The Congregation "Bible" Study (CBS) for the week of December 29, 2014 to January 4, 2015 was taken from Draw Close To Jehovah, pages 179-182, paragraphs 1-8.
Paragraph 3 seems to be using the ancient Jew's fear of Jehovah's thunderous voice to justify the wisdom of him using Moses to record and transmit his laws to the people. But there is an implied false dichotomy here. Since God is supposedly Almighty he is most certainly capable of giving a personal revelation of his requirements to every human in a clear, concise and unambiguous manner that they can fully understand and remember - without having to use his thunderous voice. Such a "holy download" into the brain of every human would not only ensure that all know and understand God's requirements but would also, by its very nature, provide convincing evidence of it's divine source since each human can see that the message he received perfectly correlates with that received by others and yet is communicated is different words to suit the knowledge, understanding and unique background of each individual.
There would also be little cause for doubting the accuracy and divine authorship of the message as happens when it is conveyed to a few humans who in turn write it down so that it can be copied from generation to generation, leaving later generations in the position of having to trust the claim of human tradition which says it is the handed down written word of God.
Paragraph 4 makes the point about how writing the law down solved the issue of the difficulty of having to remember so many laws. But isn't that exactly what rank and file Israelites living in Moses' day had to do? Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it true that the Law was only readily available to the priests who were charged with orally instructing the rest of the nation? Regular Israelites didn't have the luxury of consulting their own personal copy of the Law like bible owners today have.
Mention is made too about the inaccuracy of conveying the message orally from generation to generation. This point is valid but the personal revelation method I mentioned above addresses this issue better than creating a written record in ancient Hebrew which then has to be translated in myriads of future languages, many of which do not have the vocabulary to exactly convey the message as it is in the native ancient Hebrew. In other words, having to translate also introduces errors, or more accurately, it obscures or waters down the message. A personal Revelation tailor made to each individual who is born at all times in history, solves such problems perfectly.
Paragraphs 7 and 8 talk about the wisdom of God using human writers. It mentions the great knowledge and wisdom of angels then turns around and says the angels would not have been able to convey God's message to humans in the best way for us to appreciate it. What a contradiction! In actuality it would have been better for angels to have been used. Why? Angels have greater insight into God's true nature than any human can. Also, given that angels have the opportunity to observe humans for many centuries, they would be able to sift out the truly timeless and universal human qualities from those that are specific to one particular culture living at one particular time. Thus they would be able to convey God's message in a manner that would be understandable to all humans living at all times. By contrast, having the bible written by humans living in ancient Palestine, results in the creation of a book filled with archaic language and cultural references that are not only difficult to understand and translate to other future cultures of humans, but are also often offensive to them.
So a better job most certainly could have been done. While recording the bible is better than relying on oral tradition, it is certainly not the most wise option that one would expect from an all wise God, given that this particular method also has serious issues. God giving a clear personal revelation to each individual living at all times is most certainly a much better option that removes a lot of the issue that comes with a once for all time written record made thousands of years ago in archaic language with archaic cultural references that future generations find hard to translate, understand and stomach.