To perspicacia2 - Continued

by ItsJustlittleoldme 14 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • ItsJustlittleoldme
    ItsJustlittleoldme

    Hi,

    I appreciate you still wanting to converse on the new 'side' topic that we seem to have started from your original 607 thread.

    So, continuing on, you stated

    Please note that all the men are imperfect. (Rom. 5:12)
    God knows that. Since the Churchs are composed by men...
    all the Churches are imperfect. Even the Churchs of God.
    But,once again, God knows that his Church is composed by
    imperfect men. So, or you accept the imperfection inside
    Church of God, or you will not believe that God has a Church.
    But do not confound the imperfections with voluntary sins.

    I have a couple of questions for this one:

    1.) If god knows that all churches are run by imperfect men, why would god pick just one group of imperfect men above all others and state "These imperfect men are going to be my mouthpiece" whereas all the other imperfect men are tools of Satan?

    2.) Is it possible that the 'church' Jehovah was talking about is not a physical entity, but rather the person? So instead of having a congregation of church goers that all belong to a single denomination (JW's, Catholics, Protestants etc) anyone who professes and believes in Christ Jesus and what he did for us belongs to a world-wide brotherhood of Christian? If, as the bible says, you should have a personal relationship with God through Jesus, why do we even need a man-made imperfect church in the middle of that relationship?

    3.) Are you stating that the Roman Catholic Church, or any other church except the JW's are committing voluntary sin? How so? How do you know that it is just the imperfections of the men that misinterpreted what the bible states?

    YOU WROTE;
    This very statement would scare the bejeebers out of me, since
    you have just admitted that you KNOW it is wrong, and yet you
    (as with all people) will give a personal account to Jehovah
    on his day.. You cannot 'hide' under the organization with this
    statement.. You are not blindly following an error, you know an
    error (or at least you feel conscieniously an error is being
    made) and yet YOU CHOOSE TO FOLLOW THE ERROR...

    ME:
    This is your statement, not mine! I never said that i will
    follow the errors.

    I wrote:
    <<You can even find something correct in some apostate's book,
    as i did. But the correct thing to do is to discuss it directly
    with governing body (as I did) and if the information is correct
    they will confirm it (as per my cases).>>

    I wrote also:
    <<You will never be disfellowshipped to have read
    a book, but you could in the moment you WILL TEACH something
    you have read in that book.>>

    I wrote:
    <<If I will not agree
    with new statements of WT, i will let them know my position
    and i will confirm them my loyalty>>

    No, you never stated that you will follow the errors. What you did state was that you would continue to be loyal. Loyalty implies that you will follow, and following someone you believe to have errored is forgoeing your conscience and is the same as committing the error itself?

    I'll give you an example: Let's say that new light comes out from the GB (doctrine x).. You disagree with doctrine x, and even contact the GB about it.. They say, that is the correct interpretation, sorry you do not agree with us, but doctrine x stands.

    Now, to be 'pleasing to god' you are taught to go in field service.. So, you go out in field service, and you meet someone who asks about doctrine x. You now have a choice, you can be loyal to the organization, and teach them doctrine x all the while believing it to be in error, or you can tell them that you do not believe in doctrine x in which case you would become an apostate, right? So, out of loyalty to the organization, you now teach or at least support a doctrine that you do not believe in. To me, that is going against your conscience, and when the day of judgement comes, and you have to personally account to Jehovah, what will you tell him?

    I can understand your point of view.
    Do you remember king Saul?
    Note that i do not want to compare GB with Saul, it's just
    an EXAMPLE.
    He represented the human organization of God, in the past.
    You know that he made a lot of mistakes.
    He also tried to kill David. So could you please explain me
    1 SAMUEL 26:11 ?
    Was David loyal to the Visible Organization or was he loyal
    to Jehovah?
    11 But the Lord forbid that I should lay a hand on the Lord 's anointed. Now get the spear and water jug that are near his head, and let's go."

    Huh? How have you proven to me that the GB is indeed to lord's annointed? That is your claim, not mine..

    How come you apply that to the GB, but not to any other church (Cathlolic, Protestant, etc)? What is the difference; all of these you mentioned are mere mortal imperfect men, doing the best that they can to try to 'reason' from the scriptures, right? After all, does the GB have any direct revelation from Jehovah, or just a self-made claim (via imperfect men) that they indeed are God's mouthpiece? If the claim has no divine inspiration (which needs to be proven) then that claim is simply being made by imperfect men, whom we all know could make mistakes, and as well-intentioned as they may be, could have made a mistake about that claim as well.

    But by following the claim that they are indeed God's mouthpiece without ANY evidence that they are receiving divine inspiration, you are now required to shun anyone that is not loyal to them, required to teach what they tell you as truth, even if you do not believe it yourself, and keep seperate from the 'world'. Explain to me how you are not:

    1.) Shunning ex-members

    2.) teaching stuff that you may not believe in (going against your conscience)

    3.) stayed seperate from the 'world'

    All of the above is based on a man made claim that they are god's mouthpiece. Without any divine evidence you are now Judging everything from these imperfect human's eye and claims. What if they are wrong, and they are NOT the lord's annointed ones? What do you think Jehovah will do when that judgement day comes, and you tell him that you followed these men, and he asks you why you followed imperfect men, went against your personal conscience, shunned your loved ones, and stayed seperate from the world, and rejecting people I sent to you because you thought they were of the world, when in-fact they were from me?

    Are you willing to place yourself in such a position because a group of imperfect men claim to be god's mouthpiece? Without any divine proof of such claim, aren't you just following the dictates of men, knowing full well that they have made signifigant errors in the past, are probably making signfigant errors in the present, and via their own admission, will continue to make signifigant errors in the future, as new light is continually received to 'correct' them?

    Please show me divine proof that the claim they make of being god's mouthpieice (the lord's annointed) is accurate. Otherwise, it is just their word, and they could be wrong, as we all know they are imperfect men.

    Edited by - ItsJustlittleoldme on 18 June 2002 10:35:2

  • Room 215
    Room 215

    Perspicacia,

    Since the Governing Body requency acknowledges (in print anyway) its imperfection, a failing it shares with all fallen humans, why then does it coerce its rank and file to accept uncritically and unquestioningly EVERY SINGLE UTTERANCE OF THEIRS under pain of expulsion and ostracism from friends and family? An we're not talking about toublemakers who reject all JW teachings utterly; it's not enough to say that while one accepts say 85 percent of JW doctrine but abjures on the remaining 15 percent.. IT'S ALL OR NOTHING OR FACE EXPULSION!

    If that's not an abuse of eccelstiatical power, then what is?

  • ItsJustlittleoldme
    ItsJustlittleoldme

    bttt so perspicacia2 doesn't miss it

  • perspicacia2
    perspicacia2

    To tsJustlittleoldme

    Sorry, i must leave for Austria country (Job reasons).

    I'll be back in one week. Please wait.

    Thanks.

  • ignored_one
    ignored_one

    Sorry, i must leave for Austria country (Job reasons).

    I'll be back in one week. Please wait.

    We shall see.

    Ignored One (Iggy).

  • ItsJustlittleoldme
    ItsJustlittleoldme

    Thanks Pers for the response,

    I was getting concerned that you didn't want to adress my questions, as so many other JW's have done to me in the past. I ask a few questions, and suddenly they dissapear.. Weird, they usually get sick, and cannot continue.. Odd how Jehovah doesn't protect his people better. You'd think with his divine protection, they wouldn't get sick as much as they do. After all, it can give the appearance that the JW's are afraid of the questions, which we all know that shouldn't be. Truth should NEVER fear anything; see Phil 1:27-29

    Anyway, glad to hear that you are feeling ok; and that you have a very valid reason for not being able to answer them right away. Have a safe and happy trip, and I'll be awaiting your reply when you get back.

    Good luck with the job stuff.

    Edited by - ItsJustlittleoldme on 19 June 2002 8:21:42

  • perspicacia2
    perspicacia2

    Hallo, ItsJustlittleoldme
    Yesterday I had a car accident so i could not leave for Austria.
    I've read your message wherein you wrote that a lot of Jw run
    away in the middle of conversation.
    Please consider (as you know) that all Jw are really busy.
    Job...Family...Congregation...Field service...personal study
    ...ect..ect.., we really have not a lot of free-time to converse
    in newsgroups.
    Anyway, now I'm really sick. I've problems with my neck and
    for some days i can not move the head. (i 've a lace around the
    neck...i don not know the English name) BUT i'm here to answer
    your last messagge.
    I don't want you could say i escaped the conversation, but please
    consider i will need a little bit of time for every message
    for the above reason.

    I WROTE:
    Please note that all the men are imperfect. (Rom. 5:12)
    God knows that. Since the Churchs are composed by men...
    all the Churches are imperfect. Even the Churchs of God.
    But,once again, God knows that his Church is composed by
    imperfect men. So, or you accept the imperfection inside
    Church of God, or you will not believe that God has a Church.
    But do not confound the imperfections with voluntary sins.

    YOU ANSWERED:
    I have a couple of questions for this one:
    1.) If god knows that all churches are run by imperfect men,
    why would god pick just one group of imperfect men above
    all others and state "These imperfect men are going to be my
    mouthpiece" whereas all the other imperfect men are tools
    of Satan?

    ME:
    You should ask it to God, not to me!
    Why God pick one group of persons (Israel) and state
    <<this is my people>> ?
    and more important:
    Why God guided his ancient people through imperfect men like
    Moses or the Judges and not through perfect angels?
    (Isaiah 55:8-9)

    YOU WROTE:
    2.) Is it possible that the 'church' Jehovah was talking
    about is not a physical entity, but rather the person? So
    instead of having a congregation of church goers that all
    belong to a single denomination (JW's, Catholics, Protestants
    etc) anyone who professes and believes in Christ Jesus and
    what he did for us belongs to a world-wide brotherhood of
    Christian? If, as the bible says, you should have a personal
    relationship with God through Jesus, why do we even need a
    man-made imperfect church in the middle of that relationship?

    ME:
    I do not think so. The bible is clear. In the first century
    there was a real Church of God composed by Apostoles, Elders, ect..
    They had meetings and they used to go in field service.
    Acts 15:6
    Acts 15:4
    Acts 15:2
    Ebrew 10:25
    Acts 20:20

    YOU WROTE:
    3.) Are you stating that the Roman Catholic Church, or any
    other church except the JW's are committing voluntary sin?
    How so? How do you know that it is just the imperfections
    of the men that misinterpreted what the bible states?

    ME:
    Do you remember what Jesus stated in Matthew 7: 16-20 ?
    and Matthew 7: 21-24 ?
    and Matthew 15:3 ?
    and Matthew 15:9 ?
    and Matthew 15:19-20a ?

    The volountary sins I was talking about are the same you
    can find in the above scriptures. Nothing more, nothing less.

    YOU WROTE:
    No, you never stated that you will follow the errors. What
    you did state was that you would continue to be loyal.
    Loyalty implies that you will follow, and following someone
    you believe to have errored is forgoeing your conscience
    and is the same as committing the error itself?

    ME:
    I don't think so!
    I repeat my previous question:
    could you please explain me 1 SAMUEL 26:11 ?
    Was David loyal to the Visible Organization or was he loyal
    to Jehovah?

    YOU WROTE:
    I'll give you an example: Let's say that new light comes out
    from the GB (doctrine x).. You disagree with doctrine x,
    and even contact the GB about it.. They say, that is the
    correct interpretation, sorry you do not agree with us, but
    doctrine x stands.
    Now, to be 'pleasing to god' you are taught to go in field
    service.. So, you go out in field service, and you meet
    someone who asks about doctrine x. You now have a choice,
    you can be loyal to the organization, and teach them doctrine
    x all the while believing it to be in error, or you can tell
    them that you do not believe in doctrine x in which case you
    would become an apostate, right? So, out of loyalty to the
    organization, you now teach or at least support a doctrine
    that you do not believe in. To me, that is going against
    your conscience, and when the day of judgement comes, and
    you have to personally account to Jehovah, what will you
    tell him?

    ME:
    Sorry, but i've never teached things that i do not believe
    in! So all the above statements are nonsense.
    I don't agree some points of WTB but i never teached them
    in Field service or in Congregation. I always discussed them
    directly with GB and Elders of my congregation. And MY decision
    was to wait until God will clarify that points.
    **********************************************************
    remember, it is the attitude that makes the apostates
    **********************************************************

    I WROTE:
    I can understand your point of view.
    Do you remember king Saul?
    Note that i do not want to compare GB with Saul, it's just
    an EXAMPLE.
    He represented the human organization of God, in the past.
    You know that he made a lot of mistakes.
    He also tried to kill David. So could you please explain me
    1 SAMUEL 26:11 ?
    Was David loyal to the Visible Organization or was he loyal
    to Jehovah?

    YOU WROTE:
    Huh? How have you proven to me that the GB is indeed to
    lord's annointed? That is your claim, not mine..
    How come you apply that to the GB, but not to any other
    church (Cathlolic, Protestant, etc)? What is the difference;
    all of these you mentioned are mere mortal imperfect men,
    doing the best that they can to try to 'reason' from the
    scriptures, right? After all, does the GB have any direct
    revelation from Jehovah, or just a self-made claim
    (via imperfect men) that they indeed are God's mouthpiece?

    ME:
    ....wait, wait, wait a minute!!
    I was not talking about GB.
    I was talking about Saul that represented the ancient
    organization of God. And i'm still waiting for the answer:
    Was David loyal to the visible Organization or was he
    loyal to Jehovah ?

    YOU WROTE:
    ....Explain to me how you are not:
    1.) Shunning ex-members
    2.) teaching stuff that you may not believe in (going
    against your conscience)
    3.) stayed seperate from the 'world'
    All of the above is based on a man made claim that they are
    god's mouthpiece.

    ME:
    1- Why did you said i'm not shunning ex-members ?
    2- Why did you said i'm teaching stuff i do not believe in ?
    3- Why did you said i'm not seperate from the 'world'?

    (I hope to have understood in the correct way! If not,
    please explain me again with simple words.)

    YOU WROTE:
    ...
    What if they are wrong, and they are NOT the lord's
    annointed ones? What do you think Jehovah will do when that
    judgement day comes, and you tell him that you followed
    these men, and he asks you why you followed imperfect men,
    went against your personal conscience, shunned your loved
    ones, and stayed seperate from the world, and rejecting
    people I sent to you because you thought they were of the
    world, when in-fact they were from me?

    ME:
    I will answer...
    <<Because ,after Jesus, you did not provide any perfect man
    to follow.
    Because i've passed 18 years of my life in another religion
    and i used other years to study other religions again...but
    i found the Fruits of the Spirits only through JW's.
    I know they are imperfect (as per myself) but i made this
    choice in armony with my studies and my conscience.
    So, now, if you want to reject me, i'm ready to die with the
    absolutely conviction that i made the right thing.>>

    But obviously, I'm sure this conversation will never happen.

    YOU WROTE:
    ...
    Please show me divine proof that the claim they make of
    being god's mouthpieice (the lord's annointed) is accurate.
    Otherwise, it is just their word, and they could be wrong,
    as we all know they are imperfect men.

    ME:
    Maybe you do not remember that your above statements are
    exactly the same Jesus was talking about in Matthew 12:38-39.
    see also:
    Luke 23:8
    2 Cor 5:7

    John 13:35.... I found this kind of love inside the JW
    organization. If you found it in some other organization, ok!
    Stay there. But when that day will came, remember that
    somebody knocked at your door.

    Regards.
    Frank
    P.S.
    please do not consider my late answers as a try to escape.
    I've also the other thread with a long message to translate
    again!

  • ItsJustlittleoldme
    ItsJustlittleoldme
    Yesterday I had a car accident so i could not leave for Austria.
    I've read your message wherein you wrote that a lot of Jw run
    away in the middle of conversation.

    I am very sorry to hear this.. I hope you have a speedy recovery, and that no-one was seriously hurt.

    Please consider (as you know) that all Jw are really busy.
    Job...Family...Congregation...Field service...personal study
    ...ect..ect.., we really have not a lot of free-time to converse
    in newsgroups.

    Hmmm, sounds like a case of needing some balance. Everyone has a family, job, and other responsibilities.. However, I was told by all the JW's that I know that they have 'little or no time'.. Sounds like a recurring theme. I do not question that you are busy, I just find it interesting that Jehovah's chosen people have so little time in their lives that they have a hard time finding spare time for something that is of such importance (life/death) to Jehovah. After all, I was told that nothing is more important than to spread the word and to make diciples. How sad that Jehovah's people are kept sooo busy that this becomes a chore for them. Maybe the people 'tending to the flock' need to make a few adjustments, because it really is giving Jehovah's people a bad name. I would expect Jehovah's people to be better balanced. Everyone else in the world can and does make time for their most important duties. (Please don't take offense, like I said before, I REALLY appreciate you answering these questions, and continuing the dialog. I am learning alot from it)

    Anyway, now I'm really sick. I've problems with my neck and
    for some days i can not move the head. (i 've a lace around the
    neck...i don not know the English name) BUT i'm here to answer
    your last messagge.

    I am VERY sorry to hear this... I will say a prayer for your speedy recovery!

    I don't want you could say i escaped the conversation, but please
    consider i will need a little bit of time for every message
    for the above reason.

    I didn't say that, if you will check I wished you a safe trip, and was looking forward to your reply when you returned.. If you didn't reply in a week or so then I would have said that, but I have no reason at the moment to question that you will not reply. You have replied to me every time in a thought provoking manner.

    YOU ANSWERED:
    I have a couple of questions for this one:
    1.) If god knows that all churches are run by imperfect men,
    why would god pick just one group of imperfect men above
    all others and state "These imperfect men are going to be my
    mouthpiece" whereas all the other imperfect men are tools
    of Satan?

    ME:
    You should ask it to God, not to me!
    Why God pick one group of persons (Israel) and state
    <<this is my people>> ?
    and more important:
    Why God guided his ancient people through imperfect men like
    Moses or the Judges and not through perfect angels?
    (Isaiah 55:8-9)

    No, I should ask it of you, because no-one has proven to me that your organization represents god any more or any less than any other Christian church. You (or your organization) are the one that has made the claim to be God's sole channel of Communication here on Earth. That is a statement that has not been proven yet.

    Oh, and while moses was being guided, did Moses EVER once do something different than what god told him to do? While under God's inspiration, Moses (or anyone else) did NOT make any mistakes. If you think otherwise, then I would have to ask how come you have absolute faith that the bible is God's word, as we know that the bible was written by mere imperfect men, yet we both agree that the bible is the absolute word of god. The reason is because (I assume, correct me if I'm wrong) we both agree that the writers were inspired by god when they wrote everything. They were mere men, and made errors, but while under the direction of God, not a single error was made.

    YOU WROTE:
    2.) Is it possible that the 'church' Jehovah was talking
    about is not a physical entity, but rather the person? So
    instead of having a congregation of church goers that all
    belong to a single denomination (JW's, Catholics, Protestants
    etc) anyone who professes and believes in Christ Jesus and
    what he did for us belongs to a world-wide brotherhood of
    Christian? If, as the bible says, you should have a personal
    relationship with God through Jesus, why do we even need a
    man-made imperfect church in the middle of that relationship?

    ME:
    I do not think so. The bible is clear. In the first century
    there was a real Church of God composed by Apostoles, Elders, ect..
    They had meetings and they used to go in field service.
    Acts 15:6
    Acts 15:4
    Acts 15:2
    Ebrew 10:25
    Acts 20:20

    All Bible quotes are from the NIV.

    Acts 15:1-11

    1 Some men came down from Judea to Antioch and were teaching the brothers: "Unless you are circumcised, according to the custom taught by Moses, you cannot be saved." 2 This brought Paul and Barnabas into sharp dispute and debate with them. So Paul and Barnabas were appointed, along with some other believers, to go up to Jerusalem to see the apostles and elders about this question. 3 The church sent them on their way, and as they traveled through Phoenicia and Samaria, they told how the Gentiles had been converted. This news made all the brothers very glad. 4 When they came to Jerusalem, they were welcomed by the church and the apostles and elders, to whom they reported everything God had done through them.
    5 Then some of the believers who belonged to the party of the Pharisees stood up and said, "The Gentiles must be circumcised and required to obey the law of Moses."
    6 The apostles and elders met to consider this question. 7 After much discussion, Peter got up and addressed them: "Brothers, you know that some time ago God made a choice among you that the Gentiles might hear from my lips the message of the gospel and believe. 8 God, who knows the heart, showed that he accepted them by giving the Holy Spirit to them, just as he did to us. 9 He made no distinction between us and them, for he purified their hearts by faith. 10 Now then, why do you try to test God by putting on the necks of the disciples a yoke that neither we nor our fathers have been able to bear? 11 No! We believe it is through the grace of our Lord Jesus that we are saved, just as they are."

    Hebrews 10:25

    25 Let us not give up meeting together, as some are in the habit of doing, but let us encourage one another--and all the more as you see the Day approaching.

    Acts 20:20

    20 You know that I have not hesitated to preach anything that would be helpful to you but have taught you publicly and from house to house.

    Yes, I agree there was a 'church' in the first century, however, I believe there is a story in the bible about a Eunic who had a question, the question was answered, he was then baptized that very same day, and then went along allowing the holy spirit to take him away and continue teaching him. Doesn't sound like he needed a church to be baptized and allow the holy spirit to be in him. Also, I find it very interesting the last few scriptures in Acts 15, don't you? Clearly, one's heart is purified by FAITH, not by works, there is an admonishment about being caught up in the law (Yoke), and above all, the apostles believed "It was through the grace of our Lord Jesus that we are saved, just as they are". -- > No rule books, no monthly 'time keeping' cards, and no mention of being a mandatory member of a church to be saved!

    I agree with Hebrews also, in that loved ones should gather together, it should be a habit, and they should encourage one-another. But I also seem to remember somewhere in the bible it stating something to the effect of "Wherever two or three are gathered in my name, I will be there".. That scripture doesn't say anything about needing a church for Jesus/God to be with you, it just simply states that he will be with us when we allow us to be with him... I would assume that you and your family continually talk/study at home etc and encourage one another outside of the Kingdom Hall.. Do you believe that you can do that without the Kingdom hall? Obviously, because I'm sure you do your study (as you mentioned at the beginning of this message as to a reason why you are busy) at home with your family. All the Christian religions that I know about believe that the church is not nessicarily needed for salvation.. It's a tool used to help one get closer to a personal relationship with our Saviour, but it is not needed to be saved.

    Acts 20:20 clearly states that yep, you should go house to house. However, just like the JW's believe that the 144,000 is a literal number of people who will be annointed, they reject the other literal part of that scripture that states that the 144,000 are made up of virgin males. They claim that is a 'figurative' saying (I believe). Well, most Christian denominations that I know of believe that the 'going from house to house' is a figurative saying. It was probably true in the day of Christ, as there were no telephones/postal mail/email/Internet etc.. so the only way one could get the message of the good news out was to go from house to house, but the very fact that you and I are exchanging these messages means you and I are both getting our message of the good news out. So, yep, I agree with Acts 20:20, but not in the literal sense that you believe. And, since we are all imperfect humans, who can say that you are more right than I am, or vice versa. Who would I be to say that the 144,000 is comprised of only Male Virgins as the bible states. Either one of us, or both of us could be wrong. And that is my whole point, if the GB admits they are fallable and have made errors in the past, and will continue to make errors in the future (New light) then how can they claim to be the sole channel of communication on Earth for God? Doesn't the GB have any proof of this claim?

    YOU WROTE:
    3.) Are you stating that the Roman Catholic Church, or any
    other church except the JW's are committing voluntary sin?
    How so? How do you know that it is just the imperfections
    of the men that misinterpreted what the bible states?

    ME:
    Do you remember what Jesus stated in Matthew 7: 16-20 ?
    and Matthew 7: 21-24 ?
    and Matthew 15:3 ?
    and Matthew 15:9 ?
    and Matthew 15:19-20a ?
    The volountary sins I was talking about are the same you
    can find in the above scriptures. Nothing more, nothing less.

    Matthew 7:1-24

    1 "Do not judge, or you too will be judged. 2 For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.
    3 "Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? 4 How can you say to your brother, 'Let me take the speck out of your eye,' when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? 5 You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye. 6 "Do not give dogs what is sacred; do not throw your pearls to pigs. If you do, they may trample them under their feet, and then turn and tear you to pieces. 7 "Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you. 8 For everyone who asks receives; he who seeks finds; and to him who knocks, the door will be opened. 9 "Which of you, if his son asks for bread, will give him a stone? 10 Or if he asks for a fish, will give him a snake? 11 If you, then, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father in heaven give good gifts to those who ask him! 12 So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets. 13 "Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. 14 But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it. 15 "Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. 16 By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? 17 Likewise every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them.
    21 "Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22 Many will say to me on that day, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?' 23 Then I will tell them plainly, 'I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!' 24 "Therefore everyone who hears these words of mine and puts them into practice is like a wise man who built his house on the rock.

    Matthew 15:1-20

    1 Then some Pharisees and teachers of the law came to Jesus from Jerusalem and asked, 2 "Why do your disciples break the tradition of the elders? They don't wash their hands before they eat!" 3 Jesus replied, "And why do you break the command of God for the sake of your tradition? 4 For God said, 'Honor your father and mother' [1] and 'Anyone who curses his father or mother must be put to death.' [2] 5 But you say that if a man says to his father or mother, 'Whatever help you might otherwise have received from me is a gift devoted to God,' 6 he is not to 'honor his father [3] ' with it. Thus you nullify the word of God for the sake of your tradition. 7 You hypocrites! Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you: 8 " 'These people honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me. 9 They worship me in vain; their teachings are but rules taught by men.' [4] " 10 Jesus called the crowd to him and said, "Listen and understand. 11 What goes into a man's mouth does not make him 'unclean,' but what comes out of his mouth, that is what makes him 'unclean.' " 12 Then the disciples came to him and asked, "Do you know that the Pharisees were offended when they heard this?" 13 He replied, "Every plant that my heavenly Father has not planted will be pulled up by the roots. 14 Leave them; they are blind guides. [5] If a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit." 15 Peter said, "Explain the parable to us." 16 "Are you still so dull?" Jesus asked them. 17 "Don't you see that whatever enters the mouth goes into the stomach and then out of the body? 18 But the things that come out of the mouth come from the heart, and these make a man 'unclean.' 19 For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, slander. 20 These are what make a man 'unclean'; but eating with unwashed hands does not make him 'unclean.' "

    Are you claiming that the 'love' you have amongst yourselves is somehow better or deeper than the love people have in other Christian denominations? Although I cannot comment on the love within the JW organization (never having been one myself), I can personally attest to the fact that I have seen love from many people of all Christian denominations, enough that I consider some people my brothers and sisters, although we are not family related. More over, the love I have felt from other Christian denominations is not based on my love and loyalty to an organization. I also think that would be very arrogant of anyone who thought they were part of an elite 6 million people on Earth that are the only people that can and do love each other. Anyone believing in the good news of the bible will have true honest Christian love for one another. And I've found many of these people in my life, of all different Christian denominations.

    YOU WROTE:
    No, you never stated that you will follow the errors. What
    you did state was that you would continue to be loyal.
    Loyalty implies that you will follow, and following someone
    you believe to have errored is forgoeing your conscience
    and is the same as committing the error itself?

    ME:
    I don't think so!
    I repeat my previous question:
    could you please explain me 1 SAMUEL 26:11 ?
    Was David loyal to the Visible Organization or was he loyal
    to Jehovah?

    1 Sam 26:11 But the Lord forbid that I should lay a hand on the Lord 's anointed. Now get the spear and water jug that are near his head, and let's go."

    Yup, the Lord says you should not harm his people... David was loyal to Jehovah, the LORD stated that you should not lay a hand on his people, and he didn't. Again, however, you have NOT proven that the organization is the lords exclusive chosen people.

    YOU WROTE:
    I'll give you an example: Let's say that new light comes out
    from the GB (doctrine x).. You disagree with doctrine x,
    and even contact the GB about it.. They say, that is the
    correct interpretation, sorry you do not agree with us, but
    doctrine x stands.
    Now, to be 'pleasing to god' you are taught to go in field
    service.. So, you go out in field service, and you meet
    someone who asks about doctrine x. You now have a choice,
    you can be loyal to the organization, and teach them doctrine
    x all the while believing it to be in error, or you can tell
    them that you do not believe in doctrine x in which case you
    would become an apostate, right? So, out of loyalty to the
    organization, you now teach or at least support a doctrine
    that you do not believe in. To me, that is going against
    your conscience, and when the day of judgement comes, and
    you have to personally account to Jehovah, what will you
    tell him?

    ME:
    Sorry, but i've never teached things that i do not believe
    in! So all the above statements are nonsense.
    I don't agree some points of WTB but i never teached them
    in Field service or in Congregation. I always discussed them
    directly with GB and Elders of my congregation. And MY decision
    was to wait until God will clarify that points.
    **********************************************************
    remember, it is the attitude that makes the apostates
    **********************************************************

    Ok, answer me this one: You go out in Field Service, and someone asks you a question about doctrine X, which you do not believe is correct, but the organization states that the answer to doctrine X is YYY (you think it is ZZZ).. Do you teach the person YYY or ZZZ? If you teach him YYY you are not being loyal to your conscience, as you don't believe YYY; If you teach the person ZZZ you are not being loyal to the organization that states 'this is what it is'. If you decide not to teach, the organization will state that you are spiritually weak, yet you obviously have a very deep love for Jehovah, and just have a conscientious objection to one of the doctrines (let's say it is a small doctrine, nothing even very big) you are classified as spiritually weak. So, what do you do?

    I WROTE:
    I can understand your point of view.
    Do you remember king Saul?
    Note that i do not want to compare GB with Saul, it's just
    an EXAMPLE.
    He represented the human organization of God, in the past.
    You know that he made a lot of mistakes.
    He also tried to kill David. So could you please explain me
    1 SAMUEL 26:11 ?
    Was David loyal to the Visible Organization or was he loyal
    to Jehovah?

    David was loyal to Jehovah, as I don't even see a visible organization there; and it was clearly Jehovah's wish not to have anyone lay a hand on his annointed. But, then the question still remains for which you have shown no proof.. How do you know that the organization's annointed are the only annointed that are 'gods annointed'?

    YOU WROTE:
    Huh? How have you proven to me that the GB is indeed to
    lord's annointed? That is your claim, not mine..
    How come you apply that to the GB, but not to any other
    church (Cathlolic, Protestant, etc)? What is the difference;
    all of these you mentioned are mere mortal imperfect men,
    doing the best that they can to try to 'reason' from the
    scriptures, right? After all, does the GB have any direct
    revelation from Jehovah, or just a self-made claim
    (via imperfect men) that they indeed are God's mouthpiece?

    ME:
    ....wait, wait, wait a minute!!
    I was not talking about GB.
    I was talking about Saul that represented the ancient
    organization of God. And i'm still waiting for the answer:
    Was David loyal to the visible Organization or was he
    loyal to Jehovah ?

    David was loyal to Jehovah.

    YOU WROTE:
    ....Explain to me how you are not:
    1.) Shunning ex-members
    2.) teaching stuff that you may not believe in (going
    against your conscience)
    3.) stayed seperate from the 'world'
    All of the above is based on a man made claim that they are
    god's mouthpiece.

    ME:
    1- Why did you said i'm not shunning ex-members ?
    2- Why did you said i'm teaching stuff i do not believe in ?
    3- Why did you said i'm not seperate from the 'world'?

    (I hope to have understood in the correct way! If not,
    please explain me again with simple words.)

    I'm not sure how you took that, I didn't mean any offense if that was what you took it as.. As a JW, I am under the impression that it is your 'duty' to shun ex-members, stay seperate from the world, and to teach what the society believes to be true on any given day. That was my statement, that you as a JW in good standing would be following these directives. (Correct me if I am wrong). To which, I replied:

    YOU WROTE:
    ...
    What if they are wrong, and they are NOT the lord's
    annointed ones? What do you think Jehovah will do when that
    judgement day comes, and you tell him that you followed
    these men, and he asks you why you followed imperfect men,
    went against your personal conscience, shunned your loved
    ones, and stayed seperate from the world, and rejecting
    people I sent to you because you thought they were of the
    world, when in-fact they were from me?

    ME:
    I will answer...
    <<Because ,after Jesus, you did not provide any perfect man
    to follow.
    Because i've passed 18 years of my life in another religion
    and i used other years to study other religions again...but
    i found the Fruits of the Spirits only through JW's.
    I know they are imperfect (as per myself) but i made this
    choice in armony with my studies and my conscience.
    So, now, if you want to reject me, i'm ready to die with the
    absolutely conviction that i made the right thing.>>
    But obviously, I'm sure this conversation will never happen.

    Uhhh, you would actually say to Jehovah, "So now if you want to reject me, I'm ready to die with the absolute conviction that I made the right thing".. Whoa! I don't know about you, but I plan on being alot more humble towards my creator.

    Anyway, for you, you believe that the JW's have the "spirit as manifested by their fruits".. I can attest to the fact that many Christians who are not JW's believe that they too have found evidence of genuine Christian fruits in others.

    Oh, and are you sure that Jehovah's/Jesus' answer to you about; "Because ,after Jesus, you did not provide any perfect man to follow." isn't going to be something along the lines of where did you get the idea that you were to follow man? Then he'll probably point to a scripture about the Pharisee's...

    And, the bottom line question remains: On what authority does the WT claim that you must follow them in order to have a hope for salvation? I have yet to see any proof.

    YOU WROTE:
    ...
    Please show me divine proof that the claim they make of
    being god's mouthpieice (the lord's annointed) is accurate.
    Otherwise, it is just their word, and they could be wrong,
    as we all know they are imperfect men.

    ME:
    Maybe you do not remember that your above statements are
    exactly the same Jesus was talking about in Matthew 12:38-39.
    see also:
    Luke 23:8
    2 Cor 5:7

    Matthew 12:38-39 38 Then some of the Pharisees and teachers of the law said to him, "Teacher, we want to see a miraculous sign from you."
    39 He answered, "A wicked and adulterous generation asks for a miraculous sign! But none will be given it except the sign of the prophet Jonah.

    Luke 23:8 8 When Herod saw Jesus, he was greatly pleased, because for a long time he had been wanting to see him. From what he had heard about him, he hoped to see him perform some miracle.

    Ok, so you are stating that the WTBTS of New York is a prophet, and in that case is subject to the tests in the bible of Prophets? Basically, to be a prophet from god, they have to prophesy in god's name, and what was said in god's name has to come true. (I.E. while speaking for God, absolute unwaivering truth has to be told -- no new light, no nothing -- plain and simple, what is said is in fact exactly what happens). If a prophet claims to prophesy in God's name, and that does NOT come true, then the prophet is a false prophet, God did not send them, and you should not be afraid of that one (I think there is even something in there about that prophet shall die).

    So, we now have the test to see if indeed the WT is as they claim to be.. I'll tell ya what, you look up any prophesies that the WT made (in print) in God's name that came true, and I'll see if I can find a prophesy that they stated in God's name that did not come true.

    2 Cor 5:7 We live by faith, not by sight.

    Then why do you need a visible organization?

    John 13:35 35 By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another."

    John 13:35.... I found this kind of love inside the JW
    organization. If you found it in some other organization, ok!
    Stay there. But when that day will came, remember that
    somebody knocked at your door.

    I am very happy that you have found the love that you were looking for within the organization. My question is why do you believe that this love is not found outside the organization as well? I am sure that there are some people on this board (ex-jw's) who have found love outside of the organization, and hopefully some of them will attest to it here.. I can attest to the fact that I have plenty of love, and have yet to see any love from a JW that is 'better' than the love bonds that I already have.

    Oh, and the part where you say to remember that someone knocked on my door is only valid if indeed your organization is a prophet sent from God. That should be easily proven/disproven, as we are both going to look up their 'record' of prophesies that they spoke claiming they were from god, and see if they came true or not (As per biblical tests for prophets). If they are proven correct, and I do not heed their warning, then yes, I will have to answer to Jehovah on why I rejected his people's message. On the other hand, if they did prophecy even once in the name of God and that prophecy did not come true, then your warning will apply to you, and not me. (Get out of her, she is a false prophet, do not be afraid of her, and that prophet will certainly die)

    please do not consider my late answers as a try to escape.
    I've also the other thread with a long message to t

    No, I do not consider the delay in any way shape or form a way to avoid the questions. You stated that you would be away for a week, so I wasn't expecting an answer until you returned.. Had you not answered after you returned, then I would have chalked up your non-answer as avoiding the questions, but you have given me no reason as yet to question your intentions to reply to my questions. Of this I can say thank you, I appreciate it very much..

    I look forward to your replies, and until then, I shall say a prayer that you have a speedy recovery, and wish you peace.

    Edited by - ItsJustlittleoldme on 21 June 2002 10:48:15

  • perspicacia2
    perspicacia2

    Hallo. I'm back.
    Thanks for your consideration about my car accident.
    Now i'm ok.

    YOU WROTE:
    ...Everyone else in the world can and does make time for their
    most important duties...

    ME:
    You right. That's why we have no time for NewsGroups.
    Your words sound like a judgement. I never said you have no
    balance in your life, so why did you say (or suppose) that
    for the life of Jw's ?
    Never elevate ourself to a position of a judge. Don't you agree?

    YOU WROTE:
    I am VERY sorry to hear this... I will say a prayer for your
    speedy recovery!

    ME:
    Thanks. I REALLY appreciate your action.

    YOU WROTE:
    ...Oh, and while moses was being guided, did Moses EVER once do
    something different than what god told him to do? While under
    God's inspiration, Moses (or anyone else) did NOT make any
    mistakes...

    ME:
    Moses made a lot of mistakes. For this reason he was not
    able to enter into Promise-Land. He had to use his free will
    everyday for every action. But when we talk about Moses
    <<the Writer>> the thing is different.
    God moved the hand of Moses. Moses was just like a secretary.
    He wrote under inspiration. But today, this divine inspiration
    no more exist. see 1 cor. 13:8b-9-10

    YOU WROTE:
    Yes, I agree there was a 'church' in the first century..

    ME:
    That's good.

    YOU WROTE:
    however, I believe there is a story in the bible about a
    Eunic who had a question, the question was answered, he was
    then baptized that very same day, and then went along allowing
    the holy spirit to take him away and continue teaching him.
    Doesn't sound like he needed a church to be baptized and
    allow the holy spirit to be in him.

    ME:
    The question is: <<Was the Church (Organization) necessary
    or not ? moreover, is it NOW necessary or not?>>
    If you read carefully the story of Eunuc, you can check that
    he was going to Gerusalem to worship. So he was going into
    the temple of his Church. That's mean the Eunuc recognized
    to need a Temple and to need the organization all around the
    Temple.
    This story, on the contrary, support the idea that we need a
    Organization. If not, why the Angel sent Philip to explain
    the Bible? The Angel directly could explain the Bible to the
    Eunuc. Moreover, why God did not let the Eunuc able to
    understand the Bible by himself?
    Why the first Christians recognized to need an Organization,
    as you confirmed in above statement ?

    YOU WROTE:
    Also, I find it very interesting the last few scriptures in
    Acts 15, don't you? Clearly, one's heart is purified by
    FAITH, not by works...

    ME:
    Yes, you right! The faith first of all....but after ?! This
    verse do not say <<anything>> about the "after"! What about
    James 2:26 ?
    And what about Act 14:27 ?
    and Act 9:26 ?

    There are a lot of scriptures that show us the first disceples
    was organized in a Church.

    YOU WROTE:
    Wherever two or three are gathered in my name, I will be
    there".. That scripture doesn't say anything about needing a
    church for Jesus/God to be with you, it just simply states
    that he will be with us when we allow us to be with him...

    ME:
    It's too simple to stay togheter in the NAME of Jesus and
    pretend that he is really with us!
    We have to link this sentence with Matthew 7:21 and with Matthew
    28:19-20.
    The first thing is to obey to the commands of Jesus.
    And the first Christians understood that to do that, it was
    necessary a Church. Take also note that they was guided by
    the Holy Spirit. So if they considered necessary to organize
    themself in a Church, it is clear the The Holy Spirit guided
    that choice. See Act 15:28

    YOU WROTE:
    Acts 20:20 clearly states that yep, you should go house to
    house....claim that is a 'figurative' saying (I believe).
    Well, most Christian denominations that I know of believe
    that the 'going from house to house' is a figurative saying.
    It was probably true in the day of Christ, as there were
    no telephones/postal mail/email/Internet etc..

    ME:
    Here...i've some problem to understand your point of view
    (even if i respect it).
    You said that It was probably true in the day of Christ but
    NOW is figurative!
    Why today should it be figurative ? There is no reason.
    Maybe because it is not simple ? But Jesus said the street
    of the truth is not simple!
    You right when you say that now there is Internet, telephone,
    ect.. and we use also this instruments to talk about GoodNews...
    but why say that <<house to house>> is NOW figurative?!
    About the 144000....see the bottom of this message.

    YOU WROTE:
    ...More over, the love I have felt from other Christian
    denominations is not based on my love and loyalty to an
    organization. I also think that would be very arrogant of
    anyone who thought they were part of an elite 6 million
    people on Earth that are the only people that can and do
    love each other...

    ME:
    Maybe the ancient peoples thought the same things about Israel
    due to the claim they were people of God. But this did not
    changed the reality...they really were the people of God.
    They were the Visible organization of God and only among
    them the law of God acted.
    But.....as i told you in a previous message; if you think to
    have found this kind of love in another organization..OK! I'm
    happy for you. We have just to wait the big A (if you believe
    in it).

    YOU WROTE:
    David was loyal to Jehovah, the LORD stated that you should
    not lay a hand on his people, and he didn't...

    ME:
    I just wanted to explain that Saul (king of ancient people of
    God) was anointed one even after the big mistakes he did!
    David didn't say: "..Oh! Since you have made big mistakes...
    i do not more consider you as anointed!"
    To be loyal to God means to understand that even the anointed
    ones can make mistakes. To be loyal to the organization of God
    means to be loyal to God. That's what I believe in.

    YOU WROTE:
    Ok, answer me this one: You go out in Field Service, and
    someone asks you a question about doctrine X, which you do
    not believe is correct, but the organization states that the
    answer to doctrine X is YYY (you think it is ZZZ).. Do you
    teach the person YYY or ZZZ? If you teach him YYY you are
    not being loyal to your conscience, as you don't believe YYY;
    If you teach the person ZZZ you are not being loyal to the
    organization that states 'this is what it is'. If you decide
    not to teach, the organization will state that you are
    spiritually weak, yet you obviously have a very deep love
    for Jehovah, and just have a conscientious objection to one
    of the doctrines (let's say it is a small doctrine, nothing
    even very big) you are classified as spiritually weak.
    So, what do you do?

    ME:
    I'll show what the bible states and let the person decide by
    himself. (obviously we are talking about a small point)

    YOU WROTE:
    How do you know that the organization's annointed are the
    only annointed that are 'gods annointed'?

    ME:
    see the bottom of this message.

    YOU WROTE:
    ...Whoa! I don't know about you, but I plan on being alot
    more humble towards my creator.

    ME:
    I think that everybody should be convinced that his Church
    is the right one. If not...all the streets could take you in
    Rome (as we say in Italy).

    YOU WROTE:
    ...Then why do you need a visible organization?

    ME:
    For the same reason the first Christians needed it.
    For the same reason the Holy Spirit approved it.
    Nothing less...nothing more...

    YOU WROTE:
    ...My question is why do you believe that this love is not
    found outside the organization as well...

    ME:
    Never said that!!!
    I said that if you have found it outside the BORG...i'm
    happy for you! I can not judge anyone!
    But do not forget Ephesians 4:4-5.

    And now:
    What about GB, 144000, ect.. ect.. ???

    I think we should understand first if God required an
    Organized Church. Only after that, we could speak about the
    identity of this Church.
    If you are not convinced that NOW as in the PAST God has
    a real Church...is useless to talk about the anointed ones.

    YOU WROTE:
    I shall say a prayer that you have a speedy recovery,
    and wish you peace.

    ME:
    Thanks. I also prayed to have the opportunity to meet you
    in the New World. (hoping that I will be considered worthy
    to be there!)

    Regards
    Frank

  • ItsJustlittleoldme
    ItsJustlittleoldme
    Hallo. I'm back.
    Thanks for your consideration about my car accident.
    Now i'm ok.

    I am very happy to hear that you are ok.

    YOU WROTE:
    ...Everyone else in the world can and does make time for their
    most important duties...

    ME:
    You right. That's why we have no time for NewsGroups.
    Your words sound like a judgement. I never said you have no
    balance in your life, so why did you say (or suppose) that
    for the life of Jw's ?
    Never elevate ourself to a position of a judge. Don't you agree?

    I agree that we shouldn't judge, however, I do feel that because all JW's profess that they are in unity with one another, and since I've had personal experience with many (8+) JW's who all suddenly 'don't have time' I was making an observation. Again, I am very happy that you took time out of your busy schedule to reply to me, as I am you.

    Speaking of judging others, would you answer me a question honestly:

    If Armageddon happened right now (This very instant), and I am certainly not one of Jehovah's Witnesses, in fact I have signifigant questions as to the claim that the organization is god's channel, do you REALISTICALLY believe that I will be saved from Jehovah's wrath? -- I've been to MANY KH meetings where the speaker is constantly re-enforcing that very premise, that "JW's are the only one's with a realistic hope of making it through the big A".. So, if you answer differs from what I've heard many times from the podium, I'd love to hear your explanation. And if it is in unity with all the other JW's I've talked to, I'd love to hear you explain how that is not judging me, in this case judging me as unworthy of Jehovah, especially in the light that we have already agreed that the organization is made of imperfect humans who can make mistakes, and it could be possible that they have made a mistake and they are NOT god's channel. (unless of course you have divine proof of such claim, in which case show it to me, and I'll be a JW tomorrow happily going from door-to-door) If they are not god's channel, and you view everyone that has sworn allegience to the organization as the only one's that have a 'realistic' chance of being saved, how do you think Jehovah will judge you?

    I made an observation based on about 10 experiences I've had over the years, where all of the JW's claim to be in unity with one another (In fact, they boast of that fact!), and all of them use the exact same reasons over and over again for different things. Your organization makes the claim that anyone not of the organization is part of satan's world, and has no realistic hope of being 'hidden' in the day of Jehovah's anger. Please compare my observation to your view of the world, and tell me who appears to be passing judgement on who?

    YOU WROTE:
    ...Oh, and while moses was being guided, did Moses EVER once do
    something different than what god told him to do? While under
    God's inspiration, Moses (or anyone else) did NOT make any
    mistakes...

    ME:
    Moses made a lot of mistakes. For this reason he was not
    able to enter into Promise-Land. He had to use his free will
    everyday for every action. But when we talk about Moses
    <<the Writer>> the thing is different.
    God moved the hand of Moses. Moses was just like a secretary.
    He wrote under inspiration. But today, this divine inspiration
    no more exist. see 1 cor. 13:8b-9-10

    Yes, I agree, Moses made alot of mistakes, and yes, he was even forbidden to enter the promised land, however, did MOSES complete Jehovah's will for him; I.E. did moses via Jehovah's blessing get his people to the promised land? And during that journey, did moses EVER once state anything to his people that did not come true? Did he mislead the people in anyway, and give them ANY reason to question that he was acting on authority from god? I don't believe so, (I'm sure you will put scripture here if indeed I am wrong), so in that case, why would Jehovah take his chosen people and allow them to cause some of his flock to question the authority that he has vested in his people (I'm referring to the organization here, which has made many mistakes over the years that have caused many to stumble).. Show me one example where Moses caused someone to stumble and feel that Moses was not acting under God's authority.

    YOU WROTE:
    Yes, I agree there was a 'church' in the first century..

    ME:
    That's good.

    Yeah, but I didn't say that a church is NECCESARY for salvation. The church is a tool used to help a person form a personal relationship with god, I never said that it was required to be between god and man.

    YOU WROTE:
    however, I believe there is a story in the bible about a
    Eunic who had a question, the question was answered, he was
    then baptized that very same day, and then went along allowing
    the holy spirit to take him away and continue teaching him.
    Doesn't sound like he needed a church to be baptized and
    allow the holy spirit to be in him.

    ME:
    The question is: <<Was the Church (Organization) necessary
    or not ? moreover, is it NOW necessary or not?>>
    If you read carefully the story of Eunuc, you can check that
    he was going to Gerusalem to worship. So he was going into
    the temple of his Church. That's mean the Eunuc recognized
    to need a Temple and to need the organization all around the
    Temple.
    This story, on the contrary, support the idea that we need a
    Organization. If not, why the Angel sent Philip to explain
    the Bible? The Angel directly could explain the Bible to the
    Eunuc. Moreover, why God did not let the Eunuc able to
    understand the Bible by himself?
    Why the first Christians recognized to need an Organization,
    as you confirmed in above statement ?

    Again, I do not believe that you need an organization or a church. The church/organization is used as a tool to help you foster a personal relationship with god, it is not nessecary for salvation. Are you in some way stating that Jehovah is going to look at our 'record' and say that he never spent time in Church/Kingdom Hall, and because of that he is not worthy of my love, and will not be hidden in my day of anger? I believe the JW's (as do I) believe that Jehovah looks at an individuals heart condition, and that alone is how Jehovah judges. So, by stating that you need an organization, you are stating that people in parts of this world who do not worship in an organized fashion have no chance of being hidden on Jehovah's day of anger? Is that what you are stating? Are you similairily stating that people who do not go to church/Kingdom halls on a regular basis will not be hidden in the day of Jehovah's anger? Are you stating that Jehovah's undeserved kindness and love for us hinges on us belonging to a church/organization? Could it be, like I said before, that the 'orgainization' of which you speak is the 'organization' of people from all nations in all parts of the world who believe in Jesus, and what he did for us?

    YOU WROTE:
    Also, I find it very interesting the last few scriptures in
    Acts 15, don't you? Clearly, one's heart is purified by
    FAITH, not by works...

    ME:
    Yes, you right! The faith first of all....but after ?! This
    verse do not say <<anything>> about the "after"! What about
    James 2:26 ?
    And what about Act 14:27 ?
    and Act 9:26 ?

    James 2:24-26

    24 You see that a person is justified by what he does and not by faith alone.
    25 In the same way, was not even Rahab the prostitute considered righteous for what she did when she gave lodging to the spies and sent them off in a different direction? 26 As the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without deeds is dead.

    Acts 14:26-28

    26 From Attalia they sailed back to Antioch, where they had been committed to the grace of God for the work they had now completed. 27 On arriving there, they gathered the church together and reported all that God had done through them and how he had opened the door of faith to the Gentiles. 28 And they stayed there a long time with the disciples.

    Sorry, I don't see how acts 9:26 applies to this one.. Maybe you can explain that to me..

    I fully agree with the above scriptures, and they are in harmony with what I believe. If one has faith, then one's heart will be motivated to show that faith by action (works). It is the faith that is the motivating factor here, not fear, or any other reason. You can show works (going out in field service, volunteering at the Kingdom hall etc) 24 hours a day, but if you do not have faith, it is worthless. Jehovah will see through that, and realize the only reason you were doing those things is because you were 'afraid' or being 'pressured' into it (peer pressure). True faith is it's own motivator, and if you have true faith, your heart will show through, and you will demonstrate that faith threw works. Works cannot make one believe, but believing will certainly make one work.

    What I've observed (i'm not passing judgement on them, just making an observation) from the mjority of JW's that I know, they seem to be motivated more by 'fear of god' and peer pressure than by faith. Those are NOT motivating factors that cultivate faith, those are motivatiing factors that cultivate works.

    For example, why is there such a push within the organization to go out in field service? I've been to meetings where they 'encourage' all the brothers and sisters to go out in the field ministry, and in fact, they even have defined hours for various pioneer (aux, special, regular) levels. They then follow that up with 'Wouldn't it be wonderful if you were out in the door-to-door' ministry when the big A starts, or 'maybe you can encourage some who are not active in the ministry work any longer to re-join our efforts'.

    Those seem to me to be peer pressure and fear tactics. Can you explain to me how they are not?

    Oh, and would you explain James 2:25 to me? How can someone be claimed Righteous if they practice sexual imorrality?

    There are a lot of scriptures that show us the first disceples
    was organized in a Church.

    Certainly, to get the word out, I agree with that, but show me in the bible where you have to be a member of a church to have a proper 'heart condition'. Show me in the bible where you MUST be a member of a church to be saved.

    YOU WROTE:
    Wherever two or three are gathered in my name, I will be
    there".. That scripture doesn't say anything about needing a
    church for Jesus/God to be with you, it just simply states
    that he will be with us when we allow us to be with him...

    ME:
    It's too simple to stay togheter in the NAME of Jesus and
    pretend that he is really with us!
    We have to link this sentence with Matthew 7:21 and with Matthew
    28:19-20.

    Matt 7:20 - 24

    20 Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them.
    21 "Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22 Many will say to me on that day, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?' 23 Then I will tell them plainly, 'I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!'

    Matt 28:19-20

    19 Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in [1] the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age."

    I agree whole heartedly, just calling on his name will not save one. One has to have true faith and believe in him. And if one has true faith, his heart condition will reflect such faith, and their 'fruit' will show through.

    The first thing is to obey to the commands of Jesus.
    And the first Christians understood that to do that, it was
    necessary a Church. Take also note that they was guided by
    the Holy Spirit. So if they considered necessary to organize
    themself in a Church, it is clear the The Holy Spirit guided
    that choice. See Act 15:28

    Acts 15:28-29

    28 It seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us not toburden you with anything beyond the following requirements: 29 You are to abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood, from the meat of strangled animals and from sexual immorality. You will do well to avoid these things. Farewell.

    Show me in those two above scriptues where it says that the following REQUIREMENT was to form a church? -- It clearly states what the REQUIREMENTS are, and I see no mention of a church being REQUIRED there!!!!

    Oh, and here is an interesting question, Are JW's allowed to eat meat from that of strangled animals?

    YOU WROTE:
    Acts 20:20 clearly states that yep, you should go house to
    house....claim that is a 'figurative' saying (I believe).
    Well, most Christian denominations that I know of believe
    that the 'going from house to house' is a figurative saying.
    It was probably true in the day of Christ, as there were
    no telephones/postal mail/email/Internet etc..

    ME:
    Here...i've some problem to understand your point of view
    (even if i respect it).
    You said that It was probably true in the day of Christ but
    NOW is figurative!
    Why today should it be figurative ? There is no reason.

    For the exact same reason that the JW's have decided arbitrarily that the 144,000 people are literal, but the male virgin jews part of that same scripture is figurative. Actually, my reason is better (I believe). When the bible was written, there was no email/fax/internet/telephone etc. You and I are shining examples of that in action at the moment. We are exchangin ideas about Christ, the bible, Jehovah, etc without actually being in the other's house -- We are figurativly in each other's house, but not literally.

    And I was told by a JW recently that they allow some JW's to use the phone to do bible studies. Sounds like even the JW's themselves are starting to realize there are other ways to reach people that by going door-to-door exclusivly.

    Maybe because it is not simple ? But Jesus said the street
    of the truth is not simple!
    You right when you say that now there is Internet, telephone,
    ect.. and we use also this instruments to talk about GoodNews...
    but why say that <<house to house>> is NOW figurative?!

    I didn't mean to state that going from house-to-house is a bad thing, I just dont' believe it is the only way any longer (using technology that the bible didn't know existed when it was created -- The exact same reason you use to justify the fact that blood transfusions are not allowed, but not specifically admonished in the bible)..

    If you are a missionary in a third world country, going door-to-door may be your only alternative. But here (In the USA anyway) there are many other avenues to get the word out. And I believe that is what the bible is saying, get the word out. When the bible was written there was no other way to get the word out, now there are. Do you agree with me that going door-to-door is to get the word out about the good news?

    Oh, and just to follow up on the previous subject, does it say to go door-to-door and make disciples, and make sure they goto church?

    YOU WROTE:
    ...More over, the love I have felt from other Christian
    denominations is not based on my love and loyalty to an
    organization. I also think that would be very arrogant of
    anyone who thought they were part of an elite 6 million
    people on Earth that are the only people that can and do
    love each other...

    ME:
    Maybe the ancient peoples thought the same things about Israel
    due to the claim they were people of God. But this did not
    changed the reality...they really were the people of God.
    They were the Visible organization of God and only among
    them the law of God acted.

    I'm not quite sure how you claim that the nation of Israel was a visible organization of god, in the same way that you are making claim to the JW organization. First, the entire nation of Israel was brought into a covenant by god, no-one certainly was required to get baptized into God's good graces, and more importantly, during that time, Jehovah DID NOT USE the 'organized' nation of Israel to do his work, he chose individuals to do his work. Now you are claiming to be in a covenant with god you must 'choose' to be one with god (unlike the nation of Israel) and that god is using the organization to do his will (again, different from when he picked Israel as his nation). Exactly what similiarities exist between your organization today and the nation of Israel?

    But.....as i told you in a previous message; if you think to
    have found this kind of love in another organization..OK! I'm
    happy for you. We have just to wait the big A (if you believe
    in it).

    I personally have not made a judgement either way, but I haven't seen any JW as yet show me how they arrive at the idea that their organization is what it claims to be. Therefor, I'm doing what I believe the bible states to do; That of don't pass judgement on others, and be true to what you believe, listen to everyone, but test everything and hold on to what is good and true.. Your ogranization has made a very lofty claim, and I've yet to see any proof of such claim. But I'm still willing to listen to anything you have to say. But do expect me to test what is true, according to scripture.

    More over, I've seen no evidence that the people within the JW organization have a better from of love that that which I've found outside of the organization. In fact, by the JW's own admissions, the love a JW has is conditional, upon the fact that you love the organization. They will continue to love and support you so long as you love and support the organization.. On the outside, I've found no such conditions, I can count on the love and support of my family and friends, as can they count on me. The love isn't based on the loyalty to a third party. Yes, my loyalty is to god first and foremost, (as is my friends and families first loyalty) but that does not interfere in my relationships, as it seems to interfere in the JW relationships (Loyalty to an organization that claims to be God's representative).

    I can be true to my conscience and still have the full support of my friends and family, even if my conscience disagrees with someone else's interpretation over matters. I'm not viewed as spiritually weak, but as an individual that has a different view/interpretation. JW's, on the other hand, seem to be viewed as spiritually weak if they have different views, and are told to be careful of association with people spiritually weak, therefor, if a JW has a different conscientious interpretation of something than that of the GB, their relationships with friends and family may and due suffer because of it. I am free to express my conscience, while the JW's fear losing their friends and family if they express theirs. Can you explain to me how this is freedom (The freedom as expressed in the bible, never shall you be 'yoked' in the slavery of the law again) , or have I misinterpreted what I've heard at the KH meetings, and read in your literature? If I have misinterpreted this, can you explain to me how it really works?

    YOU WROTE:
    David was loyal to Jehovah, the LORD stated that you should
    not lay a hand on his people, and he didn't...

    ME:
    I just wanted to explain that Saul (king of ancient people of
    God) was anointed one even after the big mistakes he did!
    David didn't say: "..Oh! Since you have made big mistakes...
    i do not more consider you as anointed!"
    To be loyal to God means to understand that even the anointed
    ones can make mistakes. To be loyal to the organization of God
    means to be loyal to God. That's what I believe in.

    Yep, Saul was a chosen one of God, even after all the mistakes he made. And again, god made a covenant with the nation of Israel. Where did he make a similiar covenant with the JW organization?

    Jesus made a covenant with all that call his name, and believe in him. Why is that covenant limited to only the JW's?

    YOU WROTE:
    Ok, answer me this one: You go out in Field Service, and
    someone asks you a question about doctrine X, which you do
    not believe is correct, but the organization states that the
    answer to doctrine X is YYY (you think it is ZZZ).. Do you
    teach the person YYY or ZZZ? If you teach him YYY you are
    not being loyal to your conscience, as you don't believe YYY;
    If you teach the person ZZZ you are not being loyal to the
    organization that states 'this is what it is'. If you decide
    not to teach, the organization will state that you are
    spiritually weak, yet you obviously have a very deep love
    for Jehovah, and just have a conscientious objection to one
    of the doctrines (let's say it is a small doctrine, nothing
    even very big) you are classified as spiritually weak.
    So, what do you do?

    ME:
    I'll show what the bible states and let the person decide by
    himself. (obviously we are talking about a small point)

    YOU WROTE:
    How do you know that the organization's annointed are the
    only annointed that are 'gods annointed'?

    ME:
    see the bottom of this message.

    YOU WROTE:
    ...Whoa! I don't know about you, but I plan on being alot
    more humble towards my creator.

    ME:
    I think that everybody should be convinced that his Church
    is the right one. If not...all the streets could take you in
    Rome (as we say in Italy).

    YOU WROTE:
    ...Then why do you need a visible organization?

    ME:For the same reason the first Christians needed it.
    For the same reason the Holy Spirit approved it.
    Nothing less...nothing more...

    YOU WROTE:
    ...My question is why do you believe that this love is not
    found outside the organization as well...

    ME:
    Never said that!!!
    I said that if you have found it outside the BORG...i'm
    happy for you! I can not judge anyone!
    But do not forget Ephesians 4:4-5.

    And now:
    What about GB, 144000, ect.. ect.. ???

    I think we should understand first if God required an
    Organized Church. Only after that, we could speak about the
    identity of this Church.
    If you are not convinced that NOW as in the PAST God has
    a real Church...is useless to talk about the anointed ones.

    Ok, 1 question about this then. Do you believe that the 144,000 is a literal number, however the part in that scripture that refers to the male/virgin/jew is figurative? Yes/No?

    ME:
    Thanks. I also prayed to have the opportunity to meet you
    in the New World. (hoping that I will be considered worthy
    to be there!)
    Thank you, I too have prayed that I will meet you in what I believe to be my spiritual paradise, heaven.

    Edited by - ItsJustlittleoldme on 26 June 2002 13:31:20

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit