New publications 2010

by jmbrasil 36 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • yknot
    yknot

    Additionally.....

    2010_GOD'S WORD FOR US THROUGH JEREMIAH.....

    http://www.sendspace.com/file/nfaa39

    ______________________

    for anyone having difficulty with 'sendspace'

    Try:

    http://www.4shared.com/document/n5G7zv2r/2010_Gods_Word_For_Us_Through_.html

    http://www.4shared.com/document/GgyuDC9c/2010_Was_Life_Created.html

    http://www.4shared.com/document/d-3vF0Dd/2010_The_Origin_of_Life_Five_Q.html

    __________________

    CREDIT FOR THE AVAILABILITY OF THESE WONDERFUL 'PROVISIONS' BELONGS TO 'ANONYMOUS BROTHER' ........(SO SHOW HIM SOME LOVE!)

  • yknot
    yknot

    Thank You Pixiesticks!

    Being so busy I didn't have to chance to send them to Mox......(http://www.jehovahswitnessrecovery.com/)

    I would suggest others too provide links to JW and Ex JW sites!

    The WTS afterall should have no problem seeing these publications 'placed' with as many 'desiring ones' as possible!!!!

  • miseryloveselders
    miseryloveselders

    Thanks for the links Yknot.

    Wanted to mention something, I don't know if anybody already touched on this, but on page 55 of that Jeremiah book, they're sticking with 607 BCE as the year Jerusalem was destroyed. So I guess any hopes of them dropping that, or 1914, would be false hope.

    Archaeologist Eilat Mazar reports unearthing a small clay seal impression, or bulla. (below left)

    It was found in 2005 during a supervised excavation of a layer dating back to when jerusalem was destroyed in 607 B.CE.

  • yknot
    yknot

    I too noticed this.....

    Can you imagine how funny it might be to answer pg 28, para 24 question !!!!

    24. Describe the events of 607 B.C.E

  • miseryloveselders
    miseryloveselders

    Wow!!!! Ynot, just wow!! I'm wondering if they have something in the works regarding 607 vs 586/587. Like they have this calculated and planned, that when this chapter is done at the Congregation Bible Study, they'll have a WT article or letter defending 607. I'm just surprised they're sticking with their guns on this one. This would have been a oppurtunity to disregard the whole thing. Just quit mentioning it altogether. Rather, they went the opposite approach, highlighting 607. The conspiracy side of me is thinking there's apostates on the Writing Department hoping people will inadvertently reseach 607 and find it to be untrue.

  • jmbrasil
    jmbrasil

    has DVD AND DRAMA?

  • Beware of false prophets
    Beware of false prophets

    Thanks Yknot!!! You're awesome!!!

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit