J., to molesting Corinne and two other girls. Now 75 and a member of the Hawthorne, N.J., congregation, Pandelo told The Courier-Journal he had no comment.

    The Fair Lawn congregation expelled Clement Pandelo after a disciplinary hearing and reinstated him about 18 months later, court records show. Carl Pandelo said the reinstatement followed a letter of apology to him, not his daughter, from his father.

    Carl and Barbara Pandelo said it was bad enough that the family saw Corinne's attacker at church meetings. They also became upset when members and an elder warned they would not "make it through Armageddon" unless they renewed ties with Clement Pandelo, Carl Pandelo said.

    Corinne was by then preparing to be baptized and had recurring nightmares of encountering her grandfather in the baptismal pool, according to court documents.

    "I can understand how the Pandelos might feel," Valenti said, adding that a person is only reinstated after a three-man committee deems him or her repentant. "It would be better if they could forgive (Clement Pandelo), but circumstances are what they are."

    Eventually, Corinne's parents took her to a therapist. Corinne said she began to unlock memories of being molested by her grandfather over several years, court documents said. To help guide her therapist, Corinne's parents said they obtained the police report and were shocked to read Clement Pandelo had confessed to fondling girls for 40 years.

    The parents said they went to church elders asking for any details Clement might have confessed to them and were told that the confession was confidential.

    "As parents, we feel we have the legal right to know what he did actually confess to," Carl Pandelo said in a Jan. 21, 1993, letter to the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society, a legal corporation of the church.

    Valenti said the Pandelos were involved in discussions among elders that pertained to their daughter. He declined to say what elders discussed with Clement Pandelo on other occasions.

    Clement Pandelo did not face any other criminal charges, but his Hawthorne congregation expelled him in 1992, according to court documents. Four years later it reinstated him, according to a letter from the Pandelos to the Watch Tower Society.

    When Carl and Barbara Pandelo prepared to sue Clement Pandelo in 1993 to recover costs for Corinne's therapy, Valenti said he told them the Bible held that Christians shouldn't sue each other.

    Valenti said the church allows members to sue to collect insurance payments -- Clement Pandelo would be paying out of homeowner's liability insurance -- but that elders tried to mediate the conflict outside of court.

    Carl and Barbara Pandelo appealed to the Jehovah's Witnesses' headquarters, which eventually gave them the green light to sue, according to a church letter.

    Corinne Holloway, now 24, married and living in Spring Lake Park, N.J., won $1.8 million in compensatory damages against Clement Pandelo in Bergen County Superior Court in 1999 after other women testified he molested them when they were girls.

    Clement Pandelo also was ordered to pay $500,000 in punitive damages. But the jury deducted 40 percent of Holloway's original $3 million compensatory-damage award, judging her parents 40 percent responsible for leaving her in her grandfather's care.

    The jury heard testimony that a relative had told Carl Pandelo that his father had molested a girl years before. Carl Pandelo said in an interview that he was told by Valenti that at least one elder had investigated Clement Pandelo for suspected sexual abuse and found it to be untrue.

    Valenti, in a pretrial deposition, confirmed that he had been told by an elder that an investigation had found no evidence Clement Pandelo committed sexual abuse.

    Valenti, who did not testify in court because of clergy confidentiality, declined to comment.

    Holloway is appealing the jury decision
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Christianity Today - February 2nd 2001:

    Witness Leaders Accused of Shielding Molesters

    Former and current Jehovah Witnesses question a policy they say discourages leaders from reporting abuse.

    A candle-maker in the cozy western Kentucky town of Draffenville, Bill Bowen has been a devoted Jehovah's Witness all his life. For nearly seven years, he has served as an elder in his local Kingdom Hall. As part of his job, he maintained confidential files for the 50-person group. The recent discovery of one file left Bowen stunned. "I came across some information that raised questions as to whether or not a child was molested," he says.

    By Corrie Cutrer | posted 2/2/01

    Christianity Today

    Yet Bowen says when he approached his fellow elders about the situation, they turned a blind eye toward the evidence and did little to help the victim. "I discovered how corrupt this organization was in terms of hurting children," Bowen says. In protest to the elders' response, Bowen, 43, resigned his position as an elder. He is part of a growing group of former and current Jehovah's Witnesses speaking out against a policy they claim is protecting child molesters in Jehovah's Witness circles nationwide.

    A reluctance to report

    Bowen says that to avoid embarrassment or shame, Witness leaders discourage followers from reporting any incident of sexual misconduct to authorities, even if the law requires it, citing the November 1995 issue of the organization's magazine, The Watchtower. The publication says that Witnesses must follow the biblical standard of finding two or three eye-witnesses to verify a claim before making an accusation of abuse (referencing 2 Cor. 13:1 and 1 Tim. 5:19).

    Otherwise, it says, the matter should be dropped, and the accused should be treated as innocent. For those who recall repressed memories of sexual abuse, The Watchtower statement said, "The nature of these recalls is just too uncertain to base judicial decisions on them without other supporting evidence."

    J. R. Brown, director of the public affairs office of the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society (WTBTS) in Brooklyn, says he shares Bowen's concern. "We abhor what [molestation] does to children," he tells Christianity Today.

    Critics, however, say that the Witness organization uses the policy for all abuse cases, whether they deal with repressed memories or not. Most abuse situations rarely have multiple witnesses, critics argue, adding that local leaders are not appropriately handling alleged abuse and have a bias toward protecting their congregations.

    Jim Whitney, 49, formerly a Witness elder, says he discovered meeting notes from other elders regarding abuse cases at a Kingdom Hall in California where he had been active. He said none of these cases were ever turned over to the police.

    When he began attending another Kingdom Hall in Oregon, he discovered a similar pattern. "They shield the organization," he says. "They will do anything to protect Jehovah's Witnesses."

    Paul Carden, executive director for the Centers for Apologetics Research in San Juan Capistrano, California, says this protective attitude is prevalent in the WTBTS. "There is a fortress mentality," Carden says. "The Watchtower Society is loath to admit wrongdoing of any sort. Because they portray themselves as being Jehovah's sole mouthpiece to mankind, they have sought to present themselves as being above question."

    Whitney believes many child molesters make their way into Witness congregations. "It's a fertile ground," he says. "Pedophiles know that any confession they make is concealed. The Witnesses don't want to bring shame to their name."

    Witness spokesman Brown says that the incidence of pedophilia is no worse in his religion than in others, but he admits that some elders have not reported suspicions of abuse. In 38 states, the law requires clergy and other professionals to report physical and sexual abuse of children. Some critics argue that even in the 22 states that do not require clergy members to report, Witness elders do not qualify for such a privilege because most are neither professionally trained nor paid employees of the organization.

    Internal policies vary among American religious groups. While the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) says it complies with all government reporting laws, some incidents may be handled in house, according to Zane Bruxton, the denomination's manager of judicial process. "You have to take it seriously," Bruxton says. "But we cannot bring charges in every case."

    Although the Book of Discipline for the United Methodist Church outlines abuse procedures, local pastors often determine how to handle the specifics of a case. "We generally report it to the authorities while also conducting an in-house investigation," says Scott Field, senior pastor at Wheatland Salem United Methodist Church in Naperville, Illinois. "At the very least, we would remove the alleged perpetrator from [his or her] area of responsibility until the investigation is resolved."

    Broken families

    Dozens of court cases, both national and international, have surfaced in recent years that shed light on how seriously many people have been affected by the Watchtower's instruction regarding abuse. In lengthy interviews with Christianity Today, two former Witness families described how sexual abuse has shattered their lives. Don and Kim Clemens of Mount Shasta, California, say that in 1996 their son accused his babysitter, Alizum Variuma neighbor and a fellow Witnessof molesting him frequently for six years, beginning when he was 5 years old.

    The family informed local Witness leaders. "It was my son's words against her words," Kim Clemens remembers. "The elders filed it away and said there's nothing they can do."

    When the Clemens family saw Varium volunteering at a daycare center, they hired a private investigator to gather information. "Our goal is to keep her completely away from all kids," Kim Clemens says. "If there are more children who come out of there having been abused, I don't want to say 15 or 20 years down the road that I didn't say anything."

    Varium refused to speak with CT about the case and faces no official charges in connection with the abuse allegation.

    Jeff Tucker, one of the Mount Shasta Kingdom Hall elders, says there were not enough eye-witnesses to go to the police. Tucker believes the family is just trying to cause trouble. "They were disfellowshipped," Tucker says. "They're just trying to create problems and bring reproach on Jehovah's name and his organization."

    Although Witnesses comply with secular laws when necessary, Witness spokesman Brown says, the group prefers to deal with such matters spiritually. "We handle wrongdoing, sin, and transgression," he says. "This is what a religious organization is supposed to do. We're not getting into law enforcement. We're just going to handle the repentance."

    In another instance, Sabrina Montgomery, a 37-year-old former Witness in Brigham City, Utah, alleges that her father, John Bohman, sexually abused her from when she was 14 until she was 19. When Witness elders found out, she says, Bohman simply resigned his position as an elder, and no further action was taken. Montgomery has asked local authorities to prevent any contact between her three daughters and Bohman. Montgomery's former husband is still a Witness, and maintains regular contact with Bohman. Bohman did not respond to CT's requests for an interview.

    After resigning as an elder at his Kentucky congregation, Bowen hopes to motivate Jehovah's Witness leaders to change their policies. "I want all confidential files to be opened and any information that involves pedophiles to be given to the police," Bowen said. "Children are being molested. They are a flock of little sheep who are afraid to speak out. God doesn't want that."
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Paducah Sun (Kentucky) Newspaper - January 28th 2001:

    Jehovah's Witnesses' handling of child sexual abuse criticized

    The cases aren't reported by police, and elders may allow violators to remain, critics say.

    Carl and Barbara Pandelo, as devout Jehovah's Witnesses, did what they thought was right when their 12-year-old daughter came to them and told them her grandfather had molested her: They went to the elders of the church. Thirteen years later, they are no longer Witnesses, their case remains in court, and Carl Pandelo now believes "that organization is as corrupt as any other."

    By C.D. Bradley [email protected]--270.575.8650

    Mario Moreno, associate general counsel at the church's New York headquarters, said when church policy is applied to child molesters, "as a parent, an attorney and an elder, I'm comfortable with our policy."

    William Bowen, 43, of Marshall County was raised a Witness and served as an elder in his Draffenville congregation for nearly two decades, along with service throughout the region and the country for the church, also known as the Watchtower Society.

    Last month, Bowen resigned his leadership position in the church because of a policy he claims "has harmed thousands, is leaving many unprotected, and provides refuge to outright criminals."

    Since Bowen's resignation, the Sun has been contacted by several current and former Witnesses with concerns about the church's policy regarding child molesters, or who say they themselves have been victims.

    Moreno said while he believes in the church's policy, he knows that some members have been hurt, and "my heart goes out to them." But he said that some elders don't follow the policy as they should, and that's where trouble begins.

    Carl Pandelo, of Hackensack, N.J., was naturally shocked when his daughter came to him and his wife in 1988 and told them she had been molested by his father. What he would later find would shock him even more.

    At the time, Pandelo's daughter told her parents that her grandfather, Clement, had molested her once. They took the matter to the elders, who in turn questioned Clement, and he confessed. The elders advised him to turn himself in, which he did. He was removed from the fellowship shortly thereafter.

    The elders also advised Carl and his wife not to pursue prosecution but to settle for a plea bargain because going to court would only worsen the girl's mental state. They agreed, and in 1989 Clement Pandelo was ordered to undergo counseling and given five years probation, according to court documents.

    "We thought we would never have to see him again," Barbara Pandelo remembers. "But we saw him the next day at Kingdom Hall."

    "He continued going and sitting right behind us like nothing was wrong," Carl Pandelo added.

    Clement Pandelo was reinstated as a member 18 months later. To do so, he had to show repentance and admit his wrongdoing, as well as being judged by the elders to be ready to be accepted back into the congregation.

    By that time, the Pandelos had their daughter in therapy.

    "The wall of denial and secrecy began to come down," Carl Pandelo said. "When she began talking about the extent of the abuse, it became clear he had been molesting her every time she was in her grandparents' care since she was a couple of years old."

    Barbara Pandelo said one of the first things the therapist asked was what Clement had admitted to the prosecutor. The Pandelos hadn't been aware they were privy to that information, but they soon obtained it.

    When he turned himself in, Clement Pandelo told a prosecutor's investigator that he had molested Carl and Barbara's daughter as well as their niece, according to a transcript of the interview. He also admitted that he had been fondling young girls for four decades. Investigators' reports note that he was investigated in 1986 for fondling his female teen-age neighbor, but her mother declined to press charges.

    The Pandelos requested information from the elders about their investigation, but were refused.

    "We were told, 'That's all confidential,'" Barbara Pandelo said.

    Other people began to come forward, and Clement Pandelo was dropped from the fellowship a second time in 1994.

    The Pandelos filed a lawsuit against Clement, seeking compensation for the therapy, for which Carl and Barbara had been paying. Clement filed a countersuit, later dismissed, charging that they had been at fault because they had let their daughter come to his house. While the suit was still being litigated, Clement was again reinstated in the church in 1996.

    "He has the freedom to go door to door and minister," Carl Pandelo said, referring to the faith's practice of public ministry.

    During a deposition in the civil lawsuit, Anthony Valenti, an elder in the Pandelos' congregation, said he had discouraged them from pursuing the investigation against Carl's father based on a scriptural encouragement against taking another brother to court, according to a transcript of the deposition. During the course of the civil case, several Witnesses claimed that Clement Pandelo had molested them as well, and they waived ecclesiastical privilege so the elders could testify to what they had been told, Carl Pandelo said. The elders, citing ecclesiastical privilege, refused to testify.

    In December 1999, the civil case was decided against Clement Pandelo, and his son and daughter-in-law were awarded nearly $1.8 million, plus $500,000 in punitive damages. Clement's wife, Olga Pandelo, was dismissed from the suit, and with her went the insurance company that would have been able to pay the decision.

    Carl and Barbara are arguing on appeal that the Witnesses' elders cannot claim ecclesiastical privilege because they are volunteer, thus unpaid, clergy. They are also trying to have Olga Pandelo reinstated. A hearing is scheduled Feb. 26 in New Jersey Appellate Court.

    "They're harboring criminals at the risk of families in the neighborhood," Barbara Pandelo said of the church.

    Moreno said when a Witness goes to an elder with an accusation of abuse, the first step the elders should take is calling the church's legal department.

    He said there are then three factors considered: protecting the child, complying with the law, and protecting minister-adherent confidentiality, with the last receiving the least weight.

    The legal department will then advise the elders what is required by law. Twenty-two states, including Illinois and the District of Columbia, do not require clergy to report accusations of child abuse. In those states, Moreno said, the legal department generally advises the elders not to report the matter to law enforcement authorities.

    J.R. Brown, public affairs director for the church, said the reason for this is "we do not think, as an ecclesiastical authority, we should run ahead of Caesar's laws," using a biblical reference to secular authority. "Even if secular authority does not require it, generally we have endeavoured to be more zealous for enforcing and seeing that these laws are complied with. If Caesar has a law, and it does not conflict with God's law, we follow it."

    Brown said the church does not necessarily equate reporting the matter to law enforcement to protecting the child because "not all the time does government authority provide the protection the child needs. We don't say automatically that, but unfortunately too many reports show that's the case. You can be sure they're going to take what action is necessary to see that the child is protected."

    Both Brown and Moreno said that the elders, who volunteer and are essentially untrained clergy, might err in their application of a policy both believe puts protecting children first.

    "It's a matter of trying to balance confidentiality and protecting the child," Brown said. "It's not always easy. Have mistakes been made? Very likely, they have. We're trying to see that everyone is educated to what needs to be done to see that innocent children are not victimized."

    Moreno agrees with Bowen's claim that no investigation is initiated in the church if there is only one witness and the accused denies the charge, but he said elders have the responsibility to watch the accused more closely. He added that elders sometimes advise the accused to not put himself or herself in suspicious situations.

    He also said that when members are disfellowshipped, the congregation is told but no reason is given in order to protect confidentiality. When asked if the parents of the victim would be allowed to tell fellow congregates why a member is disfellowshipped, Moreno replied, "That would be their choice. We don't tell them that, but it would be their choice. Is that encouraged? No."

    He agreed with Bowen's charge that a congregation would also not be told if a pedophile had joined the flock. But he said because of the church's structure, the fact that such a member, if male, who would have fewer rights in the congregation, would not be serving in a leadership role would alert members that "he obviously lacks spiritual maturity."

    Moreno said he believes that while some of the church's critics on this topic have legitimate concerns, most "have a problem with pride" and "want the organization to change for them. We go by what we believe the Bible says, and we don't change for anybody."

    He also said he feels the church is "being picked on" and added that he would be willing to put the church's policy up against any other.

    The church's critics believe that it is the church, not children, that the policy is designed to protect.

    Mike Terry, a therapist and a former elder in Arkansas, said there are many parallels between sexual abuse and spiritual abuse. He said he had seen a disproportionately large number of abusers and abused Witnesses for years in his work, which has centered on treating sex offenders.

    Bob Smith, a former elder in the Northeast, said part of the problem is that the victims, usually female, have to go before three elders, always male.

    "It's a repetition of the same sort of abuse," he said.

    Smith said both his wife and daughter remain Witnesses, which is why he asked that his hometown not be disclosed.

    "I try to appreciate the fact that my wife likes that comfort" that comes from the faith, he said. "She respects that I've made some changes. We talk about it, and she, like many other Witnesses, quietly questions some of it. But when someone asks questions like that, they always say, 'Where else is there to go?'"

    Steve Hassan, who operates the Resource Center For Freedom of Mind and is an author who has written several books on mind control and cultlike organizations, said he has seen several patients who were former Witnesses who had been abused "who tried to speak out and were disfellowshipped."

    He said the Witnesses controlled the flow of information to their members by demanding that members not read or view anything that disagrees with the teachings of the church.

    When the church allows its members to view such information without the fear of punishment, "they'll start looking less like a destructive cult and more like a benign denomination. Judaism and Christianity are based on free will."

    He said that when speaking to former Witnesses, he will describe the factors at play in a cult organization, and they will invariably reply, "That's the Watchtower."
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Associated Press (AP) News - January 16th 2001:

    Ore. Slay Suspect Known As Con Man

    By JEFF BARNARD
    .c The Associated Press

    NEWPORT, Ore. (AP) - By the time Christian Longo reached the Oregon coast last fall with his wife and three children, he had left a trail of bad checks, fraud and theft charges stretching clear back to Michigan. But all those troubles never seemed to bother him.

    Though his job brewing lattes at the local Starbucks couldn't begin to pay the rent on his luxury waterfront condo or the big sport utility vehicles he liked to drive, he came off as a nice-looking guy who was charming, a good dresser, sweet with his wife and kids, and possessed of plenty of money.

    By the time Longo left town around Christmas, it was clear that things were not as they seemed: Longo, 27, was at best a con man with a taste for the good things in life, at worst a murderer.

    Over the weekend, Longo was captured in Mexico and brought back to the United States to face charges he murdered his wife and children and dumped their bodies in Oregon's coastal waters. Investigators have not said how they were killed or why.

    Sheri Johansen, who used to trade jokes with Longo when he worked at the espresso stand, said she is not ready to believe any of the bad stuff until she hears him confess.

    ``He just seemed so happy-go-lucky,'' Johansen said. ``He seemed like he had a lot of money. And oh, God, cute kids. Adorable kids.''

    The bodies of Zachary Michael, 5, and Sadie Ann, 3, were found days before Christmas in an Oregon backwater. Then, two days after the holiday, police divers found the body of his wife, Mary Jane, and youngest daughter, 2-year-old Madison, stuffed under a dock behind his condo.

    By the time authorities identified the youngsters and began searching for Longo, he was gone, like so many other times in his life.

    The Longos were married in 1993 and lived in Ypsilanti, Mich. They took regular vacations to nice places, particularly Mexico, said Mary Jane's sister, Penny Dupuie of South Boardman, Mich. Dupuie said she always kind of wondered where the money came from.

    ``He always liked the best,'' Dupuie said. ``They drove nice cars. Liked nice things. One of those guys who goes out and gets a $30 haircut. I just think he wanted to live beyond his means, but didn't want to work for it.''

    James Baker, Mary Jane's father, a janitor in Traverse City, Mich., said people liked Longo instantly: ``I thought it was a natural charm, a sincere honest charm that he had. At some point, apparently, he took this charm and used it to defraud people.''

    Baker said the financial problems began in 1998. The Longos couldn't make their mortgage payments. Longo ran up credit card debts and was prone to mood swings. Once he came home with two snowmobiles, telling his wife he won them in a raffle. There was a boat in the yard.

    Longo started a construction cleaning business in 2000 but it wasn't paying the bills. He pleaded guilty to using his laptop computer to print counterfeit checks worth nearly $30,000. He was sentenced to three months' probation and ordered to pay $32,000, but soon fell behind in the payments.

    After his conviction, the Jehovah's Witnesses elders excluded Longo from the church, though his wife and children continued to attend.

    ``A person isn't excluded from fellowship simply because they do something wrong,'' said Chad Onufer, a minister in the church. ``They have to be unrepentant''

    Changing his ways wasn't Longo's way.

    The Ann Arbor News fired him from his job dropping off bundles of newspapers last summer after he apparently cashed two counterfeit checks for more than $800 each, said circulation manager Fred Jahnke.

    State police were investigating claims Longo wrote bad checks to pay employees of his cleaning company when the family left town. Over the summer, the Longos surfaced in Toledo, Ohio. Longo was gone again before police there charged him with receiving stolen construction equipment and passing bad checks.

    In Oregon, Longo rented a $1,500-a-month condo with a view of sailboats and cabin cruisers. He claimed to work for a telephone company and told condo staff members he would pay them as soon as his check came through.

    Then on Dec. 17, he told people his family was flying home to Michigan for a visit. Two days later, the bodies started showing up, and Longo was gone again. He flew to Mexico on stolen ID.

    Tourists in Tulum, Mexico, where he was arrested while living in a beach shack, said he told them he was a travel writer for The New York Times working on a story, and had divorced his wife because she cheated on him.

    Baker said his son-in-law was never abusive toward his wife. And Dupuie said she, too, is at a loss to explain it all.

    ``I could only think that Mary Jane possibly wanted to leave him, or Chris was sick enough that he thought his family couldn't live without him and he thought he was doing them a favor,'' she said.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Paducah Kentucky News Channel 6 - January 5th 2001:

    Watchtower Society PR Statement

    If child abuse becomes known to our church elders, they strictly comply with applicable child abuse reporting laws. We also encourage the wrongdoers to do everything they can to set the matter straight with the authorities. Furthermore, we do not prohibit or discourage the victim or the victim's parents from reporting child abuse to the authorities even if the alleged perpetrator is one of Jehovah's Witnesses. If you would like to receive more information on how we report such matters, please contact Mario Moreno, Watchtower Legal Department. (845) 509-0416 or (845) 306-1000. A primary focus of Jehovah's Witnesses is to elevate me Bible's strong family values in all communities and to help willing ones come to know and serve God acceptably.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Paducah Sun (Kentucky) Newspaper - January 5th 2001:

    JW elder steps down over concealed child/sexual abuse in WT

    By C.D. Bradley [email protected]--270.575.8650

    DRAFFENVILLE, Ky. --An elder in a Jehovah's Witnesses congregation at Draffenville has resigned his leadership position because of a policy he claims "has harmed thousands, is leaving many unprotected, and provides refuge to outright criminals."

    The elder, William Bowen, resigned last week from his position as an elder and presiding overseer, the rough equivalent to a pastor in other Protestant denominations. In doing so he cited the church's policy regarding the reporting of suspected child abusers to law enforcement authorities. Bowen said the policy, which requires accusers to report alleged abuse to church elders rather than to legal authorities, lets "literally thousands" of pedophiles go unpunished.

    "I am referring to Watch Tower policy to keep information about pedophiles confidential," Bowen wrote in his resignation letter. "Pedophiles are protected by a code of silence and in many cases remain (in leadership positions or as members in good standing) while their victims suffer in silence or face sanctions. This policy is unethical and immoral in my opinion."

    A spokesman at the church's headquarters in New York said there is no prohibition or discouragement in going to legal authorities in the event of child abuse.
    Bowen, 43, who has served in various leadership capacities in the church for about two decades, said he has seen multiple similar cases in his visits to various congregations. The Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society is a not-for-profit entity the church uses to publish literature, supervise global evangelizing and organize conventions and schools for the ministry of Witnesses. Bowen said he grew up in the faith and by resigning, "I'm basically throwing away 40 years in the organization." Still, it was something Bowen felt he had to do because he doubts that the policy will change unless public pressure mounts, he said.

    "I have fretted with this for two or three years, but this is wrong and it has to be stopped," he said. "This is not something where I can allow myself to look the other way anymore."
    J.R. Brown, public affairs director for Jehovah's Witnesses at the church's headquarters in Brooklyn, N.Y., said in a statement that the members of the faith "abhor all forms of wickedness, including child abuse. "If child abuse becomes known to our church elders, they strictly comply with applicable child abuse reporting laws. We also encourage the wrongdoers to do everything they can to set the matter straight with the authorities. Furthermore, we do not prohibit or discourage the victim or the victim's parents from reporting child abuse to the authorities even if the alleged perpetrator is one of Jehovah's Witnesses." Bowen said church policy calls for the elders to question the accused in private, and if the charge is denied, the burden of proof then falls on the accuser to prove the allegations. If the accuser cannot do so and two witnesses are required the matter is dropped, he said. Confidentiality is paramount throughout the process, Bowen said, and not even the spouse of the accused or the parents of children who are in contact with the accused are told of the accusations. "As an elder, I am instructed if it is one person's word against another, and not two witnesses to the wrong, no action would be taken and no authorities would be notified," Bowen wrote. "The victim? Cautioned to keep silent or face discipline within the congregation that could go as far as being disfellowshipped for slander." James Bonnell, another elder in the Draffenville congregation, calling child molestation "a terrible thing," said the church "in no way condones that at all." According to the church's Web site, the faith has nearly 6 million practicing members in almost 90,000 congregations worldwide. The Draffenville congregation has approximately 50 members, Bowen said.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Louisville Courier-Journal Newspaper - January 4th 2001:

    Church officials say elders alert authorities to suspected abuse in states that require reporting. But in other states they prefer to take steps to protect children that don't breach what they see as confidential communication between elders and members.

    A lawyer for the Jehovah's Witnesses church, which has nearly 1 million members nationally and 6 million worldwide, said it complies with those state laws that require church elders to report abuse.

    "If there is a law that mandates reporting, that takes precedent over any confidentiality, whether in church policy or statute," said Mario Moreno, associate general counsel for the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society, a legal corporation of the church.

    "In states where there is no reporting requirement, it's a different scenario," Moreno said.

    Elders might have the victim relocated away from the abuser or have the parent or guardian of the victim, or even the accused person, report the abuse to police, he said.

    "The laws of this country, as well as people's moral values, tell you there are some things that should be kept private. That's why laws protect confidential communications between clergy and their flock."

    But Moreno said elders who contact the church's legal department with cases of suspected sexual abuse -- as they must do -- are often advised to refer victims to police or other outside help, even if the law doesn't require it.

    Victims and their parents are free, Moreno said, to seek help from police or therapists and should not blame the church if they choose not to do so.

    "Parents are encouraged to do whatever they need to do to protect their child," said Moreno.

    Church attorney Moreno said church members know they can go to the authorities on a matter of abuse. "They haven't committed a sin by turning in a Jehovah's Witness to the authorities," he said. "It's a very personal decision."

    Moreno would not comment on whether elders violated the law in this case but said, "Once in a while, in a small minority cases, elders screw up. They screw up because they don't call here (the Watch Tower legal department). When they call here, they don't screw up."

    Moreno said that eventually, the truth comes out. "Somebody else comes out of the woodwork and now you can take action," he said. Moreno said two separate accusers would count as two witnesses when making a sexual abuse accusation.

    Church policy neither encourages nor discourages members to report suspected or admitted sexual abuse to police, Moreno said. Elders are instructed to always call the central legal department of the church in Carmel, N.Y., upon receiving an accusation.

    When elders call, church lawyers tell them whether state law requires them to report abuse to police, Moreno said. A still-valid 1989 church memo also tells elders to call for legal advice before being interviewed by police, responding to a subpoena or voluntarily turning over confidential church records, unless police have a search warrant.

    Moreno said church lawyers might advise elders to refer victims to police or other outside help. "That's a personal decision."

    A Jan. 2 statement from J.R. Brown, director of public affairs for the Jehovah's Witnesses, said church elders "encourage the wrongdoers to do everything they can to set the matter straight with the authorities."

    Ayers, Rees' stepfather, declined to comment, but church lawyer Moreno applauded the decision.

    "There is no duty to announce to people that 'John Brown' is a child abuser," he said. If the court had ruled otherwise, he said, it "would basically discourage people from going to their ministers and getting help."

    "If people could not count on confidentiality when they go and confess to a Catholic priest, there's going be quite a chilling effect on religion," he said.

    Church lawyer Moreno said it would be "ridiculous" for any elder to make such a threat, and if one did, it would contradict church policy.

    "That's not scriptural," he said. "We teach the Scriptures. The Scriptures don't say, 'If you file criminal charges against an abuser you're going to have eternal damnation.' The one in danger of eternal damnation is the abuser."

    Watch Tower officials are not consistent on how the church punishes child molesters.
    In a Jan. 2 statement, church public affairs director Brown Church said that child abusers are "disfellowshipped," or expelled from the congregation. Later, he acknowledged the church can use less severe penalties.

    He defended his original statement, saying that for "mass consumption it conveys the thought (that elders) do institute this discipline. They're not soft on abusers."

    Said Moreno: "I wouldn't be too happy myself if somebody abused my child and was reinstated. The bottom line is if an elder determines a former child abuser has demonstrated repentance, (he has) a scriptural obligation to reinstate him."

    Brown said pedophiles are restricted from working with minors and must also be with a well-respected church member when they go door to door.

    Pedophiles also might not be sent into neighborhoods where they might be recognized as molesters, Brown said.

    According to church lawyer Moreno, the system worked. Elders did their job, and victims and police did theirs, he said.

    "What was the harm?" Moreno said. "The report got made.

    "You've got a teen, who has been molested, upset at the elders for not calling the police?" he said. "You can call the police. You're the one injured.

    "Who makes the laws? Not us. Don't blame us for the laws, please. Talk to the state legislators of Colorado."
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Edited by - UnDisfellowshipped on 23 October 2002 3:32:3

  • UnDisfellowshipped
    UnDisfellowshipped
    The Dallas Observer - December 7th 2000:

    Sects and Lies

    Did the isolated, unhappy life of an Arlington family of Jehovah's Witnesses breed false charges of sexual abuse? Absolutely, says a family member who never got a chance to tell her side of the story.

    By Thomas Korosec

    His looks could not have helped.

    That's the first thing you think as you watch Edward Lee Stevenson lower his large, lumpy frame onto a visiting-room stool. His face appears narrow and squirrel-like, compressed as it is by goggle-size bifocals and limp, gray-black hair. His teeth, noticeably misaligned and punctuated by a scattering of gold crowns, are arranged into a pronounced overbite, which slurs his diction ever so slightly. His breath has the unpleasant scent of problem gums, or maybe tooth decay.

    Stevenson's oldest daughter, who once thought the idea of his being imprisoned too far-fetched to consider, believes his appearance--the teeth, the glasses, the eccentric manner--helped put him where he is. "He's a weird, ugly guy," she says. "If he looked like Robert Redford, nobody would have believed these things against him."

    And even in prison, there are few offenses greater than being convicted of "these things."

    "Nobody in here admits they're a sex offender," Stevenson says from the prison visiting room in his slightly hurried way. "There's probably a lot here, but everybody makes up stories. They're drunk drivers or drug dealers. They'll say they were caught with an illegal gun." On his days out on the "field force," hoeing, planting, harvesting, or plucking weeds from cracks in a nearby airstrip, he mainly hopes nobody will ask. "People in here aren't violent," he says. "They're scared."

    Stevenson's words, his story of being falsely accused of unforgivable crimes, would be easier to follow if Lupe Miranda, the guard just outside the steel-plate door, would stop shaking his keys. Tink...tink...tink... Like a watch ticking away the man's sentence, the sound pings down the linoleum floors of this minimum-security compound in Cuero, Texas, which for the next 16 years could be Stevenson's home. Tink...tink...tink...

    Located on the edge of a small county seat--a collection of turn-of-the-century storefronts and supply stores southeast of San Antonio--the prison has surroundings that are almost picturesque. Brahma cattle, big-humped and beige, graze in an adjacent field. Stands of oaks and pecans hang across the farm-to-market road. For Stevenson, life inside the fences and metal-sided buildings is almost pleasant compared with his most unhappy home, he says. He reads his science-fiction novels and his Travis McGee mysteries in his two-man cell. No nonstop domestic strife. No waiting for the multiples in his wife's multiple personality to, as he puts it, "clash."

    Two years ago, as Stevenson complained in vain that he was the victim of a mentally unstable and vindictive ex-wife, a Tarrant County jury heard three family members--his ex-wife, a daughter, and a son--accuse the 56-year-old Vietnam vet of fondling his 16-year-old daughter and routinely masturbating in front of her in their Arlington home. Amending her story later, the daughter said he raped her too.

    Stevenson, who could not afford a lawyer and foolishly chose to represent himself, let prosecutor Lisa Callaghan, a veteran of the Crimes Against Children Unit, pick the jury. He called no witnesses in the guilt-innocence portion of the trial. And as jurors now relate, he never could make a clear point as he attempted to cross-examine his family, those accusing him of the crime.

    "The prosecution lined up witnesses who testified to the facts. He did nothing, absolutely nothing, to discredit those facts," recalls juror Douglas Free.

    The results for Stevenson were disastrous.

    Instead of casting doubt on a case built on delayed outcries, recovered memories, and a complete lack of physical evidence, he landed an 18-year sentence and a trial record almost entirely devoid of legal objections on which to base future appeals.

    Too bad, one could say. He made his own dumb mistakes. "The jury heard the witnesses, saw the witnesses," says Callaghan, who maintains she brought a solid case. "They saw stuff [in the way the witnesses gave their accounts] you can't see now...There is a quality when people are telling the truth you can see and hear."

    Stevenson's story would have ended with that had three people not come forward in recent months insisting his case deserves another look. They are his oldest daughter, Sheila Lott, who is estranged from the entire family but has now given a detailed affidavit about their odd, unhappy life; the defendant's mother, Ima Jean Ely, who is paying for a new legal challenge; and Fort Worth defense attorney Ward Casey, who filed a legal action last summer seeking to gain Stevenson a new trial.

    They say false charges could easily have emerged from the Stevenson household, which was disturbed in a variety of ways. As members of the Jehovah's Witnesses, the family was unusually insulated from the outside world, says Sheila Lott. The kids didn't go to school or play with neighbors or do anything to expose them to much beyond their mother's enormous influence. Lott says her siblings, particularly the youngest two, were dominated by Shirley Stevenson, a woman who claimed to have multiple-personality disorder and various undiagnosed diseases, and did strange, neurotic things such as insist she was pregnant when it was obvious she was not.

    When police and prosecutors are asked to investigate sex-related charges made against a backdrop of divorce and disputes over child support, as was the case here, one would expect prosecutors to exhibit considerable skepticism about what is being alleged. In this instance, says Casey, they ignored some clear, contradictory evidence and chose instead to rely on the word of family witnesses who were unusually close, one of whom had a big ax to grind.

    "It was a swearing match," Casey says. "These accusations were so stale, so implausible...Those witnesses were troubled enough, manipulated enough, to lie."

    Edward and Shirley Stevenson agree on few things about their 25 years together beyond a few basic details.

    They met in 1967, after they had written each other while he was stationed in Vietnam. Of the several men she had written to from her Tampa-area home, "he sounded really lonely, more lonely than some of the other boys I was writing to," Shirley testified at his trial. Born and raised in Abilene, the son of a schoolteacher, Edward had enlisted in the Air Force after failing to finish any courses during his one year in college.

    Just four days after they met in person, Edward and Shirley were married. By 1968, they had their first child, Sheila. Another daughter, Shelly, followed in 1971.

    By that time, says Edward, the honeymoon was over. "After Shelly was born, she started to get harder to get along with. We started fighting over all kinds of things."

    One thing they did agree on, though, was their decision in the late 1960s to join the Jehovah's Witnesses, the door-to-door proselytizers who had been predicting the world would end in 1975. "These Witnesses came to the house and I turned them away, and Shirley said, 'Oh, I like their literature.' She got me interested in starting Bible study with them...and I moved into that religion."

    The Stevensons began distributing the Witnesses' newsletter, The Watchtower, most Saturdays, attending church at the Kingdom Hall, and adopting the habits and beliefs of the sect: eschewing material gain, education, and all manner of holidays in order to get to work preparing to be saved.

    "When Ed came back from Vietnam, he decided our government was a little on the corrupt side, and he didn't want a lot to do with it," recalls Stevenson's younger brother, Leland Beatty, who manages a foundation that does rural development work. "He wanted to live as simple and pure and God-fearing a life as he possibly could."

    In long, involved letters, Stevenson tried to convert his two brothers and mother, lifelong Methodists, to his new faith.

    "It was a good religion if you're poor, and we were poor," recalls Sheila Lott. "You don't have birthdays or Christmas or the Fourth of July. You don't have phone calls from friends or Girl Scouts." The only contact she was allowed to have with nonbelievers, she recalls, is when she and her parents knocked on their doors selling Watchtowers, Bibles, and books.

    From the time she was born until she left home at age 18, Lott says, the family moved about eight times among trailers, duplexes, and small rent houses in Florida and Texas. Usually they packed up and left in advance of unpaid bills. Their houses were small, cluttered with "pack-rat stuff like newspapers, milk jugs, egg cartons, old furniture, and clothes," and dark. Her mother, she says, usually hung blankets or quilts over all of the windows. As Edward recalls: "In the middle of a bright summer day, you'd have to put a light on to see."

    Edward worked in jobs such as carpentry or repairing electric motors, or labored in the fields picking strawberries. He turned his paycheck over to his wife, who managed the family bills. Making as little as $5,000 in a bad year, he earned enough to afford 15-year-old station wagons and a black-and-white TV. "One day it would be beans and franks, the next macaroni and cheese, the next beans and franks," recalls daughter Sheila.

    By the late '70s, there were two more mouths to feed. In 1975, a third daughter, Sally, was born, and in 1978, a son, Sam. (Both of these names have been changed to protect the privacy of complainants in a sex-crimes case.)

    By the time the two youngest children were starting public school in Clyde, a small town near Abilene, Shirley Stevenson decided they would be home-schooled. The decision rankled Edward's mother, Ima Jean Ely, who taught public school in Abilene for 21 years.

    "I talked to school officials asking if she could keep them out of school, and they wouldn't touch it with a 10-foot pole," Ely recalls. "Sometimes I'd go to Clyde during the day to see if the children were studying. They'd just be sitting around in that dark house. I felt so sorry for the kids."

    Stevenson says his ex-wife, who has a 10th-grade education, actually did teach the kids, bringing home from the library stacks of books, which they learned to read. There also were days when something came over her and she was so listless, she wouldn't get out of bed, her daughter and ex-husband say.

    Shelly Stevenson, the second-oldest child, testified at her father's trial that living in her family was "like being locked away in a terrible prison somewhere." But she and her older sister, Sheila, have far different ideas about who was at fault.

    "He was mean to his family, always wanted respect. That's all he ever talked about, but he never did anything," Shelly testified about her father. She declined to be interviewed for this story.

    Her sister Sheila Lott, who is now a graphics technician at a sign company in Abilene, says her parents "really fought, but things were always my mother's way. If we're gonna go somewhere, it was where she wanted to go. In her house, she reigns. My mom is the kind of person who, if you disagree with her, she is angry, she doesn't love you."

    Sheila recalls that when she was about 11 years old, her mother took her into her bedroom and told her she was going to kill her. "She said I had to decide what method she would use to kill me, and if I didn't, she would decide on the method, and it would be the most painful she could imagine...In the morning she didn't say anything more about it."

    In her sworn affidavit, Sheila states: "When I was about 13 years old, my mother developed multiple sclerosis. She was so disabled, she had to use a wheelchair for approximately three or four years." A few years later, though, "My mother did not have multiple sclerosis anymore, but she had developed multiple-personality disorder."

    The daughter adds, "She'd say she was this little girl, and I'd think, whatever. If it was big on TV or in the news, that's what she had. It was all in her mind."

    Shirley Stevenson and her daughter Sally, who still live together, declined to be interviewed for this story.

    Edward says he believes the multiple-personality disorder was real. "Sam and I would try to count how many personalities she had," he says. But he says his wife was unstable just some of the time. Some days she would go off to her job as a grocery checker and be just fine.

    "We didn't always live in a somber house," Edward recalls. "We talked, we studied, we played together outside and went on our Watchtower walks together. We grew a garden outside and planted and hoed and stuff, Shirley and all of us."

    More often, though, there were deep, drawn-out arguments and fighting "over money, or little things, over everything," recalls Sheila Lott. "There wasn't a lot of love in that house." The combat was mostly verbal, with the kids drilled by their mother to take her side, she says. At worst, her father would swing a fist and deliberately miss. Once, she recalls, her mother threw a glass of tea at her father. He split her lip.

    As for attitudes toward sex--something that would be quite telling given events to come--Sheila says the household was as conservative as its faith. "When my mother told me about the birds and the bees, I came away with the impression that when a baby is conceived, a man and woman lie in bed fully clothed and God makes something go from him to her...She very much made us feel sex was dirty."

    Even a suggestion of raciness in a TV program would bar it from the family set, Sheila and her father agree.

    In 1988, the family had moved to a little brick bungalow in a blue-collar section of Arlington, and Sheila left home, mad at both of her parents. The second oldest, Shelly, was also about to go out on her own.

    The marriage was just about over too.

    In June 1992, the Stevensons separated, and Edward moved out. Less than two years later, in February 1994, they finalized a contested divorce in which the only outstanding issue was custody of Sam, who was 16 at the time.

    At the divorce hearing, Stevenson remembers, his son testified that he would rather kill himself than be made to have visitation rights with his father. Stevenson says his son's words showed the depth of hatred for him that his wife had helped instill. Sam got his wish to stay in the custody of his mom.

    More critical, though, is the fact that at the hearing in 1994, two years after Stevenson had moved away, nobody in the family said a word about the behavior for which he is now behind bars. Not his son, his daughter, or his wife. In a proceeding in which his character and actions would have been a central issue, nobody accused him of such things.

    Two and a half years later, however, on November 11, 1996, Shirley, Sally, and Sam Stevenson showed up at the Arlington police station telling extremely disturbing tales. Back in 1992, they claimed, when Stevenson was still living with them, he was a sexual monster--groping his daughter and masturbating in front of her. As it came out in court, presented by a veteran prosecutor who says she can discern when someone is telling the truth, their stories required a few leaps of faith to be believed.

    Stevenson says the catalyst for the charges was yet another fight, this time over the two months or so he was behind in his $200-a-month child support, an obligation that was soon to run out as his son became an adult. "She told me I'd better get the money," he says, "or she would make me pay."

    Looking "bedraggled, sort of whipped," in the words of the detective who took the case, Shirley Stevenson arrived at the Arlington police station that November morning with two of her children: Sally, who was then 21 and living at home, and Sam, who was about to turn 18.

    The mother had driven them. Neither owned a car or had learned to drive.

    In an interview room, Sally told detective James Warman of the sex-crimes squad that Edward Stevenson deliberately masturbated in front of her on at least 10 occasions in early 1992. He would be on his bed, more or less ordering her to watch from the doorway of his room, she said.

    "Since he was my father and I was just a kid, I had to obey him," she later told the jury--which may or may not have processed that she was a "kid" of 16 at the time.

    Her mother said she, too, witnessed this ugly ritual, but didn't think to report it to police until now. "I did not know it was against the law," Shirley Stevenson told jurors at her husband's trial. "I knew it was against God's law of everything good, but I didn't know police would do anything about it." The son also said he witnessed his sister at his father's door.

    The three accused Stevenson of groping Sally's breasts through her clothing while he play-wrestled with her, again, behavior that supposedly began when she was 16.

    But there was more to tell, a lot more.

    According to Warman, three weeks after Sally accused her father of exposing himself and groping her, she said she remembered something else that happened that spring of 1992. It was something she left out the first time she talked to police: Her father had raped her.

    "I did not remember it when I made the first statement," she testified later. "I had made drawings to help me remember, because I knew that what I had remembered him doing had not been all, and so my mother and my brother were talking about the pictures I had just drawn, and I was thinking about them, and suddenly I remembered what he had done."

    Her mother also testified about how these memories were suddenly "recovered."

    "I had seen different programs on television where children had been in traumatic situations of one kind or another...but wouldn't be able to talk about it...So what they would do, they would have these children draw pictures of their feelings or what they would remember, so I asked [Sally] to draw a picture of Ed. It was just kind of a stick figure, but I kept gently persisting, and over the course of a few days, I asked her to draw a picture of what happened in the bedroom."

    Pretty soon Sally was drawing figures that represented the bed and the door and her father. Shirley testified how she suggested to her daughter that the drawing showed Sally in her father's bed. "And she said, yes, they were both on the bed. She closed her eyes and nodded, and when she opened them, she just looked so--like guilty and disgusted and every emotion you can imagine. And I just told her, I said, 'It's OK.'"

    Thus, Sally came to remember, as a 21-year-old woman, that her father had raped her four and a half years earlier.

    "...He forced himself on me both anally and the normal way that a man would do that sort of thing with a woman," Sally told the jury.

    She also testified that "bits of memory" had returned to her about how her father would molest her and her older sister Shelly when she was "5 or 6."

    "There is a memory that I have of my father taking me and my sister Shelly to the library, where he would meet another man, and that other man would take Shelly away, and then my father would take me to the hotel...He would then rape me."

    Sally's sister Shelly testified--after Stevenson had already been convicted in the first phase of the trial--that these events simply did not happen. Her father never did anything sexual, never had any kind of sexual contact with any of the children, she said during the trial's sentencing phase.

    According to Sheila Lott, Shelly has told her the same thing in private. Sheila, who did not testify at the trial, said later in her affidavit, "I never heard anybody accuse my dad of any type of sexual misconduct. He certainly did not masturbate in front of the children. If he had, my mother would have called the police in a heartbeat."

    What did Callaghan think of the apparent hole in the case caused by Shelly's testimony?

    The fact that Shelly said the library-hotel episode didn't happen had no bearing on how she assessed the case or the truthfulness of what was being alleged, she says.

    "The question is whether what [Sally] said was true. It's not about this other stuff," says Callaghan, suggesting that perhaps Shelly was molested but simply doesn't want to talk about it.

    Asked whether she pressed Shelly on this important matter of corroboration, Callaghan replied, "If that is something she prefers not to discuss, I am not going to make it emotionally difficult for her more than I have to...A lot of kids suppress stuff they don't want to talk about. She wasn't going to talk about it. I didn't ask her about it, didn't talk about it."

    But Shelly, who was in her mid-20s when she took the stand, did talk about it. She said under oath that it didn't happen.

    Another very graphic bit of evidence that seemed not to support stories of forceful rapes was the testimony of Cheryl Gharis, an emergency-room nurse who did a rape exam on Sally. She testified that the young woman's hymen was still intact.

    Again, Callaghan says this was not a problem in the case. "It doesn't mean anything one way or another," says Callaghan. "In most instances, sexual abusers don't actually perform full intercourse. What they usually do is rub their genitals."

    But that, the trial record shows, is not what Sally said on the witness stand. She said in frank detail that "he put his penis in my vagina" during the alleged 1992 assault.

    Stevenson, working in his own defense, did nothing to underscore these kinds of troubling inconsistencies. For the most part, he offered his claim that his ex-wife put the children up to smearing him but did not subpoena any witnesses or ask the precise questions needed to bolster his defense. He returned several times to the weakly supportive fact that police found no pornography at his Addison apartment, where he had moved after the divorce, and that he kept none at the family home.

    But Callaghan did have one thing, one piece of hard evidence, that she says showed the defendant to have a sick, sexual mind. It was a letter he had written to his daughter shortly after the 1992 divorce. It read: "Dear Sally, you sure looked smashing in the suit at court the other day. Pink sure looks good on you. It sure made me wonder if any young brothers were noticing as well. Well? How 'bout the flowers. I bought some tulips at the grocery store the other day and they sure are pretty. They have almost burgundy petals, soft and feathery. I sure thought of you and wondered if you had practiced your 'green thumb' any since I've been gone. Well, be good. I know you are anyway, and call or write, especially if I can be of help. Bye now. Love, Dad."

    In her closing argument to the jury, Callaghan said the letter was filled with "sexualized content," particularly its "obsessive discussion of botany" and "observations concerning her appearance."

    Stevenson says the letter was nothing more than an icebreaker following the divorce. What could be wrong about inquiring whether his then-19-year-old daughter had caught the eye of any boys at church? And gardening was an interest he and his daughter shared, something he could bring up in strained times.

    Says Casey, the defense attorney, "They're true believers down there at the DA's office. If you ask me, anyone who saw sex in that letter is the one I'd say had a sick mind."

    Throughout Stevenson's trial, Casey says, contradictory evidence was shoved aside with explanations of what "usually happens" in sex-abuse cases, such as memories being repressed or outcries delayed. And the hard evidence, the letter, was no evidence at all.

    As his own attorney, though, Stevenson made none of those points, poked none of those holes. "When he cross-examined his family, it sounded like a bunch of people arguing about stuff around the kitchen table," says Casey, whose best-known court victory, the winning of a probated sentence for an accomplice in a race-hate murder case, prompted 10,000 people to march through downtown Fort Worth in 1992.

    Rather than go to the heart of the matter, Stevenson brought up tangential family spats, such as the time in 1990 when his wife snatched Sheila's 2-year-old child because she wanted to raise the toddler herself. The police were called, but she gave the child back, and no charges were filed.

    Worse, he didn't know enough to object when the state was going out of bounds.

    In response to one of Callaghan's questions, Warman, the detective, said he thought Sally was telling the truth about the sexual abuse. Under the law, experts aren't allowed to testify what they think about witnesses' truthfulness. "Police aren't human lie detectors," Casey says. That is something the law gives to the jury to decide. "Stevenson didn't know that," Casey adds. "Hell, he testified he thought those prosecutors had been real fair to him."

    Stevenson was sentenced to 18 years for touching his daughter's breasts through her clothing and 10 years for indecent exposure, terms that visiting Judge Calvin Ashley set to run at the same time. Callaghan presented the evidence about the alleged rapes, but she dropped the charge at trial. Still, she argued to the jury that the rape evidence helped prove the other two charges.

    Casey calls the tactic "poisoning the well," and Stevenson did nothing to blunt its effects. The defense attorney suspects it explains the lengthy sentences for the charges that did go to the jury.

    Given what jurors remember about the case, he might be right.

    "I thought we should give him more time," recalls Douglas Free, a 38-year-old information tech worker from Grapevine. "It was pretty clear to me he raped that girl."

    He says he and others on the panel thought a 20-year sentence, the most they could give for a second-degree felony, was too low. Then again, with several close relatives in police work, Free says he was surprised he was chosen for the jury at all. "I'm the kind of person who thinks the legal system does too much to protect the guilty," he says. "I'm not a guy a defense lawyer would pick."

    In this case, though, the prosecutor did all the picking.

    As Stevenson sat back during jury selection and didn't say a word, Callaghan quizzed prospective jurors about their attitudes on a number of sensitive issues in the case. "Anyone think that, frankly, repressed memory or memories that come back a long time later is just too weird? That you couldn't accept that as a possibility? Do you think that you could listen to evidence concerning repressed memory and decide whether you think it happened?"

    When several on the panel answered "Yes" to the last question, Callaghan affirmed their views to the rest. "In other words, people can do that because, OK, that happened, but I still have to live in this world and I still have to go on despite it." She also asked whether prospective jurors had problems with delayed outcries from victims or whether they could convict someone with no physical evidence, as was the issue here.

    Ima Jean Ely, the defendant's mother, was in the courtroom from the start of her son's trial. She remembers thinking when he told Callaghan she could pick the jury, "It's all over for him. How could he be so ignorant?"

    Says Casey, "As lawyers, we go to all these seminars, spend years listening to people teach you how to pick juries, how to make that first impression talking with them. And here Stevenson doesn't even make an attempt. That's how it all started."

    Several Fort Worth defense lawyers who weren't involved in the case say self-representation, which never is a wise idea, is particularly foolhardy when the charges involve incest or domestic sexual abuse. "They try these cases with no physical evidence all the time, and they're dad-gum difficult to defend," says Bill Magnuson. "The attitude is, if a child makes an outcry, they tend to believe it. Even a good lawyer has a difficult time."

    It is on this issue--how Stevenson came to represent himself--that Casey is hanging his attempt to gain Stevenson a new trial. He says the implausible facts of the case, and new evidence such as Sheila's affidavit, show that the issue of representation was critical to Stevenson's getting a fair trial.

    Legally, though, it isn't enough to say Stevenson did a terrible job playing his own lawyer. Casey argues that Tarrant County's system of appointing lawyers to people who can't afford one worked to coerce Stevenson into representing himself.

    From the first time detective Warman came to question him in November 1996, Stevenson maintained his innocence, insisting that the charges were organized by his spiteful ex-wife.

    After his arrest in December 1996, he was released on $5,000 bail and paid Fort Worth defense attorney Brian Willett $2,500 to represent him. According to a sworn statement from Stevenson, Willett later told him that the $2,500 only covered fees for an uncontested case--in other words, it paid only for entering a guilty or no-contest plea. It would take another $7,500 to defend him in a trial.

    Stevenson says he told his lawyer that he couldn't afford the fee--by the time of the trial he was working as a pizza-delivery man--and that under no circumstances would he accept a plea-bargain.

    This is the juncture, Casey claims, where Stevenson was forced to make an unfair and unconstitutional choice.

    On his bail bond, Stevenson was informed in bold type that he was required to appear in court with a lawyer, and that if he did not, he could be found "to have violated a condition of bond and may be arrested and placed in jail and his bond forfeited."

    Stevenson didn't want to accept a guilty plea, and he didn't want to go to jail. "I already waived my right to a speedy trial, so I thought I'd sit in jail for a year or two. Then maybe they'd offer me a plea," he says. "I wasn't ever going to plead guilty to doing these filthy, disgusting things."

    So Stevenson wrote the court a note saying, "I will under no circumstances accept a plea...I move this court to remove [his lawyer] and proceed to trial pro se...representing myself."

    Also guiding Stevenson's thoughts, Casey says, is the common practice in Tarrant County of offering court-appointed lawyers only to defendants who are too poor to make bail. To support that, he collected affidavits from seven Fort Worth defense attorneys who said it is the long-standing practice of the county's judges to advise defendants that a lawyer will not be appointed to represent them if they are out on bail.

    That is fairly common across the state, according to a State Bar of Texas study released in September. The report, written by Fort Worth attorney Allan Butcher, found that most Texas counties have no criteria for determining whether defendants are indigent. Two-thirds of defense lawyers surveyed across the state said that whether a person is able to post bail is the standard typically used in the courts to determine a person's eligibility for court-appointed counsel.

    This leaves people such as Stevenson--who had enough money to make bail but not enough to afford an attorney who would take the case to trial--in a bind, Casey contends. It forced him to choose between two rights: the right to bail and the right to legal counsel. The bond-requirement warning pushed him into defending himself.

    Prosecutor Callaghan calls Casey's argument "bunk." Stevenson made it clear that even if he could afford a lawyer, he wanted to represent himself. He said on the record that he had a better chance of acquittal on his own. "He is very arrogant. He made it clear he was smarter than all of us, and he was going to get out of it for that reason," the prosecutor says.

    Her office's legal response to Casey's challenge contends that the court never threatened Stevenson with jail if he requested a court-appointed attorney.

    But Casey argues in response: "No court, no lawyer ever advised [Stevenson] that his bail would not be forfeited and that he would not be placed back in jail if he requested that the court appoint him an attorney."

    Fort Worth defense attorney Tim Moore says Casey's argument is interesting, but he doesn't give it much of a chance. "With our appeals courts, he's probably out of luck," says Moore, pointing to the pro-prosecution bent of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in recent years. "If they won't let guys out when their DNA shows they weren't at the scene, you have to wonder in a case like this."

    Ima Jean Ely says Casey has admitted to her that a new trial is a long shot, but she's willing to pay for him to take it through the state appeals process. And Casey seems willing to take it beyond that--to the federal courts--if need be.

    "He needs a full, fair hearing," Casey says. "He's already had a lawyer who has said, 'Pay me or I'm out of here.'"

    Like many prisoners, Stevenson spends a little time with the law books these days--to pass the hours, maybe to see if the fat, brown volumes hold any secrets to his case. He sent a letter from Cuero while this story was being researched that included references to Tiberius Caesar, the U.S. Constitution, and Texas judges' oath of office.

    If he was arrogant about his courtroom abilities at his 1998 trial, he isn't anymore. "This crime didn't happen. I needed a lawyer to tell the jury that," he says. "I was way out of my league."
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Times (U.K.) Newspaper - August 15th 2000:

    Exile saves child sex offender from jail

    BY SHIRLEY ENGLISH

    A SHERIFF decided not to jail a convicted paedophile yesterday because he had "voluntarily exiled" himself to a remote Hebridean island. Thomas Maxwell, 60, a Jehovah's Witness for 30 years, could have been imprisoned for six months after admitting two counts of shameless indecency with a 12-year-old girl he met through his church while he was living in Sauchie, near Alloa, between 1994 and 1996.

    Instead Maxwell, now living on the island of Harris, was given three years' probation and 240 hours' community service by Sheriff William Reid at Alloa Sheriff Court. He was also placed on the sex offenders register. Angry islanders claimed that Maxwell was now living close to a school and that his nextdoor neighbours had two young girls.

    Morag Munro, an Independent councillor on Harris, said: "This is not some remote castaway island. The sheriff must be pretty ignorant if he thinks this is some kind of uninhabited island."
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    BBC News - August 14th 2000:

    Paedophile escapes jail

    Maxwell's name was added the sex offenders' list

    A sheriff's decision not to jail a 60-year-old paedophile has provoked a public outcry on the island of Harris where the man is now living.

    Monday, 14 August, 2000, 18:08 GMT 19:08 UK

    Thomas Maxwell, a Jehovah's Witness for more than 30 years, was sentenced to three years probation and 240 hours community service for sex offences against a 12-year-old.

    His name will also be added to the sex offenders' register.

    At Alloa Sheriff Court, Sheriff William Reid said his decision not to impose a prison sentence had been influenced by Maxwell's voluntary exile to a remote part of the Western Isles.

    But the residents of Leverburgh in Harris where Maxwell is now living are outraged.

    'Thoroughly nasty'

    Community council secretary John Mitchell said people would be horrified and that children on the island needed protection from Maxwell.

    But Sheriff Reid, who described the offences against the girl as "thoroughly nasty", said: "If I were to send you to prison the maximum period you could spend there would be three months, and then you would be released back into the community without any supervision whatsoever.

    "I doubt whether such a short period of imprisonment would benefit you or society as a whole.

    "It is better for the community that you be kept under prolonged supervision.

    "I also take into account that you have voluntarily exiled yourself to some remote part of the Western Isles."

    'Animal'

    Maxwell was living in Woodlea Park, Sauchie, near Alloa, at the time of the offences.

    He was found guilty at Alloa Sheriff Court in June on two counts of behaving with shameless indecency.

    His victim, now 17, broke down in loud sobs as the sentence was read out. She shouted "animal" as Maxwell was led quickly from the dock.

    As he left the building, members of the Alloa congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses shouted "pervert".

    Robert Millan, a church elder, said Maxwell would be summoned before the church's judicial committee and could be dismissed from the movement.

    The girl's father said: "This man betrayed our trust and ruined our family life.

    'Huge personal loss'

    "He should be disfellowshiped and no longer regarded as a brother in the Christian congregation until such time as he shows true repentance, and I don't think he's very likely to do that."

    Defence lawyer, April Campbell, said Maxwell had suffered "huge personal loss" as a result of the case.

    She said: "His life has been irrevocably shattered. His marriage has broken down, he has been rejected by his family, and he has been rejected by the congregation of the church of which he was a member for 30 or so years.

    "He has suffered severe psychological difficulties and depression and it is inconceivable that he should find himself in a position to re-offend."

    Miss Campbell added: "He feels a great and terrible shame and recognises the possibility of psychological harm to his victim."
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Illawarra Mercury News - August 5th 2000:

    Judge blasts church over sex offences

    A Wollongong judge yesterday launched a scathing attack on the Jehovah's Witness congregation at Balgownie, accusing elders of failing to report child sex abuse.

    Illawarra Mercury/ August 5, 2000

    By Michelle Tydd

    Judge John Goldring in Wollongong District Court said he was surprised police had not taken action against the congregation.

    ``And I wished they had,'' the angry judge said.

    The attack came as he sentenced Robert Leslie Souter to five years' jail for sexual assaults on two teenage boys 20 years ago.

    Judge Goldring said congregation elders were told of the sexual assaults by Souter in 1990 and he was ``disfellowshipped'' or excommunicated five years later without any further action.

    ``The moral punishment imposed by a church is not punishment demanded by law,'' Judge Goldring said.

    ``I cannot criticise the church sufficiently enough ... it's well known in these courts that churches are criticised for failing to report criminal activity.''

    ``The church may have spiritual responsibility but it does not exceed the authority of the state,'' Judge Goldring said.

    The congregation that met in Balgownie was known as the Corrimal congregation. It has since moved to Fairy Meadow.

    Souter, 46, pleaded guilty to one count of buggery and four counts of indecent assault.

    The court was told the offences took place when Souter and the two victims were members of the congregation at Balgownie. From 1978 to 1980 Souter committed at least five offences, four of which were committed on one victim.

    The court heard Souter became known to the boys' families and earned their trust.

    Souter committed the sex acts during outings to the beach and to the Blue Mountains.

    Solicitor for the Crown Ines Chiumento said it had been a major violation of trust.

    Souter's barrister Terry McGill, who defended the congregation saying it took great pains to care for its flock, told the court his client had suffered remorse since the offences.

    He said Souter's marriage had broken up and he now lived in another state.

    Judge Goldring said he reduced the jail sentence taking into account Souter had been a sex abuse victim. He imposed a non-parole period of three years.

    Presiding elder in the Corrimal congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses, Roger Graham, said he could not comment about practices 20 years ago.

    However, he said the approach the congregation took today was to speak to victims and offer them support and encouragement to come forward.

    ``If they choose to take legal action, we give them all the support they need,'' Mr Graham said.

    ``It is not up to the church to take that action without victim approval because it is they who have to face the interrogation and stress of the matter.''
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Associated Press (AP) News - October 21st 1999:

    Man loses bid to sue Jehovah's Witnesses over sexual abuse

    The Associated Press

    10.21.99

    PORTLAND, Maine A Portland man who sued the Jehovah's Witnesses over sexual abuse he suffered from a church member when he was a teen has lost his appeal to have the case reinstated.

    Bryan Rees, 24, obtained a judgment against Larry Baker, who pleaded guilty to sexually abusing Rees, but he also sought to sue three elders of the Augusta church as well as the denomination's legal corporation.

    In a unanimous ruling, the Maine Supreme Judicial Court on Oct. 18 upheld a lower court's dismissal of the claims against the church leaders and the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York Inc.

    Rees' lawyer says the decision effectively gives rights to churches that are not afforded individuals or corporations.

    "If we molest someone, we're liable. If they molest somebody, they can hold up the First Amendment shield and be granted immunity," said Michael J. Waxman, who vowed to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

    Bruce Malonee, a Bangor lawyer for the Watchtower Society, says that the way in which the Watchtower Society chooses leaders and disciplines church members is part of its constitutionally protected freedom of religion.

    He says the decision permits members to make religious decisions without worrying about being second-guessed by a secular court.

    In his lawsuit, Rees contended leaders in the Augusta church he attended as a teen-ager knew that Baker had molested a child in the past but did not warn church members or expel Baker.

    Rees was molested by Baker from 1989 to 1992 while he was a teen-ager living next door to Baker in the Lincoln County town of Jefferson.

    Baker, who served six months in prison for unlawful sexual contact with a minor and sexual abuse of a minor, said in a deposition that he engaged in sexual acts about 30 times with Rees, Waxman said.

    Rees ultimately required psychiatric hospitalization following the acts that started when he was 14 years old, Waxman said. Rees won a $1.2 million judgment against Baker but did not collect damages, the lawyer said.

    Rees' lawsuit accused the defendants of breaching a fiduciary duty owed to him as a member of the congregation and of infliction of emotional distress. He also sued his stepfather, one of the church elders, for negligence.

    According to the high court ruling, the elders of the church demoted Baker, rebuked him in private and temporarily forbade him from having contact with minors after becoming aware of the first case episode.

    However, the elders did not make the congregation aware of the episode and they later allowed him to resume activities as an ordinary member of the church.

    In dismissing claims for emotional distress, Justice Leigh Saufley wrote that to hold the church responsible would require delving into matters of redemption and forgiveness, "an inquiry that would require secular investigation of matters that are almost entirely ecclesiastical in nature."

    "State courts may not interfere in matters concerning religious doctrine or organization," Saufley wrote.

    Waxman says the state's position regarding churches is among the most conservative in the country. He also says that common sense dictates the church should have done something to protect children from Baker.

    "The church's dogma would not have precluded reasonable and appropriate action in this case," Waxman said.

    Malonee said his clients were sorry that Rees was victimized but that they felt the court made the right decision.

    As for Rees, he says he has straightened out his life after going through a difficult period following the sexual abuse. He now has a daughter and a job as a security officer.

    He said he believed the justices let him down in their ruling and added that he is disenchanted with organized religion.

    "I agree with Governor Ventura that religion is a sham for weak-minded people," he said, referring to recent comments the Reform Party governor from Minnesota made in an interview with Playboy.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Quote from August 9th 1999 Issue of Newsweek Magazine, Pages 27, 28 about Mark Barton:

    "In his suicide note last week, Barton denied that he had killed his first wife and her mother. He went on to say, "I have come to hate this life in this system of things." His marriage was in trouble by fall of last year. In October Leigh Ann moved out and rented an apartment in a neighboring town. Barton's cyberspace "profile" as an America Online subscriber was, in retrospect, slightly ominous. In his first entry, about a year ago, he wrote, "Enjoy day to day stock trading" as a hobby. His personal quote was "A dollar earned is a dollar saved." But in early 1999, he no longer listed himself as married, and his hobbies now included "Guns, Day Trading." His personal quote was from the Clint Eastwood shoot-'em-up "Dirty Harry": "Make my day."

    Searching for help, Barton went to the Jehovah's Witnesses for instruction. His wife had left him over money, he told his minister, but he couldn't stop gambling on stocks. "It was a fever that he had," the minister, who did not wish to have his name used, told NEWSWEEK. Barton said he was waking up in the middle of the night, and feared that he had inherited some kind of undefined mental imbalance from his father. From the Bible, he began reciting from Revelation 21:4 ("and there shall be no death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be anymore pain")."
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    "This Is Lancashire" News - March 19th 1999:

    Jail for Jehovah's Witness

    A MORECAMBE man has admitted indecently assaulting a young boy who was a member of his church.

    Godfrey Bagnall, 57, of Arnside Crescent, Morecambe, was an elder and pioneer for the Jehovah's Witnesses. He admitted three charges of indecent assault on a boy starting at the age of eight. The court heard how the boy, now and adult, had turned to drugs "as a direct result of the abuse he sustained."

    Bagnall was "de-fellowshipped" from the religion after the boy complained but was later re-instated. Mr Stuart Denny, defending, said Bagnall and the boy had a good relationship which Bagnall had taken too far. The Judge, Mr Justice Newman, said: "He deserved better of you."

    Bagnall was sentenced to nine months imprisonment for three counts of indecent assault and was placed on the sex offenders register for 10 years.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Portland.com News - May 1998

    Religious group invokes rights in abuse case

    By Steven G. Vegh Staff WriterCopyright

    The Jehovah's Witnesses are invoking their constitutional right to religious freedom as a defense in a lawsuit that blames the church for sexual abuse by a member.

    The lawsuit, filed by Bryan Rees in Cumberland County Superior Court, seeks unspecified damages for abuse that Rees says he endured between 1989 and 1992. It names Larry Baker as the man who abused him.

    The lawsuit also names the denomination, known formally as the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York Inc.; Alan Ayers, Rees's stepfather and a church leader; and Patrick LaBreck and Robert Wells, who Rees says were leaders in his congregation.

    Rees claims that leaders in the Augusta church he attended as a teen-ager knew that Baker had molested a child in the past but did not warn church members or expel Baker. That failure left Rees vulnerable to abuse, the lawsuit says. Rees is now 23 and lives in Portland.

    The First Amendment to the Constitution provides several protections, one of which prevents Congress from prohibiting the free practice of religion.

    The way in which the Watchtower Society chooses leaders and disciplines church members is part of its practice of religion, says Bruce Mallonee, the attorney representing Wells, LaBreck and the Society.

    ''If they can be required to go to trial and defend their actions . . . they'll have to base their decisions not on what their prayers and Bible tell them, but on what they think a jury would require of them,'' Mallonee said.

    Mallonee has asked the court to dismiss the case. A ruling on that request is expected this summer.

    Rees's attorney says that churches and church leaders should be held accountable for leaders' mistakes.

    ''It's disgusting to think their interest in governing their own people somehow surpasses the state's and our own interest in making sure (abuse) doesn't happen,'' Michael J. Waxman said.

    According to the lawsuit, Baker was Rees's next-door neighbor in the Lincoln County town of Jefferson and a member of the Jehovah's Witnesses congregation to which Rees's family belonged.

    The lawsuit says that Ayers, Wells and LaBreck were elders in the congregation who served on a church panel that disciplined Baker before 1989 for molesting a boy. The panel forbade Baker from having contact with children in the church and demoted him from his position as an elder.

    The lawsuit says the congregation was never told about Baker's acts, leaving Rees vulnerable to abuse.

    According to Rees, Baker started abusing him in 1989 and continued until 1992. The lawsuit says that during that time, Baker regained his leadership post as an elder.

    Rees later told a counselor about the abuse, and the case was reported to police. Baker was convicted in 1993 of unlawful sexual contact and sexual abuse of a minor.

    Court papers filed by attorney M. Michaela Murphy on behalf of Baker deny the bulk of Rees's allegations. Murphy had no comment when contacted Monday.

    According to Waxman, the Jehovah's Witnesses dodged their responsibility to protect children when the elders kept their discipline against Baker confidential.

    But Mallonee says that if the case goes to trial, ''(that) puts the court in the position of telling the religious organization how to run its affairs.''

    Attorneys disagree on whether churches can cite the First Amendment in a case like this one.

    ''To say this (case) should be dismissed . . . because they're a church and immune from civil liability because of the First Amendment seems a creative argument,'' said Cabanne Howard, who teaches at the University of Maine School of Law.
    But David Gregory, who also is on the law school's faculty, said the case probably falls under the principal of avoiding interference with religious beliefs by not treating churches under ordinary liability laws.


    A Jehovah's Witness Lawyer from the Watchtower's Patterson, NY branch writes a rebuttal:
    ====================================================
    LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    Published on Saturday, May 23, 1998 Page: 8A 1998 Guy Gannett Communications

    Church has no control over its members

    It is not my practice to litigate a matter outside of the courtroom, but as an attorney involved in representing the interests of Jehovah's Witnesses, I must respond to the false allegations that sexual abuse was perpetrated by an elder, contained in Mr. Vegh's article of May 12.

    Jehovah's Witnesses believe they have a responsibility before God to protect the children in the congregation.

    The Watchtower Society has stated its official position in the Jan. 1, 1997, ``Watchtower.'' ``For the protection of our children, a man known to have been a child molester does not qualify for a responsible position in the congregation.''

    The perpetrator at no time held a leadership position in the church - not before the wrongdoing, not at the time of the wrongdoing, not after the wrongdoing. The May 12 article is wrong when it says he ``regained his leadership post as an elder.'' He was a next-door neighbor of the plaintiff and a fellow parishioner.

    The plaintiff is seeking to hold the church responsible for activities that took place in a private setting, between neighbors.
    Clearly, the personal activities of church members are outside of the control of the church.

    The plaintiff's counsel seeks to strip a church of the sanctity and complete confidentiality of the confession and impose upon it liability for the wrongdoing of its members.

    When all the facts have been developed, in a court of law rather than the court of public opinion, it will be clear that the Watchtower Society and church elders did all that was possible to safeguard the plaintiff.

    Paul D. Polidoro
    Patterson, N.Y.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Associated Press (AP) News - May 13th 1998:

    Maine man sues Jehovah's Witnesses over alleged sexual abuse

    The Associated Press

    05.13.98

    PORTLAND, Maine -- A Portland man is suing the Jehovah's Witnesses because he was allegedly sexually abused by a church member in Augusta and the denomination did nothing to protect him.

    Bryan Rees, 23, seeks unspecified damages for abuse that Rees says he endured between 1989 and 1992.

    Rees claims that leaders in the Augusta church he attended as a teen-ager knew that Larry Baker had molested a child in the past but did not warn church members or expel Baker.

    Besides Baker, the lawsuit names one of the denomination's legal corporations, the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York Inc., along with Alan Ayers, Rees' stepfather, and Patrick LaBreck and Robert Wells, who were leaders in his congregation.

    Part of the Jehovah Witnesses' defense is based on its constitutional right to religious freedom.

    The way in which the Watchtower Society chooses leaders and disciplines church members is part of its practice of religion, says Bruce Mallonee, the attorney representing Wells, LaBreck and the Society.

    If the case goes to trial, that "puts the court in the position of telling the religious organization how to run its affairs," Mallonee said.

    Mallonee has asked the Cumberland County Superior Court to dismiss the case. A ruling on that request is expected this summer.

    Rees' attorney says that churches and church leaders should be held accountable for leaders' mistakes.

    "It's disgusting to think their interest in governing their own people somehow surpasses the state's and our own interest in making sure (abuse) doesn't happen," Michael J. Waxman said.

    According to the lawsuit, Baker was Rees' next-door neighbor in the Lincoln County town of Jefferson and a member of the Jehovah's Witnesses congregation to which Rees' family belonged.

    Court papers filed by attorney M. Michaela Murphy on behalf of Baker deny the bulk of Rees' allegations.

    Baker could not be reached for comment. There was no telephone listing for him in the town of Jefferson.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Associated Press (AP) News - March 16th 1998:

    Former church elder convicted of lewdness with minor

    YERINGTON, Nev. (AP) - A former Jehovah's Witnesses church elder was convicted of lewdness with a minor for a 1992 incident with an 8-year-old girl at his home.

    March 16, 1998

    A Lyon District Court jury returned the verdict Thursday against Daniel Steven Fitzwater, who faces up to 20 years in prison when he returns to court for sentencing April 20.

    During the trial, Chief Deputy District Attorney John Schlegelmilch said Fitzwater used his position as a church elder to gain the trust of the victim's family before the incident.

    The girl, now 13, was left in the care of Fitzwater's wife when her parents went on a deer hunting trip, and the sexual molestation occurred when Mrs. Fitzwater made a trip to town, the prosecutor said.

    "He was supposed to be looking over the flock," but he committed a "crime against nature and Jehovah," Schlegelmilch said.

    The girl went on to develop behavioral problems, experience nightmares and attempt suicide at the age of 10, he added.

    But court-appointed defense attorney Jeffrey Morrison questioned the girl's credibility, saying she has accused others of the same crime.

    "It will be your task to determine what is fact and what is fantasy in the mind of a troubled young girl," he told jurors.

    Fitzwater took the stand during the trial to deny the charges, but two women supported the prosecution's case by testifying he inappropriately touched them when they were young.

    One was his stepdaughter.

    Fitzwater lived in Weed Heights, a mining community near Yerington, when the crime occurred. He has since moved out of Lyon County.

    Yerington is 80 miles southwest of Reno.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Associated Press (AP) News - February 25th 1998:

    Lawsuit accuses church organization of not reporting sexual abuse

    HOUSTON (AP) -- A Houston teen-ager has filed a lawsuit accusing the national Jehovah's Witness organization of failing to tell authorities that her brother was sexually abusing her.

    Wednesday, February 25, 1998

    Now 19, the woman says her brother, three years older than she, began sexually abusing her in the mid-1980s. In 1988, she says, her family sought counseling by church elder Kerry W. "John" Landers and told him of the assaults.

    "Despite this knowledge and/or suspicion, Landers was instructed by the national Jehovah's Witness organization to handle the matter in-house rather than report such sexual abuse to the authorities, as required by Texas law," according to the lawsuit, filed by attorney John T. McDowell:

    The brother was counseled to stop the inappropriate activity, but the church was advised that he was continuing to molest his sister.

    The local Jehovah's Witnesses leadership in 1992 appointed Landers and two other elders "to 'investigate' the matter as a 'judicial proceeding,' " McDowell said in the suit.

    During that action, the brother confessed, "apologized, said he wouldn't do it anymore, and the elders put the matter to rest without reporting the matter to the Texas authorities," the lawsuit says.

    The brother was eventually convicted of sex abuse and sentenced to prison. Authorities were tipped off to the abuse when the sister was being treated for depression and told a hospital worker of the abuse.

    During the trial, the church counselor testified under a grant of immunity that the church had said it wanted the matter kept "in-house."

    That attitude of secrecy was changed after the criminal case, McDowell said.

    Church attorney Jeffrey Parsons of Houston says the church strongly believes it did nothing wrong.

    "We are sorry to see this come to litigation, but that is her right," Parsons said. He said further comment would be inappropriate.

    Defendants include Landers and the national nonprofit groups that head the national church -- the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania, and Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York Inc.

    The suit seeks unspecified damages for "severe emotional and bodily injuries," compensation for medical and psychiatric treatment, and gross negligence.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Verdens Gang Newspaper - September 16th 1996:

    Didn't Repent Enough

    Jehovah's Witness committed new sex abuse crimes.

    The Jehovah's Witness who through 23 years sexually abused an unknown number of children, continued his sexual crimes after in vain having asked to be punished.

    By FREDDY KONGSBERG, The Newspaper Verdens Gang, Sept 16th, 1996

    Three years after he came forth as a very repentant sinner, he committed at least four new acts of sexual abuse.

    My acts and my desires are violations of the word of the Bible. I want to make up for myself and return to the congregation, was the 61 year old man's prayer to the police and prosecution.

    Not answered

    His prayer was not answered, even if there was not a shadow of doubt that he had for years sexually abused an unknown number of Jehovah's Witness children.

    His detailed confession was about crimes which, according to the police, were legally obsolete.

    Despite having committed a series of shocking crimes against small children, he had to leave the Police Station as a free man, against his will.

    What should have been his final confrontation with his dark sexual desires and pedophilia, never became a confrontation.

    Reported to the Police

    The man who, after the disclosure of the sexual abuse, was disfellowshipped from the religious movement, continued abusing children.

    Three years after reporting himself to the police for his shocking secret, he was himself reported to the police by the parents of a nine year old boy.

    When he was called for interrogation by the police, he confessed yet again to having abused small children.

    This time, the sexual crimes were not obsolete. In Toten magistrate's court the man was sentenced for five instances of lewd action.

    35-50 victims

    There are reasonable cause to believe that the seriously religious man based on depositions from acquaintances and the man's many sex victims may have sexually abused between 35 and 50 Jehovah's-children. He received a very gentle sentence.

    He did not have to be imprisoned for any of the five month sentence which was made conditional with two years period of probation.

    Both the Police prosecution and the State Attorney asked for unconditional prison sentence, says Chief of Police Tore Vigen with Vestoppland Police District.

    The magistrate's court were informed that the man had confessed crimes that the prosecution meant was obsolete.

    The police documents from the shelved cases, partly as obsolete and partly because of insufficient evidence, were given to the court for information. These crimes were not considered for sentencing.

    Were silent

    Despite that many of the abuse victims of the former Jehovah's Witness informed their parents about the crimes, the man was never reported to the police for any of the sex-crimes that demonstrated to be obsolete.

    Both the parents of the children and the leaders of the congregation were silent about the crimes after having done an internal trial of the sex-crimes. The man was disfellowshipped by the congregation's elders in the so-called judicial committee.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Verdens Gang Newspaper - September 16th 1996:

    The Congregation Was Silent

    Jehovahs Witnesses were completely silent about one of their own sexually abusing children for many years.

    By FREDDY KONGSBERG, The Newspaper Verdens Gang, Sept 16th, 1996

    The man was after internal exposure disfellowshipped from the sect, but never reported to the police.

    If Jehovah's Witnesses had reported the case, the man would probably have been sentenced for some of the crimes which then would not have been obsolete, says Chief of Police Tore Vigen.

    From what VG knows, he explained in his confession and during interrogations that the leaders of the congregation never encouraged him to go to the police.

    The decision to report himself was wholly his own, because he allegedly felt very burdened by guilt, first and foremost because the Bible condemn those assaults.

    He did not hide that he by demonstrating sincere repentance and make up for himself could come back to the congregation.

    The man has, as VG understands, tried to keep a certain contact with the congregation, but is not an active Witness.

    Jehovah's Witnesses relation to abuse caused some sensation when VG earlier could report the sect's demands to its sex victims: Witnesses needed three eye witnesses to the abuse before congregation elders wanted to process those cases. The judicial committees of the religious community judge according to Bible principles.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Verdens Gang Newspaper - September 16th 1996:

    Asked to be Punished for Child-Sex

    Jehovahs Witness confessed assault on children, but avoids prosecution

    A repentant Jehovahs Witness confessed to the police that he for 23 years had sexually abused children in the congregation. But his request for punishment was not answered.

    By Freddy Kongsberg (The Newspaper Verdens Gang, Sept 16th, 1996)

    He was disfellowshipped from the controversial sect which has its own court, but the leaders of the congregation were silent about the shocking sexual abuse of the congregations children.

    When he two years later on his own initiative went to the police, he asked in vain to be punished for his sexual desires and crimes:

    Vestoppland police district dismissed the case against the 61 year old man. The repentant sinner repented too late.

    A couple of the incidents were close to the line, but most of them were legally obsolete, says Chief of Police Tore Vigen.

    Several Years

    In his own confession he told the police how he got release for his dark sides by sexually abusing ten children in the ages from 6 to 14 years. He named nine of the children who were victims of his sexual desires, which came with unresistible force. Some of the children he abused for several years.

    There are indications that the man as an active Jehovahs Witness may have sexually abused as many as 35 to 50 children.

    Among other things, the sex-victims tell in their explanations to the police that they know about several others they mean were sexually abused by the man.

    Also the closest-of-kin to the man, who now no longer want anything to do with him, have in conversations with Secretary General Ola degaard in Landsforeningen Rettferd for Taperne (The Society Justice for Losers), given similar information.

    We therefore have all reason to believe that a shocking number of children have been defenceless victims of a man who will not have to be called to justice, says Secretary General Ola degaard.

    Regrets

    Chief of Police Vigen can only regret that it was not possible to prosecute the man.

    Even if the police, after what VG knows, according to their documents showed the man content of the punishment acts paragraph 195, Vigen says it was never really the idea to accuse the man after this provision.

    The punishment acts paragraph 195 about "sexual relations to minors" have a time limit of wholly 15 years.

    The mans sexual abuse was mostly palpation, which has a much shorter time limit, says Vigen.

    Vigen means the police handled the case in a proper way. The named victims and their relatives were all questioned.

    Wanted to settle

    I have taken the case up many times to see if there is anything we could have done differently. My conclusion is that we could not, says Chief of Police Vigen.

    Vigen confirms, however, that the decision not to prosecute despite the mans confession and the offendeds explanation, partially was justified by the stand of evidence.

    But the decision not to prosecute was caused mainly by limitations.

    The man explain to the police he wanted to settle this, hoping to go back to the congregation.

    But his prayer for punishment was not answered.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Western Daily Press Newspaper - March 25th 1977:

    "Satan's Witness"

    Here is the Web Page where you find more information about this News Article: http://watchtower.observer.org/apps/pbcs.dll/article?Date=20020510&Category=JWANDCHILDREN2&ArtNo=205100005&Ref=AR


    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Edited by - UnDisfellowshipped on 23 October 2002 4:38:39

  • UnDisfellowshipped
    UnDisfellowshipped

    bttt (bringing this Thread back to the top of the Active Threads List).

    Also, I wanted to let everyone know that there appears to be some technical problems with this Thread, and it seems that I am the only person who can Post on it (weird huh?).

    So, if anyone has been trying to post comments on this Thread, you can E-Mail them to me at [email protected] if you want.

  • UnDisfellowshipped
    UnDisfellowshipped

    Watchtower Society QUOTES about Child Molestation are below:

    Awake! February 8th 1981 Issue, Pages 16-19:

    Incest The Hidden Crime

    IS THERE any help for a person like me? This sad question came from a woman with a difficult problemone shared by a surprising number of other women today. After many years, she was still suffering from a childhood experience. She had been a victim of incest. How can her question be answered?

    Incest is not a pleasant word. Most would rather not discuss it, yet it is increasingly common. If estimates are correct, it is quite likely that some of your personal friends have been victims. It is certainly a problem of which parents should be aware.

    Most of us know what incest means-sexual activity between close relatives. It is suspected that a lot of such activity goes on between brothers and sisters, although this is not usually reported. Authorities are particularly concerned when children are abused by adult relatives. Of greatest concern, and probably accounting for most of the reported cases, are instances where children are molested by their fathers or stepfathers.

    Is the Problem Really Widespread?

    Despite the lack of complete statistics, the answer is clearly, Yes. Susan Brownmiller, in her book Against Our Will, says: The sexually abused child is statistically more prevalent than the physically abused, or battered child. Mrs. Lee Preney, a childcare worker, asserts that incest is more common than rape, and less frequently reported.

    A report in the Seattle Times said: Look at any 15 girls in your daughters classroom the next time youre there . . . the odds are good that at least oneand possibly two or threehas been a victim of incest.

    Hank Giarretto, a psychologist who works in a sexual-abuse treatment program in prosperous Santa Clara County, California, thinks that incest is epidemic in America. In an area with a population of around one million, he saw incest cases rise from 30 in 1971 to more than 500 in 1977. In an interview with the magazine People, he said: I think we are just beginning to tap the actual prevalence.

    Some estimate that 25 million women in America today suffered incestuous abuse as children! Reports indicate that many other countries are experiencing the same growing problem.

    Should We Be Concerned About It?

    Many experts have raised this question. For example, Wardell Pomeroy, coauthor of the original Kinsey reports, was quoted in Time magazine as saying: It is time to admit that incest need not be a perversion or a symptom of mental illness. Incest between . . . children and adults . . . can sometimes be beneficial.

    Are you a parent? How do you feel about that viewpoint? Would you allow your little boy or girl to have sex relations with an older relative?

    If you are a Christian, you know you should be concerned about incest. God's opinion about it-much more important than any man's-was stated very clearly to the Israelites: You people must not come near, any man of you, to any close fleshly relative of his to lay bare nakedness. The forbidden relationships are specified, including: brother/sister, parent/child, as well as uncle-or-aunt/niece-or-nephew relations. Leviticus 18:6-18.

    The experience of children who have been incestuously abused also shows that we should be concerned.

    What Happens to the Child?

    In correspondence with the Australian Womens Weekly, a woman described how childhood incest drove her to several suicide attempts, starting from the age of 10. Others could not have normal sex relationships when they grew up.

    Another, one of three sisters molested by their father, wrote: It has taken me 10 years and a lot of help from my husband to come to terms with it and discuss it freely. It affects everybody differently. My eldest sister thinks sex is the dirtiest thing in the world; my youngest just doesnt care. She was charged with prostitution at the age of 14 and had a child by the time she was 15 years old.

    Prostitution, drug abuse, committing rape (in the case of boys), alcoholism, rebelliousness and emotional turmoil have all resulted from incest. One young girl could not think of God as her heavenly Father. An incestuous relationship with her natural father had soured her on the whole concept of fatherhood.

    Why does incest seem to cause more emotional turmoil than, say, rape? Because the molester is imposing on a very close and important relationship. One girl complained that she felt more like a wife than a daughter and believed that she was there only for her father's sexual pleasure.

    Consider the comment of another victim: I was terrified to tell anyone what was happening to me. I was so scared to disobey him; after all he was my father, he wouldn't do anything he wasn't supposed to . . . As I grew into my teens, things got worse and worse. I understood things better. I felt like I was dirty, cheap and worthless. So many times I considered suicide. And how I hated men! . . . I knew I was only a little girl when it started, but I could not stop feeling that it was all my fault . . . almost worse than the actual molesting is the guilt.

    What About the Perpetrator?

    Not only the victim, but the molester, too, can suffer because of incest. Often he feels shame and self-hatred, while all the time becoming more and more involved. A therapist told the Seattle Times: The problem is that were dealing with compulsive behavior. These men have conditioned themselves through repeated sexual daydreaming . . . to respond to young girls.

    One molester said: I tried stopping it several times, and I told my stepdaughter that I had to stop because of what I was doing to the family. But he did not stop. Another said his incestuous relationship left him with permanent emotional scars.

    Besides this, remember that in most lands incest is against the law, punishable by a possible prison sentence. Surely, if all these facts were kept in mind, fewer parents would allow themselves to fall into incestuous relationships.

    Then Why Do They Do It?

    Some adults who turn to incest are psychotic. Most are not, however. They may be apparently good family men, business or community leaders, even good churchgoers.

    Why do such ordinary people commit incest? Loss of control due to alcohol has been involved. Sometimes, a man marries a woman who already has children. As his stepchildren get older, he may be tempted sexually.

    Family problems can contribute. Hank Giarretto says: Usually it's a man losing his job or going through a low-ebb period in his life. He and his wife become alienated. The father reaches out to his daughter, looking for closeness. She is open to him, loves him, thinks he's great. The first overtures are not sexual.

    There may be additional causes. One incest victim told how pornographic literature was always present in the house. Giarretto adds: It's the sexual climate of our society which helps create the problem. We teach our girls to be Lolitas and sexual provocateurs from the time they're 2.

    An adult committing incest with a child betrays selfishness. He shows no concern at all for the welfare of the child. Yet, in a world that encourages us to do our own thing and promotes such perversions as child pornography, is it surprising that cases of incest are on the increase?

    Can It Be Prevented?

    It surely can, but it means that individuals must make a determined mental stand against the worsening moral climate of this world. For this, we can get no better advice than that found in the Bible. The apostle Paul tells us: Quit being fashioned after this system of things, but be transformed by making your mind over. (Rom. 12:2) To do this, we must avoid unclean books and entertainment and block from our minds the unclean influences to which we are constantly exposed. Thus, we avoid conditioning ourselves to wrong behavior.

    One incest victim recommended teaching children at an early age that certain parts of their bodies are not for others to play with. This can be done in a loving way, perhaps using the story of Dinah, in the publication My Book of Bible Stories. Then, if anything resembling molestation should occur, the child can immediately tell mother or father. Remember, sexual molestation does not have to be intercourse. Fondling, touching, unwarranted intimacy or any sexual playing can cause great damage in later life.

    Deep parental love is a true safeguard. Paul said: Love . . . does not behave indecently, does not look for its own interests. (1 Cor. 13:4, 5) This unselfish love will surely prevent parents from allowing fleshly weaknesses to nudge them to do wrong acts toward their offspring. It will also help to prevent another problem. Sometimes, as children start to become young men or women, their parents, afraid of falling into incestuous relationships, become cold and distant. Of course, this, too, is harmful to the growing child.

    Handling the Problem

    Handling incest has not proved easy. It is a secret crime. Families often try to keep it hidden. Mothers who know that something is going on may turn a blind eye, afraid of disrupting the family. Children who report their parents may come under strong pressure to withdraw the complaint. Yet, in the experience of many specialists, children rarely lie about incest.

    Some feel that prison is not always the answer for the molester. Hence, counseling centers have been set up where these families can be treated as a whole. Explaining what he thinks is very important in such treatment, Hank Giarretto says: [The father] must face the daughter and accept full responsibility for whatever happened. This may be difficult for the father to do; but it is a way he can try to undo some of the harm that has been done to the child.

    Outsiders can help too. Many victims have testified how, through patient, considerate and selfless care, they were assisted to overcome the emotional confusion and start planning for the future. The scars may never completely disappear; but with persistence, they will at least recede into the background.

    Another Source of Help

    What, then, about the incest victim whose question appears at the beginning of this article? She was molested by her grandfather from the age of six until nine. She tried immorality, drugs and psychiatrists, but found in these no relief from her unhappiness.

    Happily, there is help for such a person. However confused and down we may be, there is One who is raising up the lowly one from the very dust, and we can get to know him by means of the Bible. (Ps. 113:7) He can help even in the deepest depression, for he is the Father of tender mercies and the God of all comfort. (2 Cor. 1:3) It takes much prayer, study and discussion with mature people to replace the depressing, guilt-ridden thoughts in the mind with upbuilding ones. But it can be done. The following experience may help to demonstrate this.

    A woman said that she was abused by her natural father from a very early age, and then by her stepfather. She sank into immorality, drug abuse and finally had an illegitimate child. But she says: There is a way out of incest, child-abuse, statutory rape, drugs and homosexuality. You may feel as though you can't live through these things with a completely sane mind, but you can if you have hope of something better to live for. I have that hope . . . I never fought back as a child. I only wish I had, but I was afraid, afraid no one would take care of me or want me. I was wrong, very wrong! Jehovah cares . . . and the elders at the local Kingdom Hall [of Jehovahs Witnesses] care too.

    Whatever our past history, any of us can be washed clean, and sanctified from the standpoint of God. (1 Cor. 6:11) The Bible explains how. By the power of his Word and spirit, God can also remove our guilt feelings and provide escape even from emotional confusion. He can help us to live a satisfying life now, and give us confidence that, one day soon, we will live in a world where such things as incest will never happen again.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    "You Can Live Forever In Paradise On Earth" Book (1982), Pages 187-188:

    "If church members who gamble, get drunk or do other wrongs are permitted to remain in good standing within their church, what does this show? It is evidence that their religious organization is not approved by God. (1st Corinthians 5:11-13)"
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Awake! January 22nd 1985 Issue:

    (MY COMMENT: This Article is also available on the Official Watchtower Website at this Address: http://www.watchtower.org/library/g/1985/1/22/article_01.htm )

    Child Molesting

    You CAN Protect Your Child

    A YOUNG woman who was molested as a girl by her brother and her brother-in-law says: "I was afraid, so I did not tell anyone. For this reason, I would like to warn all parents: 'Please teach your children not to let anyone in the family, or outside the family, put their hands on them in any wrong way. If anyone tries to, do not be afraid to tell on them.'" She adds: "It can happen to any child at any time!"

    In this degenerating world, we must take definite steps to protect our children from sexual molestation. It is not wise to leave things to chance and just hope that nothing will happen.

    The First Line of Defense

    The first line of defense is to avoid situations that leave our children vulnerable. For example, parents are advised to be careful about using as baby-sitters young adults who seem to prefer being with children rather than with folks their own age. One clinical psychologist reports that two thirds of the molesters he is treating committed the offense while baby-sitting.

    Dr. Suzanne M. Sgroi mentions two more situations that have led to trouble: Children doubling up (in beds or rooms) with adults or teenagers, and large family gatherings where the grown-ups get involved in enjoying themselves and just assume that the older children are taking care of the young ones.

    The truth is, the more we can keep our children under our own supervision, the less opportunity molesters will have to get at them. Ann, a mother of three, goes to the extent of not allowing her youngest child, a 14-year-old boy, to wander around the shopping mallor even to go into public rest roomsalone. The boy probably finds this very restrictive, but his mother has her reasons. She was molested as a child.

    However, parents cannot always keep such a close watch on their children. Working parents may have no choice but to use day-care facilities or to leave their children with relatives or baby-sitters. Children have to go to school, and parents cannot always be with them. Relatives and friends come to visit. And then there are the neighbors! How can we protect our children when they are so vulnerable? Really, there is only one way

    Talk to Your Child About the Danger

    Psychologist Debrah Shulman said: "It's foolish to pretend to children that dangers do not exist. Children are aware of their vulnerability and are naturally concerned about their own safety. It's part of a parent's job to give them the tools to deal with danger realistically. If presented honestly and positively such information will not threaten children, it will reassure them." Yes, we have to talk to them about it.

    This is easy to say but not so easy to do, especially since the greatest danger is from friends and relatives. We may already have warned our children against the stranger who wants to lure them into the woods or carry them away in a car. But how can we give them "the tools" to protect themselves from ones they know, respect, and even love?

    Follow Their Instincts

    Ann, the mother referred to previously, reports that she was only five years old when a male relative molested her. Nevertheless, she knew that he was doing something wrong, although she did not know how to stop him. And, unhappily, she could not talk to her parents about it. The lines of communication were not very good at that time.

    Ann's experience demonstrates that children usually have a natural sense of what is fit and proper. We have to reinforce this instinct, tell them that they should obey it even if an adult tells them differently. A simple and determined "No, I don't want you to do that!" is often enough to deter a molester. Ann's experience also shows the need for open lines of communication with our children.

    Recently a husband and wife were discussing this problem between themselves. Becoming concerned, they asked their child if she had ever been molested. To their horror, the child said yes. An old and trusted friend of the family had repeatedly done so. The family had excellent communication with their children, so why had the child not said something before? Simply because she did not know how. Once the subject was mentioned, the child was more than willing to discuss it.

    If the Worst Should Happen

    No parent can give a child complete protection against sexual molestation, although taking sensible precautions will enormously reduce the possibility that anything will happen. However, if parents have established good family communication, it may be that children will talk about it in the event that the worst should happen. Sometimes, though, children are so shocked by or ashamed of the experience that they will not discuss it. Hence, parents need to be alert. Here are some signs that researchers say may show that something has happened.

    Be suspicious of any changes in the normal routine. In one case, a teacher asked that certain children come to school long before others. Watch for any telling signs in children such as declining grades or extreme anxiety around a specific adult. One woman who was victimized by her brother and her father as a girl said: "I came at the bottom of a class of 42, and nobody tried to find out why."

    Pay attention to physical symptoms, such as headaches, vomiting or loss of appetite, and difficulty in sleeping. Genital complaints, such as soreness, are particularly important. Be aware of precocious sexuality in language, dress, or behavior. Be on the lookout for sudden changes in behavior that might indicate a problem. If a child becomes unusually withdrawn or shows an inclination to avoid one member of the family, a warning bell should sound. We also have to listen for the oblique messages that our children send us. The statement, "I don't like that math teacher any more" may be the child's way of trying to broach this difficult subject.

    If parents see anything like this in their child, they should try to find out what is wrong. The child has a problem, and it may be a problem of molestation. If so, the child needs help. Unfortunately, many children do not get that help. Molested children have been accused of inventing the incident, although researchers assure us that children rarely, if ever, invent such things. Incest has been covered up so as not to break up the family.

    However, if molestation and especially incest is discovered to have occurred, two things must be done immediately:

    First, the child and other children too must be protected from any further abuse. This must be done, whatever the cost. In many cases the accused molester will have to be confronted. But whatever it takes, it is important that the child should feel confident that the molester will never be able to get at her (or him) again.

    Second, the child must be given a lot of love and emotional support. Parents must make it very clear that the little victim is not to blame. The crime and anything that happens as a result of it even if a close relative goes to prison is not her (or his) fault. But that reassurance will have to be given many times, so that the victim comes to believe itand to believe that the parents believe it too!

    How Can We Tell Them?

    First, we have to bring the subject up. One suggestion is that if ever a scandal is reported in the news, parents could use it as an opportunity to ask their children: "Did anyone ever do anything like that to you?" and then go on to tell them how to act if anyone tries to.

    Parents who teach their children about the Bible can use parts of it as a starting point. They can use the story of Dinah, the daughter of Jacob, to explain the boundaries that exist in what one person may do to another. (Genesis 34:1-4) The story of Tamar and Amnon can be used to show that there are things that even close relatives are not permitted to do to each other. (2 Samuel 13:10-16) And we should make sure they understand that if something like that does happen to them, we want to know about it. We will not get angry with them if they tell us.

    Mary was molested when she was a little girl, so she made very sure to put her three daughters on guard against molesters. How did she do it? As soon as they were old enough to understand, she told them: "If anyone touches you in the wrong place, tell me and I will not be angry." How would they know where the wrong places are? Mary says that when they were about three years old she showed them. When she was bathing them or getting them ready for bed, she pointed out the parts of their body that other people should not touch. As they got a little older, she presented situations: "Nobody should touch you there, even if it is a schoolteacher or a policeman. Not even Mummy or Daddy should touch you there. And a doctor should only touch you there if Mummy or Daddy is with you!"

    Did this work? Mary remembers one occasion when a relative was playing with her six-year-old daughter. The things the relative was doing started to make the little girl feel uncomfortable. What did she do? She just walked away from him. Mary is not sure whether the relative had bad intentions or not. But she is delighted that her daughter was able to walk away from the situation when it started to feel "not right," or "strange."

    "If anyone touches you in the wrong place, tell me"

    Hence, just as parents warn their children against going off with strangers, playing in a busy street, and putting their hands on electric wires, they should also tell them about avoiding molestation. They should explain the boundaries on their bodies that otherseven their own parentsshould not transgress. They should clearly state that if something does happen, they want to know about it. And they will not blame the children.

    The "What if . . . ?" Game

    Sometimes adults will use their greater experience and intelligence to deceive children into joining them in some inappropriate activity, and children may not spot the deception without help. So Linda Tschirhart Sanford, author of the book The Silent Children, suggests a tool that could be used to counter this in advance: the "What if . . . ?" game. From time to time, ask the children what they would do in certain situations: "What if the baby sitter said that you could stay up late watching television if you got in the bathtub with him and played games? What would you tell him?" "What if someone you knew took you for a ride and wanted to put his hands where he should not? What would you do?" "What would you do if an older friend touched you in a way you did not like, or wanted to undress you and play a secret game with you?"

    Tell children the right names for the parts of their body

    In teaching the child how to answer, parents can show that there are occasions when they can say no to an adult. There are also occasions when they should reveal secrets. If they are trained to say things like "I will just go and ask Mummy first," they will be able to discourage most potential molesters. If the child learns the right answers in the "What if . . . ?" game, it is gaining some good tools to protect itself. If it gives a wrong answer, well, go back over the question and suggest a different answer.

    Give Them the Words

    The following experience shows another problem that children face in the matter of molestation: A woman relates that she was abused as a child and tried to tell her mother about it. But she did not have the right words and could not explain what had happened. Her mother thought that someone was just trying to be affectionate and that the little girl had misunderstood the situation and blown it out of proportion.

    Because of similar experiences, social workers encourage parents to tell their children the right names for parts of their bodies. Give them the vocabulary to express themselves in case the worst happens.

    Alert but Balanced

    One of a parent's worst nightmares is that their child might be sexually molested. However, we need to remember that most adults are not going to molest our children. Most of our relatives love them and would be as concerned as we are to protect them from abuse.

    On the other hand, it can happen. And merely hoping that it will not happen is not enough. The Biblical proverb says: "Shrewd is the one that has seen the calamity and proceeds to conceal himself." (Proverbs 22:3) Hence, it is wise to be cautious, especially in view of the times we live in. If we avoid, to the extent possible, putting our children in situations that leave them vulnerable, if we explain to them the boundaries that even adults are not to cross, and if we teach them how to react in case any adult should try to cross those boundaries, then we are doing a lot to protect our children from the molester.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Awake! July 22nd 1985 Issue, Pages 26-28:

    From Our Readers

    Response on Child Molesting

    THE January 22, 1985, issue of Awake! carried a three-part series entitled Child Molesting-You Can Protect Your Child. In today's world, this unpleasant subject is one of which parents must become aware, and many of our readers wrote letters expressing gratitude for the information presented. We would like to share some of their expressions.

    Your Suggestions Were Very Helpful

    Here is part of a letter from the United States: Thank you so much for the information on child molesting. As children, both my sister and I were molested by a cousin. Now we both have families and want to do all we can to protect our children. We will surely be applying the sound advice found in this article.

    From the United States: I really appreciated your article Child Molesting-You Can Protect Your Child. Your suggestions were very helpful and simple. I have a couple I would like to share with you: It can be dangerous for children to have their names on their shirts. They are more likely to go with a stranger who knows their name. Also, when children are naughty, parents often threaten them, saying: The police will get you! This makes children afraid and perhaps unwilling to approach the police if they ever need help.

    From the United States: After having re-read the January 22 issue of Awake! on child molesting, I want you to know that it is one of the best I have read. Naturally I wish we had had this information several years ago, before my two beautiful granddaughters were so terribly and unmercifully abused. But if it prevents some other child from suffering as they have, I shall be glad.

    I Was a Victim

    Many letters confirmed the terrible damage done by child molestation. For example, here is a letter from England: Thank you for the recent articles on the subject of child molestation. I was a victim of child abuse and experienced feelings similar to those reported in your article. Even now, after so many years, I have to restrain myself because I get very emotional when I read or hear of these things happening to children.

    Another letter from England says: I was a victim of incest over a period of years beginning when I was about five. The offender was my stepfather. What I experienced at his hands was so traumatic for my young mind that much of it was submerged in my subconsciousness until only a few months ago. The memories, once triggered, emerged like some sort of nightmare.

    Some people may regard your article as an overreaction and may feel shocked about telling their little ones about what to do if someone even a close relative should touch their private body parts or ask them to look at or touch theirs. I have a message for those people: The advice in the article is excellent.

    Who Would Believe You?

    Some letters shed light on the tactics of molesters. A reader in England writes: As a young child, I was abused by an older man whom I had a lot of respect for. As your article brought out, the indecent fondling (which is what it was restricted to) was disguised as playing and tickling. It left me with tremendous feelings of guilt and shame.

    A reader from the United States reminds us that it is not only adults who molest children. She writes: I warned my children about adults, never imagining that it would be a nine-and-a-half-year-old girl who would improperly fondle my four-year-old daughter.

    Another reader from England tells us: My foster father was a judge; therefore, when he started to molest me, I didn't think there was anything wrong. When I got to the age of 12, I knew it was wrong but was unable to tell anyone, for he had drummed into me: Who would believe you? And don't be ungrateful. Look at all the things you've got. In my early teens my brothers and an uncle abused me. So by the age of 14, I was using drugs, thinking this was my only way to happiness. I grew up being very promiscuous, which was the only way I could afford the drugs. I'd like to thank you again for the article. I can now make sure my son will never have to go through the pain I had.

    A reader in the United States writes: I just finished reading the article on Child Molesting in the January 22, 1985, issue of Awake! I could not hold back the tears from my eyes because I, too, was molested. It happened when I was five. The molester was a man that my mother was dating. While my mother was away and my brothers were out playing, this man would take sexual liberties with me. I have been trying to forget, trying to blot it out of my mind, trying to pretend that it was a bad dream, but it was not a dream. It actually did happen, and for all these years (I am now 27) I have never told anyone. Thank you for the article on child molesting. It gave me the courage to write this letter.

    These are just a few of the many letters received that show the frightening scope of the problem. We are living in truly decadent times. (2 Timothy 3:1, 3) There have even been cases involving Christian families, which had to be handled by the congregation elders! Never forget that while child molesting is usually a sin committed by adults, it is children who carry the burden. It is tragic that so many children are being robbed of their childhood by adults who have no self-control. The emotional wounds inflicted on these young ones may last a whole lifetime!

    [Box on Page 27]:

    Alert Use of Awake! in Oregon

    When the January 22, 1985, issue of Awake! arrived in Oregon, U.S.A., Joy, a minister of Jehovah's Witnesses, went with a friend to show the articles on child molesting to the local police sergeant in charge of crime prevention. He revealed that he was just on his way to the local community college to set up a seminar on child molesting, so he took a copy of the magazine along. That afternoon, he contacted Joy and said he would like to use the magazine in the seminar. Joy alertly told him about the April 22, 1984, issue of Awake!, which featured a series of articles about missing children. The police sergeant ordered 200 copies of each magazine in order to give one to each person in attendance at the seminar.

    Later, the police sergeant increased his order to 250 copies of each issue so that there would be some available to use in the local police Helpline Support programs. He also recommended that Joy contact the local Children's Service Department. She followed his advice and was able to give her presentation before a group of 20 counselors during an orientation seminar. The group took her remaining copies of both issues of the magazine.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Watchtower January 1st 1986 Issue, Page 13:

    "Shocking as it is, even some who have been prominent in Jehovah's organization have succumbed to immoral practices, including homosexuality, wife swapping, and child molesting."
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    "Pay Attention to Yourselves and to All the Flock" Book ("Secret" Elders Rule Book) (1991), Pages 110-111:

    Handling Judicial Cases

    Do not send an individual any kind of correspondence that directly accuses him of specific wrongdoing.

    It is best for two elders to speak with the individual and invite him to meet with the Judicial committee.

    Suitable arrangements should be made as to the time and place of the hearing.

    State what the person's course of action is supposed to have been.

    If it is necessary to send a written invitation, you should simply state what the individual's course is alleged to have been, the time and place of the hearing, and how the person can contact the chairman if the arrangements are inconvenient for him.

    If the accused wishes to bring witnesses who can speak in his defense regarding the matter, he may do so.

    However, observers are not permitted.

    No tape-recording devices are allowed.

    If the accused repeatedly fails to come to the hearing, the committee will proceed with the hearing but will not make a decision until evidence and any testimony by witnesses are considered.

    The committee should not take action against a person unless the evidence clearly proves this necessary.

    Failure to appear before the committee is not in itself proof of guilt.

    What kind of evidence is acceptable?

    There must be two or three eyewitnesses, not just persons repeating what they have heard; no action can be taken if there is only one witness. (Deut. 19:15; Jol1ll 8:17)

    Confession (admission of wrongdoing), either written or oral, may be accepted as conclusive proof without other corroborating evidence. (Josh. 7:19)

    Strong circumstantial evidence, such as pregnancy or evidence (testified to by at least two witnesses) that the accused stayed all night in the same house with a person of the opposite sex (or in the same house with a known homosexual) under improper circumstances, is acceptable.

    The testimony of youths may be considered; it is up to the elders to determine if the testimony has the ring of truth.

    The testimony of unbelievers may also be considered, but it must be carefully weighed.

    If there are two or three witnesses to the same kind of wrongdoing but each one is witness to a separate incident, their testimony can be considered.

    Such evidence may be used to establish guilt, but it is preferable to have two witnesses to the same occurrence of wrongdoing.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Awake! October 8th 1993 Issue (This Article is available on the Official Watchtower Website at this Address: http://www.watchtower.org/library/g/1993/10/8a/article_01.htm ):

    Protect Your Children!

    Your Child Is in Danger!

    The molestation of children is an ugly reality in this sick world. Lear's magazine said: "It affects more of us than cancer, more of us than heart disease, more of us than AIDS." Awake! thus feels an obligation to try to alert its readers to this danger and what can be done about it.Compare Ezekiel 3:17-21; Romans 13:11-13.

    IN RECENT years a global outcry has arisen over the molestation of children. But the media attention, replete with celebrities who have publicly disclosed their own experiences of childhood abuse, has led to some popular misconceptions. Some believe that all this talk about attacks on children is simply the latest fad. In truth, though, there is little new about such sexual assault. It is nearly as old as human history itself.

    An Ancient Problem

    Some 4,000 years ago, the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah were famous for depravity. Pedophilia was apparently among the region's many vices. Genesis 19:4 describes a sex-crazed mob of Sodomites ranging "from boy to old man" seeking to rape Lot's two male guests. Consider: Why would mere boys be inflamed with the idea of raping males? Clearly they had already been introduced to homosexual perversions.

    Centuries later, the nation of Israel moved into the region of Canaan. So steeped was this land in incest, sodomy, bestiality, prostitution, and even the ritualized sacrifice of little children to demon gods that all these vile acts had to be expressly forbidden in the Mosaic Law. (Leviticus 18:6, 21-23; 19:29; Jeremiah 32:35) Despite divine warnings, rebellious Israelites, including some of their rulers, adopted these despicable practices.Psalm 106:35-38.

    Ancient Greece and Rome, however, were far worse than Israel in this regard. Infanticide was common to both, and in Greece it was a widely accepted practice for older men to have relations with young boys. Boy brothels flourished in every ancient Greek city. In the Roman Empire, child prostitution was so prevalent that special taxes and holidays were set up specifically for that trade. In the arenas, girls were raped and forced into acts of bestiality. Similar atrocities were prevalent in many other ancient nations.

    What about modern times? Is mankind too civilized for such horrible sex acts to flourish today? Students of the Bible cannot accept this notion. They well know that the apostle Paul characterized our era as "critical times hard to deal with." He detailed the rampant self-love, the love of pleasure, and the disintegration of natural family love that overrun modern society and added: "Wicked men and impostors will advance from bad to worse." (2 Timothy 3:1-5, 13; Revelation 12:7-12) Has child molestation, so often perpetrated by "wicked men and impostors," got worse?

    An Urgent Problem

    Assaults on children are often cloaked in secrecy, so much so that they have been called perhaps the most unreported of crimes. Even so, such crimes have evidently spiraled upward in recent decades. In the United States, a survey on the subject was conducted by the Los Angeles Times. It found that 27 percent of the women and 16 percent of the men had been sexually abused as children. Shocking as these statistics are, other careful estimates for the United States have run considerably higher.

    In Malaysia, reports of child molestation have quadrupled over the past decade. In Thailand, some 75 percent of the men in one survey admitted to using child prostitutes. In Germany, officials estimate that as many as 300,000 children are sexually abused each year. According to South Africa's Cape Times, the number of reports of such assaults soared by 175 percent in a recent three-year period. In the Netherlands and Canada, researchers found that about one third of all women had been sexually abused as children. In Finland, 18 percent of the ninth-grade girls (15 or 16 years old) and 7 percent of the boys reported having had sexual contact with someone at least five years their senior.

    In various countries disturbing reports have surfaced about religious cults that abuse children with sadistic sexual practices and torture. Often, those who report that they were victims of such crimes are treated with incredulity, not compassion.

    So child molestation is neither new nor rare; it is a long-standing problem that is epidemic today. Its impact can be devastating. Many survivors suffer profound feelings of worthlessness and low self-esteem. Experts in the field have listed some common aftereffects of incest on girls, such as running away, drug and alcohol abuse, depression, attempted suicide, delinquency, promiscuity, sleep disturbances, and learning problems. Long-range effects may include poor parenting skills, frigidity, distrust of men, marriage to a pedophile, lesbianism, prostitution, and child molestation itself.

    These aftereffects are not inevitable for a victim; nor could anyone rightly excuse wrong conduct solely on the grounds of having been assaulted in the past. Abuse does not predestine its victims to be immoral or delinquent; nor does it dissolve all their personal responsibility for the choices they make later in life. But these common outcomes for victims are real dangers. They add urgency to the question, How can we protect children from molestation?

    How Can We Protect Our Children?

    "No one would believe you."

    "If you tell, your parents will hate you. They'll know it was your fault."

    "Don't you want to be my special friend anymore?"

    "You don't want me to go to jail, do you?"

    "I'll kill your parents if you tell."

    AFTER using children to satisfy perverted lusts, after robbing them of their security and their sense of innocence, child molesters still want something else from their victimsSILENCE. To secure that silence, they use shame, secrecy, even outright terror. Children are thus robbed of their best weapon against abusethe will to tell, to speak up and ask an adult for protection.

    Tragically, adult society often unwittingly collaborates with child abusers. How so? By refusing to be aware of this danger, by fostering a hush-hush attitude about it, by believing oft-repeated myths. Ignorance, misinformation, and silence give safe haven to abusers, not their victims.

    For example, the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops concluded recently that it was a "general conspiracy of silence" that allowed gross child abuse to persist among the Catholic clergy for decades. Time magazine, in reporting on the widespread plague of incest, also cited a "conspiracy of silence" as a factor that "only helps perpetuate the tragedy" in families.

    However, Time noted that this conspiracy is crumbling at last. Why? In a word, education. It is as Asiaweek magazine put it: "All experts agree that the best defence against child abuse is public awareness." To defend their children, parents must understand the realities of the threat. Don't be left in the dark by misconceptions that protect child abusers and not children.See box.

    Educate Your Child!

    Wise King Solomon told his son that knowledge, wisdom, and thinking ability could protect him "from the bad way, from the man speaking perverse things." (Proverbs 2:10-12) Isn't that just what children need? The FBI pamphlet Child Molesters: A Behavioral Analysis says this under the heading "The Ideal Victim": "For most children sex is a taboo subject about which they receive little accurate information, especially from their parents." Don't let your children be "ideal victims." Educate them about sex.* (FOOTNOTE SAYS: See Awake! of February 22, 1992, pages 3-11, and July 8, 1992, page 30.) For example, no child should reach puberty unaware of how the body will change during this time. Ignorance will make them confused, ashamedand vulnerable.

    A woman we'll call Janet was sexually abused as a child, and years later her own two children were sexually abused. She recalls: "The way we were brought up, we never talked about sex. So I grew up embarrassed about it. It was shameful. And when I had kids, it was the same. I could talk to other people's kids but not to my own. I think that's unhealthy because children are vulnerable if you don't talk to them about these things."

    Abuse prevention can be taught early. When you teach children to name such body parts as the vagina, the breasts, the anus, the penis, tell them that these places are good, they are specialbut they are private. "Other people are not allowed to handle themnot even Mommy or Daddyand not even a doctor unless Mommy or Daddy is there or has said it is OK."# (FOOTNOTE SAYS: Of course, parents must bathe and change very little children, and at such times parents wash the private parts. But teach your children to bathe themselves early on; some child-care experts recommend that they learn to wash their own private parts by the age of three if possible.) Ideally, such statements should come from both parents or each adult guardian.

    In The Safe Child Book, Sherryll Kraizer notes that while children should feel free to ignore, scream at, or run from an abuser, many children who are abused explain later that they didn't want to seem rude. Children thus need to know that some grown-ups do bad things and that not even a child has to obey anyone who tells him or her to do something wrong. At such times a child has a perfect right to say no, just as did Daniel and his companions to the Babylonian adults who wanted them to eat unclean food.Daniel 1:4, 8; 3:16-18.

    One widely recommended teaching tool is the "What if . . . ?" game. You might, for example, ask: "What if your teacher told you to hit another child? What would you do?" Or: "What if (Mommy, Daddy, a minister, a policeman) told you to jump off a tall building?" The child's answer may be inadequate or simply wrong, but don't correct harshly. The game need not include shock or scare tactics; in fact, experts recommend that it be played in a gentle, loving, even playful manner.

    Next, teach children to fend off displays of affection that are inappropriate or that make them feel uncomfortable. Ask, for example, "What if a friend of Mommy and Daddy wanted to kiss you in a way that made you feel funny?"% (FOOTNOTE SAYS: Some experts caution that if you force your child to kiss or hug every person who asks for such displays of affection, you may undermine this training. Thus, some parents teach children to make polite excuses or substitutions when unwanted demands are made of them.) It is often best to encourage the child to act out what he or she would do, making it a "Let's pretend" game.

    In the same way, children can learn to resist other tactics of abusers. For example, you might ask: "What if someone says, 'You know, you're my favorite. Don't you want to be my friend?'" When the child learns to resist such ploys, discuss others. You might ask: "If someone says, 'You don't want to hurt my feelings, do you?' What will you say?" Show the child how to say no through words and clear, firm body language. Remember, abusers often test how children respond to subtle advances. So a child must be taught to resist firmly and say, "I'm telling on you."

    Teach children to use words and clear, firm body language to resist improper advances

    Be Thorough in Your Training

    Do not limit such training to a onetime talk. Children need much repetition. Use your own judgment in determining just how explicit the training should be. But be thorough.

    Be sure, for example, to forestall any attempt by an abuser to create a secret pact. Children should know that it is never all right for an adult to ask them to keep a secret from either parent. Reassure them that it is always proper for them to telleven if they had promised not to. (Compare Numbers 30:12, 16.) Some abusers blackmail the child if they know that the child has disobeyed some family rule. "I won't tell on you if you won't tell on me" is the message. So children should know that they will never get in trouble for tellingeven under these circumstances. It is safe to tell.

    Your training should also be threat-resistant. Some abusers have killed small animals in front of a child and threatened to do the same to the child's parents. Others have warned their victim that they will abuse younger siblings. So teach children that they should always tell on an abuser, no matter what scary threats are made.

    In this regard the Bible can be a helpful teaching tool. Because it so vividly stresses Jehovah's almighty power, it can take the bite out of abusers' threats. Children need to know that no matter what threats are made, Jehovah is able to help his people. (Daniel 3:8-30) Even when bad people hurt those Jehovah loves, he can always undo the damage afterward and make things better again. (Job, chapters 1, 2; 42:10-17; Isaiah 65:17) Assure them that Jehovah sees everything, including the people who do bad things and the good people who do their best to resist them.Compare Hebrews 4:13.

    He Cried Out for Help

    "PLEA to Jehovah Halts Molester's Attack on Youth," declared a headline in the U.S. newspaper The Arizona Republic, on May 5, 1993. The alleged molester abducted the 13-year-old youth at gunpoint, taking him to the perpetrator's apartment. When the youth cried out, "Jehovah, help me!" the molester was shaken and let the boy go free. The police later apprehended the man.

    While calling upon Jehovah's name is certainly appropriate under such circumstances, it does not mean that God's servants will be free from attack in these critical "last days." (2 Timothy 3:1-5, 13) Christian parents must therefore train their children to be cautious with all strangers, regardless of apparent authority.

    Cautious as Serpents

    It is the rare pedophile who uses physical force to molest a child. They generally prefer to befriend children first. Jesus' advice to be "cautious as serpents" is thus appropriate. (Matthew 10:16) Close supervision by loving parents is one of the best safeguards against abuse. Some molesters look for a child alone in a public place and strike up a conversation to spark the child's curiosity. ("Do you like motorcycles?" "Come see the puppies out in my truck.") True, you cannot be with your children at all times. And child-care experts recognize that children need some freedom to move around. But wise parents are cautious about granting children too much freedom prematurely.

    Make sure you get to know well any adults or older youths who are close to your children, using extra caution when deciding who should care for your children in your absence. Be wary of baby-sitters who make your children feel funny or ill at ease. Likewise, beware of teenagers who seem to have an excessive interest in younger children and have no friends their own age. Thoroughly check out day-care facilities and schools. Tour the entire premises and interview the staff, observing carefully how they interact with children. Ask if they mind if you drop in to check on your children at unexpected times; if this is not allowed, look elsewhere.See Awake! of December 8, 1987, pages 3-11.

    The sad truth is, however, that not even the best of parents can control everything that happens to their children.Ecclesiastes 9:11.

    If parents work together, there is one thing they can control: the home environment. And since the home is where most child abuse occurs, that will be the focus of the next article.

    Prevention in the Home

    Monique was nine years old when he started abusing her. He began by spying on her as she undressed; then he started visiting her room at night and touching her private parts. When she resisted him, he was furious. Once he even attacked her with a hammer and threw her down a flight of stairs. "No one would believe me," Monique recallsnot even her mother. The abuser was Monique's stepfather.

    IT IS NOT the stranger in a trench coat, the loner lurking in the bushes, who poses the greatest threat to children. It is a member of the family. The vast majority of sexual abuse occurs in the home. So how can the home be made more resistant to abuse?

    In his book Slaughter of the Innocents, historian Dr. Sander J. Breiner examines the evidence of child abuse in five ancient societiesEgypt, China, Greece, Rome, and Israel. He concludes that while abuse did exist in Israel, it was relatively rare compared to the other four civilizations. Why? Unlike their neighbors, the people in Israel were taught to have respect for women and childrenan enlightened view they owed to the Holy Scriptures. When the Israelites applied divine law to family life, they prevented child abuse. Today's families need these clean, practical standards more than ever.

    Moral Laws

    One survivor of years of incest said: "Abuse kills children, it kills their trust, their right to feel innocent. That's why children have to be protected. Because now I have to rebuild my whole life. Why make more children do that?"

    Why indeed?

    Does Bible law have an impact on your family? For instance, Leviticus 18:6 reads: "You people must not come near, any man of you, to any close fleshly relative of his to lay bare nakedness. I am Jehovah." Similarly the Christian congregation today enforces strong laws against all forms of sexual abuse. Anyone who sexually abuses a child risks being disfellowshipped, put out of the congregation.* (FOOTNOTE SAYS: Sexual abuse of a child occurs when someone uses a child to gratify his or her own sexual desires. It often involves what the Bible calls fornication, or pornei'a, which could include fondling of genitalia, sexual intercourse, and oral or anal sex. Some abusive acts, such as the fondling of breasts, explicitly immoral proposals, showing pornography to a child, voyeurism, and indecent exposure, may amount to what the Bible condemns as "loose conduct."Galatians 5:19-21; see The Watchtower of March 15, 1983, footnote on page 30.) 1 Corinthians 6:9, 10.

    All families should know and review such laws together. Deuteronomy 6:6, 7 urges: "And these words that I am commanding you today must prove to be on your heart; and you must inculcate them in your son and speak of them when you sit in your house and when you walk on the road and when you lie down and when you get up." Inculcating these laws means more than occasionally lecturing your children. It involves a regular give-and-take discussion. From time to time, both mother and father should reaffirm God's laws on incest and the loving reasons for these laws.

    You might also use such stories as that of Tamar and Amnon, David's children, to show children that in sexual matters there are boundaries that no oneclose relatives includedshould ever cross.Genesis 9:20-29; 2 Samuel 13:10-16.

    Respect for these principles can be shown even in practical living arrangements. In one Oriental country, research has shown that much incest occurs in families where children sleep with parents even when there is no economic necessity for this. Similarly, it is generally unwise to have opposite-sex siblings share a bed or a room as they grow older, if this is at all avoidable. Even when cramped living conditions are a fact of life, parents should use good judgment in deciding on where each family member should sleep.

    Bible law forbids drunkenness, suggesting that it can lead to perversion. (Proverbs 23:29-33) According to one study, some 60 to 70 percent of incest victims reported that their abusing parent had been drinking when the abuse started.

    Listen to the Children!

    IN BRITISH COLUMBIA, Canada, a recent study examined the careers of 30 child molesters. The results were chilling. The 30 individuals had, between them, abused 2,099 children. Fully half of them held positions of trustteachers, ministers, administrators, and child-care workers. One molester, a 50-year-old dentist, had abused nearly 500 children over a 26-year period.

    However, The Globe and Mail of Toronto notes: "In 80 per cent of cases, one or more sectors of the community (including friends or colleagues of the offender, families of victims, other children, some victims) denied or minimized the abuse." Not surprisingly, "the report suggests that denial and disbelief allow abuse to continue."

    Some of the victims had told on the abusers. However, "parents of young victims were unwilling to accept what their children were telling them," The Globe and Mail quotes the report as saying. Similarly, a government official in Germany recently cited a report that child victims of sexual abuse have to approach adults with their story as many as seven times before they are believed.

    A Loving Family Head

    Researchers find that abuse is more common among families with domineering husbands. The widely held view that women exist merely to fulfill male needs is Scripturally wrong. Some men use this unchristian opinion to justify turning to a daughter for anything they cannot get from a wife. This type of oppression can cause women in these circumstances to lose their emotional balance. Many lose even the natural urge to protect their own children. (Compare Ecclesiastes 7:7.) One study, on the other hand, found that when workaholic fathers were largely absent from the home setting, sometimes mother-son sexual abuse has festered.

    What about your family? Do you as husband take the role of head seriously, or do you abdicate it to your wife? (1 Corinthians 11:3) Do you treat your wife with love, honor, and respect? (Ephesians 5:25; 1 Peter 3:7) Do her views count? (Genesis 21:12; Proverbs 31:26, 28) And what about your children? Do you see them as precious? (Psalm 127:3) Or do you view them as mere burdens, readily exploitable? (Compare 2 Corinthians 12:14.) Eliminate warped, unscriptural views of family roles in your household, and you will make it more resistant to abuse.

    An Emotionally Safe Place

    One young woman whom we'll call Sandi says: "My whole family was set up for abuse. It was isolated, and each member was isolated from the other." Isolation, rigidity, and obsessive secrecythese unhealthy, unscriptural attitudes are trademarks of the abusive household. (Compare 2 Samuel 12:12; Proverbs 18:1; Philippians 4:5.) Create a home atmosphere that is emotionally safe for children. Home should be a place where they feel built up, where they feel free to open their hearts and speak freely.

    Also, children have a great need for physical expressions of lovehugging, caressing, handholding, romping. Do not overreact to the dangers of sexual abuse by withholding these demonstrations of love. Teach children through open, warm affection and praise that they are valued. Sandi remembers: "My mom's view was that to give anyone any commendation for anything was wrong. It would give you a big head." Sandi suffered at least ten years of sexual abuse in silence. Children who are not secure in the knowledge that they are beloved, worthwhile individuals may be more susceptible to an abuser's praise, his "affection," or his threats to withdraw it.

    A pedophile who sexually abused hundreds of boys over a 40-year period admitted that the boys who had an emotional need for a friend like him made the "best" victims. Don't create such a need in your child.

    "Get Help Now"

    "IF YOU are a man and you are sexually involved with children, you may be saying to yourself, 'She likes it,' or 'He asked for it,' or 'I'm teaching her about sex.' You're lying to yourself. Real men are not involved sexually with children. If there's any part of you that really cares about that child, stop it. Get help now."A proposed public service announcement, quoted in the book By Silence Betrayed.

    Break the Cycle of Abuse

    Under severe trial Job said: "My soul certainly feels a loathing toward my life. I will give vent to my concern about myself. I will speak in the bitterness of my soul!" (Job 10:1) Likewise, many parents have found that they can help their children by helping themselves. The Harvard Mental Health Letter noted recently: "Strong social sanctions against the expression of pain by men apparently perpetuate the cycle of abuse." It seems that men who never get to express their pain about having been sexually abused are more likely to become abusers themselves. The Safe Child Book reports that most child molesters were themselves sexually abused as children but never got help to recover. They express their pain and anger by abusing other children.# (FOOTNOTE SAYS: While most child molesters were abused as children, this does not mean that abuse makes children become abusers. Less than a third of abused children become child molesters.) See also Job 7:11; 32:20.

    The risk to children may also be higher when mothers do not come to terms with past abuse. For example, researchers report that women who were sexually abused as girls often marry men who are child abusers. Furthermore, if a woman has not come to terms with past abuse, she may understandably find it difficult to discuss abuse with her children. If abuse occurs, she may be less able to discern it and take positive action. Then the children pay an awful price for the mother's inaction.

    Thus, abuse may pass from one generation to the next. Of course, many individuals who choose not to discuss their painful past seem able to cope well enough in life, and that is commendable. But in many the pain is deeper, and they do need to make a concerted effortincluding, if necessary, seeking competent professional helpto heal such severe childhood wounds. Their goal is not to wallow in self-pity. They want to break this sick, hurtful cycle of child abuse affecting their family.See Awake! of October 8, 1991, pages 3 to 11.

    Children need plenty of warm, loving attention

    The End of Abuse

    Properly applied, the foregoing information can do much to reduce the chances of child abuse in your home. Remember, though, that abusers work in secrecy, they take advantage of trust, and they use adult tactics on innocent children. Inevitably, then, some of them do seem to get away with their disgusting crimes.

    However, rest assured that God sees what they do. (Job 34:22) Unless they repent and change, he will not forget their vile acts. He will bring them out into the open in his due time. (Compare Matthew 10:26.) And he will exact justice. Jehovah God promises a time when all such treacherous people will be 'torn away from the earth,' and only the meek and gentle who love God and fellowman will be allowed to remain. (Proverbs 2:22; Psalm 37:10, 11, 29; 2 Peter 2:9-12) We have that marvelous hope of a new world thanks to the ransom sacrifice of Jesus Christ. (1 Timothy 2:6) Then, and only then, will abuse end forever.

    In the meantime we must do all we can to protect our children. They are so precious! Most parents will readily put their own safety at risk in order to protect their little children. (Compare John 15:13.) If we don't protect our children, the consequences can be horrible. If we do, we give them a wonderful gifta childhood that feels innocent and free from calamity. They can feel just as the psalmist did, who wrote: "I will say to Jehovah: 'You are my refuge and my stronghold, my God, in whom I will trust.'"Psalm 91:2.

    Common Misconceptions

    Misconception: Child abusers are usually strangers, deranged misfits who abduct children and use physical force to abuse them.

    In the vast majority of casesfrom 85 to 90 percent by some estimatesthe abuser is a person the child knows and trusts. Rather than using force, abusers often manipulate the child into sexual acts gradually, taking advantage of the child's limited experience and reasoning ability. (Compare 1 Corinthians 13:11 and Proverbs 22:15.) These abusers are not the drooling loners of the stereotype. Many are quite religious, respected, and well liked in the community. According to the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation, "to assume that someone is not a pedophile simply because he is nice, goes to church, works hard, is kind to animals, and so on, is absurd." Recent research suggests that it is also wrong to assume that all abusers are male or that all victims are female.

    Misconception: Children fantasize or lie about sexual abuse.

    Under normal circumstances children lack the experience or sophistication in sexual matters to invent explicit claims of abuse, although some small children may become confused about details. Even the most skeptical of researchers agree that most claims of abuse are valid. Consider the book Sex Abuse HysteriaSalem Witch Trials Revisited, which focuses on false claims of abuse.* (FOOTNOTE SAYS: In some divorce cases, contending adults have been known to use an accusation of child abuse as a weapon.) This book admits: "Genuine sex abuse of children is widespread and the vast majority of sex abuse allegations of children . . . are likely to be justified (perhaps 95% or more)." Children find it enormously difficult to report abuse. When they do lie about abuse, it is most often to deny that it happened even though it actually did.

    Misconception: Children are seductive and frequently bring the abuse on themselves by their conduct.

    This notion is particularly warped, since, in effect, it blames the victim for the abuse. Children have no real concept of sexuality. They have no idea of what such activity implies or of how it will change them. They are therefore incapable of consenting to it in any meaningful way. It is the abuser, and the abuser alone, who bears the blame for the abuse.Compare Luke 11:11, 12.

    Misconception: When children disclose abuse, parents should teach them to refrain from talking about it and to 'put it behind them.'

    Who is best served if the child keeps silent about the abuse? Is it not the abuser? In fact, studies have shown that denial with emotional suppression may be the least effective way to deal with the trauma of abuse. Of the nine coping methods used by one group of adult survivors studied in England, the ones who denied, avoided, or suppressed the issue suffered the greater emotional maladjustment and distress in adult life. If you experienced a terrifying assault, would you want to be told not to talk about it? Why tell a child such a thing? Allowing the child the normal reaction to such a terrible event, such as grief, anger, mourning, will give him the opportunity eventually to put the abuse in the past.

    If Your Child Is Abused

    TO STOP abuse, you must know it when you see it. In the numerous books on the subject, experts have listed dozens of telltale signs of abuse that parents can watch for. These include: complaints of pain while urinating or defecating, genital infections, abrasions or lesions in the genital area, the sudden onset of bed-wetting, appetite loss or other eating problems, precocious sexual behavior, a sudden fear of such places as school or parts of the house, periods of panic, an extreme fear of undressing, a fear of being alone with a familiar person, and self-mutilation.

    However, be careful about jumping to conclusions. Most of these symptoms do not by themselves necessarily mean that a child has actually been sexually abused. Each could indicate some other problem. But if you see disturbing symptoms, gently broach the subject, perhaps with such a statement as: "If anyone ever touches you in a way that makes you feel uncomfortable, I want you to know that you can always tell me, and I'll do all I can to protect you. Has anything like that ever happened to you?"Proverbs 20:5.

    If your child discloses sexual abuse, you will no doubt feel shattered. But remember: Your reaction will play a major role in the child's recovery. Your child has been carrying an unbearable burden and needs you, with all your adult strength, to lift it from her or his shoulders. Praise the child for being so brave as to tell you what happened. Repeatedly reassure the child that you will do your best to provide protection; that the abuse was the abuser's fault, not the child's; that the child is not "bad"; that you love the child.

    Some legal experts advise reporting the abuse to the authorities as soon as possible. In some lands the legal system may require this. But in other places the legal system may offer little hope of successful prosecution.

    What, though, when the abuser is one's own beloved mate? Sad to say, many women fail to take decisive action. To be sure, it is never easy to face the ugly reality of a mate who is a child abuser. Emotional ties, and even financial dependency, can be overwhelmingly strong. The wronged wife may also realize that taking action could cost her husband his family, his job, his reputation.* (FOOTNOTE SAYS: In reality, the molester is already in trouble and badly needs help. Even if the perpetrator claims to be sorry, the wronged mate may consider: Why didn't he confess before being exposed by his victim?) The hard truth is, though, that he may just be reaping what he has sown. (Galatians 6:7) Innocent children, on the other hand, stand to lose much more if they are not believed and protected. Their whole future is at stake. They do not have the resources that adults have. Trauma can scar and shape them adversely for life. They are the ones who need and deserve tender treatment.Compare Genesis 33:13, 14.

    Parents must therefore make every reasonable effort to protect their children! Many responsible parents choose to seek out professional help for an abused child. Just as you would with a medical doctor, make sure that any such professional will respect your religious views.# (FOOTNOTE SAYS: For instance, when Jehovah's Witnesses are confronted with issues involving blood transfusion, they make sure that the doctor respects their religious beliefs.) Help your child rebuild his or her shattered self-esteem through a steady outpouring of parental love.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Watchtower November 1st 1995 Issue:

    (MY COMMENT: This Article is also available on the Official Watchtower Website at this Address: http://www.watchtower.org/library/w/1995/11/1a/article_01.htm )

    Comfort for Those With a "Stricken Spirit"

    TODAY, Satan's world has come to be "past all moral sense." (Ephesians 4:19; 1 John 5:19) Adultery and fornication are pandemic. In many lands 50 percent or more of marriages end in divorce. Homosexuality is widely accepted. Sexual violencerapeis often in the news. Pornography is a billion-dollar industry. Romans 1:26, 27.

    Among the vilest perversions is the sexual abuse of innocent children. Like the wisdom of Satan's world, child sexual abuse is "animal, demonic." (James 3:15) In the United States alone, Time magazine says, "more than 400,000 reports of verifiable sexual assaults are filed with authorities each year by teachers and doctors." When victims of this abuse become adults, many still carry painful wounds, and those wounds are real! The Bible says: "The spirit [mental inclination, inner feelings and thoughts] of a man can put up with his malady; but as for a stricken [wounded, afflicted] spirit, who can bear it?" Proverbs 18:14.

    The good news of God's Kingdom appeals to people of all kinds, including "the brokenhearted" and those with a "downhearted spirit." (Isaiah 61:1-4) Not surprisingly, many who are in emotional pain respond to the invitation: "Let anyone thirsting come; let anyone that wishes take life's water free." (Revelation 22:17) The Christian congregation can be a place of comfort for these. They rejoice to learn that suffering will soon be a thing of the past. (Isaiah 65:17) Until that time, though, they may need to be 'comforted' and have their wounds 'bound up.' Well did Paul counsel Christians: "Speak consolingly to the depressed souls, support the weak, be long-suffering toward all." 1 Thessalonians 5:14.

    "Repressed Memories"

    In recent years some have been "brokenhearted" for reasons that others find difficult to understand. They are adults who, on the basis of what have been described as "repressed memories," say that they were sexually abused when they were children.* (FOOTNOTE SAYS: "Repressed memories" and similar expressions are enclosed in quotation marks to distinguish them from the more typical memories that all of us have.) Some have no thought of having been molested until, unexpectedly, they experience flashbacks and "memories" of an adult (or adults) abusing them when they were young. Do any in the Christian congregation have such disturbing thoughts? In a few lands, yes, and these dedicated ones may experience deep distress, anger, guilt, shame, or loneliness. Like David they may feel isolated from God and cry out: "Why, O Jehovah, do you keep standing afar off? Why do you keep yourself hid in times of distress?" Psalm 10:1.

    Many aspects of these "memories" are not well understood by mental-health professionals. Still, such "memories" can affect the spirituality of dedicated Christians. So we look with confidence to God's Word for guidance in handling them. The Bible provides "discernment in all things." (2 Timothy 2:7; 3:16) It also helps all concerned to put faith in Jehovah, "the Father of tender mercies and the God of all comfort, who comforts us in all our tribulation." 2 Corinthians 1:3, 4.

    Did It Really Happen?

    In the world, there is much controversy as to what these "memories" are and to what extent they represent things that actually happened. Jehovah's Witnesses are "no part of the world" and take no part in this controversy. (John 17:16) According to published reports, "memories" have sometimes proved to be accurate. For example, after insurance adjuster Frank Fitzpatrick "remembered" being molested by a certain priest, almost one hundred others came forward to claim that they too had been abused by the same priest. The priest reportedly admitted to the abuse.

    It is noteworthy, however, that a number of individuals have been unable to corroborate their "memories." Some afflicted in this way have had vivid recollections of a certain individual committing abuse or of the abuse being committed in a specific place. Later, though, legitimate evidence to the contrary made it clear that these "remembered" details could not be true.

    Providing a Refuge

    Nevertheless, how can comfort be given to those who experience a "stricken spirit" because of such "memories"? Remember Jesus' parable of the neighborly Samaritan. A man was set upon by robbers, beaten, and stripped of his possessions. When the Samaritan came along, his heart went out to the wounded man. What did he do? Did he insist on hearing every last detail about the beating? Or did the Samaritan get a description of the robbers and immediately chase after them? No. The man was hurt! So the Samaritan gently dressed his wounds and lovingly carried him to the safety of a nearby inn where he could recover. Luke 10:30-37.

    True, there is a difference between physical wounds and a "stricken spirit" caused by actual childhood sexual abuse. But both cause great suffering. Hence, what the Samaritan did for the wounded Jew shows what can be done to help an afflicted fellow Christian. The first priority is to give loving comfort and to help him recover.

    The Devil afflicted faithful Job, apparently confident that either emotional or physical pain would break his integrity. (Job 1:11; 2:5) Since then, Satan has often tried to use sufferingwhether he directly causes it or notto weaken the faith of God's servants. (Compare 2 Corinthians 12:7-9.) Can we doubt that the Devil now plays upon child abuse and the "downhearted spirit" of many adults who suffered this (or are troubled by "memories" of having suffered it) to try to weaken the faith of Christians? Like Jesus when under attack by Satan, a Christian who suffers pain but who stalwartly refuses to abandon his integrity is saying: "Go away, Satan!" Matthew 4:10.

    Stay Spiritually Strong

    "The faithful and discreet slave" has published information to help handle the spiritual and emotional hurt caused by child abuse. (Matthew 24:45-47) Experience shows that the sufferer is helped if he can rely on the 'power of the Lord and the mightiness of his strength,' putting on "the complete suit of armor from God." (Ephesians 6:10-17) This armor includes Bible "truth," which exposes Satan as the ultimate enemy and dissipates the darkness in which he and his henchmen work. (John 3:19) Then, there is "the breastplate of righteousness." The afflicted one should strive to hold to righteous standards. For example, some have strong impulses to harm themselves or to commit immorality. Every time they resist these impulses, they win a victory!

    Spiritual armor also includes "the good news of peace." Talking to others about Jehovah's purposes strengthens the one talking as well as anyone who listens. (1 Timothy 4:16) If you should be one with a "stricken spirit," making it difficult for you to talk about the good news, try to accompany another Christian as he or she does this vital work. And do not forget "the large shield of faith." Have faith that Jehovah loves you and that he will restore all that you have lost. Believe without reservation that Jesus also loves you, and he proved this by dying for you. (John 3:16) Satan has always falsely claimed that Jehovah does not care for his servants. That is just another of his gross, vicious lies. John 8:44; compare Job 4:1, 15-18; 42:10-15.

    If pain of heart makes it difficult to believe that Jehovah is concerned about you, it will help to associate with others who firmly believe that he does have concern. (Psalm 119:107, 111; Proverbs 18:1; Hebrews 10:23-25) Refuse to allow Satan to rob you of the prize of life. Remember, "the helmet of salvation" is part of the armor; so is "the sword of the spirit." The Bible is inspired by holy spirit, which Satan cannot defeat. (2 Timothy 3:16; Hebrews 4:12) Its healing words can soothe emotional pain. Compare Psalm 107:20; 2 Corinthians 10:4, 5.

    Finally, pray constantly for the strength to endure. (Romans 12:12; Ephesians 6:18) Heartfelt prayer sustained Jesus through intense emotional agony, and it can help you too. (Luke 22:41-43) Is it difficult for you to pray? Ask others to pray with you and for you. (Colossians 1:3; James 5:14) Holy spirit will support your prayers. (Compare Romans 8:26, 27.) As with a painful physical illness, some with deep emotional wounds may not be completely healed in this system of things. But with Jehovah's help we can endure, and endurance is victory, as it was in Jesus' case. (John 16:33) "Trust in [Jehovah] at all times, O people. Before him pour out your heart. God is a refuge for us." Psalm 62:8.

    What of the Alleged Abuser?

    A person who actually abuses a child sexually is a rapist and should be viewed as such. Anyone victimized in this way has the right to accuse his abuser. Still, an accusation should not be made hastily if it is based solely on "repressed memories" of abuse. In this case the most important thing is for the sufferer to regain a degree of emotional stability. After the passage of some time, he may be in a better position to assess the "memories" and decide what, if anything, he wants to do about them.

    Consider the case of Donna. She reportedly had eating disorders and went to a counselorapparently one of dubious competence. Soon she was accusing her father of incest and he was taken to court. The jury was deadlocked, so the father did not go to prison, but he was left with $100,000 in legal bills. Then, after all that, Donna told her parents that she no longer believed that the abuse happened!

    Wisely, Solomon said: "Do not go forth to conduct a legal case hastily." (Proverbs 25:8) If there is some valid reason to suspect that the alleged perpetrator is still abusing children, a warning may have to be given. The congregation elders can help in such a case. Otherwise, take your time. Eventually, you may be content to let the matter drop. If, though, you want to confront the alleged perpetrator (after first assessing how you would feel about the possible responses), you have a right to do so.

    During the time that the one experiencing "memories" is healing, awkward situations may arise. For example, an individual may have vivid mental images of being molested by someone he or she sees every day. No rules can be laid down for handling this. "Each one will carry his own load." (Galatians 6:5) Sometimes one may feel that a relative or a member of one's immediate family is involved. Remember the dubious nature of some "repressed memories" when it comes to identifying the one suspected of being a perpetrator. In such a situation, as long as the matter has not been firmly established, keeping contact with the family at least by occasional visits, by letter, or by telephone would show that one is trying to follow a Scriptural course. Compare Ephesians 6:1-3.

    What Can Elders Do?

    If the elders are approached by a member of the congregation who is experiencing flashbacks or "repressed memories" of child abuse, two of them are usually assigned to help. These elders should kindly encourage the afflicted one to focus for the time being on coping with the emotional distress. The names of any "remembered" abusers should be kept in strict confidence.

    The elders' primary task is to act as shepherds. (Isaiah 32:1, 2; 1 Peter 5:2, 3) They should be especially careful to "clothe [themselves] with the tender affections of compassion, kindness, lowliness of mind, mildness, and long-suffering." (Colossians 3:12) Let them listen in a kindly way and then apply healing words from the Scriptures. (Proverbs 12:18) Some who are afflicted with painful "memories" have expressed appreciation for elders who make regular visits or even telephone calls to check to see how they are doing. Such contacts need not take a lot of time, but they show that Jehovah's organization cares. When the afflicted one realizes that his Christian brothers truly love him, he may be helped to recover a considerable degree of emotional balance.

    What if the sufferer decides that he wants to make an accusation?# (FOOTNOTE SAYS: It may also be necessary for the step outlined in this paragraph to be taken if the matter has become common knowledge in the congregation.) Then the two elders can advise him that, in line with the principle at Matthew 18:15, he should personally approach the accused about the matter. If the accuser is not emotionally able to do this face-to-face, it can be done by telephone or perhaps by writing a letter. In this way the one accused is given the opportunity to go on record before Jehovah with his answer to the accusation. He may even be able to present evidence that he could not have committed the abuse. Or perhaps the one accused will confess, and a reconciliation may be achieved. What a blessing that would be! If there is a confession, the two elders can handle matters further in accordance with Scriptural principles.

    If the accusation is denied, the elders should explain to the accuser that nothing more can be done in a judicial way. And the congregation will continue to view the one accused as an innocent person. The Bible says that there must be two or three witnesses before judicial action can be taken. (2 Corinthians 13:1; 1 Timothy 5:19) Even if more than one person "remembers" abuse by the same individual, the nature of these recalls is just too uncertain to base judicial decisions on them without other supporting evidence. This does not mean that such "memories" are viewed as false (or that they are viewed as true). But Bible principles must be followed in establishing a matter judicially.

    What if the one accused though denying the wrongdoing is really guilty? Does he "get away with it," as it were? Certainly not! The question of his guilt or innocence can be safely left in Jehovah's hands. "The sins of some men are publicly manifest, leading directly to judgment, but as for other men their sins also become manifest later." (1 Timothy 5:24; Romans 12:19; 14:12) The book of Proverbs says: "The expectation of the righteous ones is a rejoicing, but the very hope of the wicked ones will perish." "When a wicked man dies, his hope perishes." (Proverbs 10:28; 11:7) Ultimately, Jehovah God and Christ Jesus render everlasting judgment in justice. 1 Corinthians 4:5.

    Resisting the Devil

    When dedicated souls endure in the face of great physical or emotional pain, what an evidence it is of their inner strength and love for God! And what a testimony to the power of Jehovah's spirit to sustain them! Compare 2 Corinthians 4:7.

    Peter's words apply to such ones: "Take your stand against [Satan] solid in the faith." (1 Peter 5:9) Doing so may not be easy. Sometimes, it may even be difficult to think clearly and logically. But take heart! Soon, the Devil and his crafty acts will no longer exist. Truly, we long for that time when "God himself . . . will wipe out every tear from their eyes, and death will be no more, neither will mourning nor outcry nor pain be anymore. The former things have passed away." Revelation 21:3, 4.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Watchtower January 1st 1997 Issue:

    (MY COMMENT: This Article is also available on the Official Watchtower Website at this Address: http://www.watchtower.org/library/w/1997/1/1/article_01.htm )

    Let Us ABHOR What Is Wicked

    JEHOVAH is a holy God. In ancient times he was "the Holy One of Israel," and as such he demanded that Israel be clean, unsullied. (Psalm 89:18) He told his chosen people: "You must prove yourselves holy, because I am holy." (Leviticus 11:45) Anyone who wanted to "ascend into the mountain of Jehovah" had to be "innocent in his hands and clean in heart." (Psalm 24:3, 4) That meant more than merely avoiding sinful acts. It meant "the hating of bad."Proverbs 8:13.

    Lovingly, Jehovah laid down detailed laws so that the nation of Israel could identify and avoid wrongdoing. (Romans 7:7, 12) These laws included strict guidelines on morality. Adultery, homosexual acts, incestuous relationships, and bestiality were all identified as unholy spiritual pollutants. (Leviticus 18:23; 20:10-17) Those guilty of such degraded acts were cut off from the nation of Israel.

    When the congregation of anointed Christians became "the Israel of God," similar moral standards were laid down for them. (Galatians 6:16) Christians too were to "abhor what is wicked." (Romans 12:9) Jehovah's words to Israel also applied to them: "You must be holy, because I am holy." (1 Peter 1:15, 16) Such unholy practices as fornication, adultery, homosexual acts, bestiality, and incest were not to corrupt the Christian congregation. Those refusing to stop engaging in such things would be excluded from God's Kingdom. (Romans 1:26, 27; 2:22; 1 Corinthians 6:9, 10; Hebrews 13:4) In these "last days," the same standards apply to the "other sheep." (2 Timothy 3:1; John 10:16) As a result, anointed Christians and other sheep make up a clean and wholesome people, able to carry the name of their God as Jehovah's Witnesses. Isaiah 43:10.

    Keeping the Congregation Clean

    In contrast, the world condones all kinds of immorality. Although true Christians are different, they should not forget that many who now serve Jehovah were once in the world. There are many who, before they knew our holy God, saw no reason not to indulge the desires and fantasies of their fallen flesh, wallowing in a "low sink of debauchery." (1 Peter 4:4) The apostle Paul, after describing the disgusting practices of degraded people of the nations, said: "That is what some of you were." Still, he went on to say: "But you have been washed clean, but you have been sanctified, but you have been declared righteous in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ and with the spirit of our God." 1 Corinthians 6:11.

    What a comforting statement that is! Whatever a person did earlier in life, he changes when the glorious good news about the Christ has an effect on his heart. He exercises faith and dedicates himself to Jehovah God. From then on he lives a morally pure life, washed clean in God's eyes. (Hebrews 9:14) The sins that he committed previously are pardoned, and he can 'stretch forward to the things ahead.'* (FOOTNOTE SAYS: See "Questions From Readers" in the May 1, 1996, issue of The Watchtower.) Philippians 3:13, 14; Romans 4:7, 8.

    Jehovah forgave repentant David for murder and adultery, and He forgave repentant Manasseh for immoral idolatry and much bloodshed. (2 Samuel 12:9, 13; 2 Chronicles 33:2-6, 10-13) We can be truly grateful that he is prepared to forgive us too if we repent and approach him in sincerity and humility. Still, despite Jehovah's forgiving David and Manasseh, these two menand Israel with themhad to live with the consequences of their sinful acts. (2 Samuel 12:11, 12; Jeremiah 15:3-5) In a similar way, while Jehovah forgives repentant sinners, there may be consequences of their actions that cannot be avoided.

    Inevitable Consequences

    While Jehovah forgives repentant sinners, there may be consequences of their actions that cannot be avoided

    For example, a man who lives a life of immoral debauchery and contracts AIDS may accept the truth and turn his life around to the point of dedication and baptism. Now he is a spiritually clean Christian having a relationship with God and a wonderful hope for the future; but he still has AIDS. He may eventually die of the disease, a sad but inescapable consequence of his former conduct. For some Christians the effects of former gross immorality may persist in other ways. For years after their baptism, perhaps for the rest of their lives in this system of things, they may have to fight urges in their flesh to return to their previous immoral life-style. With the help of Jehovah's spirit, many succeed in resisting. But they have to wage a constant battle. Galatians 5:16, 17.

    Such ones do not sin as long as they control their urges. But if they are men, they may wisely decide not to 'reach out' for responsibility in the congregation while still having to struggle with powerful fleshly impulses. (1 Timothy 3:1) Why? Because they know the trust that the congregation puts in the elders. (Isaiah 32:1, 2; Hebrews 13:17) They realize that the elders are consulted on many intimate matters and have to handle sensitive situations. It would be neither loving, wise, nor reasonable for one waging a constant fight with unclean fleshly desires to reach out for such a responsible position. Proverbs 14:16; John 15:12, 13; Romans 12:1.

    For a man who was a child molester before he was baptized, there may be another consequence. When he learns the truth, he repents and turns around, not bringing that cruel sin into the congregation. He may thereafter make fine progress, completely overcome his wrong impulses, and even be inclined to 'reach out' for a responsible position in the congregation. What, though, if he still has to live down notoriety in the community as a former child molester? Would he "be irreprehensible, . . . have a fine testimony from people on the outside, . . . [be] free from accusation"? (1 Timothy 3:1-7, 10; Titus 1:7) No, he would not. Hence, he would not qualify for congregation privileges.

    When a Dedicated Christian Sins

    Jehovah understands that we are weak and that even after baptism we may fall into sin. The apostle John wrote to Christians of his day: "I am writing you these things that you may not commit a sin. And yet, if anyone does commit a sin, we have a helper with the Father, Jesus Christ, a righteous one. And he is a propitiatory sacrifice for our sins, yet not for ours only but also for the whole world's." (1 John 2:1, 2) Yes, on the basis of Jesus' sacrifice, Jehovah will forgive baptized Christians who fall into sinif they truly repent and abandon their wrong course.

    An example of this was seen in the first-century congregation at Corinth. The apostle Paul heard of a case of incestuous fornication in that young congregation, and he gave instructions that the man involved be disfellowshipped. Later, the sinner repented, and Paul exhorted the congregation to reinstate him. (1 Corinthians 5:1, 13; 2 Corinthians 2:5-9) Thus, by the healing power of Jehovah's loving kindness and the great value of Jesus' ransom sacrifice, the man was cleansed of his sin. Similar things may happen today. Again, though, even if a baptized person who commits a serious sin repents and is forgiven in Jehovah's eyes, there may still be ongoing consequences of his sin. Proverbs 10:16, 17; Galatians 6:7.

    For example, if a dedicated girl commits fornication, she may bitterly regret her act and eventually be restored to spiritual health with the help of the congregation. But what if she is pregnant because of her immorality? Then her whole life has been inescapably changed by what she did. A man who commits adultery may repent and not be disfellowshipped. But his innocent mate has Scriptural grounds to divorce him, and she may choose to do so. (Matthew 19:9) If she does, the man, although forgiven by Jehovah, will live the rest of his life with this grave consequence of his sin. 1 John 1:9.

    What of a man who unlovingly divorces his wife in order to marry another woman? Perhaps he will eventually repent and be reinstated in the congregation. Over the years he may make progress and "press on to maturity." (Hebrews 6:1) But as long as his first wife lives without a mate, he will not qualify to serve in a responsible position in the congregation. He is not "a husband of one wife" because he had no Scriptural right to divorce his first wife. 1 Timothy 3:2, 12.

    Are these not powerful reasons why a Christian should cultivate an abhorrence of what is wicked?

    What of a Child Molester?

    What if a baptized adult Christian sexually molests a child? Is the sinner so wicked that Jehovah will never forgive him? Not necessarily so. Jesus said that 'blasphemy against the holy spirit' was unforgivable. And Paul said that there is no sacrifice for sins left for one who practices sin willfully despite knowing the truth. (Luke 12:10; Hebrews 10:26, 27) But nowhere does the Bible say that an adult Christian who sexually abuses a childwhether incestuously or otherwisecannot be forgiven. Indeed, his sins can be washed clean if he repents sincerely from the heart and turns his conduct around. However, he may still have to struggle with the wrong fleshly impulses he cultivated. (Ephesians 1:7) And there may be consequences that he cannot avoid.

    Depending on the law of the land where he lives, the molester may well have to serve a prison term or face other sanctions from the State. The congregation will not protect him from this. Moreover, the man has revealed a serious weakness that henceforth will have to be taken into account. If he seems to be repentant, he will be encouraged to make spiritual progress, share in the field service, even have parts in the Theocratic Ministry School and nonteaching parts in the Service Meeting. This does not mean, though, that he will qualify to serve in a position of responsibility in the congregation. What are the Scriptural reasons for this?

    For one thing, an elder must be "self-controlled." (Titus 1:8) True, none of us have perfect self-control. (Romans 7:21-25) But a dedicated adult Christian who falls into the sin of child sexual abuse reveals an unnatural fleshly weakness. Experience has shown that such an adult may well molest other children. True, not every child molester repeats the sin, but many do. And the congregation cannot read hearts to tell who is and who is not liable to molest children again. (Jeremiah 17:9) Hence, Paul's counsel to Timothy applies with special force in the case of baptized adults who have molested children: "Never lay your hands hastily upon any man; neither be a sharer in the sins of others." (1 Timothy 5:22) For the protection of our children, a man known to have been a child molester does not qualify for a responsible position in the congregation. Moreover, he cannot be a pioneer or serve in any other special, full-time service. Compare the principle at Exodus 21:28, 29.

    Some may ask, 'Have not some committed other types of sin and apparently repented, only to repeat their sin later?' Yes, that has happened, but there are other factors to consider. If, for example, an individual makes immoral advances to another adult, the adult should be able to resist his or her advances. Children are much easier to deceive, confuse, or terrorize. The Bible speaks of a child's lack of wisdom. (Proverbs 22:15; 1 Corinthians 13:11) Jesus used children as an example of humble innocence. (Matthew 18:4; Luke 18:16, 17) The innocence of a child includes a complete lack of experience. Most children are open, eager to please, and thus vulnerable to abuse by a scheming adult whom they know and trust. Therefore, the congregation has a responsibility before Jehovah to protect its children.

    Well-trained children learn to obey and honor their parents, the elders, and other adults. (Ephesians 6:1, 2; 1 Timothy 5:1, 2; Hebrews 13:7) It would be a shocking perversion if one of these authority figures were to misuse that child's innocent trust so as to seduce or force him or her to submit to sexual acts. Those who have been sexually molested in this way often struggle for years to overcome the resulting emotional trauma. Hence, a child molester is subject to severe congregational discipline and restrictions. It is not his status as an authority figure that should be of concern but, rather, the unblemished purity of the congregation. 1 Corinthians 5:6; 2 Peter 3:14.

    If a child molester sincerely repents, he will recognize the wisdom of applying Bible principles. If he truly learns to abhor what is wicked, he will despise what he did and struggle to avoid repeating his sin. (Proverbs 8:13; Romans 12:9) Further, he will surely thank Jehovah for the greatness of His love, as a result of which a repentant sinner, such as he is, can still worship our holy God and hope to be among "the upright" who will reside on earth forever. Proverbs 2:21.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Watchtower July 15th 2001 Issue, Page 21:

    Are You Truly Tolerant?
    (Balance Is Needed)

    Of course, we need to avoid being overly tolerant. For instance, terrible damage is done when religious authorities tolerate abusive priests who persistently molest boys and girls. Treating the children as occasions of sin, commented one reporter in Ireland , the church authorities merely moved on the offending priest (to another location).

    Is just transferring such a man an example of proper tolerance? Hardly! Suppose a medical body allowed an irresponsible surgeon to continue operating, transferring him from one hospital to another, even though he was killing or maiming his patients. A mistaken sense of professional loyalty might produce such tolerance. But what about the victims whose lives were lost or adversely affected because of negligent or even criminal practices?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Watchtower June 1st 2002 Issue, Page 25:

    Certain incidents in particular shocked me.... Another time, the principal of the Baptist school attempted to abuse me sexually. I learned afterward that he was a homosexual and had abused others. I pondered these things, wondering to myself, 'Does God approve of religions whose members and even whose leaders are not held accountable for gross sins'.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit