I stopped reading Pom's recent responses to my list of questions after I read his response to the statement below. I will return to his other responses later, if we can get past the contradiction implied in Pom's answer below:
>>and with him all things are possible,<<
Pom's response: Disagree.
Alward's response:
Pom evidently doesn't believe that Matthew and Mark should be taken literally when they said, "...with God all things are possible." (Matthew 19:26), and, "...all things are possible with God" (Mark 10:27)
Now, let me guess what Pom's going to say. He's going to say that Matthew and Mark didn't really mean for us to believe that "all" meant literally all things; for instance, it is not possible for God to lie, Pom will assert. Well, if Matthew and Mark wanted their readers to know that they were excluding lying from the list of things which were possible for God to do, then why didn't they tell us that? They were--according to Pom--guided by God when they wrote those words, so God would have known that the chosen words were not expressing the literal truth, and the god wouldn't have allowed that; this is strong evidence that a god didn't guide the writing of those words.
Furthermore, if that was their intention--that we should mentally subtract lying from the "all" they spoke of, then it is obvious that what they wrote was not literally true. That's what most of my arguments have been about in my discussions of biblical errancy. The Bible, according to Pom, is the word of God; as such, one would expect it to contain no inadequacies, no imprecision, no contradictions. That is not the case here, clearly; Pom will say that Mark and Matthew didn't really mean it when they said "all"; well, if that's the case, Pom, why didn't God inspire them to say, "with God all things are possible except lying" ? At least then we could believe that their words could be taken literally; as they stand now, they cannot; thus the Bible is not literally true. If it's not literally true here, perhaps it is not literally true in its account of the resurrection.
Joseph F. Alward
"Skeptical Views of Christianity and the Bible"
http://members.aol.com/jalw/joseph_alward.html