They have made that claim for the length of the days for years now.
There is a lot wrong with that article. Just two things for now :
1. They quote Alfred Russel Wallace as though his thoughts on the Mind and the Universe somehow undermine Darwin. In no way do they, Wallace as a proponent of Natural Selection before Darwin went in to print, was certainly no Creationist. His concept of "Mind" was very Philosophical, and was not it seems along the lines of modern "Intelligent Design", which is what this article is hinting at.
2. They say this " The Bible account of creation does not conflict with scientific conclusions about the age of the universe."
That is true, but what they don't say is the Bible's account of "creation" conflicts with all the Science in other respects !
The other thing that amused me was the Chart at the end, a "Timeline", which it isn't, it just lists what the Bible says happened on each Day, but it says "culminating in the creation of the first human couple".
That must have been then long before the humans were running around on what is now a Norfolk, U.K beach, i.e 800,000 years ago.