by metatron 18 Replies latest jw friends
http://americankabuki.blogspot.com/2012/11/geoengineering-chemtrails-haarp-world.html#more
I make no claim that this strange article is telling the truth...... but it does seem to tie together a whole lot of current fringe ideas in one neat package. It's the wildest ride I've read in a long time (and I read a lot of weird stuff).
and you thought the election was scary!
metatron
Printed it off for slow reading, thanks
They lost me at the word ascension.
S
I can hear Marla Gibbs inside my head say, "Oh Lorrrrrd...."
oh god, if I have to listen any more to that crap about chemtrails I'll explode. Many people in my town are on the woowoo fringe and they are paranoid about chemtrails and all sorts of crap like that. They sell Mayan skulls, too.
Yikes! Credible! Research! Is! Never! Published! In! Blogs!
Ah, I spotted at least two glaring errors within the first 5 paragraphs... Whoops!! On page 2, that is...
"Stars start out as large dust clouds, condense into red supergiants, orange giants, yellow then
white main sequence stars, then on up to blue giants, then supernova. The same process as heating up a piece of metal, from the initial red glow to where it gets blue-hot and breaks. • Since stars are built from dust and debris as fuel, the more fuel available, the hotter the sun will get..."
Ahhh..... Astronomers can see "young" stars in many "star nurseries" in space, yet these are not condensing into "red supergiants"... From: http://www.space.com/8750-star-nursery-photographed-vivid-colors.html
Nope....
No "red giants" there...
Secondly, it's not "dust and debris" that fuel stars, it's hydrogen...
Sorry to disappoint you, Hortensia. While the theory of chemtrails may be inconclusive, geoengineering spraying is an admitted fact. The only difference between the two is whether the trails contain Malthusian elements. With the world government's concern over the surplus population, I would say there is a good chance the geoengineers seek to kill two birds with one stone. It's just common sense.
Looks like disinfo. Very silly disinfo. Geoengineering is a topic that is not covered on the news so much, and it leaves a vacuum that gets filled in by crackpots.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/28/opinion/sunday/geoengineering-testing-the-waters.html
http://www.tgdaily.com/sustainability-features/66992-solar-geoengineering-could-be-safe
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/6-ways-billionaires-try-to-play-god-on-climate-2012-11-02
Kurt, the fact that geo-engineering was admitted by governments well after the fact of conspiracy theorists calling foul on jet spraying (1997) seems to indicate a whitewash (pun intended).
