Lakota Indian tribe is now its own nation!

by skeeter1 33 Replies latest social current

  • skeeter1
    skeeter1

    Lakota Indians Withdraw Treaties Signed With U.S. 150 Years Ago

    Thursday, December 20, 2007

    WASHINGTON — The Lakota Indians, who gave the world legendary warriors Sitting Bull and Crazy Horse, have withdrawn from treaties with the United States.

    "We are no longer citizens of the United States of America and all those who live in the five-state area that encompasses our country are free to join us,'' long-time Indian rights activist Russell Means said.

    A delegation of Lakota leaders has delivered a message to the State Department, and said they were unilaterally withdrawing from treaties they signed with the federal government of the U.S., some of them more than 150 years old.

    The group also visited the Bolivian, Chilean, South African and Venezuelan embassies, and would continue on their diplomatic mission and take it overseas in the coming weeks and months.

    Lakota country includes parts of the states of Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, Montana and Wyoming.

    The new country would issue its own passports and driving licences, and living there would be tax-free - provided residents renounce their U.S. citizenship, Mr Means said.

    The treaties signed with the U.S. were merely "worthless words on worthless paper," the Lakota freedom activists said.

    Withdrawing from the treaties was entirely legal, Means said.

    "This is according to the laws of the United States, specifically article six of the constitution,'' which states that treaties are the supreme law of the land, he said.

    "It is also within the laws on treaties passed at the Vienna Convention and put into effect by the US and the rest of the international community in 1980. We are legally within our rights to be free and independent,'' said Means.

    The Lakota relaunched their journey to freedom in 1974, when they drafted a declaration of continuing independence — an overt play on the title of the United States' Declaration of Independence from England.

    Thirty-three years have elapsed since then because "it takes critical mass to combat colonialism and we wanted to make sure that all our ducks were in a row,'' Means said.

    One duck moved into place in September, when the United Nations adopted a non-binding declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples — despite opposition from the United States, which said it clashed with its own laws.

    "We have 33 treaties with the United States that they have not lived by. They continue to take our land, our water, our children,'' Phyllis Young, who helped organize the first international conference on indigenous rights in Geneva in 1977, told the news conference.

    The U.S. "annexation'' of native American land has resulted in once proud tribes such as the Lakota becoming mere "facsimiles of white people,'' said Means.

    Oppression at the hands of the U.S. government has taken its toll on the Lakota, whose men have one of the shortest life expectancies - less than 44 years - in the world.

    Lakota teen suicides are 150 per cent above the norm for the U.S.; infant mortality is five times higher than the U.S. average; and unemployment is rife, according to the Lakota freedom movement's website.

  • skeeter1
    skeeter1

    I remember the Conch Republic - when Key West left the Union!

    I can just hear Jay Leno calling this the "Thunderbird Republic".

  • skeeter1
    skeeter1

    I wish the Native American way could be our way. They left a small footprint on the earth. They did not destroy it, but lived in harmony with the land. So, unlike us. And, we had the nerve to call them the "savages." We are the beasts.

    The Native Americans where I live operate the largest casinos. They finally are getting money. Their housing is improving. However, when I go through their community, which I sometimes do find myself out in the swamp, there are some buildings with thatch roofs. So wonderful to see.

    Skeeter

  • FreudianSlip
    FreudianSlip

    Good for them but I don't see it working out the way they hope it might.

  • darkuncle29
    darkuncle29

    What prevents the U.S. govt from blockading them in like the soviets did to Berlin after WWII? Could they survive if that happened? I'd love to see them make it.

  • sammielee24
    sammielee24

    .........hmmmmm renounce your US citizenship while living in the USA? ..can we say Civil War??? Better bring the troops home 'cos they might be needed here....sammieswife.

  • skeeter1
    skeeter1

    What happens when the US government cuts off all aid & grants to the Lakota tribe?

    I don't know much about the Lakota tribe, and if they are self sufficient these days or not. It sounds like they are in a terrible mess.

    Skeeter

  • sammielee24
    sammielee24
    wish the Native American way could be our way

    I think there is beauty to be found in every culture so I never romanticize one over the other. Unfortunately most societies become motivated by selfishness and greed and learn to survive that way. It's the way it is. What's inherently sad is that it's always us vs them and I don't mean specifically in this instance but in general. If you are French/English - it seems that you have to choose either or. Protestant/Catholic - chooseo one or the other. Black/White - choose which side. Asian/German - whose side you on? .......in this case if you don't revoke your citizenship and are part Lakota - then you'll be outcast. If you do and side with the Lakota - you'll be unpatriotic. I want to move to Norway. I'll even take Switzerland or Sweden. sammieswife.

  • marmot
    marmot

    Skeeter, be careful about seeing the "Indian Way" with rose-colored glasses. I grew up on reservation and I'm also a student of history and it's my conclusion that the Native peoples would have taken a path similar to Western culture if it had been left in isolation for longer and populations had continued to grow.

    The whole "in tune with mother earth" line is a bunch of baloney. We had an impact on the environment but it was mitigated by lower population density. My own ancestors practiced slash and burn agriculture, which is perfectly fine if you're only supporting a limited population but when you have large-scale production it becomes unsustainable. The same goes for hunting and fishing. On the cultural side we also practiced war and slavery. First Nations were no different from any other culture at that particular period of development.

    As for the Lakota situation, I'm curious to see how it plays out but unless they create their own self-sustaining economy I don't know how it could succeed.

  • skeeter1
    skeeter1

    Marmot & Sammielee,

    Thanks for your informative feedback. I think my New Year's resolution will be to read up on the real Indian culture. Sounds like I've something new to learn. Any suggested reading?

    Skeeter

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit