pom thanks for treating me like an idiot, I know what a metaphor is...I'm an english major for crissakes! I fail to see how you know that the tree is a real event, and not a metaphor and that the snake IS a metaphor.
First, I'm not here to treat you like an idiot. You asked, I answered.
Well, snakes don't talk, nor do they eat dust. That makes it OBVIOUS METAPHOR, right? Now, what around the TREE event isn't for real, normal or familiar? Nothing. It all is as familiar in the normal human perception now as it was then. I see no strict metaphor.
I see the trees in the garden as surely being SYMBOLIC of the two opposing sides...Tree of Life (God) ...Tree of Good and Bad (Satan)
We have snakes now today too
Ones that TALK? Ones that EAT DUST?
so your arguement that trees are real and grow fruit is not a very good one...trees do not give you knoweldge and God does not talk to us and ban us from eating fruit.
Actually, I'm not here to argue at all. So, I will exit from your own private THINKING thread after this post so you can think alone.
My personal opinion the first chapters of Genesis are ALL metaphor. Adam and Eve not really two individuals,
You know what happens when you go back 100 years? Less people. 1000 years? Less people than that. Eventually, you go back to ONLY TWO.
Cain and Abel a lovely metaphor for the rivalry between farmers and ranchers, etc. I'm quite aware of the idea that metaphor abounds in the Bible, I am also quite aware that there is an idea that the creation accounts are two seperate stories and possibly written by two groups of people, and merged together later...I was trying to have fun with the idea of flying snakes, and point out how absurd it is to try and take anything in the Bible and interpret it into truth statements.
Well have your fun. I hate to break it to you, that snake in Genesis does fly. They call them kinda snakes DRAGONS.