New BBC article on JW abuse

by snare&racket 25 Replies latest jw friends

  • snare&racket
    snare&racket

    www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-33609927

    Is religion doing enough to root out abuse?

    He would go upstairs, on the premise that he was saying a prayer with his niece, then sexually abuse her.

    Now in her 30s, Karen wasn't understood when she first told her parents what her uncle, Mark Sewell, was doing.

    Sewell was also the son of a trusted older member of the local Jehovah's Witnesses congregation, known as an elder.

    Christian churches, as well as other religions, have faced claims of child abuse.

    But what is striking about the Jehovah's Witnesses is their explicit policy of dealing with abuse in-house.

    Because of their practice of following the Bible literally, they insist there must be two witnesses to a crime, often not the case in child abuse cases.

    However, in Karen's case a second witness did come forward: Wendy, a family friend and fellow member of the Barry congregation in south Wales. She had been raped by the same man.

    When she reported the crime to elders, Wendy was made to describe it in minute detail to a group of older men.

    Later, she had to give her account again in the same room as Sewell.

    Afterwards, the elders told her that as it was only her account against that of Sewell, nothing more could be done.

    This bringing together of the accused and the accuser in a "judicial committee" is a common feature of Jehovah's Witnesses' justice.

    Karen, still a teenager at the time, was put through the process.

    Reluctance to co-operate

    The elders also ruled that their separate accusations didn't constitute the required two witnesses.

    Despite a pattern of predatory sexual behaviour, it took more than two decades to bring Wendy and Karen's abuser to justice.

    He is now serving a 14-year prison sentence.

    His punishment from the Jehovah's Witnesses? There wasn't one.

    Even when the case came to court, the organisation was reluctant to co-operate.

    Karen's father, John Viney, who was also an elder in the Barry congregation, says that elders who knew of Sewell's conduct and were asked to give statements or evidence in court did not want to get involved.

    In a programme for Radio 4's The Report, we have identified this lack of co-operation in several other similar cases.

    Confidential documents from the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of Britain - the official name for the Jehovah's Witnesses - that we have seen are explicit about the best way to deal with such matters being within the congregation.

    Nowhere in the hundreds of pages we have seen are elders told that they must go to the police, even if the perpetrator confesses, unless state or national law makes it mandatory to report such allegations.

    The Jehovah's Witnesses' UK leadership declined to talk to us for the programme.

    In a statement, they said they were appealing against a recent High Court rulingin the UK that awarded substantial damages against the organisation for failing to protect a child from sexual abuse by a paedophile.

    Their statement also insists that the organisation does take child abuse extremely seriously.

    Karen Morgan and Wendy are now pursuing a civil claim against the organisation, hoping that further financial penalty may force the leadership of the Jehovah's Witnesses to change its policies.

    For both of them, what made it even harder was the sense that belonging to the Jehovah's Witnesses was part of an all-encompassing lifestyle, with members encouraged to socialise and marry within the group.

    The organisation has some eight million members around the world, but as Karen found to her cost, those who decide to have a boyfriend or girlfriend who is not a member may find themselves "disfellowshipped" or shunned.

    Jehovah's Witnesses are not the only religious organisation to try to deal with allegations of sexual abuse in-house.

    Growing awareness

    For many decades, that was the preferred method of the Roman Catholic Church, which has since reformed its child safeguarding policies following numerous court cases in the US and Europe against priests for the sexual abuse of children.

    Other churches have also tightened up their child safeguarding policies, with the Methodist Church conducting its own recent inquiry into abuse allegations dating back to 1950.

    That inquiry has led to calls for the Church of England to hold a fresh internal inquiry of its own, separately from the overarching national public inquiry that has just begun, and from the investigation it published in 2010, which critics termed inadequate.

    However, it is the more closed religious communities and new religious movements where it remains hardest for the victims of such abuse to speak out and gain access to secular justice, although awareness of the issue is growing.

    Only this month, an ultra-Orthodox Jewish scholar from Manchester - who fled to Israel after he was exposed as a paedophile - was jailed for 13 years.

    Karen MorganKaren Morgan said the church offered no help when she reported the abuse

    From when Karen Morgan was 12, until she was well into her teens, she was sexually abused by her uncle - a ministerial servant with the Jehovah's Witnesses.

    He would go upstairs, on the premise that he was saying a prayer with his niece, then sexually abuse her.

    Now in her 30s, Karen wasn't understood when she first told her parents what her uncle, Mark Sewell, was doing.

    Sewell was also the son of a trusted older member of the local Jehovah's Witnesses congregation, known as an elder.

    Christian churches, as well as other religions, have faced claims of child abuse.

    But what is striking about the Jehovah's Witnesses is their explicit policy of dealing with abuse in-house.

    Because of their practice of following the Bible literally, they insist there must be two witnesses to a crime, often not the case in child abuse cases.

    However, in Karen's case a second witness did come forward: Wendy, a family friend and fellow member of the Barry congregation in south Wales. She had been raped by the same man.

    When she reported the crime to elders, Wendy was made to describe it in minute detail to a group of older men.

    Later, she had to give her account again in the same room as Sewell.

    Mark SewellMark Sewell was sentenced to 14 years in prison

    Afterwards, the elders told her that as it was only her account against that of Sewell, nothing more could be done.

    This bringing together of the accused and the accuser in a "judicial committee" is a common feature of Jehovah's Witnesses' justice.

    Karen, still a teenager at the time, was put through the process.

    Reluctance to co-operate

    The elders also ruled that their separate accusations didn't constitute the required two witnesses.

    Despite a pattern of predatory sexual behaviour, it took more than two decades to bring Wendy and Karen's abuser to justice.

    He is now serving a 14-year prison sentence.

    His punishment from the Jehovah's Witnesses? There wasn't one.

    Even when the case came to court, the organisation was reluctant to co-operate.

    Karen's father, John Viney, who was also an elder in the Barry congregation, says that elders who knew of Sewell's conduct and were asked to give statements or evidence in court did not want to get involved.

    In a programme for Radio 4's The Report, we have identified this lack of co-operation in several other similar cases.

    Confidential documents from the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of Britain - the official name for the Jehovah's Witnesses - that we have seen are explicit about the best way to deal with such matters being within the congregation.

    Nowhere in the hundreds of pages we have seen are elders told that they must go to the police, even if the perpetrator confesses, unless state or national law makes it mandatory to report such allegations.

    Ephraim MirvisChief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis has urged Jews to report cases of child abuse

    The Jehovah's Witnesses' UK leadership declined to talk to us for the programme.

    In a statement, they said they were appealing against a recent High Court rulingin the UK that awarded substantial damages against the organisation for failing to protect a child from sexual abuse by a paedophile.

    Their statement also insists that the organisation does take child abuse extremely seriously.

    Karen Morgan and Wendy are now pursuing a civil claim against the organisation, hoping that further financial penalty may force the leadership of the Jehovah's Witnesses to change its policies.

    For both of them, what made it even harder was the sense that belonging to the Jehovah's Witnesses was part of an all-encompassing lifestyle, with members encouraged to socialise and marry within the group.

    The organisation has some eight million members around the world, but as Karen found to her cost, those who decide to have a boyfriend or girlfriend who is not a member may find themselves "disfellowshipped" or shunned.

    Jehovah's Witnesses are not the only religious organisation to try to deal with allegations of sexual abuse in-house.

    Growing awareness

    For many decades, that was the preferred method of the Roman Catholic Church, which has since reformed its child safeguarding policies following numerous court cases in the US and Europe against priests for the sexual abuse of children.

    Other churches have also tightened up their child safeguarding policies, with the Methodist Church conducting its own recent inquiry into abuse allegations dating back to 1950.

    That inquiry has led to calls for the Church of England to hold a fresh internal inquiry of its own, separately from the overarching national public inquiry that has just begun, and from the investigation it published in 2010, which critics termed inadequate.

    However, it is the more closed religious communities and new religious movements where it remains hardest for the victims of such abuse to speak out and gain access to secular justice, although awareness of the issue is growing.

    Only this month, an ultra-Orthodox Jewish scholar from Manchester - who fled to Israel after he was exposed as a paedophile - was jailed for 13 years.

    Justice Lowell GoddardLowell Goddard chairs a national independent inquiry into child sexual abuse

    Todros Grynhaus was deported by the Israeli authorities to face justice in the UK, with his conviction for sex offences against girls leading to a change in attitudes in the Haredi Jewish community.

    The case prompted the UK's Chief Rabbi, Ephraim Mirvis, to urge members to report child sex abuse.

    The court had heard that both women who testified against Grynhaus in the case had been "ostracised" by their community as a result of speaking out about their ordeal.

    For young Muslim girls, the price of speaking out about child sexual abuse can also be high, with many reluctant to report such abuse because of the fear that it would bring shame on them and their family.

    Sexual and physical abuse at Islamic religious schools, known as madrassas, has also resulted in some prosecutions in recent years, although often victims still hesitate to come forward with such allegations.

    Many religious organisations will find themselves being closely scrutinised in the national independent inquiry into child sexual abuse, chaired by New Zealand judge Lowell Goddard.

    The survivors of such abuse hope that the inquiry will prove itself truly independent, and help ensure that abusers will not be able to rely on their own congregations or religious leaders to protect them - whatever their faith.

    line

    Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse:

    The Inquiry will investigate a wide range of institutions including:

    Local authorities

    The police

    The Crown Prosecution Service

    The Immigration Service

    The BBC

    The armed forces

    Schools

    Hospitals

    Children's homes

    Churches, mosques and other religious organisations

    Charities and voluntary organisations

    Full details of the inquiry

    line

    JW.org JW.org JW.org JW.org JW.org JW.org JW.org JW.org JW.org JW.org

  • cofty
    cofty

    Good article. Jehovah's Witnesses are increasingly becoming the poster child of bad practice in the field of child welfare.

    I challenged a couple of JW young men about this on Monday and his reply was "I don't care I don't have children".

  • MMXIV
    MMXIV

    This is the kind of article that JW's in the UK will accidently start reading. They will know about the two witness rule, JC's, shunning for having a worldly girlfriend or boyfriend. Might even make a few think. Another mainstream simple clear summary that creates awareness.

    mmxiv

  • Slidin Fast
    Slidin Fast

    BBC Radio 4 is a very well respected channel that has a large part of it's remit to report news and current affairs. The fact that this program will be aired by the most respected organ of information in the country should result in at least some discussion.

    I hope that the fact that it will be broadcast in the evening during most cong's meeting will not restrict it's impact too much. Perhaps the sound man at the back of the hall could accidentally use the wrong feed.

  • Ruby456
    Ruby456

    thanks for sharing this, snare&racket

    Interestingly Caroline Wyatt the news reporter says religion matters. I think it does too and probably for the same reasons that she does - that it will always generate newsworthy material and that it is here to stay.

    And reading through the article you have shared she really does get to the crux of this story.

    will the radio phone programme involve phone in questions and answers? I would love to air my views on the two witness rule

  • punkofnice
    punkofnice
    I am sure many JWs that see this would cry 'persecution(tm)'....but I wonder how many would start to question....especially after seeing those goofy Governing body idiots on their evangelistic tv show?
  • Zoos
    Zoos

    "I don't care I don't have children".

    Good lord.

  • Half banana
    Half banana

    I heard much of this information on Radio 4 on the BBC at about 6.45 this morning...good negative publicity for putting people off Jehovah's Witnesses.

    A significant element of the JW position is that they choose to insist on the Biblical 'rule' of "two witnesses".

    Does this not expose the stupidity of basing modern life on primitive tribal dogma? JWs cling to the Bible and faith in its brand of holiness since they have such narrow horizons and are prevented from seeing that better methods and opportunities exist elsewhere.

  • Joe Grundy
    Joe Grundy

    I'm looking forward to this programme. The fact that BBC R4 is widely (internationally) recognised as a good source of factual news reporting probably won't cut much ice with die-hard JWs (all criticsm must come from satanic sources and is a sign of persecution) but it will, I think, raise awareness outside JW circles. To the vast majority of the UK, JWs are a minority, quirky and irrelevant cult - but this issue may well raise some concerns. The ongoing Charity Commission investigation, court cases and reports in other publications (e.g. Private Eye) seem to be coming together. 'Quirky and irrelevant' is one thing, but those people who listen to this information are more likely to connect 'JW' and 'hidden child abuse' in their minds, I suggest.

    Not that JWs are the only ones, of course, but a balanced view suggests that the RC church, at least, has recognised the problem and is doing something about it.

  • Joe Grundy
    Joe Grundy

    And a word (or more) about 'two witnesses'.

    In the UK - and in many other jurisdictions, I believe - this principle continues in the form of seeking corroboration. The problem is that ignorant, arrogant, untrained, unprofessional JW overlords do not understand the concept and certainly do not wish to apply it even if they were capable of doing so. I must reiterate my view most strongly that JW heirarchy must immediately stand aside from any investigation of abuse and that by not doing so they risk causing further harm to victims, fouling up a prosection and further damage. Their god has no place in this process.

    But a 'second witness' legally could include:

    - 'Early complaint'

    - Forensic evidence (DNA deposits, etc.)

    - Evidence that the perpetrator was at the locus at the time

    - Interview/admissions/lies from suspect

    - Physical fact evidence (e.g victim describes birthmark on perpetrator)

    - 'Similar fact' in serial cases (e.g. perpetrator had a fetish for certain acts/words)

    - Multiple independent complaints from victims

    It can readily be seen that JW elders etc. not only don't have the training/expertise to look at these aspects, it would be horrendous if they tried to do so.

    I never was a JW and I try not to be over-critical of all elders and leaders. But sadly, all of the ones I have met and engaged in conversation have proved to be mildly deceptive at best and outright liars at worst.

    I stand by my previous assertion on posts on this topic here. If while I was working in this field I had come across elders interfering in abuse investigations (even by following the 'flock' book) I would have arrested them for obstruction/attempting to pervert the course of justice.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit