National Media ignoring potential mass shooting stopped by Concealed carry permit holder!

by BU2B 14 Replies latest jw friends

  • BU2B

    Wednesday, 02 January 2013 08:00

    The San Antonio Theater Shooting the National Media Ignored

    Written by Bob Adelmann

    At approximately 9:25 p.m. on Sunday night, December 16, just two days after the horrific shootings in Newtown, Connecticut, Jesus Manuel Garcia, age 19, entered the China Garden restaurant across the mall from the Santikos Mayan Palace 14 theater complex in San Antonio, Texas, looking for his ex-girlfriend. Angered that she had just broken up with him, he sent her a text message saying that he planned to go to the restaurant where she worked and “shoot somebody.”

    Before she could warn patrons at the restaurant Garcia entered and started shooting. One bullet slightly wounded one patron while others scattered out the exit doors and headed for the safety of the theater lobby across the mall. Garcia chased them and continued shooting.

    This got the attention of an armed off-duty law-enforcement officer who was working at the theater, Bexar County sheriff’s Sgt. Lisa Castellano, who chased Garcia to the back of the theater where he ducked into the men’s room. When he emerged, Castellano shot him four times which immediately and effectively ended the threat. Garcia was handcuffed with the help of another off-duty officer and taken to the hospital where he was listed in stable condition. He was charged with attempted capital murder of a police officer and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, and his bail was set at $1 million.

    In reporting the incident, local news recalled the Aurora, Colorado, theater attack last July. Hollie O’Connor, who covered the story for, said: "The shooting immediately sparked fears of a mass slaying like the one in July that killed 12 people and injured 58 at a movie theater in Aurora, Colorado." She included a quote from one Cassandra Castillo, the mother of the theater's projectionist, who was worried about her son’s safety in the incident. Said Castillo, “It brings back memories of the other theater shooting and the elementary school shooting. You think only the worst.”

    But the national media ignored this story, even though the shooting occurred just two days after the Newtown shooting. It wasn't just a case that (thankfully) no one was killed in the San Antonio incident. Very likely, no one was killed because of the timely intervention of the armed off-duty officer. If the media were honestly looking for solutions to gun violence, they should have jumped on the San Antonio to show the difference a good person with a gun can make. But they didn't, apparently because it does not fit the narrative that the mainstream media promote — that is, that guns cause violence rather than prevent it.

    In their coverage of the Aurora theater tragedy, the media made much of the weaponry used by James Holmes and his ability to purchase his weapons and his body armor and ammunition online without difficulty. The coverage pointed to the horrors of Holmes' “assault” weapons as the cause of the tragedy while ignoring that the theater was a “gun-free zone." No suggestion was ever made that the gun-free zone mandated by the theater made it an attractive target for Holmes because he knew he would meet no resistance.

    Though they gave the Aurora theater shooting mega-publicity and spun it in a way that meshed with their anti-gun agenda, the major media almost completely ignored another Aurora shooting that occurred last April. In the little-reported shooting, 29-year-old Kiarron Parker, after killing his first victim outside an Aurora church, immediately encountered armed resistance from a churchgoer who killed him before he could take any more innocent lives.

    The San Antonio theater shooting was neutralized by armed resistance before anyone was killed. The off-duty officer recognized the threat and was trained to meet it and she did — so successfully in fact that the city gave her a medal for her actions.

    When Wayne LaPierre, executive director of the National Rifle Association, suggested that potential threats be met with armed resistance in schools so that future massacres can be avoided, the media just scoffed, quoting various gun-control advocates that the last thing needed in schools is more guns. It widely disseminated President Obama’s comment that he is “skeptical that the only answer is putting more guns in schools ... that that somehow is going to solve our problem.”

    The April Aurora church shooting and the recent San Antonio theater shooting should be more than enough to persuade all but the most hardened and determined enemies of the Second Amendment that the best thing is for more people to be armed and enabled to resist threats like these, rather than fewer. But the media aren't listening. Those incidents don’t fit the narrative

  • sammielee24

    Old news. Been discussed on here before.

    First off - the incident wasn't on par with the Colorado theater shooting although the heading wants everyone to make it seem so. On par meaning the man didn't enter a theater in military gear hoping to wipe out a few hundred people - this guy was out to kill his girlfriend and it so happened he chased her into the theater.

    Second the person who responded to the shooter was an off duty officer - a person trained to react in these exact circumstances. What would have been much more informative but something that NEVER seems to come up, is a tally of the number of people milling around or in the area ie the restaurant, the mall, the street, the cars, the theater and so on that were carrying guns and didn't fire back to stop him before the off duty officer. If there are a thousand people carrying guns and they are all too scared or don't know how to react in an emergency situation like this then those guns are of no use to anyone. Maybe if a pro-gun group wants to make a real point, they would start taking a tally at the site and report facts on how many people were there with their own weapon but that they did not choose to fire for whatever reason.


  • Berengaria

    What about the 87 gun deaths that occur every day? Who's reporting on that?

  • EntirelyPossible

    Or the vehicular deaths every day that exceed the gun deaths. Who're reporting on those deaths?

  • Barrold Bonds
    Barrold Bonds


  • Berengaria
  • Berengaria

    But that was not actually my point.

    The implication of the OP is that there is some huge conspiracy in the media, which is why they supposedly did not give enough attention to the story in San Antonio. My point is that it is usually only a local story, unless it involves large numbers of innocent people.

  • besty
    Or the vehicular deaths every day that exceed the gun deaths. Who're reporting on those deaths?

  • EntirelyPossible

    So, no one?

  • BizzyBee

    I don't see these kinds of headlines gaining much traction as "news":

    "Massive Pile-Up on Interstate Could Have Happened, Hundreds Could Have Died - But Did Not"

    "Two-hundred and Thirty Passengers on Dallas Flight to Orlando Would Have Died Today Had Their Pilot Fallen Asleep - But He Managed to Stay Awake Even Though He Was Very Sleepy"

    "Area Woman Did Not Give Birth to Quintuplets Today - Mainly Because She Wasn't Even Pregnant, Though She Felt Extremely Bloated"

    "Staten Island Ferry Carrying 187 Tourists Could Have Potentially Capsized in Choppy Waters Drowning All On Board - But Did Not Even Come Close"

    Why does the media ignore these potential stories?

Share this