No Sd, you misunderstand me.
I use the word existence, as "having boundary conditions". For a "person" to exist, one would have to have boundary conditions, otherwise it would be meaningless to use the term "person" as we commonly use this word.
This does not mean that all things which "exist" are known to other things which "exist". (All that "exists" is not necessarily "existing" within the same domain.)
This is the problem that all "persons" who "exist" contend with.
To clarify the logical sequence what I'm proposing is:
1. Postulate: Existence is defined as "having boundary conditions".
2. Axiom: Having boundary conditions means being able to know only those things up to but not exceeding ones own boundary conditions. (This is really just an elaboration of #1, but I'm connecting the dots with regard to "boundary conditions", making explicit that having boundary conditions necessarily includes a "bounds" on possible knowledge. (Informational "Thermodynamics" applies in analogous fashion here. Information comes from "somewhere" and no one can "create" more information than is available in any domain. For the same reason we know perpetual motion machines are impossible.)
3. Postulate: The Matrix is really nothing more than two concentric boundary conditions, in the movie, some "wake" others "sleep", while others do both.
4. Postulate: "God" exists.
5. Conclusion: "God" has boundary conditions because of #1.
QED: God can't escape the Matrix
(Actually, now that I think about it, it would be more precise to say that God CAN'T know whether or not he is bound up within a Matrix-like domain. In the movie, people had a choice, or were presented with a choice. The mirror image of this knowledge deficit in us is that we can't "know" anything other than that we "exist" and this is the same problem God faces. He can know that he "exists", however that is all he can know with a capital "K".
For these reasons we OUGHT to realize that if WE can imagine and "know" of the possibility that we may in point of fact be existing within a "Matrix", then surely God would "know" these things as well.
We look at the world and we "know" that what we see is not all that there is, and yet we would expect that God wouldn't know these things about his own class of existence?
I don't and can't trouble my cat with my own disquieting thoughts because my cat has her own boundary conditions. God is likely in the same position. He can never communicate all that there is in his "heart" with anyone who is not at least a peer.
I would expect that God would need search for God.
Now that I think further on this, I would submit that if God exists, then just like I can only imagine I "know" what my cat thinks about me, so too God can only imagine he "knows" what I think about him.