Californian Jehovah Witnesses - Sexual abuse victims....California Child Victims’ Act Passes Judiciary

by Sol Reform 21 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse

  • Sol Reform
    Sol Reform

    CA window hearing June 18!

    http://sol-reform.com/News/ca-window-hearing-june-18/

    CA window hearing June 18!

    "This is it! SB 131, the Child Victims Act in CA, will receive its hearing in the Assembly Judiciary Committee on June 18th.

    Please help pass this bill to bring justice to me and other survivors of abuse.

    Please call and write to CA Assembly Judiciary Committee members and ask them to vote YES on SB 131 to stop child rapists and those who protect them. Please share this information and ask others to do the same!

    CA Assembly Judiciary:http://ajud.assembly.ca.gov/

    CA Assembly:http://assembly.ca.gov/assemblymembers

    CA Senators:http://senate.ca.gov/senators

    History of votes:http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml

    Track this bill:http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/postquery?bill_number=sb_131&sess=CUR&house=B&author=beall

    Updated information:www.facebook.com/TiffanyMoonFoundationforAbductionRecovery“

    Listen Live on the 18th (starting at 9am PST): http://ajud.assembly.ca.gov/hearings

  • Sol Reform
    Sol Reform

    The California House Judiciary Committee has just passed Senate Bill 131 by a margin of 8-2. The bill will now go to the entire California House of Representatives for a vote.

    http://www.kellyclarkattorney.com/california-house-judiciary-committee-passes-senate-bill-on-sex-abuse/

    California House Judiciary Committee Passes Senate Bill on Sex Abuse Posted on June 18th, 2013 by Kelly Clark

    in Announcements Blog California Sex Abuse General Links Opinion & Commentary Our Work in the News Sex Abuse News of InterestThis Post has No Comments

    The California House Judiciary Committee has just passed Senate Bill 131 by a margin of 8-2. The bill will now go to the entire California House of Representatives for a vote. The bill has previously passed the California Senate. If it is signed into law, the new bill would provide a one year revival window for any victim who was over the age of 26 in 2003 but had not made a causal connection between the sexual abuse and the cause of his or her injuries until after 2004.

    The California Catholic Conference, assisted, we believe, by lobbyists for the Church of Latter Day Saints (Mormons) and perhaps even the Boy Scouts of America, has already stated its opposition to the proposed legislation by stating that it would hurt Catholic schools in California.
    The bill would change the statute of limitations for suits against private schools and private employers who failed to take action against sexual abuse by employees or volunteers. The bill would allow alleged victims younger than 31 to sue employers of abusers and the present age limit for alleged victims is 26 years old. However, the bill also provides a one-year statutory window for victims older than the age limit to sue alleged negligent employers. This could result in many new abuse lawsuits concerning allegations dismissed after 2003, when the statute of limitation was previously suspended.

    Author: Kelly ClarkEmail: [email protected] Kelly Clark is a trial and appellate lawyer representing individuals, families and businesses against large or powerful institutions, public and private. He is recognized for his courtroom skills, for his knowledge of public and constitutional law, and for his tenacious and creative litigation strategies.

  • Sol Reform
    Sol Reform

    http://sol-reform.com/News/analysis-in-support-of-sb-131/

    Analysis in Support of SB 131

    27 Jul 2013 | California

    Professor Bainbridge (view article http://www.professorbainbridge.com/professorbainbridgecom/2013/06/an-open-letter-to-assemblyman-adrin-nazarian.html ) has failed to deal with any of the arguments in favor of a window.

    Here is the analysis in support of SB 131:

    http://sol-reform.com/California/HamiltonCASB131testimony3413.pdf

  • Sol Reform
    Sol Reform

    http://www.mercurynews.com/opinion/ci_23754486/mercury-news-editorial-bill-would-allow-victims-child

    Mercury News editorial: Bill would allow victims of child abuse to seek justice

    Mercury News EditorialPosted: 07/29/2013 01:45:00 PM PDT | Updated: about 5 hours ago

    Pope Francis made two statements of historic proportion Monday.

    He said of gays: "If they accept the Lord and have good will, who am I to judge them? They shouldn't be marginalized. The tendency (to be homosexual) is not the problem. They are our brothers."

    What a heartening declaration from the Roman Catholic pontiff. We hope it helps open the minds of some vocal Christians opposed to gay rights.

    We also were heartened to hear the pope carefully distinguish between being gay and being a predator. Chastising reporters for dwelling on possible homosexual affairs by priests, he said they are matters of sin -- not crimes like sexually abusing children.

    It is a distinction that opponents of gay rights often blur, and the pope's reminder is timely. His church in California is strongly opposing a bill by state Sen. Jim Beall, D-San Jose, that would help victims of abuse. SB 131 should be approved as quickly as possible, and Gov. Jerry Brown should sign it.

    Current state law allows childhood victims to sue abusers or abusers' employers until age 26, or three years after psychological problems have been linked to the abuse. Beall wants victims to have another chance: SB 131 would open a one-year window Jan. 1, 2014 to file suit. One year is the most that victim advocates think can pass -- partly because of intense lobbying by the church and some non-profit organizations.
    Studies conducted for the federal Centers for Disease Control found childhood abuse frequently linked to emotional, behavioral and physical problems later in life, including substance abuse, depression and conduct disorders. It can take years for victims to understand the link, let alone feel prepared to confront abusers.
    The societal costs of these problems are enormous. Nationally, the CDC puts the damage at $124 billion a year, and if abusers do not pay, taxpayers do. Lawmakers need to act in their interests.
    California opened a similar window in 2003, when more than 900 plaintiffs came forward and won $1.2 billion in damages from the church alone. They also forced the church to produce files it kept on priests accused or suspected of abuse.
    Edward Dolejsi, executive director of the California Catholic Conference, told the Los Angeles Times once was enough. "Are you going to open another window five years from now? When does it end?"
    A better question is: Why should it ever end? Why should those responsible for abuse get a pass if enough time goes by?
    Beall's bill has passed the Senate and the Assembly Judiciary Committee; it moves to Assembly Appropriations on Aug. 14. The estimated cost is $160,000, pennies by state standards, so it should quickly move to the Assembly floor and to the governor's desk.
    Pope Francis' clarity on the seriousness of abuse should influence California's church to stand up and, if necessary, pay up for all victims of priests it once sheltered. This would bring everyone a step closer to closure -- which we suspect is the aim of this pope, whose stature continues to grow.

  • Sol Reform
    Sol Reform

    http://verdict.justia.com/2013/08/08/the-california-catholic-bishops-fight-access-to-justice-for-child-sex-abuse-victims

    August 8, 2013
    Marci A. Hamilton

    The California Catholic Bishops Fight Access to Justice for Child Sex Abuse Victims

    At the end of July, Los Angeles Roman Catholic Archbishop Jose Gomez sent the following letter to the editor of California Catholic, Bob McPhail, asking him to publish Gomez's letter encouraging parishioners to contact their state elected representatives urging them to vote against statute-of-limitations (SOL) reform for child-sex- abuse victims, by voting against Bill SB131. The primary target of the Catholic bishops, and bishops nationwide, is this statute-of-limitations window which would open a one-year period during which those victims of clergy child sex abuse whose statutes of limitations had expired (which is the vast majority) could still file lawsuits against their abusers and those who covered up the abuse.Here is an excerpt of what Gomez said:Friends, my brother bishops and I in the California Catholic Conference are asking all Catholics to contact their Assembly members and Senators and urge them to vote "No" on Senate Bill 131.SB-131 fails to protect all victims of childhood sexual abuse, discriminates against Catholic schools and other private employers, and puts the Church's social services and educational mission at risk.This is the same playbook that was first conjured up by now-Philadelphia Archbishop Charles Chaput when he was the Archbishop of Denver, Colorado. The main idea is that, once SOL reform is proposed in the legislature, the bishops then mobilize their parishioners against it, with messages that misrepresent the actual impact of such legislation, and then play a false anti-Catholic card to really get their parishioners out of the pews and onto their computers and phones. The trouble is that neither claim is true, nor is either truly in the spirit of Catholic teachings.Who Is Listening to Catholic Bishops on the Issue of Child Sex Abuse, and What Religious Values Fuel Their Opposition to Victims' Access to Justice?The natural response to such a push is to ask who now, in 2013, is looking to the Catholic bishops for guidance on the protection of children? When it comes to child sex abuse, they have proven themselves deceptive and dangerous.Why are elected representatives of the people giving them any traction on this particular issue? There are plenty of others and this is just one of many they have put on their agendas. Currently, they are chattering up a storm trying to keep gay couples away from the altar, keep contraception away from working women, and to stop abortion and the death penalty. While many do not agree with them on these issues, at least, each of those positions has a home in their theology.For the Catholic Church, the sexual abuse of children, and their continued endangerment, however, are not acts sanctioned by theology. And, while the bishops have observed in the past a theologically-based "rule against scandal," which led them to shield abusers to protect the reputation of the Church, they now say that they are engaging in "zero-tolerance" of abuse, and "cooperating" with authorities. They are also committed, we are told, to transparency.So, what religious values are served by their opposition to victims of childhood sexual abuse? I am told that Catholic theology does embrace the pursuit of justice. While the Church litigators fighting the victims of the Catholic hierarchy and priests in court frequently intone Canon Law to avoid discovery and liability, the Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC), which John Paul II issued in 1992, is also part of their theological system. Father James Connell, one of the brave founding members of the Catholic Whistleblowers, recently brought the definition of "justice" in Section 1807 of the CCC to my attention:Justice is the moral virtue that consists in the constant and firm will to give their due to God and neighbor. Justice toward God is called the 'virtue of religion'. Justice toward men disposes one to respect the rights of each and to establish in human relationships the harmony that promotes equity with regard to persons and to the common good.This refreshing reminder about justice, one's neighbor, respect for rights, and the common good provides a sharp contrast to the campaign to keep victims out of the justice system. Where are these values in the public relations-fueled campaign against victims' access to justice? Nowhere. Instead, the plea to parishioners tells them that SOL reform is about money, or more specifically, about putting services and schools at risk.The Factual Shortcomings in the California Bishops' Plea to Parishioners to Fight Victims' Access to JusticeA cardinal problem with the Catholic bishops' claims in this vein, however, is that, in fact, SOL reform has not led to shutting down schools or services. Catholic schools have been shuttered because of demographics, not victims. To triangulate the relationship between victims and parishioners, so that the victims are purportedly the enemies of the parishioners, is indefensible and about as far from the spirit and letter of CCC Section 1807 as you can get.It is interesting to note that the California bishops are not fighting SB131 with the argument they have tried elsewhere: they have irresponsibly alleged that SOL reform leads to diocesan bankruptcies. They have had to pull back on that whopper, because only one state has had a diocese file bankruptcy following SOL window legislation, which actually went forward-Delaware. Under the 2003 window in California, only one diocese, San Diego, filed for bankruptcy, and it was ushered out of the bankruptcy court because of its copious holdings and wealth. The other diocesan bankruptcies, in Spokane, Portland, Davenport, Tucson, and Milwaukee have had nothing to do with SOL reform.Moreover, the California settlements that were paid to those victims who could come forward in 2003 were paid out of insurance proceeds and the sale of property that was mostly unrelated to religious uses. To tell parishioners that they must oppose SB131 in order to protect their programs and schools is the height of misleading propaganda.What religious values sanction the bishops' fabrication of arguments against victims' access to justice? None I could find.The bishops are upset in part, because there was a statute-of-limitations window that was open in 2003 in California, which assisted over 800 victims of the church hierarchy. I suppose they figure that having meted out partial justice to a fraction of their victims, it should all just go away. But many victims of the hierarchy, other institutions, and those in the largest number, victims of incest, did not know that the window was open, or understand what it meant. This new window, and the accompanying extension of civil SOLs, is intended to reach those victims whose needs were left unmet by the prior window.Let us also look to history to learn what the bishops fear the most from such lawsuits. When settlements were reached following the 2003 California SOL window, they were paid expeditiously. But the bishops then litigated, hammer and tongs, for ten years, in order to keep the files that they promised to release as part of the settlements, shuttered in darkness. Only in 2013 were those files finally released, and they are embarrassing to the bishops, because of the depravity of their actions in letting criminals have easy access to children, and because of their instinct to protect themselves, rather than the children of their own believers. Cardinal Mahoney lost public credibility and his position of authority because of the files' release, and every bishop in the United States fears similar treatment when the files on which they are perched are eventually released.If Gomez were being sincere with his parishioners, he would have written that he needs them to contact their representatives in order to protect his and his brethren's already-tarnished reputations from going all the way down the tubes. It's not the services, or the schools, or the money that is motivating this frantic and expensive fight to keep clergy child abuse victims out of court. What they fear is the ugly truth's finding its way outside their mansions, cathedrals, and file drawers.It Is Not Anti-Catholic to Provide Victims of Incest and Every Private Institution Access to JusticeThe anti-Catholic charge in Gomez's letter is pure "malarkey" to borrow a phrase from Cardinal Timothy Dolan, because SB131 is aimed at all private institutions and entities. How is it that an institution that presumably has contact with families everyday that are struggling with incest can lobby against giving those victims access to justice, just to protect their own hides?And where is the Catholic value that leads the bishops to fight to keep victims of incest out of court? Which fathers, grandfathers, mothers, aunts, and cousins should be protected from legal accountability under Catholic theology?True, SB131 does not cover public institutions. As I argue in Justice Denied: What America Must Do to Protect Its Children, public institutions need justice for sex abuse.I wholeheartedly urge the California legislature to take up that issue as well, and to consider a separate bill involving state and local institutions. These institutions are always treated differently than private institutions, and issues like sovereign immunity, which are irrelevant to the private sphere, need to be considered when such institutions are at issue. Let's create justice for all victims of child sex abuse. But there is no necessity that all entities are included in any one bill. SB131 includes some of those that absolutely need to be addressed: families especially.The claim by Gomez that SB131 is prejudiced against the Catholic Church, because it does not address public institutions, also needs to be taken with a large grain of salt (one that is about the size of California), because it is not as though the bishops want justice for victims of public institutions. Instead, Gomez only floats this propaganda in order to kill the bill, not to make it more inclusive. His fear is the potential access to the files of the victims on the private side, not any concern for the victims on the public side.SB131 Is ConstitutionalThe other argument the bishops typically try to float against victims' access to justice is the weak argument that windows are unconstitutional. Gomez did not mention it in his short missive to parishioners, but his lobbyists are pushing it in the halls of the legislature in Sacramento. Surprisingly, Professor Stephen Bainbridge posted a blog with a weak constitutional argument against it. He does not take into account any of the actual cases or arguments that are relevant, and appears not to fully grasp all of the work that has already been done on the issue.My explanation of why it is obviously constitutional is here.If I were Professor Bainbridge, I would have declined the "opportunity" to defend the indefensible.The Lobbying Picture in CaliforniaThe bishops have been exerting the only truly active and well-financed lobbying pressure against sex-abuse victims' access to justice in California, and any legislator who kowtows to their pressure on an issue over which they deserve absolutely no deference is no better than they are. There are rumors that USA Swimming is lobbying against the bill as well, with the same lame argument that it's "unfair," but their involvement is less obvious, and harder to pin down. Olympic athletes across the country should be scared if this is where the USA athletic leagues are headed-against access to justice for athletes. USA Swimming should be ashamed of itself, and, again, any legislator deferring to an institution that has a history of child sex abuse on the protection of children and victims' access to justice is no better than the institution pressuring them.The choice is plain: protect children, or protect predators and the institutions that gave them access to children. The victims of child sex abuse who are suffering right now need state legislators to do the right thing, for the right reasons, and to send packing the bishops who have lost their way on the issue of justice.The pending California SOL reform bill, SB131, and the SOL window within it, is about access to justice for child-sex-abuse victims, and offers the only means to justice for thousands of survivors of sexual abuse that California law has currently barred from the system. Every parishioner needs to understand what is really at stake: justice for those who allowed children to be terribly abused. - See more at: http://verdict.justia.com/2013/08/08/the-california-catholic-bishops-fight-access-to-justice-for-child-sex-abuse-victims#sthash.WslsQ7in.dpuf

  • Sol Reform
    Sol Reform

    http://www.catholicleague.org/california-sex-abuse-bill-showdown/

    CALIFORNIA SEX ABUSE BILL SHOWDOWN

    August 13, 2013 by Bill Filed under Latest News Releases2013 - August Releases

    Bill Donohue comments on the fate of SB 131:

    Tomorrow, the California Assembly Appropriations Committee will once again take up the issue of suspending the statute of limitations for cases involving minors who allege they are victims of sexual abuse. SB 131 would allow anyone who was 26-years-old in 2002, and claims to have been molested, one year to file suit.

    To those interested in justice, the bill appears to be fair. But there is just one problem: most of those who meet the criteria are not legally permitted to file suit. How can this be? Because it does not apply to anyone who was violated by a public employee, such as a public school teacher, aide, counselor or coach. For them-and they account for the lion's share of abuse-it's just too bad.

    The purpose of this outrageous bill is to sock it to the Catholic Church. In California, lawmakers already suspended the statute of limitations for private institutions; they did so in 2003. But public school teachers have never been subjected to this condition. In other words, the bill is nothing more than a vindictive effort to punish the Catholic Church.

    Leading the fight against this bill are the California bishops, and the California Catholic Conference; we are particularly taken by the aggressive leadership of Los Angeles Archbishop José Gomez. We are proud to play a support role: The Catholic League has contacted well over 10,000 members in California asking them to weigh in on this issue.

    If California lawmakers are truly serious about combating the sexual abuse of minors (most surely are), then they should a) not make exceptions for private or public institutions and b) concentrate on current cases of abuse. To do any less-to carve out a privileged position for some, or to focus on the past, not the present-is an exercise in grandstanding. It is not what leadership is all about.

    Contact the chairman of the California State Assembly Committee on Appropriations, Mike Gatto: [email protected]

    To see a video on this issue, click here for English; here for Spanish.

  • Sol Reform
    Sol Reform

    http://www.snapnetwork.org/action_diary_tree_climbers_sb_131_california_statute_of_limitations?recruiter_id=21019

    Action Diary - Tree Climbers: SB-131 - California Statute of Limitations

    "They know they don't have to keep their victims quiet forever, just long enough to run out the clock."

    As has been previously discussed, one of the major issues regarding childhood sexual abuse and justice is that the statute of limitations vary state to state.

    Often times, the statute has run out by the time a victim/survivor is ready to talk about what happened to them. However, many states are re-visiting this issue and some are making changes:

    Read the full article here

  • Sol Reform
    Sol Reform

    CALIFORNIA SEX ABUSE BILL STALLS

    http://www.catholicleague.org/california-sex-abuse-bill-stalls/

    Bill Donohue comments on a California bill, SB 131, that would suspend the statute of limitations for one year in cases where someone claims he was molested when he was a minor in a private institution; the law applies to those who were 26-years-old in 2002:

    Good news: SB 131 never got out of committee today. While the bill can still be voted on during this legislative session, time is running out. The fact that it stalled today is encouraging.

    This bill has more to do with punishing the Catholic Church for offenses alleged to have been committed decades ago than it does with protecting minors today. The bill is also an affront to fairness on another level: it gives the biggest offenders of all-those who work in the public schools-a pass.

    The Catholic League salutes the California bishops, ably led by Los Angeles Archbishop José Gomez, and the California Catholic Conference. We also commend all those Catholic League members in California who let their voices be heard; we were happy to lead them. It goes to show that if our side is to win, we must raise our voices. No one can hear those who speak softly.

  • Sol Reform
    Sol Reform

    http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-0815-church-bill-20130815,0,7359468.story

    Bill to allow sex abuse victims more time to sue fails to advanceThe bill, which is opposed by the Catholic Church, fails to make it through a key California legislative committee.Comments

    August 14, 2013, 9:52 p.m.

    A bill that would give some sex abuse victims more time to file lawsuits, which has drawn fierce opposition from the Catholic Church, failed to get enough support Wednesday to make it out of a key legislative committee.

    The bill, which needed nine votes to leave the lower house's appropriations committee and go to the Assembly floor, mustered only six. Four committee members opposed the bill and seven did not weigh in after an emotional hearing that included testimony from a lobbyist who is also a sex abuse survivor.

    The panel, which mainly considers how much a proposal would cost the state, will take up SB 131 again next week. It has already passed the state Senate and the Assembly judiciary committee.
    The bill would, in part, lift the statute of limitations for one year to allow certain victims to sue private or nonprofit employers who may have failed to protect them from known molesters. Supporters say sex abuse victims need extra time to file lawsuits because it often takes decades for them to admit that they were molested.
    A key question for the committee is whether new lawsuits would strain an already overburdened court system. At the height of the clergy abuse scandal in 2002, the legislature signed off on a similar one-year window. Hundreds of people filed claims, many of them against the Catholic Church.
    The church, which in recent years has quashed similar bills in other states, has led the battle against SB 131. Opponents say the bill would financially cripple the church, leading to the closure of parochial schools and flooding public ones with students. They also argued Wednesday that the proposal unfairly targets private and nonprofit employers.
    "You will be advancing a bill that proposes to hold one employer culpable and another employer not culpable for precisely the same behavior," said Ron Reynolds, a lobbyist for the California Assn. of Private School Organizations, whose members include Catholic dioceses.
    The bill is far more narrow than the 2002 legislation, however, giving only certain victims abused decades ago more time to sue. Sen. James Beall Jr. (D-San Jose), who introduced the bill, said it would cost the state little money and also help victims who might otherwise need public services.
    Testimony in support of the bill repeatedly turned personal. John Lovell, a lobbyist for the California Police Chiefs Assn., mentioned that he was a lifelong Catholic.
    "I feel the argument that this bill will result in the diminution of Catholic schools to be offensive and disingenuous," he said.
    Paula Treat, a lobbyist who is also a sex abuse survivor, testified that she had spent years in therapy grappling with abuse that began when she was in second grade.
    "I go to sleep every night thinking that, had I been able to tell, other little children would not have been abused," she said. Her voice rising in anger, she added that she too had been raised Catholic and "I'm ashamed of my church."

    http://theworthyadversary.com/2090-sb-131-stalled-in-committee

    When your district is rife with crime, hold bad guys responsible

    Posted by Joelle Casteix on August 15, 2013 in Clergy Abuse Crisis

    Rep. Diane Harkey: Please take a look at cost of crimes in YOUR district before voting no.

    Yesterday, CA Assembly Appropriations Committee Vice Chair Diane Harkey voted no on important crime victims legislation-even though a similar 2003 bill exposed horrible abuse in her own district.

    I don't believe it was a malicious act against victims, I just think she doesn't know about the child sex crimes and cover-up that have thrived in the 73rd Assembly District. SB 131-the California Child Victims' Act, a bill that gives crime victims the opportunity to use the civil courts to seek justice and accountability-has stalled in House Appropriations Committee. According to the Los Angeles Times: A key question for the committee is whether new lawsuits would strain an already overburdened court system. At the height of the clergy abuse scandal in 2002, the legislature signed off on a similar one-year window. Hundreds of people filed claims, many of them against the Catholic Church. Diane Harkey (R-Dana Point) was one of the no votes. She represents the district that is the home of St. Edward's in Dana Point-home of some of the worst perpetrators in OC history. We wouldn't know about the scope and scale of the crimes against her constituents were it not for for a similar, but broader, 2003 civil window bill. And since this was a vote in Appropriations, she should be weighing the "costs" to the court system against the millions of dollars in state-wide and district-specific social services that have already and are currently being spent to care for the victims in her district alone. Let wrong-doers pay for their crimes, not taxpayers. The costs to the courts are minimal in comparison. Let's take a look at St. Edwards: Here are the known predators - It's a "Who's Who" of OC offenders. John Lenihan (who, despite the arrest chronicled in this story, is a free man) Denis Lyons (was finally sentenced when a younger victim came forward) Gerald J. Plesetz (he got a 16-year-old Mater Dei student pregnant and signed the adoption papers in San Diego) Michael Pecharich (he told parishioner there was just one "boundary violation." We later learned that he and diocese officials were not quite telling the truth) Henry Perez Sigfried Widera Without the 2003 window, Michael Pecharich would still be in ministry, Denis Lyons would never have gone to jail, and we never would have learned the whole truth about Sigfried Widera, who was sent to OC after an arrest for "sexual perversion" in Milwaukee. I think that Ms. Harkey should know what has been going on in her district, don't you? I think that the state of California would be saved a whole lot of money if wrong-doers are forced to do the right thing. What Can You Do? Fortunately, SB131 supporters have time to re-present to the committee. But in the meantime, what can YOU do? Write members of the House Appropriations Committee and let them know you support the bill. - See more at: http://theworthyadversary.com/2090-sb-131-stalled-in-committee#sthash.0BmTz7Sf.UnfVTvqp.dpuf

  • Sol Reform
    Sol Reform

    ACTION ALERT: Committee votes on SB131 tomorrow!

    Posted by Joelle Casteix on August 20, 2013 in

    **********************ACTION ALERT******************************

    - See more at:http://theworthyadversary.com/2109-action-alert-committee-votes-on-sb131-tomorrow#sthash.9APeqMnG.dpuf

    http://www.sol-reform.com/index.php

    http://sol-reform.com/California/

    Action Alerts & Upcoming Events

    California SB131 has been rescheduled for reconsideration by the Assembly Appropriations Committee for tomorrow, Wednesday, August 21st.

    CA residents--click here to contact your elected reps and tell them to protect the children, not the bishops

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit