question about judicial committee meetings

by peaches 21 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • gubberningbody
    gubberningbody

    I never was on a committee where those sorts of questions were asked. Not even close. So to pull an elder on you, I'll have to say that you don't know anything but heresay. That said, you don't know that any of those things were said or done.

    I would say that I do believe that 2 things could be done.

    1. All appointed people (men or women) should have to have criminal background checks done on them before having any position of responsibility.

    2. A video recording should be made and a copy be filed and also one given to the willing participant.

    Of course that would totally stop this sort of thing in its tracks.

  • aSphereisnotaCircle
    aSphereisnotaCircle

    mental rape

    That is a good definition.

    If you are a victim of any kind of sexual abuse, the elders must hear every tiny detail. Even if they refuse to do anything because there was not two witnesses, they still want every tiny detail.

    So that means that if a young girl gets raped.

    She must sit before the elders, alone, three against one, while they ask all these questions.

    It is a rape in inself.

  • crazy2try
    crazy2try

    As a young teen, I was in a situation similar to your friends. I was asked these sort of quesitons and answered them. I felt really lucky at the time though, my father who was an elder sat in the room with me. He had asked me these same horrible questions before the meeting, but sat quietly while I answered them in front of the other brothers. It was horrible. But I lived through it. Later my dad told me that he was proud of me for keeping it together during that meeting.

    I am sure there are alot of others here who were asked those type of questions.

  • cognizant dissident
    cognizant dissident

    You don't understand why all these personal intimate questions are asked? Well, let me explain it to you...

    How else are the elders going to jack off later if they didn't get all the juicy details?

  • BluesBrother
    BluesBrother

    The counsel that I remember hearing repeatedly at Elders Schools was not to go into salacious details.....But I am not saying that it never happens..

    The Elders Textbook "Pay Attention To Yourselves & The Flock" says , Unit 5b

    " Probing questions should not go into needless details,

    especially in regard to sexual misconduct, unless this is

    absolutely necessary, such as in determining whether

    por.nei'a had been committed .

    Elders need to treat the accused kindly and respectfully,

    never harshly . (w89 9/15 p . 19)"

  • AllTimeJeff
    AllTimeJeff

    Blues brother is right. Yet, I encountered so many elders who did this very thing. According to procedure, elders only need to establish porneia. Whether a person orgasmed or not has never been a criteria, although elders continue to justify the importance of that question. My take? They are pervs.....

  • Confuzzled
    Confuzzled

    I can't, for life of me as a parent understand why ANYBODY would allow a their teenager be submitted to this kind of questioning, let alone themselves. It is like some sort of mental-sexual abuse, like someone said "mental rape".

  • Open mind
    Open mind

    I pissed off my fellow elders on two occasions that I can remember by asking the poor person on trial:

    "I know this is horribly difficult and embarrasing, but if you can just let us know if the two of you finally ended up having sexual intercourse we don't have to make you re-live every detail leading up to it."

    Once she left the room so that we could pray for Divine Revelation as to her heart condition , whichever elder was pushing for all the details would get in my face saying that it's our duty to try and determine "Godly Repentance" (tm) and that those details could help us in our decision.

    Yeah, well, not for me. As screwed up as the whole JC process is, just go by the empirical evidence and "err on the side of mercy" even though Elder's School says not to. If a person was there for the 1st or 2nd JC for porneia, unless they were flipping us the bird and asking to be DFed, they were repentant in my book. I remember one person who just wanted out of a JW marriage and they basically had to go for 3 strikes before we kicked them out.

    So glad I'm out of that horrific Boy's Club.

    om

  • shopaholic
    shopaholic

    Once she left the room so that we could pray for Divine Revelation as to her heart condition

    Open Mind, so do the elders expect an immediate response? How do you know what the answer is? Do you pray before the confessors give you the details or after?

  • ldrnomo
    ldrnomo

    A typical Judicial commitee meeting would go somthing like this.

    Q. Were you wearing panties?

    A. Yes

    Q. What color were they?

    A. Black

    Q. What kind were they?

    A. Do you mean brand?

    Q. No I mean, were they one of those slutty kind like worldly women wear?

    A. They were Victoria's secret with ruffles.

    Q. Did they get moist when you were kissing him?

    A. I'm not sure, I didn't feel myself down there.

    Q. Did he feel you down there?

    A. Yes

    Q. Did he put his hands under your panties?

    A. No, on top

    Q. Did you move your hips when he did this?

    A. I think so.

    Q. Did you have an orgasm?

    A. I'm not sure, how does an orgasm feel?

    All three men look at each other not sure how to answer.

    Then one speaks up and says: It feels really good

    then the victim says, well then I must have had one because it felt really good.

    Q. Did you touch his private parts?

    A. Yes

    Q. Did he have an erection?

    A. YES

    Q. Did he have an orgasm?

    A. Yes I know that for sure.

    Q. Did he touch your breasts?

    A. Yes

    Q. Did he put his tongue in your mouth when he kissed you?

    A. No, I put my tongue in his mouth.

    Q. Did you put anything in your mouth?

    A. Yes, I ate some potato chips before we started making out.

    Q. No, I mean.....oh nevermind

    I think we have enough to make a decision if you would please step outside while we decide your fate.

    A half hour goes by and this lovely 22 year old woman is invited back in the conference room. An elderly man about 58 says well Jill, we have made our decision.

    Because you have blatently abused a young man by making him have an orgasm, you are guilty of pornea you really should be disfellowshipped but because you are such a beautiful young person, we have decided to privately reproove you. Quite frankly, if you were my daughter, I would put you over my knee and give you a much needed spanking.

    Then some scriptures are read and a prayer is said and she is sent away. Then the three brothers go home to their computers and look at the internet to get rid of the stress that built up.

    LD

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit