I think its a question of balance and presentation. If we appear over the top or unbalanced then the likelihood of our message being viewed favourably deminishes. Thats not to say that more radical means such as picketing etc do not have their place, I am merely making a call for balance and presentation which supports rather than undermines our position.
I think the internet has become one of the many tools that has fast become a predominant part of our arsenal and weaponry; without being over the top or unbalanced it has single handedly provided upto the minute information to people who are searching for answers to their doubts but that being said, in the wrong hands it could be counter productive as with anything. You need to consider the message.
You only need to see Danny Hazards site to see how presentation can be counter productive even though on some level his viewpoints are entirely valid.
I think there is a real danger in assuming that liberal means namby pamby or that it lacks power or even validity - This website is just one example of where a more liberal approach to apostasy has had massive results.
It is also easy but flawed to assume that the whole radical/liberal debate is merely functional. It goes much further than an attempt to pigeon hole various activities into various individual boxes. ie. Placards = Radical or Internet = Liberal.
Its about state of mind, balance and presentation and getting it right in my view will reap the greater rewards.
G