If Richard Dawkins says that we evolved from apes, why do we still have Richard Dawkins?
CHECKMATE ATHEISTS!j
The Case for Theism
by FusionTheism 182 Replies latest watchtower bible
-
-
LoveUniHateExams
The evidence against God is abundant because of the evidence against all the sources of theism - I disagree. Perhaps 'God' and 'theism' should be disentangled.
Sir David Attenborough, replying to the question "do you believe in God?", said "I don't know". I agree with this. It seems that Richard Dawkins does, too.
I also agree with the following:
There is no evidence for God's existence.
Evolution happened.
Religious people should live within the law like everyone else.
There is no place for religion in the public sphere.
-
Ruby456
just reading your op fusiontheism and I have to say God as mind or intelligent designer does not appeal to me. Mind as a sort of super consciousness doesn't either. Is this what theology is about? I don't think so as I have been very surprised that some theologians think of God as activity rather than mind, or as love rather than mind. -
FayeDunaway
Cofty and outlaw, I like you both.
Cofty, incredibly intelligent, but also respectful. Very warm and compassionate. A classy guy. I've grown to like you a lot, even tho I differ from you with the theist/atheist thing.
Outlaw, a very funny, emphatic sharpshooter. Loves satire and wit. Doesn't pull any punches but is not mean.
However, omg! Too much bickering here over agnostic/atheist Dawkins. You're both right, ok?
-
cofty
Thanks Faye, you're too nice!
-
OUTLAW
FayeDunaway..
Your a SweetHeart ..
-
cappytan
FayeDunaway is all class.
*clap* *clap* *clap* *clap* *clap* *clap* *clap* *clap* *clap* *clap*
-
freemindfade
Peace at last. Fay your comment was most refreshing :) -
FayeDunaway
Thank you, and I'm embarrassed :). -
prologos
Therefore, it is entirely possible that an effect could preceed a cause or in fact there was no connection between cause and effect. Doltologist: with that interesting statement and no movement through time, the concept of an un-created creator becomes a possibility.
Vivian: "No it does not--" Prologos: "yes it does, because if the "creator does not move through time, there can be no connection between his cause, his origin and the effect, his existence.
"dark energy is a property of the void.
Vivian" It could also be a teapot made of rhinocerus wool spoons.
Prologos: There is a big difference between assuming the Universe was ordered by a deist /worker/creator* and conjuring up a teapot boiling with dark energy. very ingenious, Ma'm.
" colour is stuck and not a reflection of my calm mood.
+ at least Richard Dawkin gives it a 1.5 % possibility that it is not a teapot but a creator/god.