Witness literature has never had a nice flow to it. A family member was a Maoist and had these perfect English pamphlets prepared by a foreign government. The grammar was perfect. The vocabulary words were good. Nevertheless, no native English speaker ever uttered such words. The Witnesses are similar. The writing is stilted and uniform in tone. It has improved very slightly over time.
My brother and I convulse in laughter describing illustrations in the WT and the orange book, dating myself.
Questions I never thought I could ask: how do they do it? why do they do it? Idiots cannot write they do. Why not write in a more compelling fashion?