Uhoh: Human hand bone dating back 1.4 mill years closes evo gap

by DS211 7 Replies latest jw friends

  • DS211
    DS211

    Discovery of 1.4 Million-Year-Old Fossil Human Hand Bone Closes Human Evolution Gap

    Dec. 16, 2013 — Humans have a distinctive hand anatomy that allows them to make and use tools. Apes and other nonhuman primates do not have these distinctive anatomical features in their hands, and the point in time at which these features first appeared in human evolution is unknown. Now, a University of Missouri researcher and her international team of colleagues have found a new hand bone from a human ancestor who roamed the earth in East Africa approximately 1.42 million years ago. They suspect the bone belonged to the early human species, Homo erectus. The discovery of this bone is the earliest evidence of a modern human-like hand, indicating that this anatomical feature existed more than half a million years earlier than previously known.

    "This bone is the third metacarpal in the hand, which connects to the middle finger. It was discovered at the 'Kaitio' site in West Turkana, Kenya," said Carol Ward, professor of pathology and anatomical sciences at MU. The discovery was made by a West Turkana Paleo Project team, led by Ward's colleague and co-author Fredrick Manthi of the National Museums of Kenya. "What makes this bone so distinct is that the presence of a styloid process, or projection of bone, at the end that connects to the wrist. Until now, this styloid process has been found only in us, Neandertals and other archaic humans."

    The styloid process helps the hand bone lock into the wrist bones, allowing for greater amounts of pressure to be applied to the wrist and hand from a grasping thumb and fingers. Ward and her colleagues note that a lack of the styloid process created challenges for apes and earlier humans when they attempted to make and use tools. This lack of a styloid process may have increased the chances of having arthritis earlier, Ward said.

    The bone was found near sites where the earliest Acheulian tools have appeared. Acheulian tools are ancient, shaped stone tools that include stone hand axes more than 1.6 million years old. Being able to make such precise tools indicates that these early humans were almost certainly using their hands for many other complex tasks as well, Ward said.

    "The styloid process reflects an increased dexterity that allowed early human species to use powerful yet precise grips when manipulating objects. This was something that their predecessors couldn't do as well due to the lack of this styloid process and its associated anatomy," Ward said. "With this discovery, we are closing the gap on the evolutionary history of the human hand. This may not be the first appearance of the modern human hand, but we believe that it is close to the origin, given that we do not see this anatomy in any human fossils older than 1.8 million years. Our specialized, dexterous hands have been with us for most of the evolutionary history of our genus, Homo. They are -- and have been for almost 1.5 million years -- fundamental to our survival."

    The study was published in theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences this week. Members of Ward's team who helped discover and analyze the bone include: Matthew Tocheri, National Museum of Natural History in the Smithsonian Institution; J. Michael Plavcan, University of Arkansas; Francis Brown, University of Utah; and Fredrick Manthi, National Museums of Kenya.

    this is all off science daily...enjoy!

    DS

  • Thoughtless
    Thoughtless

    >inb4falsified.

    I don't buy articles like this off hand. So many articles claim that the evolution gap has been closed and then it is revealed to be a fake or a lie. Its reminiscent of how many Witnesses look for signs of the Big A but it never comes.

  • Phizzy
    Phizzy

    I agree Thoughtless, that a degree of cynicism is not uncalled for. In this field in particular, the appearance of early Hominids and early "humans" there is a desire to make a name for oneself.

    However, it is not at all beyond the bounds of possibility that this all be (more or less) spot on. This is the area where remains of indisputably very early Homo Erectus have already been found, and confirmed.

    What is interesting is, if this is true, timewise, how long it took for the skills that the the physical development made possible, to develop and advance.

    1.42 million years ago, a guy,or girl, has a useful hand, and yet it takes another almost another 1.42 million before we see the invention of the Computer when he or she can put the hand to good use ! LOL

  • cofty
    cofty

    Marking thanks

  • snare&racket
    snare&racket

    In the last 3 yesrs there have been many such finds, tsking the evolution story further back than thought. I have not heard of any fakes in these cases, but it is important to be skeptical. I see no problem with the findings, our texts on the history of human ancestory is based on fossil finds, the more we find the more informstion we have, it is predictable to say we should find more evidence that will adjust our dates current timeline, exactly as we do.

  • Phizzy
    Phizzy

    The thing I alluded to above fascinates me, that despite having certain physical characteristics, the human mind takes a long time to "evolve" or progress.

    Despite having large brains, it took humans a long time to progress from simple tool making for example, not much advanced from the tool making of Chimps really, to a more sophisticated tool kit. And a long time until learning to trade between tribes etc. then a big gap until Agriculture.

    This does not give me hope that in my lifetime I will see much advance in general human thinking.

    It is long overdue for the Human Race that we left behind superstious beliefs in gods, spirits, Jinns and Daemons and whatever, but I fear that such silly groundless ideas will be around long after I have fertilised the soil.

  • cantleave
    cantleave

    I hate that word "gap". Evolution is not punctuated it's a gradual transition so the correct terminolgy is transitional not gap!

  • jhine
    jhine

    bumped

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit