I wonder if anyone here would agree with this quote by WLC:
Naturalists are typically materialists or physicalists who regard man as merely an animal organism. But if man has no immaterial aspect to his being, whether you call it a soul or mind or whatever, then we’re not qualitatively di?erent from other animal species. On a materialistic anthropology there’s no reason to think that human beings are objectively more valuable than rats. When a terrorist bomb rips through a market in Baghdad, all that really happens is a rearrangement of the molecules that used to be a little girl (Craig & Antony (2008) ).
I would strongly object along the line that the "immaterial aspect" which make us special (the soul if you will), make us special because it give us certain properties. for instance that we can love, or wonder, or enjoy music, and be conscious and so on. If these are things which make the soul special, and we (according to the naturalistic world-view) can have them without a soul, then we must be special too.