LOL!! @ Gary!!!!! Haven't seen you around for a while. I always enjoy your comments.
IloveTTATT, LOL yes, it's funny that the tablet was waved away as all wrong because it didn't agree with WTS chronology and then nearly 40 years later brought in as a corroborative witness to (allegedly) support the WTS chronology. Glad you pointed out this 180° about-turn.
(Thanks Phizzy, but I'm no expert - just an interested amateur.)