james_woods:
OK, I have read it twice and I don't completely understand the JW connection.
"People who hold false convictions are better at retaining corrected information"
Are we trying to say that JWs (who do hold many false convictions) - would be better at retaining information AFTER they let go of the false convictions?
Or, are we just saying that people who join things like the JW religion are highly impressionable, and are easier to retain suggested ideas?
Actually, what I took away from the article was that the person who goes the extra mile with their JW studies - the "true believer", if you will - who knows, for example, the scriptures to support the WTS's blood doctrine, or the scriptures that "prove" 1914 is the year that the Gentile Times™ ended, based on 607 BCE as the year for Jerusalem's destruction, who feels those beliefs in their heart of hearts, when presented with overwhelming evidence to the contrary, will have their beliefs fall apart like a house of cards. These are the ones who feel betrayed by the WTS, people who cannot unsee what they've seen, or unlearn the corrections they've learned.
On the other hand, there's a huge number (the vast majority, I would imagine) of JWs who go through the motions, more or less as social JWs. Doctrine is something the Governing Body sorts out. It's not for the Sheep™ to understand. You just trust what the Organization™ tells you and obey, and that's all you need to do to survive Armageddon™. They're intellectually lazy when it comes to the nitty gritty of the JW belief system, and you could show them stacks of evidence to disprove any number of JW doctrines, and they don't care beyond repeating the WTS's mantra: "That's Apostate™". The evidence doesn't have the same impact because they haven't invested in The Truth™ on an intellectual level - and that's how the WTS likes it. It creates dumbed down, fiercely loyal, poorly informed followers, rather than bold, well-informed and confident individuals.