You see what the title says so dont get offended I find these amusing.
The first picture isn't blasphemous at all. JW'S try to be perfect and reject Jesus gift, LOL. They care more about trying to be perfect than being christlike.
DISCLAIMER: I don't believe in Jesus. ;D
really funny pictures
I like the first one, too.
You better sin so Jesus' sacrifice will mean something! hahahahaha
I like all of them.
Most of those examples are just blasphemous in the general sense of irrever-
ence--anyone might think at least some are funny. To actually blaspheme is to
reject a God belief--an inward decision that might not be clear from any outward
indication. It probably wouldn't be much of a concern except to the believer,
who doesn't do it continually or they would't be one.
A person might not be blasphemous yet have any of those thoughts seriously,
too, such as those in the cartoon strip:
- it's up to believers and non-believers to solve problems and be moral. A
believer may pray for strength to do it, but ultimately it's up to them just as
much. Negative afterlife: a believer can choose which one, if any
- neither the most basic God nor atheist concept comes with stipulations to
hurt or kill anybody. Some leaders who were believers or non-believers have
stipulated harm for those different than them. Believers or non-believers could
reject the 'centric intolerance of both of them (Moses, Theodosius, Muhammad,
Stalin, Mao, etc.), which is more to the point in minimizing harm than the
belief/non-belief choice itself.
My favorite is "BRB" "LOL"