That list Perry posted is such a load of garbage. Here is a typical excerpt:
For instance, in the 1970s bacteria were found that could metabolize nylon, even though nylon synthesis had begun only a few decades earlier. Bacteria had been exposed to nylon via the waste water from factories, and now the bacteria could live off the new chemical. The bacteria had modified an existing enzyme (mainly via a frameshift) to create a new enzyme that degrades nylon oligomers. The slow, unguided mechanism envisioned by evolutionists could not have reacted so quickly. And furthermore the mechanism is repeatable as the enzyme has been found more than once. As one evolutionist admitted, “The swiftness with which these two enzymes have evolved is truly remarkable, for several decades are but a flash in the evolutionary time scale.?[ 13]
Apparently, if a beneficial mutation which alter a part of the genetic code, thereby creating a new enzyme, is selected for and fixed in the population which thereby gain a new capeabilities, that is not really evolution at all.
why?
Well, according to this genius, since he dont expect "the slow unguided mechanism" to do this, it didnt really happend. "But you just said it happened, both in the laboratory and in the field and all parts of the process is known!" , the non-lobotomized reader might wonder. Well, according to the writer, since the experiment was repeatable that proove it didnt really happend by evolution. WTF?!
The writer is using full circular logic. Furthermore, he support his own circular logic by saying that the more times something is observed to occur, the more it proove it could not happend. How he managed to type that out without drolling in the keyboard remains a mystery.
Perry, is it time for the soft-tissue troll yet, or do you want to pull out the human footprint "found" by the convicted murderer?
