Serious discussion of blood doctrine

by Lee Elder 11 Replies latest jw friends

• 

  TR

  expatbrit,

  This stuation is very silly indeed. It's so stupid. It's the WTS that says the person DA's himself. In other words, the WTS is speaking for the supposed DA'd person, so in effect, he is being disfellowshipped.

  RHW, you're right, it always boils down to the WTS covering their own ass, and looking "good" to the world, the world they hate so much, yet depend on so much. Wayyyy too ironic.

  TR
• 

  ianao

  You know, I wonder what would happen if a JW said to two or more witnesses that they were going to have a blood transfusion and yet choose NOT to disassociate themself, as a DA was by choice.

  I would love to be a fly on the wall for that discussion and hear about how a the lack of a choice is really a choice.