I was doing some research and stumbled upon the following two Wikipedia articles, both of which (at first glance) appear to be mostly PRO-Watchtower.
Take a look for yourself...
The persecution article seemingly attempts to portray JWs as unfairly persecuted. It has a one-line nod to the persecution in Malawi, but mentions nothing on the disparity with the Society-sanctioned political involvement of the brothers in Mexico.
The child abuse article waxes lyrical about how the two witness rule serves to protect people from unfair accusations. It even quotes sources that suggest the problems with child abuse in Jehovah's Witnesses are nowhere near as bad as the Catholic Church. Though last updated less than a week ago, it mentions not a single word about the Candace Conti verdict.
I'm honestly horrified and heartbroken. I've long looked upon Wikipedia as a beacon of objectivity when it comes to JWs. Could it be that they've sold out to the Watchtower as part of its cynical new internet "hearts and minds" strategy?