Simon: There is some opinion that the conclusions from the experiments was flawed.
You're funny. You cite the Milgram experiment, saying it, "showed that even housewives in the US would apply what they believed were lethal levels of electric shock to people they could hear screaming as long as someone in authority told them to."
Then I post two different videos confirming it and you post a news article contradicting it, saying, "the conclusions from the experiments was [sic] flawed."
Curious.
I read the Indepdent article. The gist of it is that now some researcher argue "that the meaning of the experiment has been widely misunderstood." It in no way invalidates WHAT the results of the experiment demonstrated, namely that the majority of "ordinary people will inflict extraordinary harm upon others, if someone in authority gives the orders."
Rather, these researchers--Professor Alex Haslam (University of Queensland), Professor Stephen Reicher (University of St Andrews), Professor Kathryn Millard (Macquarie University) and Professor Rachel McDonald (University of Kansas)--disagree with the motivation that people have for inflicting pain on others: "Far from being distressed by the experience, the researchers found that most volunteers said they were very happy to have participated," adding, "Far from being distressed by the experience, the researchers found that most volunteers said they were very happy to have participated."
Apparently, when someone in authority tells us to do bad things to other people, it makes us "happy" to blindly obey.
I don't see how that's better than Milgram's initial conclusion. Indeed, it maybe far, far worse.