Boing Boing - Dinotopia artist sketches Jehovah's Witnesses

by metaspy 15 Replies latest jw friends

  • metaspy
    metaspy

    Well, here is a door I wish I would have gotten when I was a JW.
    [Edited: link removed]

    Or if you want to go to the original article that Boing Boing points to...
    [Edited: link removed]


    Though the article states there were 3 JWs on the initial visit, I have a hard time picturing it.

  • ozziepost
    ozziepost

    Please refer to Posting Guideline #9:

    Invading people's privacy
    Please don't post private addresses or phone numbers, including your own. You may post email addresses so long as you make it clear who they belong to.

    This applies to images published without the owner's consent.

  • Spectre
    Spectre

    The only bit of personal information I saw, Ozziepost, is the name of a famous artist and the town that he lives in.

    I thought it was an interesting read. Especially the the comment section.

  • metaspy
    metaspy

    Sorry to have invaded privacy.
    I didn't mean to.

  • MungoBaobab
    MungoBaobab

    Dang. Can we at least get a synopsis? I'm intrigued...

  • GentlyFeral
    GentlyFeral

    Just google "Dinotopia artist sketches Jehovah's Witnesses" and it'll come right up.

    gently feral

  • funkyderek
    funkyderek

    Here's the original blog post: http://gurneyjourney.blogspot.com/2008/05/unexpected-visitors.html

    Clearly no invasion of privacy involved here.

    And further supplementary links, none of which appear in any way to violate the direct rules of this site, or netiquette or law in general:

    http://bloggasm.com/pencil-journalism-an-artists-attemp-to-depolarize-the-proselytizers

    http://www.boingboing.net/2008/06/03/dinotopia-artist-ske.html

  • frankiespeakin
    frankiespeakin

    Ozzi,

    A little quick with the fingers on the key board these days aye mate. Must be a little bored to knit pick that one...oppps.

  • ozziepost
    ozziepost

    Not at all 'nit picking' - the thread was introduced without any background that permission had been granted. We can only go by what we are given.

    Again, publishing an image of someone without their permission contravenes privacy law etc etc.

    If it's established that permission was granted, as appears now the case, then that's fine.

  • ithinkisee
    ithinkisee

    An extra 30 seconds of research would have saved the manufactured controversy Ozzie. Probably about the same amount of time it took to edit out the links.

    Sheesh.

    -ithinkisee

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit