How did that MYSTERIOUS transition from Russell to Rutherford happen?

by Terry 18 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • Terry
    Terry

    "Judge" Josephh Rutherford helped Pastor Russell draft his Last Will and Testament. As legal advisor this was fitting. Russell named five men who would adminstrate the Watch Tower Society on an editorial board. Russell stated he wanted no further or additional writings to ever be published--only his own.

    In case replacements were needed for the 5 administrators, Russell named 5 (FIVE) men as suitable replacements.

    BUT----
    Here is where the mystery begins! On this will appears the name of a 6th (SIXTH) person: J.F.Rutherford!


    "The will, along with a number of letters and other statements about the administration of the Watch Tower Society, was printed in the December 1, 1916 edition of The Watch Tower. To the positions in the editorial board, Russell’s will had named W. E. Page, W. E. Van Amburgh, H.C. Rockwell, E. W. Brenneisen and F. H. Robinson. Quite curiously, Russell’s will writes about “the five whom I suggest as possibly amongst the most suitable from which to fill vacancies” (emphasis added) and then lists six names: A. E. Burgess, R. Hirsh, I. Hoskins, G. H. Fisher, Dr. J. Edgar and J. F. Rutherford."

    It is certainly possible, but this author has not found it possible to fully confirm or reject this theory, that one name was added to the list after Russell had written it: Rutherford’s. Whatever the case may be, Page and Brenneisen declined to be on the Board for personal reasons, and Hirsh and Rutherford replaced them . Jan S. Haugland September 26, 2000 Master's Thesis


    The Watch Tower was left in the hands of a committee of five, an editorial committee (there was also a seven man board of directors). Rutherford wasn't on the list of five, he was on the list of "possible replacements". And even then as  mentioned, Russell stated "five" and there are six names listed, ironically the Judges name is listed. Anyone who knows their history knows that Russell avoided the Judge like the plague.

    Russell never stated that they were to only publish his writings. What he said was that the Society was to never publish another journal, meaning they could only publish The Watch Tower, which is why when the Judge began to publish The Golden Age, he did so against Russell's wishes, and he published it under a different name.

    Also, Russell requested that all of his writings as well as all articles appearing in the Watch Tower be anonymous.

    The Judge somehow made it on the Editorial committee, then weaseled his way onto an 3 man executive committee, being assured that he would be elected president. he wrote up by-laws which gave the president FULL control of the Society, it's assets, EVERYTHING. At the business meetings the by-laws were illegally approved and passed. I say illegally, because ONLY the board of directors could pass and appriove by-laws, NOT the membership. When the board attempted to rescind those by-laws, Rutherford dismissed and replaced them.

    After a few years, the ousted directors gave up the fight, and incorporated the Pastoral Bible Institute in 1918, there was also the Stand Fast Bible Students Association and the Laymen's Home Missionary Movement, as well as others.


       Where does this lead us?



    Note: Page 60 of the fourth edition of "Crisis of Conscience" states in a footnote at the bottom of the page that: "Russell did not list Rutherford among these five but placed him in a second group of five who might serve as replacements if occasion required."  Is author Ray Franz deducing from the mere appearance of the additional name on the document itself?


    A legal instrument has to be precise to be enforceable. Lawyers are charged with specificity and due dilligence in enumerating matters of this nature. I find it rather telling that a designated FIVE does not match an enumerated SIX.

    What he said was that the Society was to never publish another journal, meaning they could only publish The Watch Tower, which is why when the Judge began to publish The Golden Age, he did so against Russell's wishes, and he published it under a different name.

    Vitally important to realize this, too! Pastor Russell was clearly nipping in the bud the ambition of leadership and authorship problem. Rutherford clearly shows his colors in defying Russell in this way.

    To state it matter-of-factly: The Golden Age and later Awake! publications (new journals) were in clear violation of Pastor Russell's stated objection in his Last Will and Testament.

    The power play of Rutherford effectively purged Russell's loyalists from among the ranks and left Rutherford loyalists in their place.


    There was nothing the Judge wouldn't do for his own manipulative machinations

    "Where there's a will, there's a way..


    Here is something you won't find in any Watch Tower publication:

    Menta Sturgeon who was travelling with Russell when he died, wired his wife at Bethel regarding the Russell's death. However A. H. MacMillan intercepted the telegram and wired J. F. Rutherford with five words: “The old man is dead." The Judge was just a few states away attending a convention in Oakland, Maryland. He told MacMillan “do nothing until I get there”. It wouldn’t have taken him long to get to Bethel, considering that most likely most of the directors were with Russell. He went straight to Russell's office locked himself in and the rest is history.

    Please read here:

    http://www.heraldmag.org/2006_history/06history_8.htm

    Further reading:
    Jan S. Haugland September 26, 2000 Master's Thesis

  • minimus
    minimus

    very enlightening...what a crooked lawyer!

  • Terry
    Terry

    It has always been my understanding that the person who drafts the will UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES is to directly benefit from the contents of said document.

    Does anyone know differently?

  • wobble
    wobble

    A Witness to a Will cannot be a beneficiary, the guy who drafts it could, but it would be questionable practice.

    It is the duty of the two Witnesses to make sure that the Will has been read to the testator, and the contents represent his/her wishes.

    I think it would be O.K in law if the draftee of the Will also benefited.

    It is now too late to verify if Russells wishes were carried out, the witnesses are long dead.

    Seeing Rutherfords machinations over legal control of the WT and its monies, as well as his later attitiude to the law, Prohibition etc, I feel that it is highly likely that he changed just enough in the Will to give him the power he needed to wrest control.

    He was a devious man, a character that interests me no end, because I cannot fathom how much of his rhetoric was B.S and how much he actually believed, I think he was a very similar personality type to Adolf Hitler.

    Years of study are there if you want to do the work.

  • WontLeave
    WontLeave

    Anyone who's ever looked into the change of leadership from Russell to Rutherford knows it was clearly a hostile takeover. He created a schism, but because he held the presidency of the corporation, his off-shoot got to keep the printing facility. In more than the usual sense, the winners got to write the history. With an obviously power-hungry oligarch at the reins, his first thought was to start usurping the authority of the board and see who would and wouldn't cower before him. Those who wouldn't, he used slimy lawyer tactics to oust. He allowed the sycophants to stay and he was the one who set the tone for the JWs do this day.

  • Mary
    Mary

    I believe what happened is called a coup d'état.

    "A coup d'état also known as a coup, putsch, and overthrow-is the sudden, extrajudicial deposition of a government, usually by a small group of the existing state establishment-typically the military-to replace the deposed government with another body; either civil or military. A coup d'état succeeds if the usurpers establish their dominance when the incumbent government fails to prevent or successfully resist their consolidation of power. If the coup neither fully fails nor achieves overall success, the attempted coup d'etat is likely to lead to a civil war."

    While this wasn't a political party, the end result was the same. Russell obviously had no intention of leaving the Organization to Rutherfraud---Rutherfraud didn't care. He seized control and outted the men Russell had left in charge.

  • james_woods
    james_woods

    There has been a very similar suspicious changeover in cult leadership more recently - that of Scientology.

    There are many ex-Scientologists who complain that David Miscaevage basically took over the religion from L. Ron Hubbard in much the same manner as Rutherford took over from Russell.

    They both claimed to have "secret contact" with the former leader, and actively sought to expell anybody that disagreed with their coup.

  • moshe
    moshe

    Just try and get modern day JWs excited about this story- - passive acceptance of the WT leadership has been bred into their psyche since Rutherford took over.

  • saltyoldlady
    saltyoldlady

    Thank you Terry - I had never picked up on that discrepancy before - from five to six and was that in the same document? Very interesting. Somewhere - in the Harvest Siftings of the Bible Students I think - I read that Russell had actually started to become concerned about Rutherford just shortly before his death. Had Russell not died at the time he did Rutherford might never have been able to pull off the shenanigans (sp?) he did. (A good old Irish term that so well fits the circumstances I believe.)

  • greendawn
    greendawn

    It is obvious that Rutherford kicked out the inheritors and grabbed their inheritence. That's the kind of man that lead the Watchtower society, self seeking and ruthless and his successors continued in the same spirit. Subsequently Rutherford made it clear why he grabbed the leadership as he was enjoying a life of ease and luxury while he was sending out the poor R&F to preach an unjustifiably belligerant and provocative message and as a result often suffered physical abuse by outraged citizens. The man was the classical example of the power lusting narcissist and once he took over this organisation it was doomed to become an authoritarian cult.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit