Intervention and then, if necessary, decisive action ... on behalf of an individual whose state of mind and behavior do not align with what is deemed acceptable by society (or "THE" Society).
Looking back from your current vantage point, are you now less likely to give advice or - worst case scenario - get involved in saving someone from him- or herself? When would you intervene? When do you back off and say that this is none of my business?
One of my reasons for asking is because, even in the case of minors (over whose lives parents do seem to have the last word), adults often cannot distinguish between authoritarianism and beneficent parental guidance. In general, however, my query involves any person in a position of authority who attempts to control a subordinate by enforcing "what is for his/her own good."
Thanks for your input,
CoCo