Why I Stopped Apologising For The WTS

by NewWay 47 Replies latest jw experiences

  • NewWay
    NewWay

    WHY I STOPPED APOLOGISING FOR THE WATCHTOWER SOCIETY - PART 7



    In one of my more daring moments, when I was in my teens, I borrowed a book from the local library entitled 'Thirty Years a Watchtower Slave' written by a former JW. The German author, William Schnell, not only gave an account of his personal experiences as a JW, but also wrote about events involving such key figures as Joseph Rutherford. My reaction was typical of most JWs where 'apostate' literature was concerned: This was a vindictive man who told lies in order to discredit the organisation! Around this time the local view of 'apostate' literature was fairly mild compared with what it is today. Although it was not considered to be a good idea to read what former JWs said about our beliefs and practices, nevertheless, no one that I recollect was even in danger of even being the subject of a 'library job' - a humourous term used by some JWs to refer to corrective 'counsel' administered to a person by a couple of elders which usually takes place in the privacy of the Kingdom Hall library. Yet, it still took courage for me to delve into the 'contaminated' world of the 'apostate'. My previous experience with literature from this source had only been a couple of small booklets from a non-JW I met in the door-to-door work which pointed the reader in the direction of 'Christendom' - something I found spiritually distasteful. Two Very Special Books

    Within a couple of years, due to various talks and Watchtower articles on the subject, the local attitude changed so much that I felt I should not even be talking with anyone who offered 'apostate' literature, let alone accept it from them. This heightened sensitivity was no doubt a contributing factor in the guilt and sour feeling I had when first visiting my first 'apostate' web site. Although I had previously decided to stay away from Internet sites run by opposers of the organisation, the discoveries I had been making in my personal research must have had a desensitizing effect. Loathing for 'apostates' was being replaced with loathing for the way the society had been manipulating the minds of JWs. So, eventually my curiosity made me return to the web site I had previously visited. I realised that the lampooning of the society by former JWs provided these people with an outlet for the anger they felt towards it. Although not something that I felt I would be comfortable doing, I nevertheless thought that these people were justified in releasing the feelings that had been coshed and bound up under the name of 'loyalty'. By reading some of the personal experiences of former JWs on a number of different web sites, I became aware that not everyone had decided to change sides and join up with 'Christendom', nor promoted a 'worldly' way of life that opposed my own values. It was encouraging to me to know that leaving the organisation did not automatically change everyone's core beliefs or moral code.

    Once again the name of Ray Franz came to the fore. Of course, I knew that he had written a book about his experiences, but I had not dared to wade into unknown, and potentially - as I saw it then - 'dangerous' waters by reading it. In fact I wasn't sure where I would be able to get a copy, as these sorts of books are of a specialist nature. I was now determined to read this book, and I didn't care whether the society considered it to be like spiritual poison. I'd had enough of all the restraints and guilt that had been foistered upon JWs by the society over the years. However, more than anything else, what helped me to make that decision was by finally being realistic about the world. It simply was not reasonable to think that everything opposers said about the organisation was a lie. If, as the organisation said - in order to absolve itself from responsibility over failed prophetic dates - it was imperfect, then it was possible that at least some objections made against the society were true. By preventing JWs from hearing another point of view and engendering a climate of fear over being 'shopped' by fellow JWs, the society is able to wield enormous power.

    My search for Ray's book at an online bookstore revealed that he had written two books and so I decided to order both. I was already aware of 'Crisis Of Conscience'. The other book, 'In Search Of Christian Freedom', arrived first and I spent hour after continuous hour reading it. Not only were the contents astonishingly revealing and liberating, but my apprehensions about Ray's motivation for writing were quelled by his non-sensational approach. The absence of bitterness and his appeal to reason helped reassure me that I had not fallen into the hands of a spiritual troublemaker. 'Crisis Of Conscience' was eagerly consumed too, and its revelations about decisions on matters affecting the lives of millions of people were made left me with no room to resurrect the belief in the society's being 'God's channel of communication'.

    The long-held view of holy men regularly pouring over the 'Word of God' and praying together in earnest effort to feed the flock was dashed to pieces as I found out that the once-a-week meetings held by the Governing Body (GB) were barely more than propose-and-vote affairs. I was astounded to learn that even though the GB were supposed to represent the 'anointed' in feeding the sheep spiritual food, there were no special arrangements to meet regularly with other members of the 'anointed' to get their advice and views on matters related to spiritual food. How can a tiny group of men truly represent a - by comparison - huge body of people when they don't consult them? Amazingly, it was revealed that some of the major producers of spiritual food were not even of the 'anointed' class - and this was many years before the announcement was made that some of the 'great crowd' were helping the Governing Body in the various departments such as Writing.

    There were so many things that made me indignant with the society. It was one thing to make a mistake understanding, say, how a prophecy applied to the nation of Israel, but quite another where the consciences and Biblical understanding of a handful of elderly men were being foistered onto the entire body of JWs with the consequence of great hardship, emotional turmoil, and loss of family members (whether in death or through shunning). In my opinion Ray, because of his knowledge from the ultimate vantage-point as a former GB member, had provided the key any still doubting JWs needed to unlock the mental door that kept them prisoners of the WTS, and for that I am deeply thankful to God. My respect, admiration and gratitude also go out to Ray for being courageous and doing the responsible thing in publishing his experiences. I can honestly say that his two books settled matters once and for all. There was now no way I would be attending another meeting or in any other way give my support to such a reprehensible organisation. I was very, very angry and hurt that I had wasted half my life by giving such trust and allegience to a few human beings I didn't even know!

    (To Be Continued...)

  • NewWay
    NewWay

    WHY I STOPPED APOLOGISING FOR THE WATCHTOWER SOCIETY - PART 8



    Having found convincing evidence to refute the claim by the organisation that it was 'God's channel of communication', I started to examine some of the 'divine commands' JWs had been pursuaded to accept. Of course, the most controversial of these is that which pertains to the use of blood. Although personally I felt uncomfortable with the idea of another person's blood flowing in my veins, I wondered if the command to 'abstain from blood' could truthfully be applied to transfusions. I thought that it is one thing for an individual JW to make their own decision to refuse a transfusion because s/he felt his/her conscience could not allow it, but quite another for a tiny group of men to decide 6 million JWs based on their own interpretation of scripture. My - by now unblinkered - look at Genesis 9:3-6 revealed the real reason behind the 'divine command'. God was simply impressing upon human beings the value of life. He allowed human beings to take animal life, but with one proviso, that the blood of the animal be returned to the ground in recognition of the sacredness of life. The command was not given as a dietary requirement but as reminder that it was only by God's permission that animal life could be taken. Since other scriptures that addressed the use of blood were reiterating what God had said about the taking of human or animal life, the application of it to blood transfusions is a fallacy. I returned to various online forums to share my findings, and to encourage JWs to read Ray's books. Finding A New Way
    It was about this time that I started to read many books and religious works that had some connection with the Bible/Jews/Christianity. These included English translations of the Works Of Josephus, Dead Sea Scrolls, Nag Hammadi Library (gnostic gospels), and even the Qur'an. I also read J. R. Porter's book 'The Lost Bible' which contains many Jewish and Christian-oriented writings that were rejected by the Church as being uninspired. The purpose of this intensive reading campaign was to compare religious belief and to try to find out how religious thought developed. I made a number of interesting discoveries along the way (but that's another story).

    Further reading revealed the fact the politicized Catholic Church had from an early point in its history decided amongst its 'bishops' what constituted inspired writings, and based on what I knew about those who ran the church, I could not without great reservations accept that they had been 'God's channel of communication' at that time. The 'holy canon' which we have today was not decided without disagreement though, and as one early Church writer observed the various gospels, letters and even the Revelation itself were questionable among different Christians. Due to this fact, I reluctantly came to the conclusion that I could no longer accept without question everything written in what we today have as the New Testament (NT). If the NT was a collection of non-inspired works (i.e. not flawless dictations from God), then that would explain any inconsistencies within it.

    One scripture that always stood out like a sore thumb to me, is Paul's words regarding women teaching on scriptural matters (1 Timothy 11 & 12). The fact that Paul said, 'I do not permit...' rather than saying 'God does not permit...', made me think that either he was presumptious in giving his own opinion (thus, not God's), or it was added to the text by the authoritarian Church. I had my suspicions about other possible insertions. I noted how people who wanted to prove their doctrinal beliefs from the scriptures could often find a scripture here or there that might give credence to their views, but if one were honest and looked at what the scriptures said as a whole, then a different picture emerged. I did not reject the NT as of no use spiritually, but my understanding changed as I determined to get a 'bird-eye' view. I stopped taking the JW approach of homing in on a scripture and saying, 'therefore that's what we must do' (e.g. picking out the 'door-to-door' scripture in Acts to prove Christians must preach from door-to-door). This allowed me to get back to the real Jesus Christ and his teachings, instead of wasting time on internal arguments over words and phrases, which can lead to no end of do's and don'ts.

    If, during my grandparents' generation, the general public had been asked the question, 'What do you think it means to be a Christian', then I believe the majority of answers would have been along the lines of: 'One who does kind things for other people'. It seems that those who read the NT for the first time pick up on the fact that Jesus Christ was known as a man who cared not only for people's spiritual needs by also their physical needs. Although he gave much instruction of a spiritual nature and pointed folk to better times, he realised that people had to live now and needed help now. That is why I no longer worry about what will happen in the future. For most of my life I have been waiting on promises, putting life on hold being content to stare into the future watching for some miraculous event. Now, however, I live for today.

    My faith in God (however one might conceive him to be) is intact and my admiration for the person of Jesus Christ as depicted in the Bible has not disappeared. I feel no need to be part of an organised religion, as my view is that God deals with people individually not through a third party. For once in my life I actually feel at peace within. I no longer suffer from bouts of depression, despair over the fact that God's new system still hasn't arrived, nor the obsession (and accompanying guilt) with trying to live up to an impossible standard.

    Because I care about those who are trying desperately to unlock their mental prison and those struggling with emotional turmoil on account of their association with the JW organisation, I wanted to share my experiences. I am thankful to God that there is hope for any JW still trapped by the society to find out the truth, but it will require some trust and a willingness to do impartial investigation. As a final thought, I'd like to quote these words of Jesus: '...[The Lord] has sent me to proclaim liberty to captives, sight to the blind, to let the oppressed go free.' (Luke 4:18 - The New Jerusalem Bible)
    (END)
  • NewWay
    NewWay

    That concludes the series of articles.

    Thanks to everyone who took the time to read them.

  • hillary_step
    hillary_step

    Excellent series NewWay,

    Thank you for sharing part of your life with us all. I am sure many felt sympathetic stirrings with many of the points made.

    Lokking foward to your posts - HS

  • NewWay
    NewWay

    In one of my posts above, I stated: "I can accept that it could well have taken until 537 BCE before the first group of Jew returned to their homeland. So regardless of the actual length of the captivity of the Jews, as long as the Jews actually returned in 537 BCE, we still arrive at 1914 CE (i.e. 2520 years - Wow, its like riding a bicycle: you never forget!)."
    Obviously one can fall off one's bike after not riding it for a while! Of course 537+1914-1 (no year zero) = 2450 years. However, 607+1914-1 = 2520. I humbly apologise for the mistake. I'm surprised no one pointed it out. Maybe folk were trying to be polite by not mentioning it.

  • Shemittah
    Shemittah

    Hi there!

    It's been about 7 months since my last post here. At the time I felt I needed a rest from the board as it was taking up a lot of my time. I've had to sign up again, hence the new name (Shemittah - 'release'). A lot happened in my private family life over the few months or so since I left this board, but things appear to be settling down, so I've returned - I hope you don't mind!

    Kind regards.

    Alex.

  • AlanF
    AlanF

    It's nice that you've returned. I read your series for the first time just now, and see a good deal of commonality in our respective journeys out of the Watchtower bog. Do continue to post. I've learned a number of very useful things from your series. I'm especially curious about just what websites you visited over the years, and about your present family situation.

    AlanF

  • OUTLAW
    OUTLAW

    Hey Shermitta,are you saying your NewWay? ..Welcome back! I enjoyed your company the last time you were here.You were/are a good addition to the board...OUTLAW

  • hillary_step
    hillary_step

    Hello Shemmitah,

    Is it the Shemmitah year already?...lol Welcome back to the Board. I am looking forward to reading just where your paths have led you the past few months.

    Best regards - HS

  • Brummie
    Brummie

    YES !Welcome back to the board. This was a great thread, good to see it btt.

    Brummie

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit