by skeeter1 42 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse
but the article makes no presumption of molestation, and no direct victims in contact with the convicted; he was looking at child porn
That does not matter.
He was looking at child porn. When you look at child porn, it's like molesting the child yourself, don't you think? If there was no child porn, there would be no children being videotaped being raped. He is 100percent responsible for what happened to those victims, IMO.
Sick bastard.
What an asswipe.......Maybe in his new home for the next 20 months, this jerk off will get a taste as to what it's like to be sexually exploited. While there doesn't seem to be any indication that he molested any of the kids at the Hall (thank god), it never fails to amaze me how anyone could spend half their time looking at children who are being sexually exploited (so that pigs like him can get their jollies) and then go to the meetings and out in service and pretend they're so much better than the rest of the world.
Why did they have to mention that he was a witness? You never hear them say a person is a Catholic or any other religion. It's Satan
Yes that was MY comment when I was a JW..... Now I know why they mention they were JW's
because we come off as being perfect.....& the reporter wants to instill in the readers mind they are NOT as they seem
I cant believe there are brothers doing such worse things!!!
the only thing JWs would say is "Why did they have to mention that he was a witness? You never hear them say a person is a Catholic or any other religion. It's just Satan trying to bring shame to Jehovahs people." Its as if they can do no wrong and when they do, its Satan's fault.
This is exactly what my father says whenever the Witlesses get bad publicity.
This is the sick and twisted world we live in unfortunately. These pervie men who look at this child porn online many times mask themselves as acceptable in the public eye ; and once caught people can't believe that Joe whomever was viewing child porn ! Whether it's JW's trying to be respectable or any other churchgoer , it's incredible how some of these a$$wipes hide what they are doing !
In the Sacramento, California area just today in the newspaper a fire fighting captain in the fire department with 30 years in the department ( aged 51 ) got busted for viewing and sending child porn on his home computer AND they confiscated the computer he used at the fire station ! Just goes to show that these jerks get found out eventually - and you hope that they get caught before actually physically molesting any children ! It's just sick ! Now I need to vomit . Peace out, Mr. Flipper
I was just commenting that there is no suggestion that there was a cover-up in the congregation, not regarding the severity of the crime. There's so much the JW's DO cover-up, there's no use in giving them an "out" by making baseless accusations.
and had formed a belief that real people were not involved.
????????
So he thought the photographs were of.... what exactly if not "real people"?
I mean, is he pleading insanity? Becuase otherwise this is the dumbest excuse I have ever heard.
He is 100percent responsible for what happened to those victims, IMO.
The guilt is shared, in appropreate portions, between all adults involved.
There has to be a market first, and then someone has to be evil enough to provide for the market.
I would say the people making the movies/pictures carry an even larger portion of guilt than the "consumers" of their "product"
Still, only 20 months... i'm not sure that's enough to feel anything like justice
[inkling]
Now they have enough studies out to prove that sex offenders viewed pornography prior to offensive behavior.
Yes there is a link to viewing pornography and sexual offensive.
20 months turns to half on good behavior. So-called non violent offenders are getting a break lately. ugh
